w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 28 October 2016
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2016-10-28 to 2016-11-04.
13 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
- Resolutions - 28 October 2016
- Approval to publish Planning and Managing Suite of documents
- Easy Checks - Final review of new check(s)
- Resource Managers: Do you want to bring anything to the next Thursday Planning or Friday EOWG meeting?
1. Resolutions - 28 October 2016
summary | by responder | by choice
Please read the 28 October 2016 EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2016 Minutes wiki page.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! | 10 |
| I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. | 3 |
| I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
| I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Resolutions - 28 October 2016 | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Brent Bakken |
|
|
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
|
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Susan Hewitt |
|
|
| Robert Jolly |
|
|
| Caleb Watson |
|
|
| Denis Boudreau |
|
|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
|
| James Green |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
|
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! |
|
| I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed. |
|
| I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below. | |
| I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box. |
2. Approval to publish Planning and Managing Suite of documents
summary | by responder | by choice
Three documents are on GitHub as an update to the Planning and Managing Suite. They are:- Planning and Managing Web Accessibility
- Web Accessibility First Aid
- Developing Organizational Policies
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I approve publication of these resources as they are with no changes | 7 |
| I approve publication with suggestions on GitHub (or below) for editor's discretion. | 1 |
| I approve publication but only with suggestions on GitHub (or below). | 1 |
| I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. | 5 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Approval to publish Planning and Managing Suite of documents | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Brent Bakken |
|
Planning and Managing Web Accessibility (GitHub Version): - Link in the overview section (Web Accessibility First Aid: Approaches for Interim Repairs) goes to the old "short term" document, not the "first aid" document. - On the "implement" page, the last section called "Prioritize issues" is hiding the "Track Communications" section. Can only see it when you expand the former. Bug fix. First Aid document looks good! Developing Policies document looks good! |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
I reviewed Web Accessibility First Aid in detail through several revisions over the last few months. I was not able to review the others, and I accept and approve. |
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Susan Hewitt |
|
commented previously on sone issues in GitHub. |
| Robert Jolly |
|
|
| Caleb Watson |
|
|
| Denis Boudreau |
|
I read through all three and feel very comfortable with the current level of information and quality that was achieved. |
| Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
|
| Sharron Rush |
|
Comment (more of a question) on Policies in GitHub |
| James Green |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
Sorry, other things demanded more attention. That said, I have taken a close look to all of them while in development, and I don’t expect that major new issues were introduced. |
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I approve publication of these resources as they are with no changes |
|
| I approve publication with suggestions on GitHub (or below) for editor's discretion. |
|
| I approve publication but only with suggestions on GitHub (or below). |
|
| I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it and accept the decisions of the Group. |
|
3. Easy Checks - Final review of new check(s)
summary | by responder | by choice
The new checks for Moving, Flashing, or Blinking Content that we have been working on (1,23) have been added to the document so we can review them in context. Please skim the Easy Checks document overall to re-familiarize yourself with how the other topics and checks are presented.
There are two options, A & B below:
- A. Two separate topics:
- B. One combined topic:
Please review GitHub issue 27 and comment there, clearly indicating your preference for which option.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I put comments in GitHub issue 27 or below.I approve option A or B with no changes. | 6 |
| I put comments in GitHub issue 27 or below.My comments are for editor's discretion and I don't need to see another revision. | 5 |
| I put comments in GitHub issue 27 or below.I would like my comments addressed and then to review the revision. | |
| I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it now and in the future, and accept the decisions of the Group. | 2 |
Skip to view by choice.
