Editors Draft: $Date: 2011/06/23 00:03:25 $ [analysis
This document is an unapproved in-progress draft and should not be referenced or quoted under any circumstances.
Please send comments to firstname.lastname@example.org (a publicly archived list).
Any software, or collection of software components, that authors can use to create or modify web content for use by other people, is an Authoring Tool.
Authoring tools, at their best, should allow all of us to publish to a universal space of web content, read by people from all over the world, in many different languages, on many different computers, using many different input and output devices.
"Authoring tools" covers any software is used to write the web, from enterprise content management systems (CMSs) through to microblogging mobile apps, whether web-based, non-web-based or a combination. Examples include:
Authoring tools are an essential element in achieving a universal, accessible web. The ideal authoring tools produce accessible, robust web content, regardless of the technical knowledge of the content authors. They are also accessible in themselves.
Example 1: A developer creates an interface for uploading images to an events page. Although she includes the option to add alternative text descriptions with the images, it's hard to find where to add them and her interface doesn't require or encourage it. As a result, most images on the pages don't have text alternatives, thus making it is impossible for many bots and for many users with disabilities to get meaning from the photos.
Example 2: A developer is constructing a blogging interface for English/Welsh bilingual users. These are users who speak both English and Welsh, and articles and comments entered in one language are frequently replied to in the other. As comments are added, each page becomes a mixture of both languages. Unfortunately, the generated mark-up fails to apply an appropriate
lang attribute –
en for English,
cy for Welsh – to each block of content on the page. As a result, many bots and users with disabilities find half of the content unreadable.
Example 3: The owner of a popular blog wants to offer his most insightful, thoughtful comment contributors the opportunity to guest-author for a week around the theme of 'the right to self expression'. Recently, the most sparkling comment repartee is from a user with low vision and a dry wit, and she is duly invited to guest-author. The blog content is highly accessible, so she had always found adding a comment straightforward, increasing the text size and leading, and changing the colours, to suit her preference. The blog's back end authoring environment, however, has not been built with accessibility in mind. After a frustrating couple of hours, she gives up in disgust. A great opportunity is missed.
The current formally approved, stable and referenceable technical recommendation for authoring tool accessibility is ATAG 1.0.
You can implement the latest draft of the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG 2.0) by following Implementing ATAG 2.0 - a guide to implementing and understanding the guidelines.
ATAG2.0 is intended for the current and future generation of authoring tools. ATAG 2.0 is currently still a Working Draft, albeit one that the W3C believes is almost ready for use - the intent is for it to be completed and approved in 2012. Find out how you can help make ATAG better below.
ATAG is an open standard - any committed expert can become involved in developing it, it has been widely reviewed as acceptable, it is available for free on the Web, and it is royalty-free for developers and users alike.
ATAG is the result of international cooperation between the development community, industry, disability organizations, accessibility researchers, government and others interested in Web accessibility.
You can participate in the process - for example, by volunteering to help implement, promote and review guidelines; through regular (or occasional) participation in an interest group mailing list; or through dedicated participation in a Working Group such as the Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (UAWG).
A common way to get involved is reviewing and commenting on Working Drafts (and not just when it becomes a Last Call). Calls for Review and document stages are announced via: the WAI IG mailing list; twitter; identi.ca, WAI home page Highlights; and WAI Highlights RSS feed.
And you could donate some money to the grand collaborative effort, just like these WAI Sponsors.
Learn more about the current status of specifications related to:
These W3C Groups are working on the related specifications: