W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 18 March 2016

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2016-03-18 to 2016-03-30.

11 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Resolutions
  2. Planning and Managing Web Accessibility: Accept Changes
  3. How to Meet WCAG 2.0 [Quickref]: Expand/Collapse all techniques
  4. Web Accessibility Perspectives: Video start and end screens

1. Resolutions

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! 9
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. 1
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. 1

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder ResolutionsComments
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
James Green
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Andrew Arch
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
 https://www.w3.org/2016/03/18-eo-minutes.html
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.
 April
Joy Relton
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Susan Hewitt
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Howard Kramer
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • James Green
  • Eric Eggert
  • Brent Bakken
  • Joy Relton
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
  • Andrew Arch
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.
  • Vicki Menezes Miller

2. Planning and Managing Web Accessibility: Accept Changes

summary | by responder | by choice

The following changes were made to Planning and Managing Web Accessibility based on feedback from the comprehensive review.

Please review the changes and raise any comments in GithHub (or, if you're not comfortable with GitHub, you can put them in the comments here).

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add. 8
I reviewed the changes and put my comments in GitHub or below. 1
I have not gotten to this yet, and will do it by: [put in the Comment field the date by which you will get to it]
I'm not going to be able to get to this, and I will pass on commenting on it — now and in the future. 1

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Planning and Managing Web Accessibility: Accept ChangesComments
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I reviewed the changes and put my comments in GitHub or below.
James Green
  • I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add.
Eric Eggert
Brent Bakken
  • I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add.
Andrew Arch
  • I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add.
 Thanks for considering my previous comments :)
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add.
Joy Relton
  • I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add.
Susan Hewitt
  • I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add.
Sharron Rush
  • I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add.
Howard Kramer
  • I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I'm not going to be able to get to this, and I will pass on commenting on it — now and in the future.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I reviewed and accept the changes and have no comments to add.
  • James Green
  • Brent Bakken
  • Andrew Arch
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Joy Relton
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
I reviewed the changes and put my comments in GitHub or below.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
I have not gotten to this yet, and will do it by: [put in the Comment field the date by which you will get to it]
I'm not going to be able to get to this, and I will pass on commenting on it — now and in the future.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry

3. How to Meet WCAG 2.0 [Quickref]: Expand/Collapse all techniques

summary | by responder | by choice

During the approval to publish phase, a suggestion was made to add a button to expand/collapse all techniques sections in the document. Take a look at the following four pages with the button on different locations and indicate your favorite below:

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I like location 1 best. 1
I like location 2 best. 1
I like location 3 best.
I like location 4 best. 3
I like location 5 best. 5
I don’t like any of the options, but I have an idea for a better location (add to comments).
I don’t like any of the options, but I don’t have a better idea.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder How to Meet WCAG 2.0 [Quickref]: Expand/Collapse all techniquesComments
Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • I like location 4 best.
 I also like 5 and 3 (in that order). Both 3, 4, and 5 put the button in the active area of the page, which is where I would tend to look first. I'm not sure which order I like most, though. 4 seems clearest as the expand button is slightly different functionality than "clear filters" and "share this view". Note the issue with expand vs show below, too.

Option 1 works for me too, but it adds slightly more vertical space (not really an issue, though).

I could not even find the button in option 2, and it disappears when the filtering tab is selected, which is probably when it is most needed. I do not feel comfortable with this option at all.

New related issue: I just realized that messages like "showing all techniques" or "showing techniques for technologies HTML" collide with the wording of "expand all techniques" - think the difference between "showing what is filtered" and "expand from what is shown" might be too subtle for the general public to understand. I think we need to change the word "showing" to something else but don't have a better idea at the moment. Unfortunately I think this is a big issue.
James Green
  • I like location 1 best.
Eric Eggert
Brent Bakken
  • I like location 5 best.
 In my opinion location 5 is the most intuitive. I do not like the ones that disappear when you scroll or change to a different tab.
Andrew Arch
  • I like location 4 best.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I like location 5 best.
Joy Relton
  • I like location 2 best.
Susan Hewitt
  • I like location 5 best.
Sharron Rush
  • I like location 4 best.
Howard Kramer
  • I like location 5 best.
 Could also go with 2 or 3. Don't like 1 or 2. Seems strange that yellow band has text that says: Showing all success criteria and all techniques. But then you have a button that says "expand all techniques." Seems a contradiction.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I like location 5 best.
 Here's another vote for 5: <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-eo-editors/2016Mar/0055.html>

I think it would be good to re-think Showing... and Show/Hide and Expand/Collapse. Right now it's not consistent or clear -- e.g., "Showing..." relates to filters whereas "Show techniques and failures for 1.1" is expand/collapse; and "Show techniques and failures for 1.1" and "Expand all techniques" do the same thing, but are worded differently. Also, that button doesn't expand *all* techniques if some are filtered out.

Perhaps "Showing xyz success criteria and xyz techniques." becomes "Listed: xyz success criteria and xyz techniques."? Then the new button could better match the others: "Show techniques" or "Show techniques below" or "Show all listed techniques".

If we want to keep the new button "Expand techniques" or "Expand techniques below" or "Expand listed techniques" -- then I think we ought to change the buttons below that do the same thing from "Show/Hide" to "Expand/Collapse"

Since we're considering adding this new button around 5, I'd like to ask if "Share this view" can be shortened to just "Share"? We could put more in the pop-up, e.g., "Link to this view:"-> "Link to this view with the filters you have selected" or such...

