W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire EOWG Weekly Survey - 05 February

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email addresses: shawn@w3.org,shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2016-02-05 to 2016-02-10.

7 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Resolutions of 05 February
  2. Tools survey
  3. Showcase survey

1. Resolutions of 05 February

summary | by responder | by choice

Please read the 05 February EOWG teleconference meeting minutes. Indicate your approval or concerns with the resolution(s) passed at that meeting. The summary and the link to the full minutes is on the 2016 Minutes wiki page.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them! 6
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below. 1
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

Skip to view by choice.

View by responder

Details

Responder Resolutions of 05 FebruaryComments
Susan Hewitt
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Shawn Lawton Henry
  • I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
 I'm fine with "Accessible UI Components List"; however, I think we should have the subtitle of "Widgets, Templates, and Frameworks" (or a different order ;) to provide further information as to what it is.
* One could easily assume that "UI components" is just widgets and such, and not realize it includes templates and frameworks.
* We don't have to include the subtitle in places where we just want a short title, e.g., in navigation.
* We would have the option of including the subtitle in places where we want to provide the additional clarification, e.g., in site map, announcements, etc.

So I see benefits of having a subtitle -- and not really any significant drawbacks (just 3 extra words in the <h1>)...

It looks like the vote on the call was pretty close and I wonder if it's worth a just little more discussion and consideration?

However, I don't feel super strongly about it...
Eric Eggert
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Kevin White
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Brent Bakken
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
James Green
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
Sharron Rush
  • I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!

View by choice

ChoiceResponders
I was in the teleconference and I'm OK with them!
  • Susan Hewitt
  • Eric Eggert
  • Kevin White
  • Brent Bakken
  • James Green
  • Sharron Rush
I have reviewed the minutes and agree to the Resolutions passed.
I have reviewed the minutes but have concerns with the Resolutions, and I explain them below.
  • Shawn Lawton Henry
I have not read the minutes yet, and have put the date for my review into the comments box.

2. Tools survey

I completed the survey for the Evaluation Tools List.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 7
no

Details

Responder Tools survey
Susan Hewitt yes
Shawn Lawton Henry yes
Eric Eggert yes
Kevin White yes
Brent Bakken yes
James Green yes
Sharron Rush yes

3. Showcase survey

I completed the Showcase Examples with Video survey.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
yes 6
no

(1 response didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Showcase survey
Susan Hewitt yes
Shawn Lawton Henry
Eric Eggert yes
Kevin White yes
Brent Bakken yes
James Green yes
Sharron Rush yes

More details on responses

  • Susan Hewitt: last responded on 8, February 2016 at 21:50 (UTC)
  • Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 9, February 2016 at 20:43 (UTC)
  • Eric Eggert: last responded on 10, February 2016 at 10:04 (UTC)
  • Kevin White: last responded on 10, February 2016 at 13:51 (UTC)
  • Brent Bakken: last responded on 10, February 2016 at 22:44 (UTC)
  • James Green: last responded on 11, February 2016 at 04:56 (UTC)
  • Sharron Rush: last responded on 11, February 2016 at 12:56 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Eric Velleman
  2. Andrew Arch
  3. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  4. Sylvie Duchateau
  5. Kazuhito Kidachi
  6. Jedi Lin
  7. David Sloan
  8. Mary Jo Mueller
  9. Vicki Menezes Miller
  10. Reinaldo Ferraz
  11. Bill Kasdorf
  12. Cristina Mussinelli
  13. Kevin Rydberg
  14. Ahmath Bamba MBACKE
  15. Adina Halter
  16. Denis Boudreau
  17. Laura Keen
  18. Sarah Pulis
  19. Bill Tyler
  20. Gregorio Pellegrino
  21. Ruoxi Ran
  22. Jennifer Chadwick
  23. Sean Kelly
  24. Muhammad Saleem
  25. Sarah Lewthwaite
  26. Daniel Montalvo
  27. Mark Palmer
  28. Jade Matos Carew
  29. Sonsoles López Pernas
  30. Greta Krafsig
  31. Jayne Schurick
  32. Billie Johnston
  33. Michele Williams
  34. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  35. Brian Elton
  36. Julianna Rowsell
  37. Tabitha Mahoney
  38. Fred Edora
  39. Rabab Gomaa
  40. Marcelo Paiva
  41. Eloisa Guerrero
  42. Leonard Beasley
  43. Frankie Wolf
  44. Supriya Makude
  45. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  46. Angela Young

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.