w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire Disposition of display, focus, semantics, and labels bugs
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.
This questionnaire was open from 2010-05-19 to 2010-05-21.
4 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Bug 8652: what to display when images are not available is not well specified
- Bug 8657: Allow UA to reload fallback content if it fails to load
- Bug 8671: Requiring the label attribute
- Bug 8673: Restriction on command element as part of a menu
- Bug 8717: Usability and Element-level-focus-apis
- Bug 8723: image map is underspecified
- Bug 8738: Role-based navigation
- Bug 8747: Defining how a license applies to elements
- Bug 8750: User able to override the hidden attribute in incorrectly rendered pages
- Bug 8144: Is a 'visibility: hidden' element being rendered?
- Bug 8554: <progress> element should be labelable with a label
1. Bug 8652: what to display when images are not available is not well specified
Refer to Bug 8652.
Proposed disposition:
Close. We consider this addressed by the text alternatives and title attribute change proposals.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8652: what to display when images are not available is not well specified | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
2. Bug 8657: Allow UA to reload fallback content if it fails to load
Refer to Bug 8657.
Proposed disposition:
Take up in the media sub-group to develop a spec edit proposal. Assign the bug to John Foliot to track that this is addressed.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8657: Allow UA to reload fallback content if it fails to load | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
3. Bug 8671: Requiring the label attribute
Refer to Bug 8671.
Proposed disposition:
Close. Spec is now consistent with the change request in this bug.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8671: Requiring the label attribute | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
4. Bug 8673: Restriction on command element as part of a menu
Refer to Bug 8673.
Proposed disposition:
Take up in the mapping sub-group to develop a spec edit proposal. Assign the bug to Cynthia Shelly to track that this is addressed.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8673: Restriction on command element as part of a menu | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
5. Bug 8717: Usability and Element-level-focus-apis
Refer to Bug 8717.
Proposed disposition:
Close. Spec is now consistent with the change request in this bug.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8717: Usability and Element-level-focus-apis | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
6. Bug 8723: image map is underspecified
Refer to Bug 8723.
Proposed disposition:
Assign to Charles McCathieNevile with a deadline of 10 June 2010. Close after that if no proposal received.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8723: image map is underspecified | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
7. Bug 8738: Role-based navigation
Refer to Bug 8738.
Proposed disposition:
Assign to Gregory Rosmaita to work with Cynthia Shelly. This is related to an upcoming command discussion in the mapping group but is not assigned to that group.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 3 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Bug 8738: Role-based navigation | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | first consideration: accesskey as attribute or element? second consideration: using XHTML Access Module as basis for Access Element draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Access/element_versus_module Note 1: this comment will be updated when i post to the TF list on current accesskey issues & options Note 2: the list of accesskey (replacement) requirements upon which we previously agreed is located at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Access/access_key_requirements | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
8. Bug 8747: Defining how a license applies to elements
Refer to Bug 8747.
Proposed disposition:
Close and remove Task Force from further following. Ask on the main HTML list if someone wants to take over this bug to pursue getting the RDFa suggestion in the bug into the spec.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8747: Defining how a license applies to elements | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
9. Bug 8750: User able to override the hidden attribute in incorrectly rendered pages
Refer to Bug 8750.
Proposed disposition:
Close. We accept the response in this bug.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8750: User able to override the hidden attribute in incorrectly rendered pages | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
10. Bug 8144: Is a 'visibility: hidden' element being rendered?
Refer to Bug 8144.
Proposed disposition:
Remove Task Force tracking of this bug. Original submitter may pursue it further if they wish.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8144: Is a 'visibility: hidden' element being rendered? | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
11. Bug 8554: <progress> element should be labelable with a label
Refer to Bug 8554.
Proposed disposition:
Remove Task Force tracking of this bug. Original submitter may pursue it further if they wish, though it appears this one has been resolved satisfactorily.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| Accept disposition of this bug. | 4 |
| Do not accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Bug 8554: <progress> element should be labelable with a label | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Cooper | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Gregory Rosmaita | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| Cynthia Shelly | Accept disposition of this bug. | |
| John Foliot | Accept disposition of this bug. |
More details on responses
- Michael Cooper: last responded on 19, May 2010 at 16:50 (UTC)
- Gregory Rosmaita: last responded on 20, May 2010 at 02:31 (UTC)
- Cynthia Shelly: last responded on 20, May 2010 at 15:55 (UTC)
- John Foliot: last responded on 20, May 2010 at 16:08 (UTC)
Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project