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I like location 1 best.
  • James Green
I like location 2 best.
  • Joy Relton
I like location 3 best.
I like location 4 best.
  • Shadi Abou-Zahra
  • Andrew Arch
  • Sharron Rush
I like location 5 best.
  • Brent Bakken
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Howard Kramer
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I don’t like any of the options, but I have an idea for a better location (add to comments).
I don’t like any of the options, but I don’t have a better idea.

4. Web Accessibility Perspectives: Video start and end screens

The latest discussion and proposal for the start title and end title content for all videos is outlined in Start/title and ending screens Issue #108.
The proposal is also outlined below.

  • Start Screen Title
    - (smaller text) title of resource (Web Accessibility Perspectives)
    - (larger text) title of specific video (eg. "Video Captions")
  • End Screen Title
    - URL of resource (eg. "w3.org/WAI/perspectives")
    - W3C & WAI logos
    - Copyrights
Note: the resource page (eg. "w3.org/WAI/perspectives") will have text to supplement the videos, links to further resources, and contact & feedback email.

Question: Do you support having the title to the specific video in the Start Screen content to set the stage, or do you feel it should not be included as a way to try and draw the viewer into discovery as they watch?

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I think the "title of specific video" should be included in all videos. (Please provide comment in the rationale field) 6
I think the "title of specific video" should *NOT* be included in all videos. (Please provide comment in the rationale field)
I have no preference and will support the overall decision of the working group. 5

Details

Responder Web Accessibility Perspectives: Video start and end screensRationale
Shadi Abou-Zahra I think the "title of specific video" should be included in all videos. (Please provide comment in the rationale field) I really don't think adding the titles gives away that much, as most stories are not built around revealing a secret. In contrary, I think we want to promote specific concepts with these examples and videos, and want people to walk away remembering these concepts. That is, accessibility is about captions, colors, layout, ...
James Green I think the "title of specific video" should be included in all videos. (Please provide comment in the rationale field) I don't imagine we are going to only put a number in the links to watch the videos, keeping the topics secret.... So, this makes me think of https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/G199.html. When users click on a video they should get feedback immediately that they are seeing what they expected to see and not have to spend thought figuring it out...
Eric Eggert I have no preference and will support the overall decision of the working group.
Brent Bakken I think the "title of specific video" should be included in all videos. (Please provide comment in the rationale field) I think setting the stage for the viewer is important. And this may be the only place that this specific video title will be used during the entire video. We need the title somewhere and I would rather it be up front.
Andrew Arch I think the "title of specific video" should be included in all videos. (Please provide comment in the rationale field) To reassure the viewer that they're watching the video they selected or were directed to from elsewhere.
Vicki Menezes Miller I have no preference and will support the overall decision of the working group.
Joy Relton I have no preference and will support the overall decision of the working group. I believe that it is good form to have the title up front so that we can ensure that everyone is on the same page. I.e., the person knows which video they will be watching.
Susan Hewitt I think the "title of specific video" should be included in all videos. (Please provide comment in the rationale field) We can't guarantee users will visit the resource page first (what if they're linked directly to the video from somewhere else?) I think they need to know what it is before they watch it.

And, if they do go to the video from the resources page, they've already seen the title so it rather defeats the "suspense" purpose, doesn't it?

Sharron Rush I have no preference and will support the overall decision of the working group.
Howard Kramer I think the "title of specific video" should be included in all videos. (Please provide comment in the rationale field) I guess this goes back to the discussion at the face 2 face where Eric indicated his preference for 2. I think we need to be upfront with the subject of each video.
Shawn Lawton Henry I have no preference and will support the overall decision of the working group. As I've said, this is difficult to decide on without seeing at least a rough cut of the videos.

More details on responses

  • Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 19, March 2016 at 22:30 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 22, March 2016 at 20:36 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 22, March 2016 at 21:08 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 22, March 2016 at 21:30 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 23, March 2016 at 10:37 (UTC)
  • Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 29, March 2016 at 21:31 (UTC)
  • Joy Relton: last responded on 30, March 2016 at 16:18 (UTC)
  • Susan Hewitt: last responded on 30, March 2016 at 19:11 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 30, March 2016 at 20:16 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 31, March 2016 at 03:27 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 31, March 2016 at 21:18 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Sylvie Duchateau
  3. Kazuhito Kidachi
  4. Jedi Lin
  5. David Sloan
  6. Mary Jo Mueller
  7. Reinaldo Ferraz
  8. Bill Kasdorf
  9. Cristina Mussinelli
  10. Kevin White
  11. Kevin Rydberg
  12. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  13. Adina Halter
  14. Denis Boudreau
  15. Laura Keen
  16. Sarah Pulis
  17. Bill Tyler
  18. Gregorio Pellegrino
  19. Ruoxi Ran
  20. Jennifer Chadwick
  21. Sean Kelly
  22. Muhammad Saleem
  23. Sarah Lewthwaite
  24. Daniel Montalvo
  25. Mark Palmer
  26. Jade Matos Carew
  27. Sonsoles López Pernas
  28. Greta Krafsig
  29. Jason McKee
  30. Jayne Schurick
  31. Billie Johnston
  32. Michele Williams
  33. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  34. Brian Elton
  35. Julianna Rowsell
  36. Tabitha Mahoney
  37. Fred Edora
  38. Rabab Gomaa
  39. Marcelo Paiva
  40. Eloisa Guerrero
  41. Leonard Beasley
  42. Frankie Wolf
  43. Supriya Makude
  44. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  45. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.