This document is also available in these non-normative formats: XML, XHTML with changes since version 1.0 marked, XHTML with changes since previous Working Draft marked, Independent copy of the schema for schema documents, ↓A schema for built-in datatypes only, in a separate namespace↓, Independent copy of the DTD for schema documents, and List of translations.
Copyright © 2006 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark and document use rules apply.
XML Schema: Datatypes is part 2 of the specification of the XML Schema language. It defines facilities for defining datatypes to be used in XML Schemas as well as other XML specifications. The datatype language, which is itself represented in XML↓ 1.0↓, provides a superset of the capabilities found in XML↓ 1.0↓ document type definitions (DTDs) for specifying datatypes on elements and attributes.
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
This is a ↑Last Call↑ Public Working Draft of XML Schema 1.1↑: Datatypes↑. It is here made available for review by W3C members and the public. ↓It is intended to give an indication of the W3C XML Schema Working Group's intentions for this new version of the XML Schema language and our progress in achieving them. It attempts to be complete in indicating what will change from version 1.0, but does not specify in all cases how things will change. ↓ This version of this document was created on 17 February 2006.
For those primarily interested in the changes since version 1.0, the Changes since version 1.0 (§J) appendix, which summarizes both changes already made and also those in prospect, with links to the relevant sections of this draft, is the recommended starting point. An accompanying version of this document displays in color all changes to normative text since version 1.0; another shows changes since the previous Working Draft.
The major changes since version 1.0 include:
Changes since the previous Working Draft include the following:
Comments on this document should be made in W3C's public installation of Bugzilla, specifying "XML Schema" as the product. Instructions can be found at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/01/public-bugzilla. If access to Bugzilla is not feasible, please send your comments to the W3C XML Schema comments mailing list, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org (archive) Each Bugzilla entry and email message should contain only one comment.
The end of the Last Call review period is 31 March 2006; comments received after that date will be considered if time allows, but no guarantees can be offered.
Although feedback based on any aspect of this specification is welcome, there are certain aspects of the design presented herein for which the Working Group is particularly interested in feedback. These are designated 'priority feedback' aspects of the design, and identified as such in editorial notes at appropriate points in this draft.
Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.
This document has been produced by the W3C XML Schema Working Group as part of the W3C XML Activity. The goals of the XML Schema language version 1.1 are discussed in the Requirements for XML Schema 1.1 document. The authors of this document are the members of the XML Schema Working Group. Different parts of this specification have different editors.
This document was produced under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. The Working Group maintains a public list of patent disclosures made in connection with this document; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) with respect to this specification must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.
The English version of this specification is the only normative version. Information about translations of this document is available at http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?technology=xmlschema.
The presentation of this document has been augmented to
identify changes from a previous version, controlled by dg-statusquo-color-1.0.xml, which shows differences from version 1.0 of this specification. Three kinds of changes are highlighted:
↑new, added text↑,
↑changed text↓, and
↓deleted text↓.
The Working Group has two main goals for this version of W3C XML Schema:
These goals are slightly in tension with one another -- the following summarizes the Working Group's strategic guidelines for changes between versions 1.0 and 1.1:
The overall aim as regards compatibility is that
The [XML] specification defines limited facilities for applying datatypes to document content in that documents may contain or refer to DTDs that assign types to elements and attributes. However, document authors, including authors of traditional documents and those transporting data in XML, often require a higher degree of type checking to ensure robustness in document understanding and data interchange.
The table below offers two typical examples of XML instances in which datatypes are implicit: the instance on the left represents a billing invoice, the instance on the right a memo or perhaps an email message in XML.
| Data oriented | Document oriented |
|---|---|
<invoice> <orderDate>1999-01-21</orderDate> <shipDate>1999-01-25</shipDate> <billingAddress> <name>Ashok Malhotra</name> <street>123 Microsoft Ave.</street> <city>Hawthorne</city> <state>NY</state> <zip>10532-0000</zip> </billingAddress> <voice>555-1234</voice> <fax>555-4321</fax> </invoice> |
<memo importance='high'
date='1999-03-23'>
<from>Paul V. Biron</from>
<to>Ashok Malhotra</to>
<subject>Latest draft</subject>
<body>
We need to discuss the latest
draft <emph>immediately</emph>.
