ISSUE-129: Why is content language processing not equivalent to HTTP Content-Language?

Why is content language processing not equivalent to HTTP Content-Language?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

html

Raised by:

Addison Phillips

Opened on:

2011-07-23

Description:

4.2.5.3 Pragma directives
http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/semantics.html#pragma-directives

The content language processing is not equivalent to HTTP Content-Language (and is noted as such). Why?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. [html] Issue: why is "content language" pragma processing not equivalent to HTTP Content-Language? marked as i18n (from sysbot+gh@w3.org on 2016-05-03)
2. Review of tracker issues for best practices (Part IV) (from addison@lab126.com on 2015-03-31)
3. Re: [I18N-ACTION-150] Review of HTML open issues (from ishida@w3.org on 2014-02-21)
4. [I18N-ACTION-150] Review of HTML open issues (from addison@lab126.com on 2014-02-18)
5. Re: HTML5 Comment disposition (from w3@norbertlindenberg.com on 2012-03-20)
6. I18N-ISSUE-129: Why is ontent language processing not equivalent to HTTP Content-Language? [HTML5-prep] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-07-23)

Related notes:

Display change log