W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 20 November 2015

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2015-11-20 to 2015-12-02.

12 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Resolutions of 20 November
  2. Planning: Initiate content
  3. Planning: Resource name
  4. longdesc reference in Complex Images Tutorial
  5. WCAG-EM Report Tool - UI revisions made
  6. WCAG-EM Report Tool - UI revisions *not* made

1. Resolutions of 20 November

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 20 November EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2015 Minutes wiki page.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! 8
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. 3
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Resolutions of 20 NovemberComments
David Berman
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
George Heake
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Andrew Arch
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Anna Belle Leiserson
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Susan Hewitt
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
James Green
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Howard Kramer
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Kevin White
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
  • David Berman
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Andrew Arch
  • Susan Hewitt
  • James Green
  • Brent Bakken
  • Kevin White
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
  • Anna Belle Leiserson
  • Howard Kramer
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. Planning: Initiate content

summary | by responder | by choice

The content for the Initiate section of the planning resource is ready for a first review.

Please review the content for all activities and add any comments in GitHub as new issues or pull requests (use the "Fork & edit on GitHub button" on individual pages). If you are not comfortable with GitHub, please add your comments below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed it. 9
I skimmed it. 1
I will review it by the date in the comment section below.
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. 1

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Planning: Initiate contentComments
David Berman
  • I reviewed it.
George Heake
Eric Eggert
  • I skimmed it.
 Minor stuff:

- It is “Learn the basics” and “Review the situation” but “Develop business case”. For consistency reasons “Learn basics” and “Review (current) situation” might be better.
Sharron Rush
  • I reviewed it.
 Comments in GitHub
Andrew Arch
  • I reviewed it.
 1. What about adding 'older people' to the resources on http://w3c.github.io/wai-dynamic-planning/initiate/learn_the_basics.html

2. What about adding the 'quick tips' and/or 'tutorials' to http://w3c.github.io/wai-dynamic-planning/initiate/raise_awareness.html as they are getting started materials

3. I don't like that 'business case' and 'gather support' have identical For More Info resources - but don't have any immediate suggestions
Anna Belle Leiserson
  • I reviewed it.
Susan Hewitt
  • I reviewed it.
 In Github
James Green
  • I reviewed it.
 Thoroughly reviewed and put my comments in https://github.com/w3c/wai-dynamic-planning/issues/17
Brent Bakken
  • I reviewed it.
 Forked and Committed Changes on GitHub. I hope I did it correctly.
Howard Kramer
  • I reviewed it.
 Made suggested changes via issues in GitHub. Could not get the edit option to work btw.
Kevin White
  • I reviewed it.
 [Document author]
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I reviewed it.
  • David Berman
  • Sharron Rush
  • Andrew Arch
  • Anna Belle Leiserson
  • Susan Hewitt
  • James Green
  • Brent Bakken
  • Howard Kramer
  • Kevin White
I skimmed it.
  • Eric Eggert
I will review it by the date in the comment section below.
I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry

3. Planning: Resource name

The planning resource needs a new name. Discussion in the last two meetings and an earlier survey have led to the following possible options.

Please consider the planning resource and it's purpose and rank the names in the order that you think is best suited for the resource.

If you feel that there is a strong name option that is not represented here, please add it in as a comment and explain why this name is suitable.

Note that 'Web' has been included in each title. There was some discussion on this and the inclusion of that word may be revisited once the title is clearer.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Don’t mindDon’t wantRanked 1Ranked 2Ranked 3Ranked 4Ranked 5
Planning for Web Accessibility 3 1 2 3 2 1
Web Accessibility Planning 3 4 2 2 1
Planning and Managing Web Accessibility 2 4 2 1 2 1
Web Accessibility Planning Guide 3 4 2 1 2
Strategic Planning for Web Accessibility 1 5 1 1 1 1 2