Either email me at <email>
mailto:paul.v.biron@kp.org</email>
or call <phone>555-9876</phone>
</body>
</memo>
|
The invoice contains several dates and telephone numbers, the postal abbreviation for a state (which comes from an enumerated list of sanctioned values), and a ZIP code (which takes a definable regular form). The memo contains many of the same types of information: a date, telephone number, email address and an "importance" value (from an enumerated list, such as "low", "medium" or "high"). Applications which process invoices and memos need to raise exceptions if something that was supposed to be a date or telephone number does not conform to the rules for valid dates or telephone numbers.
In both cases, validity constraints exist on the content of the instances that are not expressible in XML DTDs. The limited datatyping facilities in XML have prevented validating XML processors from supplying the rigorous type checking required in these situations. The result has been that individual applications writers have had to implement type checking in an ad hoc manner. This specification addresses the need of both document authors and applications writers for a robust, extensible datatype system for XML which could be incorporated into XML processors. As discussed below, these datatypes could be used in other XML-related standards as well.
Other specifications on which this one depends are listed in References (§L).
This specification defines some datatypes which depend on definitions in [XML] and [Namespaces in XML]; those definitions, and therefore the datatypes based on them, vary between version 1.0 ([XML 1.0], [Namespaces in XML 1.0]) and version 1.1 ([XML], [Namespaces in XML]) of those specifications. In any given use of this specification, the choice of the 1.0 or the 1.1 definition of those datatypes is implementation-defined.
Conforming implementations of this specification may provide either the 1.1-based datatypes or the 1.0-based datatypes, or both. If both are supported, the choice of which datatypes to use in a particular assessment episode should be under user control.
The [XML Schema Requirements] document spells out concrete requirements to be fulfilled by this specification, which state that the XML Schema Language must:
This portion of the XML Schema Language discusses datatypes that can be used in an XML Schema. These datatypes can be specified for element content that would be specified as #PCDATA and attribute values of various types in a DTD. It is the intention of this specification that it be usable outside of the context of XML Schemas for a wide range of other XML-related activities such as [XSL] and [RDF Schema].
The terminology used to describe XML Schema Datatypes is defined in the body of this specification. The terms defined in the following list are used in building those definitions and in describing the actions of a datatype processor:
This specification provides three different kinds of normative statements about schema components, their representations in XML and their contribution to the schema-validation of information items:
This section describes the conceptual framework behind the ↑data↑type system defined in this specification. The framework has been influenced by the [ISO 11404] standard on language-independent datatypes as well as the datatypes for [SQL] and for programming languages such as Java.
The datatypes discussed in this specification are ↓computer representations of↓↑for the most part↑ well known abstract concepts such as integer and date. It is not the place of this specification to ↑thoroughly ↑define these abstract concepts; many other publications provide excellent definitions.↑ However, this specification will attempt to describe the abstract concepts well enough that they can be readily recognized and distinguished from other abstractions with which they may be confused.↑
[Definition:] In this specification, a datatype is a 3-tuple, consisting of a) a set of distinct values, called its ·value space·, b) a set of lexical representations, called its ·lexical space·, and c) a set of ·facet·s that characterize properties of the ·value space·, individual values or lexical items.
[Definition:] In this specification, a datatype has three properties:
Along with the ·lexical mapping· it is often useful to have an inverse which provides a standard ·lexical representation· for each value. Such a ·canonical mapping· is not required for schema processing, but is described herein for the benefit of users of this specification, and other specifications which might find it useful to reference these descriptions normatively. For some datatypes, notably QName and NOTATION, the mapping from lexical representations to values is context-dependent; for these types, no ·canonical mapping· is defined.
[Definition:] A value space is the set of values for a given datatype. Each value in the value space of a datatype is denoted by one or more literals in its ·lexical space·.
[Definition:] The value space of a datatype is the set of values for that datatype. Associated with each value space are selected operations and relations necessary to permit proper schema processing. Each value in the value space of a datatype is denoted by one or more character strings in its ·lexical space·, according to ·the lexical mapping·. (If the mapping is restricted during a derivation in such a way that a value has no denotation, that value is dropped from the value space.)
The value spaces of datatypes are abstractions, and are defined in ↓Built-in datatypes↓↑Built-in Datatypes and Their Definitions↑ (§3) to the extent needed to clarify them for readers. For example, in defining the numerical datatypes, we assume some general numerical concepts such as number and integer are known. In many cases we provide references to other documents providing more complete definitions.
