This is a page from the Cascading Style Sheets Working Group Blog. Some other places to find information are the “current work” page, the www-style mailing list, the Future of CSS syndicator, and the issue list on Github.
Do you want to know how the CSS WG works? Fantasai has written about:csswg, An Inside View of the CSS Working Group at W3C.
We discussed the CSS2.1 test suite today, particularly how to incorporate Ian Hickson’s tests and Microsoft’s tests into the test suite. Arron (Microsoft) and fantasai (HP) will be working together on that project.
Licensing was brought up: the HTMLWG recently adopted the MIT license for their tests, whereas the CSS tests are currently licensed under the W3C Document License. We could relicense the tests or license new tests under the MIT license if necessary, but we’re not sure if that’s needed. If you have any thoughts on that, please post to public-css-testsuite@w3.org or otherwise contact a member of the CSS Working Group.
/TR/CSS2
to CSS2.1.<p style="border: solid thick red; padding: 1em"><strong> Note: <em>This paragraph is informative.</em> This document is currently not maintained. The CSS Working Group is developing CSS Level 2 Revision 1, which corrects many errors and omissions in this document as well as making a few other changes as documented in the changes section. The CSS Working Group encourages authors and implementors to reference CSS2.1 instead of this document and when features common to CSS2 and CSS 2.1 are defined differently to follow the definitions in CSS2.1. </strong></p>
This text makes no changes that affect conformance to REC-CSS2, so should qualify as a Class 2 Change under the W3C Process.
<p style="border: solid thick red; padding: 1em"><strong> Note: <em>This paragraph is informative.</em> This document is currently not maintained. The CSS Working Group is developing CSS Level 2 Revision 1, which has much more precise and Web-compatible definitions of the features described here. The CSS Working Group encourages authors and implementors to reference CSS2.1 instead of this document and when features common to CSS1 and CSS 2.1 are defined differently to follow the definitions in CSS2.1. <strong></p>
This text makes no changes that affect conformance to REC-CSS1, so should qualify as a Class 2 Change under the W3C Process.
/TR/CSS
and point it at the CSS2.1 spec, which is the latest and most mature CSS specification. (In the future it will point to the latest Snapshot.)