W3C

Site Navigation

Nearby

Results of Questionnaire Silver FPWD Candidate

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2020-09-24 to 2020-09-15.

No answer has been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Revised MVP
  2. What do we call non-normative?
  3. Survey Overview
  4. Introduction
  5. Structure of these guidelines
  6. Normative requirements
  7. Guidelines (Not linked content)
  8. Evaluation
  9. Conformance
  10. Glossary
  11. Structured Content How To and Method

1. Revised MVP

AGWG approved the WCAG3 FPWD - MVP at the April 28th meeting. The MVP currenty asks for "Six guidelines that are complete, including all tabs." The editors are requesting a modification to this criteria to be 1 guideline complete including all tabs and 4 additional guidelines complete except for the how to content."

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Modify the MVP
Do not modify the MVP
Other (Include in comments field

Details

Responder Revised MVPComments

2. What do we call non-normative?

We received several comments that the term "non-normative" is unclear. The term is used as part of the automatic document generation so it is commonly used across W3C specifications. Please consider what the best option is to call this type of content.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Continue using "This section is non-normative."
Change to "This section is not normative."
Change to "This section is informative."
Change to "This section is informative (non-normative)."
Change to "This section is advisory only. It does not specify guidelines."
Other (add to comments)

Details

Responder What do we call non-normative?Comments

3. Survey Overview

The current draft of WCAG 3.0 is being prepared for the First Public Working Draft (FPWD).

This survey is to get approval from the Working Group and Silver Task Force to publish the FPWD. We will address sections, How Tos, and Methods individually and then vote in the joint Tuesday meeting to move the section to the CFC process. Only content that is ready to review has a question listed below.

There is still scope for addressing issues, but whilst entering comments please do consider whether:

  • It is a minor thing that could still go out for public review if it is not changed;
  • It could be included in an editors note to encourage feedback from the public on that point.
  • It must be changed before going out for public review (i.e. you object to releasing without a change);

Please indicate in your comments which category of issue it is for you. Any answer that indicates there are issues without saying what they are (in the comment) will be ignored.

Details

Responder

4. Introduction

The introduction section of WCAG 3.0 is non-normative, and sets the scene for the document.

Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
This section can be published as it is now.
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes.
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD.

Details

Responder IntroductionComments

5. Structure of these guidelines

The Structure of these guidelines section of WCAG 3.0 is non-normative, and describes the structure of the document.

Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
This section can be published as it is now.
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes.
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD.

Details

Responder Structure of these guidelinesComments

6. Normative requirements

The Normative requirements section of WCAG 3.0 is normative, a short section just defining which aspects are normative.

Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
This section can be published as it is now.
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes.
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD.

Details

Responder Normative requirementsComments

7. Guidelines (Not linked content)

The Guidelines section of WCAG 3.0 is normative and presents the initial guidelines, outcomes and methods. Do not review the linked content, just the content within the document iteself. The linked How To and Method content will be reviewed separately.

Please wait until Monday to review this particular section.

Please review and comment if there are things you think should be changed.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
This section can be published as it is now.
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes.
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD.

Details

Responder Guidelines (Not linked content)Comments

8. Evaluation

The Evaluation section of WCAG 3.0 is normative, and includes the testing and scoring content.

Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
This section can be published as it is now.
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes.
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD.

Details

Responder EvaluationComments

9. Conformance

The Conformance section of WCAG 3.0 is normative, and outlines how to claim conformance.

Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
This section can be published as it is now.
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes.
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD.

Details

Responder ConformanceComments

10. Glossary

The Glossary section of WCAG 3.0presents terms used in the WCAG 3 document.

Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
This section can be published as it is now.
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes.
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD.

Details

Responder GlossaryComments

11. Structured Content How To and Method

The Structured Content How To and Method provides an example of this type of content.

Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.

.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
This section can be published as it is now.
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes.
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD.

