w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.
This questionnaire was open from 2020-09-24 to 2020-09-15.
No answer has been received.
Jump to results for question:
AGWG approved the WCAG3 FPWD - MVP at the April 28th meeting. The MVP currenty asks for "Six guidelines that are complete, including all tabs." The editors are requesting a modification to this criteria to be 1 guideline complete including all tabs and 4 additional guidelines complete except for the how to content."
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Modify the MVP | |
Do not modify the MVP | |
Other (Include in comments field |
Responder | Revised MVP | Comments |
---|
We received several comments that the term "non-normative" is unclear. The term is used as part of the automatic document generation so it is commonly used across W3C specifications. Please consider what the best option is to call this type of content.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
Continue using "This section is non-normative." | |
Change to "This section is not normative." | |
Change to "This section is informative." | |
Change to "This section is informative (non-normative)." | |
Change to "This section is advisory only. It does not specify guidelines." | |
Other (add to comments) |
Responder | What do we call non-normative? | Comments |
---|
The current draft of WCAG 3.0 is being prepared for the First Public Working Draft (FPWD).
This survey is to get approval from the Working Group and Silver Task Force to publish the FPWD. We will address sections, How Tos, and Methods individually and then vote in the joint Tuesday meeting to move the section to the CFC process. Only content that is ready to review has a question listed below.
There is still scope for addressing issues, but whilst entering comments please do consider whether:
Please indicate in your comments which category of issue it is for you. Any answer that indicates there are issues without saying what they are (in the comment) will be ignored.
Responder |
---|
The introduction section of WCAG 3.0 is non-normative, and sets the scene for the document.
Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
This section can be published as it is now. | |
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes. | |
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD. |
Responder | Introduction | Comments |
---|
The Structure of these guidelines section of WCAG 3.0 is non-normative, and describes the structure of the document.
Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
This section can be published as it is now. | |
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes. | |
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD. |
Responder | Structure of these guidelines | Comments |
---|
The Normative requirements section of WCAG 3.0 is normative, a short section just defining which aspects are normative.
Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
This section can be published as it is now. | |
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes. | |
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD. |
Responder | Normative requirements | Comments |
---|
The Guidelines section of WCAG 3.0 is normative and presents the initial guidelines, outcomes and methods. Do not review the linked content, just the content within the document iteself. The linked How To and Method content will be reviewed separately.
Please wait until Monday to review this particular section.
Please review and comment if there are things you think should be changed.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
This section can be published as it is now. | |
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes. | |
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD. |
Responder | Guidelines (Not linked content) | Comments |
---|
The Evaluation section of WCAG 3.0 is normative, and includes the testing and scoring content.
Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
This section can be published as it is now. | |
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes. | |
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD. |
Responder | Evaluation | Comments |
---|
The Conformance section of WCAG 3.0 is normative, and outlines how to claim conformance.
Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
This section can be published as it is now. | |
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes. | |
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD. |
Responder | Conformance | Comments |
---|
The Glossary section of WCAG 3.0presents terms used in the WCAG 3 document.
Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.
Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
This section can be published as it is now. | |
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes. | |
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD. |
Responder | Glossary | Comments |
---|
The Structured Content How To and Method provides an example of this type of content.
Please review and either approve for publishing in the FPWD or comment if there are things you think should be changed.
.Choice | All responders |
---|---|
Results | |
This section can be published as it is now. | |
This section has several areas that should be updated, or include edtiorial notes. | |
This section has significant areas that must be updated before we publish the FPWD. |
Responder | Structured Content How To and Method | Comments |
---|
The following persons have not answered the questionnaire:
Send an email to all the non-responders.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
w3c/wbs-design
or
by mail to sysreq
.