View by responder
Details
| Responder | Easy Checks - Final review of new check(s) | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Brent Bakken |
|
Moving Content Section: Awkward sounding... >> Replace: Moving content includes "carousels" such as below, videos, ads, auto-updating stock tickers, and more. Users need to be able to control moving content, especially some people with attention deficit or visual processing disorders. >> Replace with: Users need to be able to control moving content, especially some people with attention deficit or visual processing disorders. Moving content includes carousels (example below), videos, ads, auto-updating stock tickers, and more. >> Replace: Some people have trouble tracking moving objects. >> Replace with: Some people have difficulty tracking moving objects. |
| Shawn Lawton Henry |
|
my GitHub comments: https://github.com/w3c/EasyChecks/issues/27#issuecomment-258016690 |
| Howard Kramer |
|
|
| Susan Hewitt |
|
I'd like someone to answer/weigh in on my comments but I don't want to hold this up from moving forward by asking to see another revision. |
| Robert Jolly |
|
|
| Caleb Watson |
|
As the Resource Owner of Easy Checks, I am good with either direction as long as the group reaches a consensus. |
| Denis Boudreau |
|
|
| Shadi Abou-Zahra |
|
|
| Kris Anne Kinney |
|
I went through the GitHub issue and I like this structure on this edit. https://rawgit.com/w3c/EasyChecks/7a396e9756575df043263d97ba56d8a29b9e89d8/index.html#moving |
| Sharron Rush |
|
I am confused by the carousel illustration since it seems to not function (I am viewing in Firefox). If it is meant to be a non-working example, that should be made clearer in the text. |
| James Green |
|
|
| Eric Eggert |
|
A |
| Sylvie Duchateau |
|
I think mixing blinking, flashing and moving content in one topic makes understanding this more complex. That is why I prefer option A that makes the explanations simpler. |
View by choice
| Choice | Responders |
|---|---|
| I put comments in GitHub issue 27 or below.I approve option A or B with no changes. |
|
| I put comments in GitHub issue 27 or below.My comments are for editor's discretion and I don't need to see another revision. |
|
| I put comments in GitHub issue 27 or below.I would like my comments addressed and then to review the revision. | |
| I didn't get to it; I will pass on commenting on it now and in the future, and accept the decisions of the Group. |
|
4. Resource Managers: Do you want to bring anything to the next Thursday Planning or Friday EOWG meeting?
Please describe what you want to bring to the group in the comment field below. Send any draft material to team-eo-plan@w3.org by Tuesday if possible.
Please plan to join the EO-Planning meeting to prepare for Friday EOWG meeting:
Thursday - 8am CT / 9am ET / 3pm CET
WebEx Link or Audio connection: +1-617-324-0000 US Toll Number, Meeting number: 314 241 816 Passcode: (same as main EOWG teleconference)
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| yes | |
| no | 11 |
(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)
Details
| Responder | Resource Managers: Do you want to bring anything to the next Thursday Planning or Friday EOWG meeting? | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Brent Bakken | no | |
| Shawn Lawton Henry | no | |
| Howard Kramer | no | |
| Susan Hewitt | no | I owe the group a draft proposal for the mobile overview page but that odds of that happening before AHG are pretty low. |
| Robert Jolly | no | |
| Caleb Watson | no | |
| Denis Boudreau | no | |
| Shadi Abou-Zahra | no | |
| Kris Anne Kinney | no | |
| Sharron Rush | no | |
| James Green | no | |
| Eric Eggert | ||
| Sylvie Duchateau |
More details on responses
- Brent Bakken: last responded on 2, November 2016 at 21:18 (UTC)
- Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 2, November 2016 at 22:22 (UTC)
- Howard Kramer: last responded on 3, November 2016 at 05:40 (UTC)
- Susan Hewitt: last responded on 3, November 2016 at 14:35 (UTC)
- Robert Jolly: last responded on 3, November 2016 at 14:48 (UTC)
- Caleb Watson: last responded on 3, November 2016 at 14:49 (UTC)
- Denis Boudreau: last responded on 3, November 2016 at 15:05 (UTC)
- Shadi Abou-Zahra: last responded on 3, November 2016 at 15:45 (UTC)
- Kris Anne Kinney: last responded on 3, November 2016 at 15:56 (UTC)
- Sharron Rush: last responded on 3, November 2016 at 16:07 (UTC)
- James Green: last responded on 3, November 2016 at 23:25 (UTC)
- Eric Eggert: last responded on 4, November 2016 at 10:57 (UTC)
- Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 4, November 2016 at 11:38 (UTC)
Non-responders
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
- Eric Velleman
- Andrew Arch
- Kazuhito Kidachi
- Jedi Lin
- David Sloan
- Mary Jo Mueller
- Vicki Menezes Miller
- Reinaldo Ferraz
- Bill Kasdorf
- Cristina Mussinelli
- Kevin White
- Kevin Rydberg
- Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
- Adina Halter
- Laura Keen
- Sarah Pulis
- Bill Tyler
- Gregorio Pellegrino
- Ruoxi Ran
- Jennifer Chadwick
- Sean Kelly
- Muhammad Saleem
- Sarah Lewthwaite
- Daniel Montalvo
- Mark Palmer
- Jade Matos Carew
- Sonsoles López Pernas
- Greta Krafsig
- Jason McKee
- Jayne Schurick
- Billie Johnston
- Michele Williams
- Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
- Brian Elton
- Julianna Rowsell
- Tabitha Mahoney
- Fred Edora
- Rabab Gomaa
- Marcelo Paiva
- Eloisa Guerrero
- Leonard Beasley
- Frankie Wolf
- Supriya Makude
- Aleksandar Cindrikj
- Angela Young
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project