Do you want to know how the CSS WG works? Fantasai has written about:csswg, An Inside View of the CSS Working Group at W3C.
Past few telecons haven’t been very well attended, so there isn’t much to report for this month in general.
No official resolutions for 2007-11-27, but the CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders editors did agree to adopt Anne’s border-radius extended shorthand syntax proposal.
We discussed the status of REC-CSS1 and REC-CSS2 and how to put some kind of colorful notice at the top about those specs being obsolete and needing to refer to CSS2.1. There seem to be a lot of process-related difficulties with this.
We also discussed putting up a public copy of the CSS2.1 Editor’s Draft, but it’s a lot of extra manual work for Bert, so we’ll revisit that question when there are more errata and Bert’s had a chance to think about a strategy for automating some of the work. (It has a complicated build system that isn’t practical to port to dev.w3.org.) Right now it’s not really that important, since there aren’t that many errata, but Melinda and I expect more errors and omissions will turn up as we make progress on the test suite.