ISSUE-51: Should 1st party have any response to DNT signal
Should 1st party have any response to DNT signal
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-09-22
- Description:
- This issue has been narrowed to "should a site in a 1st party role (defined elsewhere) be required to sent DNT response header or may it be exempted".
Other aspects have been spawned as separate issues:
ISSUE-105: Need to send response headers without receiving a DNT request header
ISSUE-106: Need to send response headers on cached objects
ISSUE-107: Exact header format - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. (from ktrilli@truste.com on 2012-02-08)
- Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-05)
- Re: ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. (from sharvey@google.com on 2012-02-05)
- ACTION-114 ISSUE-107 : Revised response header. (from tom@mozilla.com on 2012-02-03)
- Agenda for 2012-1-17 call (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-01-17)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2012-01-16)
- diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-12-21)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-12-20)
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-12-20)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-12-20)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from singer@apple.com on 2011-12-20)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from singer@apple.com on 2011-12-20)
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-12-20)
- RE: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-12-19)
- Re: tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from singer@apple.com on 2011-12-19)
- tracking-ISSUE-106: Response header on cacheable objects? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-12-19)
- tracking-ISSUE-105: Response header without request header? [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-12-19)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-12-05)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-12-02)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-12-02)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-12-02)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-02)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-12-02)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-12-02)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-12-01)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2011-12-01)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-12-01)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-01)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-01)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from haakon.bratsberg@opera.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from haakon.bratsberg@opera.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from tlr@w3.org on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from carmen@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-30)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2011-11-30)
- Proposed Agenda for 2011-11-30 TPWG call (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from Vincent.Toubiana@alcatel-lucent.com on 2011-11-30)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations; Issue-5 Definition of Tracking (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from karld@opera.com on 2011-11-29)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-29)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from haakon.bratsberg@opera.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-11-29)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-29)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from sharvey@google.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from sharvey@google.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from sharvey@google.com on 2011-11-29)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-11-29)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from sharvey@google.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-11-29)
- RE: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-11-29)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-11-28)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-28)
- Re: Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-11-28)
- Issue-17, Issue-51 First party obligations (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-28)
- Re: 'cross-site' (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-19)
- Re: 'cross-site' (tags: ISSUE-17, ISSUE-51) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-18)
- Re: 'cross-site' (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2011-11-18)
- RE: 'cross-site' (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-11-18)
- Re: 'cross-site' (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-11-18)
- RE: 'cross-site' (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-11-18)
- RE: 'cross-site' (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-18)
- RE: 'cross-site' (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2011-11-18)
- RE: 'cross-site' (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-11-18)
- Re: 'cross-site' (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-11-18)
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-13)
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2011-10-11)
- Agenda for 2011-10-12 DNT Workgroup Meeting (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-11)
- Re: Agenda for 2011-10-05 TPWG call (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-09)
- RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-09)
- Re: first parties (from tien@eff.org on 2011-10-09)
- Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-09)
- RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-07)
- Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-07)
- RE: first parties (from mike@iab.net on 2011-10-07)
- RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
- Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-07)
- RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
- Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-06)
- RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-06)
- RE: first parties (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-06)
- first parties (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-06)
- RE: Proposed language for first-party websites (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-06)
- Re: Proposed language for first-party websites (from mike@iab.net on 2011-10-05)
- Re: Proposed language for first-party websites (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-04)
- Agenda for 2011-10-04 TPWG call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-04)
- Response Headers [ISSUE-47,ISSUE-48,ISSUE-51,ISSUE-76,ISSUE-79,ISSUE-80,ISSUE-81,ISSUE-87] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-04)
- Proposed language for first-party websites (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-10-03)
- Agenda for 2011-09-28 TPWG call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-09-26)
- ISSUE-51: Should 1st party have any response to DNT signal (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22)
Related notes:
2011-10-26: The current proposal only uses communication via well-known URI. In this proposal, there are no responses to DNT signals.
Matthias Schunter, 27 Oct 2011, 14:52:122012-02-07: it is likely that some obligations will be defined for 1st parties. As a consequence, it is important to tell the user that a 1st party complies.
As a consequence, a response is needed.
Thus, ISSUE-51 should follow the guidance for ISSUE-105.
Display change log