ISSUE-84: Representing BCE months

Representing BCE months

Raised by:
Addison Phillips
Opened on:
Please add comments to bugzilla: Months

The 'months' definition only handles dates from the (proleptic) Gregorian year 0 in the common era going forwards. There is no way to represent BCE dates. Should there be?
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Triage of HTML "wontfix" items [I18N-ACTION-516] (from on 2016-06-16)
  2. Triage of HTML "wontfix" items [I18N-ACTION-516] (from on 2016-06-10)
  3. Review of tracker issues for best practices (Part III) (from on 2015-03-30)
  4. Re: [I18N-ACTION-150] Review of HTML open issues (from on 2014-02-21)
  5. [minutes] Internationalization telecon 2014-02-20 (from on 2014-02-21)
  6. [I18N-ACTION-150] Review of HTML open issues (from on 2014-02-18)
  7. [Bug 16956] i18n-ISSUE-84: Representing BCE months (from on 2012-05-08)
  8. Re: HTML5 Comment disposition (from on 2012-03-20)
  9. [minutes] Internationalization WG telecon 2011-07-27 (from on 2011-07-27)
  10. I18N-ISSUE-84: Representing BCE months [HTML5-prep] (from on 2011-07-22)

Related notes:

[aphillip]: accepted for HTML5 LC

27 Jul 2011, 16:15:37

bug 16956

Addison Phillips, 7 May 2012, 17:05:22

[aphillip]: BCE month representation. Wontfix. Consider in WG.

20 Feb 2014, 16:49:42

Display change log ATOM feed

Addison Phillips <>, Chair, Richard Ishida <>, Bert Bos <>, Fuqiao Xue <>, Atsushi Shimono <>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <>.
$Id: 84.html,v 1.1 2023/07/19 12:02:06 carcone Exp $