Details

Responder Planning for Web AccessibilityWeb Accessibility PlanningPlanning and Managing Web AccessibilityWeb Accessibility Planning GuideStrategic Planning for Web AccessibilityComments
David Berman Ranked 3 Ranked 3 Ranked 4 Ranked 5 Ranked 1
George Heake Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind Don’t mind
Eric Eggert Ranked 2 Ranked 3 Ranked 1 Ranked 4 Ranked 5
Sharron Rush Ranked 4 Ranked 2 Ranked 3 Ranked 1 Don’t want
Andrew Arch Don’t mind Don’t mind Ranked 5 Don’t mind Don’t want
Anna Belle Leiserson Ranked 3 Ranked 2 Don’t mind Ranked 1 Don’t want
Susan Hewitt Ranked 3 Ranked 5 Ranked 2 Ranked 1 Ranked 4
James Green Ranked 4 Ranked 2 Ranked 1 Ranked 3 Ranked 5
Brent Bakken Ranked 5 Ranked 4 Ranked 2 Ranked 1 Ranked 3
Howard Kramer Ranked 2 Ranked 4 Ranked 1 Ranked 5 Ranked 2
Kevin White Ranked 1 Ranked 2 Ranked 4 Ranked 3 Don’t want [Document author]
Shawn Lawton Henry Don’t mind Don’t mind Ranked 1 Don’t mind Don’t want I have a feeling that "Managing" could be important for SEO.
Is it appropriate to include "Managing" based on the content?

Missing from the list: "Planning Web Accessibility"

4. longdesc reference in Complex Images Tutorial

summary | by responder | by choice

A suggestion and pull request has been submitted to change the order of the Images Tutorial section on Complex Images. The issue will be discussed in the next EOWG teleconference. Please indicate your understanding of the issue and the background.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and am prepared to discuss it. 7
I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and have additional points for group consideration that I have entered in GitHub or below.
I have not yet reviewed but plan to do so by the date entered in the Comment field below.
I will not have time to review the background materials so will pass on commenting and discussing and accept the decisions of the Group. 4

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder longdesc reference in Complex Images TutorialComments
David Berman
  • I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and am prepared to discuss it.
George Heake
Eric Eggert
  • I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and am prepared to discuss it.
 [Editor]
Sharron Rush
  • I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and am prepared to discuss it.
Andrew Arch
  • I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and am prepared to discuss it.
Anna Belle Leiserson
  • I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and am prepared to discuss it.
Susan Hewitt
  • I will not have time to review the background materials so will pass on commenting and discussing and accept the decisions of the Group.
James Green
  • I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and am prepared to discuss it.
Brent Bakken
  • I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and am prepared to discuss it.
Howard Kramer
  • I will not have time to review the background materials so will pass on commenting and discussing and accept the decisions of the Group.
Kevin White
  • I will not have time to review the background materials so will pass on commenting and discussing and accept the decisions of the Group.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I will not have time to review the background materials so will pass on commenting and discussing and accept the decisions of the Group.
 I think this is a complicated issue that needs careful consideration, including from WCAG WG and probably APA WG.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and am prepared to discuss it.
  • David Berman
  • Eric Eggert
  • Sharron Rush
  • Andrew Arch
  • Anna Belle Leiserson
  • James Green
  • Brent Bakken
I reviewed the suggestion and the background information and have additional points for group consideration that I have entered in GitHub or below.
I have not yet reviewed but plan to do so by the date entered in the Comment field below.
I will not have time to review the background materials so will pass on commenting and discussing and accept the decisions of the Group.
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Howard Kramer
  • Kevin White
  • Shawn Lawton Henry

5. WCAG-EM Report Tool - UI revisions made

Wilco has implemented many of the UI changes suggested by usability testing earlier this year. Latest version of WCAG-EM Report Tool. The revisions are described in a GitHub summary of UI changes. Please review the summary and indicate below your status regarding the UI changes.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have reviewed the changes and they all look good, no suggestions. 5
I have reviewed the changes and commented in GitHub (or below) 2
I have reviewed the changes and commented in last week's survey 1
I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. 4

Details

Responder WCAG-EM Report Tool - UI revisions madeComments
David Berman I have reviewed the changes and commented in GitHub (or below)
George Heake I have reviewed the changes and they all look good, no suggestions.
Eric Eggert I have reviewed the changes and they all look good, no suggestions.
Sharron Rush I have reviewed the changes and commented in GitHub (or below) Dec 7
Andrew Arch I have reviewed the changes and they all look good, no suggestions.
Anna Belle Leiserson I have reviewed the changes and they all look good, no suggestions.
Susan Hewitt I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. By Friday's meeting.
James Green I have reviewed the changes and they all look good, no suggestions.
Brent Bakken I have reviewed the changes and commented in last week's survey
Howard Kramer I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. 12-9-15
Kevin White I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. Accept group decision
Shawn Lawton Henry I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. I skimmed the list of changes, but won't have time to do detailed review. I accept the decisions of the Group and Shadi as Project Manager.

