See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: JF
JF: congrats to leonie for being elected to the AB
JS: hotel rooms seem to still be available, but book sooner rather than later
zalim, take up next ite,m
<MichaelC> action-2049 due 1 week
<trackbot> Set action-2049 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/mediacapture-streams/ media capture and streams due date to 2016-06-08.
ACTION 2049
action-2044
<trackbot> action-2044 -- Léonie Watson to Review dom parsing and serialization https://www.w3.org/tr/dom-parsing/ -- due 2016-05-25 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2044
action-2043
<trackbot> action-2043 -- Cynthia Shelly to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css-position-3/ css positioned layout module level 3 -- due 2016-06-01 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2043
<MichaelC> action-2043 due 1 week
<trackbot> Set action-2043 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css-position-3/ css positioned layout module level 3 due date to 2016-06-08.
action-2042
<trackbot> action-2042 -- Fred Esch to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css-position-3/ css positioned layout module level 3 -- due 2016-06-01 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2042
action-2041
<trackbot> action-2041 -- Léonie Watson to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css-position-3/ css positioned layout module level 3 -- due 2016-06-01 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2041
<MichaelC> action-2042 due 1 week
<trackbot> Set action-2042 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css-position-3/ css positioned layout module level 3 due date to 2016-06-08.
<MichaelC> action-2041 due 1 week
<trackbot> Set action-2041 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css-position-3/ css positioned layout module level 3 due date to 2016-06-08.
FE: this is going to have the same problem as other layout issues
LJW: we decided to treat all CSS modules collectively
MC: the CSS category page (in the
wiki) has a note about this
... should we close these actios and migrate to that group?
JS: key is to generate the list
of specific modules
... think that was on Cyns
we likely will need/want that the next time we meet with the CSS WG
the issues we are seeing cut across multiple specs - it's not just the flex-box spec
MC: will not this in the wiki, and close the 3 actions. Will need to triage that going forward
Cyns: will work on that list shortly, and deliver soon
<MichaelC> close action-2041
<trackbot> Closed action-2041.
<MichaelC> close action-2042
<trackbot> Closed action-2042.
<MichaelC> close action-20143
<trackbot> Closed action-20143.
<MichaelC> close action-2043
<trackbot> Closed action-2043.
JS: should also add the stub to the CSS AAM on the agenda page/emails
action-2033
<trackbot> action-2033 -- Shane McCarron to Review https://www.w3.org/tr/tracking-compliance/ tracking compliance and scope -- due 2016-05-11 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2033
<MichaelC> action-2033 due 1 week
<trackbot> Set action-2033 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/tracking-compliance/ tracking compliance and scope due date to 2016-06-08.
action-2011
<trackbot> action-2011 -- Janina Sajka to Janina to draft examples of how the hand-wavey stuff in CSS Transitions accessibility statement could be solidified -- due 2016-06-01 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2011
<MichaelC> action-2011 due 1 week
<trackbot> Set action-2011 Janina to draft examples of how the hand-wavey stuff in CSS Transitions accessibility statement could be solidified due date to 2016-06-08.
JS: still waiting for Michiel for some code sample stuff
LJW: please copy me when you ping Michiel
action-1750
<trackbot> action-1750 -- Cynthia Shelly to Review ui events -- due 2016-06-01 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/1750
<MichaelC> action-1750 due 1 week
<trackbot> Set action-1750 Review ui events due date to 2016-06-08.
Cyns: meeting scheduled with Travis later this week with feedback - hope to resolve within the week
JS: didn't take a formal action
to review the alt text advice - appears to be a clear
improvement over 5.0
... may need/want to do a more detailed review now that dPub is
in
<MichaelC> Activity Streams 2.0
MC: assuming we are not
interested?
... "activity" seems very RDF-ish
SM: was not aware of this - will go investigate, but not relevant to this WG
<MichaelC> Activity Vocabulary
<MichaelC> Audio Output Devices API
JS: will take this and review. I care about this one a lot
<MichaelC> ACTION: Janina to review https://www.w3.org/TR/audio-output/ Audio Output Devices API [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-apa-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2050 - Review https://www.w3.org/tr/audio-output/ audio output devices api [on Janina Sajka - due 2016-06-08].
<MichaelC> CSS Overflow Module Level 3
FE: can give that to me, doubt there is anything but I will review
<MichaelC> ACTION: esch to review https://www.w3.org/TR/css-overflow-3/ CSS Overflow Module Level 3 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-apa-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2051 - Review https://www.w3.org/tr/css-overflow-3/ css overflow module level 3 [on Fred Esch - due 2016-06-08].