The ·value space· of a ↓given ↓datatype can be defined in one of the following ways:
·value spaces· have certain properties. For example, they always have the property of ·cardinality·, some definition of equality and might be ·ordered·, by which individual values within the ·value space· can be compared to one another. The properties of ·value spaces· that are recognized by this specification are defined in Fundamental facets (§2.5.1).
The relations of identity, equality, and order are required for each value space. A very few datatypes have other relations or operations prescribed for the purposes of this specification.
The identity relation is always defined. Every value space inherently has an identity relation. Two things are identical if and only if they are actually the same thing: i.e., if there is no way whatever to tell them apart. The identity relation is used when making ·facet-based restrictions· by enumeration, when checking identity constraints, and when checking value constraints. These are the only uses of identity for schema processing.
In the identity relation defined herein, values from different ·primitive· datatypes' ·value spaces· are made artificially distinct if they might otherwise be considered identical. For example, there is a number two in the decimal datatype and a number two in the float datatype. In the identity relation defined herein, these two values are considered distinct. Other applications making use of these datatypes may choose to consider values such as these identical, but for the view of ·primitive· datatypes' ·value spaces· used herein, they are distinct.
WARNING: Care must be taken when identifying
values across distinct primitive datatypes. The
·literals· '0.1' and '0.10000000009' map
to the same value in float (neither is in the value
space, and each is mapped to the nearest value, namely
0.100000001490116119384765625), but map to distinct values in decimal.
Each ·primitive· datatype has prescribed an equality relation for its value space. The equality relation for most datatypes is the identity relation. In the few cases where it is not, equality has been carefully defined so that for most operations of interest to the datatype, if two values are equal and one is substituted for the other as an argument to any of the operations, the results will always also be equal.
On the other hand, equality need not cover the entire value space of the datatype (though it usually does). In particular, NaN <> NaN in the precisionDecimal, float, and double datatypes.
The equality relation is used in conjunction with order when making ·facet-based restrictions· involving order. This is the only use of equality for schema processing.
In the equality relation defined herein, values from different primitive data spaces are made artificially unequal even if they might otherwise be considered equal. For example, there is a number two in the decimal datatype and a number two in the float datatype. In the equality relation defined herein, these two values are considered unequal. Other applications making use of these datatypes may choose to consider values such as these equal (and must do so if they choose to consider them identical); nonetheless, in the equality relation defined herein, they are unequal.
For the purposes of this specification, there is one equality relation for all values of all datatypes (the union of the various datatype's individual equalities, if one consider relations to be sets of ordered pairs). The equality relation is denoted by '=' and its negation by '≠', each used as a binary infix predicate: x = y and x ≠ y . On the other hand, identity relationships are always described in words.
Each datatype has an order relation prescribed. This order may be a partial order, which means that there may be values in the ·value space· which are neither equal, less-than, nor greater-than. Such value pairs are incomparable. In many cases, the prescribed order is the "null order": the ultimate partial order, in which no pairs are less-than or greater-than; they are all equal or ·incomparable·. [Definition:] Two values that are neither equal, less-than, nor greater-than are incomparable. Two values that are not ·incomparable· are comparable. The order relation is used in conjunction with equality when making ·facet-based restrictions· involving order. This is the only use of order for schema processing.
In this specification, this less-than order relation is denoted by '<' (and its inverse by '>'), the weak order by '≤' (and its inverse by '≥'), and the resulting ·incomparable· relation by '<>', each used as a binary infix predicate: x < y , x ≤ y , x > y , x ≥ y , and x <> y .
The value spaces of primitive datatypes are abstractions, which may have values in common. In the order relation defined herein, these value spaces are made artificially ·incomparable·. For example, the numbers two and three are values in both the precisionDecimal datatype and the float datatype. In the order relation defined herein, two in the decimal datatype and three in the float datatype are incomparable values. Other applications making use of these datatypes may choose to consider values such as these comparable.
While it is not an error to attempt to compare values from the value spaces of two different primitive datatypes, they will always be ·incomparable· and therefore unequal: If x and y are in the value spaces of different primitive datatypes then x <> y (and hence x ≠ y ).
In addition to its ·value space·, each datatype also has a lexical space.
[Definition:] A lexical space is the set of valid literals for a datatype.
For example, "100" and "1.0E2" are two different literals from the ·lexical space· of float which both denote the same value. The type system defined in this specification provides a mechanism for schema designers to control the set of values and the corresponding set of acceptable literals of those values for a datatype.