6. WCAG-EM Report Tool - UI revisions *not* made

The plan is to discuss the current iteration of the WCAG-EM Report Tool and publish as version 1.1 (probably in January.) The suggested changes that did *NOT* make it into this version are posted as a GitHub list of changes that were not implemented. Please review and indicate your status toward the publication of the new WCAG-EM Report Tool without these suggested changes.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have reviewed the changes and am OK with these being left for future consideration. 4
I have reviewed the items and commented in GitHub (or below) 2
I think that one (or more) of these items should be included if possible and ask for further discussion. 1
I reviewed and submitted comments in last week's survey 1
I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. 4

Details

Responder WCAG-EM Report Tool - UI revisions *not* madeComments
David Berman I have reviewed the items and commented in GitHub (or below)
George Heake I have reviewed the changes and am OK with these being left for future consideration.
Eric Eggert I have reviewed the changes and am OK with these being left for future consideration. Although the list linked from W4TW also had general bugs and enhancements and I’m not sure if I reviewed the right thing…
Sharron Rush I have reviewed the changes and am OK with these being left for future consideration.
Andrew Arch I think that one (or more) of these items should be included if possible and ask for further discussion. name of the tool - https://github.com/w3c/wcag-em-report-tool/issues/232
Anna Belle Leiserson I have reviewed the changes and am OK with these being left for future consideration.
Susan Hewitt I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. By Friday's meeting.
James Green I have reviewed the items and commented in GitHub (or below) I can live with this though I would like to see the tool renamed and I am mildly uncomfortable with not fixing the UI bugs. In particular, the bug where the > next to English stays there even when the language changes.
Brent Bakken I reviewed and submitted comments in last week's survey
Howard Kramer I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. 12-9-15
Kevin White I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. Accept group decision
Shawn Lawton Henry I have not been able to get to this and will complete my review by the date indicated in the comment field below. I accept the decisions of the Group and Shadi as Project Manager.

More details on responses

  • David Berman: last responded on 26, November 2015 at 01:57 (UTC)
  • George Heake: last responded on 30, November 2015 at 12:56 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 30, November 2015 at 14:12 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 30, November 2015 at 19:19 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 1, December 2015 at 23:29 (UTC)
  • Anna Belle Leiserson: last responded on 2, December 2015 at 02:22 (UTC)
  • Susan Hewitt: last responded on 2, December 2015 at 19:41 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 2, December 2015 at 21:56 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 3, December 2015 at 00:00 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 3, December 2015 at 01:38 (UTC)
  • Kevin White: last responded on 3, December 2015 at 10:27 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 3, December 2015 at 11:30 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Sylvie Duchateau
  4. Kazuhito Kidachi
  5. Jedi Lin
  6. David Sloan
  7. Mary Jo Mueller
  8. Vicki Menezes Miller
  9. Reinaldo Ferraz
  10. Bill Kasdorf
  11. Cristina Mussinelli
  12. Kevin Rydberg
  13. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  14. Laura Keen
  15. Sarah Pulis
  16. Bill Tyler
  17. Gregorio Pellegrino
  18. Ruoxi Ran
  19. Sean Kelly
  20. Muhammad Saleem
  21. Sarah Lewthwaite
  22. Daniel Montalvo
  23. Jade Matos Carew
  24. Sonsoles López Pernas
  25. Greta Krafsig
  26. Jayne Schurick
  27. Michele Williams
  28. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  29. Brian Elton
  30. Julianna Rowsell
  31. Tabitha Mahoney
  32. Fred Edora
  33. Rabab Gomaa
  34. Eloisa Guerrero
  35. Leonard Beasley
  36. Supriya Makude
  37. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  38. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.