<MichaelC> MediaStream Image Capture
JS: we can likely skip this
JF: tend to agree
MC: what we do with the resulting iimage is likely more in scope
<MichaelC> Semantic Sensor Network Ontology
<MichaelC> Shadow DOM
LJW: there are some accessibility implications on that - I've been watching it and so has Dylan B at Deque
believe it is worth monitoring
JS: what is the current status?
MC: this is a draft
LJW: still going through working draft - no timetable to move to CR
Cyns: can look at this but will need some time
SM: I don't have issues on this type of spec
LJW: yes, aware of this "problem" and therer is an effort to de-tangle that
JS: suggest we put this on a defered/watch list
<MichaelC> ACTION: cynthia to review https://www.w3.org/TR/shadow-dom/ Shadow DOM - due 1 Sep [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-apa-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2052 - Review https://www.w3.org/tr/shadow-dom/ shadow dom [on Cynthia Shelly - due 2016-09-01].
CYNS: give to me with a late September due date
<MichaelC> action-2052 due 31 Aug
<trackbot> Set action-2052 Review https://www.w3.org/tr/shadow-dom/ shadow dom due date to 2016-08-31.
<MichaelC> Web Authentication: A Web API for accessing scoped credentials
JF: sounds like a web payments thing
SM: it is NOT a web payments thing
ack left,
ack left, hand, neet, right
discussion around this - appears to be a duplication of effort
MC: Shane is going to look at this
SM: yes, this is very important - a11y issues can be huge
<MichaelC> ACTION: Shane to review https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/ Web Authentication: A Web API for accessing scoped credentials [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-apa-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2053 - Review https://www.w3.org/tr/webauthn/ web authentication: a web api for accessing scoped credentials [on Shane McCarron - due 2016-06-08].
JS: touched on this a bit last week, some editorial work has continued since then
JW: some work has started, but not anticipating any comments before a CfC shold happen
[people go off and read this]
JS: any objection to moving this to a CfC?
FE: what is HCI?
JF: Human Computer Interface
<ShaneM> +0 - don't mind
JS: we should be consistent with acronyms
JW: can make that editorial change
+1 to moving forward
RESOLUTION: Issue CfC RQTF Work Statement
FE: provides methods on how to modify the DOM after it is loaded
there is one method, "insert adjacent HTML" which allows HTML to be injected into the DOm after the page is loaded
but we have an issue with CSS injecting something into the DOM - this may be related
LJW: my understanding that CSS doesn't inject into the DOM
JS: this may not be the CSS problem then, but it still may be an issue
FE: wondering if this technique has an issue
LJW: discussed with others, and as far as she knows this is pretty straight-forward
it is simple DOM injection, and it updates the DOM on trigger
CYNS: this is an older technique and we recommend it
FE: sounds like many feel this is not a concern
JS: seems to be...
FE: this was my only concern, but it sounds like it isn't
<MichaelC> close action-2044
<trackbot> Closed action-2044.
<MichaelC> close action-2045
<trackbot> Closed action-2045.
action-2023
<trackbot> action-2023 -- Léonie Watson to John to ask Aaron for input on Pointer Lock https://www.w3.org/TR/pointerlock/ -- due 2016-05-18 -- CLOSED
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2023
LJW: filed one issue against Pointer Lock spec
based on first feedback from AiS
LJW: found it difficult to create as issues to file against the spec
JF: Leonie and I should work
off-line to continue working with AiSquared
... will target update for next week
<janina> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2016May/0058.html
transission request
want to clarify that we do not object to the publish, but requesting an updated CR and extension of time
JS: also to note that the accessibility work was work-in-progress but NOT completed
also to note that there is an express and explicit dependency on us
need to coordinate a TF
JS: think next step is to draft wrk statement
CYNS: agreed
MC: still need to get this statement written up
JS: target to have this by next week?
MC: hope so, but...
CYNS: may not be here next week...
JS: seems that's it then
thanks all - meeting adjorned
trackbot, end meeting
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/provides methods/FE: provides methods/ Found Scribe: JF Inferring ScribeNick: JF Default Present: JF, Janina, Joanmarie_Diggs, LJWatson, MichielBijl, fesch, MichaelC, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, Judy, Shadi, Jason_White, ShaneM Present: JF Janina Joanmarie_Diggs LJWatson MichielBijl fesch MichaelC Rich_Schwerdtfeger Judy Shadi Jason_White ShaneM Found Date: 01 Jun 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/06/01-apa-minutes.html People with action items: cynthia esch janina shane WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]