ISSUE-304: mismatch between ref:langString and xsd:string types?
mismatch between ref:langString and xsd:string types?
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- rdf
- Raised by:
- Addison Phillips
- Opened on:
- 2013-10-10
- Description:
- URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-mt-20130723/#D_interpretations
In Section 7.1 you say:
The built-in RDF datatype rdf:langString has no ill-typed literals. Any syntactically legal literal with this type will denote a value in every RDF interpretation. The only ill-typed literals of type xsd:string are those containing a Unicode code point which does not match the Char production in [XML10]. Such strings cannot be written in an XML-compatible surface syntax.
It's not clear why the Unicode requirements for xsd:string do not also apply to the non-language-tag content of rdf:langString? Is it because "syntactically legal" prohibits non-XML10 characters in langString?
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- I18N-ISSUE-304: mismatch between ref:langString and xsd:string types? [.prep-RDF1.1] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-10)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
