W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 26 February 2016

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2016-02-27 to 2016-03-02.

9 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Resolution of 26 February 2016
  2. Resource Title for [Showcase Examples with Videos]: Task Force Recommendation
  3. Resource Title for [Showcase Examples with Videos]: Group Suggestions
  4. Current Open Issue Review: [Showcase Examples with Videos]
  5. Scripts 6-10 Approval: Showcase Examples with Videos

1. Resolution of 26 February 2016

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 26 Feb EOWG teleconference meeting minutes or summary. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it! 7
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed. 2
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolution and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Resolution of 26 February 2016Comments
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
George Heake
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
Vivienne Conway
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed.
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
James Green
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
Andrew Arch
  • I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed.
Susan Hewitt
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
Howard Kramer
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with it!
  • Eric Eggert
  • George Heake
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Sharron Rush
  • Howard Kramer
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolution as passed.
  • Vivienne Conway
  • Andrew Arch
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolution and I explain them below.
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. Resource Title for [Showcase Examples with Videos]: Task Force Recommendation

The Showcase Task Force has outlined some key considerations to think about while finalizing the official name for this resources. Resource Wiki

Please consider the following:

  • Each example highlights an accessibility feature that is critical for people with disabilities but beneficial for many more.
  • The target audience are people who are new to web accessibility, possibly to the extent that they do not even know what it is.
  • These are all examples and rough descriptions of web accessibility, not any normative guidance or interpretation of the requirements.
  • Each video links back to this resource, which provides additional (brief) background and links to more resources (eg. Getting Started).

The current recommended name for the resource is "Impact and Benefits of Web Accessibility."

View the visual mock-up of the resource overview page with the recommended name in place.

Please use the comment field below to express your initial reactions to this recommended name for the resource. The next question will guide you through suggesting other resource name ideas.

Details

Responder Resource Title for [Showcase Examples with Videos]: Task Force Recommendation
Eric Eggert The name is very descriptive but not catchy at all. I think “Web Accessibility: Impact and Benefits” could work better, but it is still very unemotional. With the videos being not dead serious I am hoping that we find a more casual title.

(Also, I guess the overview page will be <del>beefed</del><ins>tofued</ins> up a bit, for example with a grid of video previews.)
George Heake Simple and clean design
Vivienne Conway While I'm not thrilled with the recommended name, I can't really say why. I guess it sounds a bit dry and not catchy enough?
Brent Bakken No Comment - Task Force Member
James Green It is fine, but these videos kind of deserve a more interesting/engaging title in my opinion.
Andrew Arch Works for me (without seeing the final productions)
Susan Hewitt It's not very attention grabbing. It also seems a bit generic as in could be applied to many other resources on the site.
Sharron Rush Too dull. The videos are meant to be engaging and entertaining - the name should be too.
Howard Kramer Would go for simply "Benefits of Web Accessibility"

3. Resource Title for [Showcase Examples with Videos]: Group Suggestions

Based on the input you provided for the privious question, can you provide other suggestions for the official name of the Showcase Examples with Videos resource?

To help get your started, here are other resources names brainstormed by the Task Force:

  • Features and Benefits of Web Accessibility [[Task Force close second]]
  • Web Accessibility: What's the Impact [[Task Force close second]]
  • Benefits of Making the Web an Accessible Place
  • Benefits of Making the Web Accessible
  • Why Web Accessibility?
  • Web Accessibility: A True Win/Win
  • Web Accessibility: Everyone Wins
  • Web Accessibility: See for Your Self
  • Web Accessibility: A View to What You Can Do

If you have other ideas and suggestions for a title, please list them in the additional space(s) provided below.

If you prefer any of the names above from the Task Force, please indicate your preference in the Comments field at the bottom.

Details

Responder Name Suggestion 1Name Suggestion 2Name Suggestion 3Comments
Eric Eggert Web Accessibility: Everyone benefits Web Accessibility Pays Off!
George Heake Web Accessibility: What's the Impact is my pick. I did like Features and Benefits of Web Accessibility. Using the word Impact just seems stronger and notifies the reader (perhaps:)) hey I should be we aware of any impact versus whether I am interested in a feature or benefit.
Vivienne Conway Web Accessibility: Everyone Wins Designing web sites with accessibility
Web Accessibility: Why does it Matter? or "Who does it Affect"
Brent Bakken
James Green First Hand Web Accessibility: Video Vignettes
Andrew Arch Web Accessibility: What's the Impact Web Accessibility: Who benefits I like 'benefits' in the title
Susan Hewitt Take a Look at Web Accessibility Ones I like from TF list:

