DID WG Telco — Minutes
See also the Agenda and the IRC Log
Present: Daniel Burnett, Tobias Looker, Brent Zundel, Kaliya Young, Dave Longley, Orie Steele, Ganesh Annan, Michael Jones, Markus Sabadello, Drummond Reed, Adrian Gropper, Jonathan Holt
Chair: Daniel Burnett
Scribe(s): Kaliya Young
- 1. Agenda Review, Introductions, Re-introductions
- 2. Next Topic Call
- 3. Extended discussions
- 4. Core issue status check
1. Agenda Review, Introductions, Re-introductions
2. Next Topic Call
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/labels/metadata
Daniel Burnett: Next topic call: on Thursday at noon eastern.
… wrap up resolution contracts and move onto metadata as primary topic and time permitting we will move on to key formats for JWK
3. Extended discussions
Daniel Burnett: extended discussions next Tuesday and Wednesday - apologies time confusion - look at e-mail thread and corrected.
Kaliya Young: Tuesday 10am-1:30 pm Eastern
Daniel Burnett: Chairs would like to ask for any topics that people would like to discuss -
Manu Sporny: Features we are concerned about being “at risk”
… if we don’t see them improve before candidate recommendation
… those are cobra representation and __
Daniel Burnett: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-did-wg/2020Jun/0015.html
Manu Sporny: At risk are two representations - JSON-only and CBOR-only
Daniel Burnett: we need to talk about the test suite
4. Core issue status check
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-asc
Daniel Burnett: Horizonal review tracking
… we are working on them - internationalization is done
… the TAG review and did explainer
… the ping review we need someone to write that.
Brett McDowell: johnatahan is still working on security and privacy
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/281
Daniel Burnett: Mike is assigned to this one
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/174
Daniel Burnett: who is going to take action moving forward in the issue
Manu Sporny: I expect this’ll be discussed in the metadata discussion.
Manu Sporny: (as an example)
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/105
Daniel Burnett: Accessability self test
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/301
Markus Sabadello: I don’t think there is a resolution - we should ask Kyle to see if he still needs an answer to that
Daniel Burnett: can you add comment
Markus Sabadello: yes
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/176
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/118
Daniel Burnett: Accessability guidelines
… Amy has done a lot of the work on this. What things does re-spec cover automatically
Manu Sporny: no I have not chatted with her about it
… it is likely in her cue and she is going through - she will do closer to CR
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/14
Dave Longley: has been addressed has a PR was merged 12 days ago - can be closed
Kaliya Young: marked as pending closed
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/8
Daniel Burnett: mike
… is this part of the key format discussion
Michael Jones: yes
Daniel Burnett: this should get labeled with a label for that topic
Orie Steele: its really JOSE related.
Orie Steele: not just key related.
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/198
Markus Sabadello: Did resolution we have had several special topic calls - consensus can live with two separate functions - abastract form, bite stream
… created a new PR trying to reflect this.
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/266
Daniel Burnett: not assigned to anyone
… johnathan does not want to talk about this - it can wait
Drummond Reed: might be wroth noting that DID / X509 Certifiactes coming up
… I think we should say something about this.
Michael Jones: My reaction is to just say on.
Kaliya Young: mike : to say NO
Daniel Burnett: might be effectively done
Tobias Looker: I’m unsure what it is really asking?
Daniel Burnett: could check with the original comments - saying we think we have answered and planning on closing.
… Can I assign it to one of the editors
Manu Sporny: I can take it
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/85
Daniel Burnett: metadata
… discussing thursday (Mike is assigned) anything needed to be added before conversation
… I don’t think anything has changed from a couple weeks ago - move on
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/261
Daniel Burnett: Issue number 261 Markus and the submitter are assigned
Markus Sabadello: will put in a comment about thinking about it.
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/75
Daniel Burnett: can be a pending close
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/185
Tobias Looker: there is agreement about the key agreement key
… multiple cypher suites comment will be added
Daniel Burnett: 203 metadata - part of what we are trying to wrap up
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/65
Daniel Burnett: hopefully will wrap up within the next week
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/258
Drummond Reed: +1 to Manu’s proposal
Manu Sporny: migrate over to did registry and move it over to registry
Drummond Reed: +1
Daniel Burnett: who is updating that
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/249
Markus Sabadello: I posted that this has been covered in the did resolution specification
… asked if it could be re-opened in the did resolution spec
Drummond Reed: merits a mention in security considerations - one paragraph that points over to resolution specification - drummond volunteers to put it in.
Daniel Burnett: also had some thoughts on implementor language - if you are willing to write that you are willing to write a pR would be good
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/170
Orie Steele: no, i don’t think so
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/208
Daniel Burnett: we need to reach out to IANA to see what the status of this is - the only thing this need is to know who the “we” is
Manu Sporny: myself yvonne, chairs - and it is still on the to-do list
Michael Jones: there is an issue that could take a long tie - there are no media types with to ++s in it and it may go up and down the chain at IANA IETF for a while - so need to do it sooner rather than later.
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/240
Daniel Burnett: that is what manu said two weeks ago
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/95
Daniel Burnett: document structure waiting on resolution contract work to complete
Michael Jones: how does the resolution contract relate to this - I think we can just say no
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/36
Michael Jones: I’ll pass
Drummond Reed: is writing up his action items since the editors
Dave Longley: clarification drummond - there will be no method specific parameters - just registered and unregistered
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/199
Daniel Burnett: has reached the end of page 1
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/318
Daniel Burnett: kyle - verification vs authorization relationships
… Kyle turned on the bike shed but nobody jumped in
… can you stop re-naming things
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/165
Daniel Burnett: mike still needs to write the PR - Mike are you adding this to the “doo all the did stuff day”
Michael Jones: this is the problem with issues…made mistake of reading the whole document
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/178
Manu Sporny: pending close
Daniel Burnett: next one is too
Daniel Burnett: https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues/204
Daniel Burnett: justin amy kyle - looks like it is still in progress.
… itching to get all the way around - we got close - thank you everyone
Drummond Reed: Thank you Kaliya!