W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 7 September 2018

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2018-09-07 to 2018-09-13.

12 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference
  2. Editorial Update of Tutorials for WCAG 2.1
  3. The Business Case for Accessibility - Complete Draft
  4. EOWG Teleconference Availability
  5. Other Information to Share

1. Minutes and Resolutions from Teleconference

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read or skim this week's teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the minutes and resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2018 Minutes wiki page.

If you missed the teleconference, please indicate on the wiki page that you read the minutes — after [done], add your name and date.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. 8
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. 3
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. 1

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Minutes and Resolutions from TeleconferenceComments
Laura Keen
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Lewis Phillips
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Stéphane Deschamps
  • I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.
 [will not read them, sorry, for lack of availability this week]
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Vicki Menezes Miller
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
Norah Sinclair
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Howard Kramer
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
Andrew Arch
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes.
  • Laura Keen
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Sharron Rush
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
  • Kris Anne Kinney
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Brent Bakken
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Howard Kramer
  • Andrew Arch
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.
  • Stéphane Deschamps

2. Editorial Update of Tutorials for WCAG 2.1

A complete preview of the tutorials with all changes is available.

The tutorials were updated to reflect editorial changes for WCAG 2.1. This mainly means changing references from “WCAG 2.0” to “WCAG 2” in the template and content. The following example shows a diff of the extent of the changes on most pages:

  • The Page Structure Concepts page is a good example for what changed in the template: “Related WCAG 2.0 Resources” becomes “Related WCAG 2 Resources” and the same change happens in the sentence inside the box.

Here are some pages with changes that go beyond the template as diffs:

  • Tutorials Home: Here the link to the Quick Reference was changed and the introductory sentence was changed to mention WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 explicitly.
  • Carousels Styling: While WCAG 2.1 was in development, we used the findings of the Mobile TF to mention at a good target size. Now that WCAG 2.1 provides concrete guidance, we can simplify the sentence and also mention the WCAG SC in the “Related WCAG 2 Resources” section on the bottom.
  • Caption & Summary for Tables: We mention two “WCAG 2.0” techniques. As those techniques are also present in WCAG 2.1, WCAG 2.0 is changed to WCAG 2.

Planned publication of the change is Friday September 14th, 2018. If you have any feedback on the changes above, open a GitHub issue or leave a comment below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results

Details

Responder Editorial Update of Tutorials for WCAG 2.1
Laura Keen
Sylvie Duchateau
Sharron Rush Yep, looks good, thank you.
Lewis Phillips
Shawn Lawton Henry
Stéphane Deschamps (no comment)
Kris Anne Kinney Put my edit into Github
Vicki Menezes Miller
Brent Bakken Excellent Work Eric!
Norah Sinclair
Howard Kramer
Andrew Arch Presume we'll add 2.1 specific criteria with a later pass? eg 1.4.11 with the Forms and Images tutorials

3. The Business Case for Accessibility - Complete Draft

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read and review the current draft of the Business Case for Accessibility. Please review from the perspective that this is now a Complete Draft (#3 on the list of stages).

  • Are all points covered - is anything missing?
  • Is there anything in there that shouldn't be?
  • Word-smithing suggestions and typo correction very welcome. We are trying to catch all significant issues at this stage. Please indicate if your comments are strong or if they are meant for editor's discretion in GitHub or the comment section below.

    Thank you.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I have reviewed the Business Case article and have no comments - it looks fine. 3
I have reviewed and entered my strong comment in GitHub or in the comments section below. 1
I have reviewed and entered a comment for Editor's Discretion in GitHub or in the comments section below. 3
I have added thoughts to some existing open issues but not raised anything new. 3
I was unable to review the Business Case but expect to do so and have put the date in the comment field below. 2
I will pass on reviewing this resource and leave the decisions to the group.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder The Business Case for Accessibility - Complete DraftComments
Laura Keen
Sylvie Duchateau
  • I have added thoughts to some existing open issues but not raised anything new.
  • I was unable to review the Business Case but expect to do so and have put the date in the comment field below.
 Thursday 14 September
Sharron Rush
  • I have added thoughts to some existing open issues but not raised anything new.
Lewis Phillips
  • I have reviewed the Business Case article and have no comments - it looks fine.
Shawn Lawton Henry
Stéphane Deschamps Small conjugation typo:
“Such innovations lead to the wealth of personal digital assistants in many homes and offices.”
should be
“Such innovations led to the wealth of personal digital assistants in many homes and offices.”
(preterit)

Also: “Change is occured incrementally and steadily.” I don't know if “occur” can be used in the passive form, I leave it to you English-speaking natives. ;)

“Case Study: Juan Carlos Gil vs. Winn-Dixie retailer”: the year it happened would be a useful information, I think.