-Web Accessibility: A View to What You Can Do
(Suggest changing to ..."A View to What It Can Do")

-Web Accessibility: See for Yourself
Sharron Rush My Accessible World Video Series Wake Up! - the web accessibility series Choose Web Accessibility - the why and how I like "See for Yourself," also "Making the Web More Accessible - the video series
Howard Kramer Benefits of Making the Web Accessible

4. Current Open Issue Review: [Showcase Examples with Videos]

Please take the time to go through each of the remaining open issues or "questions" for the Showcase Examples with Video resource. There are questions around topics such as a catch phrase, title and end screens, relation to WCAG, etc.

View the current Showcase Open Issues.

Please add your thoughts to the GitHub issue. If you are not comfortable with GitHub you may add your comments in the space provided below.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues in GitHub and have no comments. 1
I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues and have added comments in GitHub or below. 7
I did not get to these issues and will pass on this question and go with the decisions of the group. 1

Details

Responder Current Open Issue Review: [Showcase Examples with Videos]Comments
Eric Eggert I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues and have added comments in GitHub or below.
George Heake I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues and have added comments in GitHub or below.
Vivienne Conway I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues in GitHub and have no comments.
Brent Bakken I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues and have added comments in GitHub or below. Commented in GitHub
James Green I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues and have added comments in GitHub or below.
Andrew Arch I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues and have added comments in GitHub or below.
Susan Hewitt I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues and have added comments in GitHub or below. Only one comment on catch phrase thread.
Sharron Rush I reviewed the current Showcase Examples with Videos open issues and have added comments in GitHub or below. The repetitive catch phrase at the end of each video is necessary to tie them together and bring back the topic of web accessibility. Should be something like "[Insert short phrase specific to each] is part of web accessibility, it is necessary for people with disabilities and improves the web for everyone."
Howard Kramer I did not get to these issues and will pass on this question and go with the decisions of the group.

5. Scripts 6-10 Approval: Showcase Examples with Videos

I completed the Showcase Video, final script approval: Scripts 6 - 10 survey.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 8
no

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Scripts 6-10 Approval: Showcase Examples with Videos
Eric Eggert
George Heake yes
Vivienne Conway yes
Brent Bakken yes
James Green yes
Andrew Arch yes
Susan Hewitt yes
Sharron Rush yes
Howard Kramer yes

More details on responses

  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 29, February 2016 at 11:41 (UTC)
  • George Heake: last responded on 29, February 2016 at 21:11 (UTC)
  • Vivienne Conway: last responded on 2, March 2016 at 06:31 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 2, March 2016 at 16:47 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 2, March 2016 at 22:37 (UTC)
  • Andrew Arch: last responded on 2, March 2016 at 23:29 (UTC)
  • Susan Hewitt: last responded on 3, March 2016 at 02:51 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 3, March 2016 at 04:13 (UTC)
  • Howard Kramer: last responded on 3, March 2016 at 04:31 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Shawn Lawton Henry
  3. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  4. Sylvie Duchateau
  5. Kazuhito Kidachi
  6. Jedi Lin
  7. David Sloan
  8. Mary Jo Mueller
  9. Vicki Menezes Miller
  10. Reinaldo Ferraz
  11. Bill Kasdorf
  12. Cristina Mussinelli
  13. Kevin White
  14. Kevin Rydberg
  15. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  16. Adina Halter
  17. Denis Boudreau
  18. Laura Keen
  19. Sarah Pulis
  20. Bill Tyler
  21. Gregorio Pellegrino
  22. Ruoxi Ran
  23. Jennifer Chadwick
  24. Sean Kelly
  25. Muhammad Saleem
  26. Sarah Lewthwaite
  27. Daniel Montalvo
  28. Mark Palmer
  29. Jade Matos Carew
  30. Sonsoles López Pernas
  31. Greta Krafsig
  32. Jason McKee
  33. Jayne Schurick
  34. Billie Johnston
  35. Michele Williams
  36. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  37. Brian Elton
  38. Julianna Rowsell
  39. Tabitha Mahoney
  40. Fred Edora
  41. Rabab Gomaa
  42. Marcelo Paiva
  43. Eloisa Guerrero
  44. Leonard Beasley
  45. Frankie Wolf
  46. Supriya Makude
  47. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  48. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.