w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 1 September 2017
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: shawn@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2017-09-01 to 2017-09-06.
15 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
1. Minutes and Resolutions of 1 September 2017
summary | by responder | by choice
Please read or skim the 1 September 2017 EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the minutes and resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2017 Minutes wiki page.
If you missed the teleconference, please indicate on the wiki page that you read the minutes — after [done], add your name and date.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. | 12 |
| I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. | 3 |
| I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
| I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Minutes and Resolutions of 1 September 2017 | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Denis Boudreau |
|
|
| James Green |
|
|
| Robert Jolly |
|
|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
|
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Jes Pulido |
|
|
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
| Brent Bakken |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Norah Sinclair |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
There were no resolutions to agree or disagree with. |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I was in the teleconference and I don't have any comments on the Resolutions or minutes. |
|
| I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. |
|
| I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the minutes or Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
| I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
2. Re-titling Resources
summary | by responder | by choice
This question is a follow-up to the discussion in this week's EOWG meeting. We want to give everyone the opportunity to comment.
To prepare the new WAI site navigation for the upcoming Usability Study as well as the re-designed WAI site, please review the following GitHub renaming issues for various resources and add your thoughts and recommendations..
For context, see prototype navigation with shortened titles; full titles are in Proposed navigation (Google Sheet).
- Essential Components of Web Accessibility (in Nav under "Standards/Guidelines" as placeholder "[How Standards Work Together]") - Review and respond in GitHub 1
- Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your Organization (in Nav under "Plan & Manage" as placeholder "[Business Case]") - Review and respond in GitHub 3
- Easy Checks - A First Review of Web Accessibility (in Nav under "Test & Evaluate" as placeholder "[Easy Checks for Common Problems]") - Review and respond in GitHub 84
- How People With Disabilities Use the Web - Renaming two pages:
Diversity of Web Users (in Nav under "Accessibility Fundamentals" as placeholder "[Diverse Abilities and Disabilities]")
Diversity in Web Use (in Nav under "Accessibility Fundamentals" as placeholder "[Tools and Techniques People Use]")
Review and respond in GitHub 49
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I reviewed the GitHub Renaming issues and added to some or all threads. | 10 |
| I reviewed the GitHub Renaming issues and have no additional comments on renaming these resources. | 3 |
| I would like more time to review the GitHub Renaming issues, and will review and comment by the date in the Comment field. | 1 |
| I will pass on commenting on this, and accept the decisions of the Group. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Re-titling Resources | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
|
| Vicki Menezes Miller |
|
|
| Denis Boudreau |
|
|
| James Green |
|
|
| Robert Jolly |
|
|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
I think we need to be practical with this and move on. If there is no clear advantage of renaming a resource in a certain way, we should leave as is and put our energy to work on the content of documents. |
| Laura Keen |
|
|
| Jes Pulido |
|
I'm checking the third checkbox because I've only done a shallow "skim" read of most of the resources. I'll have time tomorrow (9/7) to do a more thorough review and leave GitHub comments. Otherwise, everything looks great: content, layout, mechanics, and style. |
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
I am less worried about the title of any of our resources as I am about the content within. We can make sure to tag the resources appropriately so that search engines find the pages that people are looking for. The titles are slightly less critical. |
| Brent Bakken |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Norah Sinclair |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I reviewed the GitHub Renaming issues and added to some or all threads. |
|
| I reviewed the GitHub Renaming issues and have no additional comments on renaming these resources. |
|
| I would like more time to review the GitHub Renaming issues, and will review and comment by the date in the Comment field. |
|
| I will pass on commenting on this, and accept the decisions of the Group. |
|
3. Other Information to Share
Feel free to put here things such as:
- What you worked on for EOWG this week.
- What you would like EOWG folks to know.
- Information or questions for EOWG planning — for upcoming teleconferences, future work planning, etc.
(Note that the results of this survey are available publicly, so what you put here can be seen by all. :)
Work for upcoming EOWG teleconferences: If you have upcoming work, please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to public-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.
Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:
Wednesday- 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
Teleconference connection info (requires W3C login permission)
Details
| Responder | Other Information to Share |
|---|---|
| Sharron Rush | Worked on Biz Case, planning, minute cleanup, other co-chair duties. Hoping to provide support needed for high group productivity in the next few weeks in prep for the usability testing and relaunch. |
| Sylvie Duchateau | |
| Vicki Menezes Miller | Older Users Resources |
| Denis Boudreau | Getting organized on the training materials resource with Vivienne. |
| James Green | |
| Robert Jolly | I'm waiting on feedback about the project plan submitted last week for Policies. Should I be waiting for feedback from the EO Planning Team, or should I be reviewing/proposing edits, and then involving the others in the Policies group? Sorry if I missed something! I was expecting either some questions for clarification, suggestions for changes, or a high-sign to proceed full steam ahead. |
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | |
| Eric Eggert | |
| Laura Keen | |
| Jes Pulido | The resources that I've reviewed have all been written very clearly, which is great because hopefully that means people in this field who are perhaps less OR more "technical" than me will both be able to appreciate WAI's advice. |
| Kris Anne Kinney | My apologies for being a less than active EOWG member these past weeks. I have tried and failed, to build in time allotted to just work on EOWG things, but I will continue each week to try. |
| Brent Bakken | Project Managing Resource Updates for the WAI site redesign effort. |
| Shawn Lawton Henry | |
| Norah Sinclair | |
| Howard Kramer | Worked on just the survey. Sorry - I will get to putting together a proposal for curriculum resources. |
More details on responses
- Sharron Rush: last responded on 2, September 2017 at 14:00 (UTC)
- Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 4, September 2017 at 09:38 (UTC)
- Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 5, September 2017 at 21:01 (UTC)
- Denis Boudreau: last responded on 5, September 2017 at 22:55 (UTC)
- James Green: last responded on 5, September 2017 at 23:00 (UTC)
- Robert Jolly: last responded on 6, September 2017 at 03:00 (UTC)
- Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 6, September 2017 at 08:05 (UTC)
- Eric Eggert: last responded on 6, September 2017 at 09:55 (UTC)
- Laura Keen: last responded on 6, September 2017 at 12:43 (UTC)
- Jes Pulido: last responded on 6, September 2017 at 20:02 (UTC)
- Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 6, September 2017 at 20:45 (UTC)
- Brent Bakken: last responded on 6, September 2017 at 22:45 (UTC)
- Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 7, September 2017 at 00:42 (UTC)
- Norah Sinclair: last responded on 7, September 2017 at 02:54 (UTC)
- Howard Kramer: last responded on 7, September 2017 at 05:02 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Eric Velleman
- Andrew Arch
- Kazuhito Kidachi
- Jedi Lin
- David Sloan
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Reinaldo Ferraz
- Bill Kasdorf
- Cristina Mussinelli
- Kevin White
- Kevin Rydberg
- Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
- Adina Halter
- Sarah Pulis
- Bill Tyler
- Gregorio Pellegrino
- Ruoxi Ran
- Jennifer Chadwick
- Sean Kelly
- Muhammad Saleem
- Sarah Lewthwaite
- Daniel Montalvo
- Mark Palmer
- Jade Matos Carew
- Sonsoles López Pernas
- Greta Krafsig
- Jayne Schurick
- Billie Johnston
- Michele Williams
- Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
- Brian Elton
- Julianna Rowsell
- Tabitha Mahoney
- Fred Edora
- Rabab Gomaa
- Marcelo Paiva
- Eloisa Guerrero
- Leonard Beasley
- Frankie Wolf
- Supriya Makude
- Aleksandar Cindrikj
- Angela Young
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project