Last typo: s/enagage/engage/

For the rest, very good paper, great job!
Kris Anne Kinney
  • I was unable to review the Business Case but expect to do so and have put the date in the comment field below.
 I am doing a copy edit review and will be done ASAP.
Vicki Menezes Miller
Brent Bakken
  • I have added thoughts to some existing open issues but not raised anything new.
Norah Sinclair
  • I have reviewed the Business Case article and have no comments - it looks fine.
Howard Kramer
  • I have reviewed the Business Case article and have no comments - it looks fine.
Andrew Arch Inconsistency with placement of super-script end-note links - sometimes there a space after the word before the number & sometimes not

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I have reviewed the Business Case article and have no comments - it looks fine.
  • Lewis Phillips
  • Norah Sinclair
  • Howard Kramer
I have reviewed and entered my strong comment in GitHub or in the comments section below.
  • Laura Keen
I have reviewed and entered a comment for Editor's Discretion in GitHub or in the comments section below.
  • Stéphane Deschamps
  • Vicki Menezes Miller
  • Andrew Arch
I have added thoughts to some existing open issues but not raised anything new.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Sharron Rush
  • Brent Bakken
I was unable to review the Business Case but expect to do so and have put the date in the comment field below.
  • Sylvie Duchateau
  • Kris Anne Kinney
I will pass on reviewing this resource and leave the decisions to the group.

4. EOWG Teleconference Availability

Have you updated your EOWG Teleconference Availability lately? (If not, please do so now. Thank you!)

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 11
no

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder EOWG Teleconference Availability
Laura Keen yes
Sylvie Duchateau yes
Sharron Rush
Lewis Phillips yes
Shawn Lawton Henry yes
Stéphane Deschamps yes
Kris Anne Kinney yes
Vicki Menezes Miller yes
Brent Bakken yes
Norah Sinclair yes
Howard Kramer yes
Andrew Arch yes

5. Other Information to Share

Feel free to put here things such as:

  • What you worked on for EOWG this week.
  • What you would like EOWG folks to know.
  • Information or questions for EOWG planning — for upcoming teleconferences, future work planning, etc.

(Note that the results of this survey are available publicly, so what you put here can be seen by all. :)

Work for upcoming EOWG teleconferences: If you have upcoming work, please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to public-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.
Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:
Wednesday- 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
Teleconference connection info (requires W3C login permission)

Details

Responder Other Information to Share
Laura Keen
Sylvie Duchateau
Sharron Rush
Lewis Phillips
Shawn Lawton Henry
Stéphane Deschamps
Kris Anne Kinney
Vicki Menezes Miller Business Case
Undoc
Brent Bakken Understand Document Review and Revision
Norah Sinclair Understanding Docs
Howard Kramer
Andrew Arch

More details on responses

  • Laura Keen: last responded on 9, September 2018 at 23:14 (UTC)
  • Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 10, September 2018 at 13:30 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 12, September 2018 at 12:42 (UTC)
  • Lewis Phillips: last responded on 12, September 2018 at 13:42 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 12, September 2018 at 13:49 (UTC)
  • Stéphane Deschamps: last responded on 12, September 2018 at 14:51 (UTC)
  • Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 12, September 2018 at 17:44 (UTC)
  • Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 12, September 2018 at 21:47 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 12, September 2018 at 22:19 (UTC)
  • Norah Sinclair: last responded on 13, September 2018 at 01:15 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 13, September 2018 at 20:03 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 17, September 2018 at 05:31 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  3. Kazuhito Kidachi
  4. Jedi Lin
  5. David Sloan
  6. Mary Jo Mueller
  7. Reinaldo Ferraz
  8. Bill Kasdorf
  9. Cristina Mussinelli
  10. Kevin White
  11. Kevin Rydberg
  12. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  13. Adina Halter
  14. Denis Boudreau
  15. Sarah Pulis
  16. Bill Tyler
  17. Gregorio Pellegrino
  18. Ruoxi Ran
  19. Jennifer Chadwick
  20. Sean Kelly
  21. Muhammad Saleem
  22. Sarah Lewthwaite
  23. Daniel Montalvo
  24. Mark Palmer
  25. Jade Matos Carew
  26. Sonsoles López Pernas
  27. Greta Krafsig
  28. Jason McKee
  29. Jayne Schurick
  30. Billie Johnston
  31. Michele Williams
  32. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  33. Brian Elton
  34. Julianna Rowsell
  35. Tabitha Mahoney
  36. Fred Edora
  37. Rabab Gomaa
  38. Marcelo Paiva
  39. Eloisa Guerrero
  40. Leonard Beasley
  41. Frankie Wolf
  42. Supriya Makude
  43. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  44. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.