Details

Responder Structured Content How To and MethodComments

Non-responders

The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Gregg Vanderheiden
  2. Chris Wilson
  3. Lisa Seeman-Horwitz
  4. Janina Sajka
  5. Shawn Lawton Henry
  6. Katie Haritos-Shea
  7. Shadi Abou-Zahra
  8. Chus Garcia
  9. Steve Faulkner
  10. Patrick Lauke
  11. David MacDonald
  12. Gez Lemon
  13. Makoto Ueki
  14. Peter Korn
  15. Preety Kumar
  16. Bruce Bailey
  17. Georgios Grigoriadis
  18. Stefan Schnabel
  19. Romain Deltour
  20. Laura Carlson
  21. Chris Blouch
  22. Jedi Lin
  23. Jeanne F Spellman
  24. Wilco Fiers
  25. Kimberly Patch
  26. Glenda Sims
  27. Ian Pouncey
  28. Alastair Campbell
  29. Léonie Watson
  30. David Sloan
  31. Mary Jo Mueller
  32. John Kirkwood
  33. Detlev Fischer
  34. Reinaldo Ferraz
  35. Matt Garrish
  36. Mike Gifford
  37. Loïc Martínez Normand
  38. Mike Pluke
  39. Justine Pascalides
  40. Chris Loiselle
  41. Tzviya Siegman
  42. Jan McSorley
  43. Sailesh Panchang
  44. Cristina Mussinelli
  45. Jonathan Avila
  46. John Rochford
  47. Sarah Horton
  48. Sujasree Kurapati
  49. Jatin Vaishnav
  50. Sam Ogami
  51. Kevin White
  52. E.A. Draffan
  53. Paul Bohman
  54. JaEun Jemma Ku
  55. 骅 杨
  56. Victoria Clark
  57. Avneesh Singh
  58. Mitchell Evan
  59. Michael Gower
  60. biao liu
  61. Scott McCormack
  62. Denis Boudreau
  63. Rachael Bradley Montgomery
  64. Francis Storr
  65. Rick Johnson
  66. David Swallow
  67. Aparna Pasi
  68. Gregorio Pellegrino
  69. Melanie Philipp
  70. Jake Abma
  71. Nicole Windmann
  72. Oliver Keim
  73. Gundula Niemann
  74. Ruoxi Ran
  75. Wendy Reid
  76. Scott O'Hara
  77. Charles Adams
  78. Muhammad Saleem
  79. Amani Ali
  80. Trevor Bostic
  81. Jamie Herrera
  82. Shinya Takami
  83. Karen Herr
  84. Kathy Eng
  85. Cybele Sack
  86. Audrey Maniez
  87. Jennifer Delisi
  88. Arthur Soroken
  89. Daniel Bjorge
  90. Kai Recke
  91. David Fazio
  92. Daniel Montalvo
  93. Mario Chacón-Rivas
  94. Michael Gilbert
  95. Caryn Pagel
  96. Achraf Othman
  97. Helen Burge
  98. Fernanda Bonnin
  99. Jared Batterman
  100. Raja Kushalnagar
  101. Jan Williams
  102. Todd Libby
  103. Isabel Holdsworth
  104. Julia Chen
  105. Marcos Franco Murillo
  106. Yutaka Suzuki
  107. Azlan Cuttilan
  108. Jennifer Strickland
  109. Joe Humbert
  110. Ben Tillyer
  111. Charu Pandhi
  112. Poornima Badhan Subramanian
  113. Alain Vagner
  114. Roberto Scano
  115. Rain Breaw Michaels
  116. Kun Zhang
  117. Jaunita George
  118. Regina Sanchez
  119. Shawn Thompson
  120. Thomas Brunet
  121. Kenny Dunsin
  122. Jen Goulden
  123. Mike Beganyi
  124. Ronny Hendriks
  125. Breixo Pastoriza Barcia
  126. Olivia Hogan-Stark
  127. Rashmi Katakwar
  128. Julie Rawe
  129. Duff Johnson
  130. Laura Miller
  131. Will Creedle
  132. Shikha Nikhil Dwivedi
  133. Marie Csanady
  134. Meenakshi Das
  135. Perrin Anto
  136. Stephanie Louraine
  137. Rachele DiTullio
  138. Jan Jaap de Groot
  139. Rebecca Monteleone
  140. Ian Kersey
  141. Peter Bossley
  142. Anastasia Lanz
  143. Michael Keane
  144. Chiara De Martin
  145. Giacomo Petri
  146. Andrew Barakat
  147. Devanshu Chandra
  148. Xiao (Helen) Zhou
  149. Bryan Trogdon
  150. Mary Ann (MJ) Jawili
  151. 禹佳 陶
  152. 锦澄 王
  153. Stephen James
  154. Jay Mullen
  155. Thorsten Katzmann
  156. Tony Holland
  157. Kent Boucher
  158. Abbey Davis
  159. Julia Kim
  160. Michelle Lana
  161. David Williams
  162. Mikayla Thompson
  163. Catherine Droege
  164. James Edwards
  165. Eric Hind
  166. Quintin Balsdon
  167. Mario Batušić
  168. David Cox
  169. Sazzad Mahamud
  170. Katy Brickley
  171. Kimberly Sarabia
  172. Corey Hinshaw
  173. Ashley Firth
  174. Daniel Harper-Wain
  175. Kiara Stewart
  176. DJ Chase
  177. Suji Sreerama
  178. Lori Oakley
  179. David Middleton
  180. Alyssa Priddy
  181. Young Choi
  182. Nichole Bui
  183. Julie Romanowski
  184. Eloisa Guerrero
  185. Daniel Henderson-Ede
  186. George Kuan
  187. YAPING LIN
  188. Justin Wilson
  189. Tiffany Burtin
  190. Shane Dittmar
  191. Nayan Padrai
  192. Niamh Kelly
  193. Matt Argomaniz Matthew Argomaniz
  194. Frankie Wolf
  195. Kimberly McGee
  196. Ahson Rana
  197. Carolina Crespo
  198. humor927 humor927
  199. Samantha McDaniel
  200. Matthäus Rojek
  201. Phong Tony Le
  202. Bram Janssens
  203. Graham Ritchie
  204. Aleksandar Cindrikj
  205. Jeroen Hulscher
  206. Alina Vayntrub
  207. Marco Sabidussi
  208. John Toles
  209. Jeanne Erickson Cooley
  210. Theo Hale
  211. Gert-Jan Vercauteren
  212. Karla Rubiano
  213. Aashutosh K
  214. Hidde de Vries
  215. Julian Kittelson-Aldred
  216. Roland Buss
  217. Aditya Surendranath
  218. Avon Kuo
  219. Elizabeth Patrick
  220. Nat Tarnoff
  221. Filippo Zorzi
  222. Mike Pedersen
  223. Rachael Yomtoob
  224. Oliver Habersetzer

Send an email to all the non-responders.

Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design or by mail to sysreq.