While the datatypes defined in this specification have, for the most part, a single lexical representation i.e. each value in the datatype's ·value space· is denoted by a single literal in its ·lexical space·, this is not always the case. The example in the previous section showed two literals for the datatype float which denote the same value. Similarly, there ·may· be several literals for one of the date or time datatypes that denote the same value using different timezone indicators.
[Definition:] A canonical lexical representation is a set of literals from among the valid set of literals for a datatype such that there is a one-to-one mapping between literals in the canonical lexical representation and values in the ·value space·.
[Definition:] The lexical mapping for a datatype is a prescribed function whose domain is a prescribed set of character strings (the ·lexical space·) and whose range is the ·value space· of that datatype.
[Definition:] The lexical space of a datatype is the prescribed domain of ·the lexical mapping· for that datatype.
[Definition:] The members of the ·lexical space· are lexical representations of the values to which they are mapped.
[Definition:] A sequence of zero or more characters in the Universal Character Set (UCS) which may or may not prove upon inspection to be a member of the ·lexical space· of a given datatype and thus a ·lexical representation· of a given value in that datatype's ·value space·, is referred to as a literal. The term is used indifferently both for character sequences which are members of a particular ·lexical space· and for those which are not.
Should a derivation be made using a derivation mechanism that removes ·lexical representations· from the·lexical space· to the extent that one or more values cease to have any ·lexical representation·, then those values are dropped from the ·value space·.
Conversely, should a derivation remove values then their ·lexical representations· are dropped from the ·lexical space· unless there is a facet value whose impact is defined to cause the otherwise-dropped ·lexical representation· to be mapped to another value instead.
For example, '100' and '1.0E2' are two different ·lexical representations· from the float datatype which both denote the same value. The datatype system defined in this specification provides mechanisms for schema designers to control the ·value space· and the corresponding set of acceptable ·lexical representations· of those values for a datatype.
While the datatypes defined in this specification generally have a single ·lexical representation· for each value (i.e., each value in the datatype's ·value space· is denoted by a single ·representation· in its ·lexical space·), this is not always the case. The example in the previous section shows two ·lexical representations· from the float datatype which denote the same value.
[Definition:] The canonical mapping is a prescribed subset of the inverse of a ·lexical mapping· which is one-to-one and whose domain (where possible) is the entire range of the ·lexical mapping· (the ·value space·). Thus a ·canonical mapping· selects one ·lexical representation· for each value in the ·value space·.
[Definition:] The canonical representation of a value in the ·value space· of a datatype is the ·lexical representation· associated with that value by the datatype's ·canonical mapping·.
·Canonical mappings· are not available for datatypes whose ·lexical mappings· are context dependent (i.e., mappings for which the value of a ·lexical representation· depends on the context in which it occurs, or for which a character string may or may not be a valid ·lexical representation· similarly depending on its context)
[Definition:] A facet is a single defining aspect of a ·value space·. Generally speaking, each facet characterizes a ·value space· along independent axes or dimensions.
The facets of a datatype serve to distinguish those aspects of one datatype which differ from other datatypes. Rather than being defined solely in terms of a prose description the datatypes in this specification are defined in terms of the synthesis of facet values which together determine the ·value space· and properties of the datatype.
Facets are of two types: fundamental facets that define the datatype and non-fundamental or constraining facets that constrain the permitted values of a datatype.
[Definition:] A fundamental facet is an abstract property which serves to semantically characterize the values in a ·value space·.
All fundamental facets are fully described in Fundamental Facets (§4.2).
[Definition:] A constraining facet is an optional property that can be applied to a datatype to constrain its ·value space·.
Constraining the ·value space· consequently constrains the ·lexical space·. Adding ·constraining facets· to a ·base type· is described in Derivation by restriction (§4.1.2.1).
All constraining facets are fully described in Constraining Facets (§4.3).
It is useful to categorize the datatypes defined in this specification along various dimensions, ↓forming a set of characterization dichotomies↓↑defining terms which can be used to characterize datatypes and the Simple Type Definitions which define them↑.
For example, a single token which ·matches· Nmtoken from [XML] ↓could be the value↓↑is in the value space↑ of ↓an↓↑the↑ ·atomic· datatype ↓(↓NMTOKEN↓);↓↑,↑ while a sequence of such tokens ↓could be the value of a↓↑is in the value space of the↑ ·list· datatype ↓(↓NMTOKENS↓)↓.
↓·atomic· datatypes can be either ·primitive· or derived. The ·value space· of an ·atomic· datatype is a set of "atomic" values, which for the purposes of this specification, are not further decomposable. ↓↑An ·atomic· datatype has a ·value space· consisting of a set of "atomic" values which for purposes of this specification are not further decomposable. ↑ The ·lexical space· of an ·atomic· datatype is a set of ↓literals↓↑·literals·↑ whose internal structure is specific to the datatype in question. ↑There is one ·special· ·atomic· datatype (anyAtomicType), and a number of ·primitive· ·atomic· datatypes which have anyAtomicType as their ·base type·. All other ·atomic· datatypes are derived either from one of the ·primitive· ·atomic· datatypes or from another ·ordinary· ·atomic· datatype. No ·user-defined· datatype may have anyAtomicType as its ·base type·.↑
Several type systems (such as the one described in [ISO 11404]) treat ·list· datatypes as special cases of the more general notions of aggregate or collection datatypes.
↓·list·↓↑·List·↑ datatypes are always ↓·derived·↓↑·constructed·↑↑ from some other type; they are never ·primitive·↑. The ·value space· of a ·list· datatype is a set of finite-length sequences of ·atomic· values. The ·lexical space· of a ·list· datatype is a set of ·literals· ↓whose internal structure↓↑each of which↑ is a space-separated sequence of ·literals· of the ↓·atomic· datatype of the items in the ·list·↓↑·item type·↑.
[Definition:] The ·atomic· or ·union· datatype that participates in the definition of a ·list· datatype is ↓known as ↓the ↓itemType↓↑item type↑ of that ·list· datatype.↑ If the ·item type· is a ·union·, each of its ·basic members· must be ·atomic·.↑
<simpleType name='sizes'> <list itemType='decimal'/> </simpleType>
<cerealSizes xsi:type='sizes'> 8 10.5 12 </cerealSizes>
A ·list· datatype can be ↓·derived·↓↑·constructed·↑ from an ↑ordinary ↑↑or ·primitive· ↑·atomic· datatype whose ·lexical space· allows space (such as string or anyURI) or a ·union· datatype any of whose {member type definitions}'s ·lexical space· allows space. ↓In such a case, regardless of the input, list items will be separated at space boundaries.↓↑Since ·list· items are separated at whitespace before the ·lexical representations· of the items are mapped to values, no whitespace will ever occur in the ·lexical representation· of a ·list· item, even when the item type would in principle allow it. For the same reason, when every possible ·lexical representation· of a given value in the ·value space· of the ·item type· includes whitespace, that value can never occur as an item in any value of the ·list· datatype.↑
<simpleType name='listOfString'> <list itemType='string'/> </simpleType>
<someElement xsi:type='listOfString'> this is not list item 1 this is not list item 2 this is not list item 3 </someElement>
When a datatype is derived ↓from↓↑by ·restricting·↑ a ·list· datatype, the following ·constraining facets· apply:
For each of ·length·, ·maxLength· and ·minLength·, the ↓unit of ↓length is measured in number of list items. The value of ·whiteSpace· is fixed to the value collapse.
For ·list· datatypes the ·lexical space· is composed of space-separated ·literals· of ↓its↓↑the↑ ·item type·. ↓Hence, a↓↑A↑ny ·pattern· specified when a new datatype is derived from a ·list· datatype ↓is matched against each literal of the ·list· datatype and not against the literals of the datatype that serves as its ·item type·↓↑applies to the members of the ·list· datatype's ·lexical space·, not to the members of the ·lexical space· of the ·item type·.↑
<xs:simpleType name='myList'> <xs:list itemType='xs:integer'/> </xs:simpleType> <xs:simpleType name='myRestrictedList'> <xs:restriction base='myList'> <xs:pattern value='123 (\d+\s)*456'/> </xs:restriction> </xs:simpleType> <someElement xsi:type='myRestrictedList'>123 456</someElement> <someElement xsi:type='myRestrictedList'>123 987 456</someElement> <someElement xsi:type='myRestrictedList'>123 987 567 456</someElement>
The canonical-lexical-representation for the ·list· datatype is defined as the lexical form in which each item in the ·list· has the canonical lexical representation of its ·item type·.
The ·canonical mapping· of a ·list· datatype maps each value onto the space-separated concatenation of the ·canonical representations· of all the items in the value (in order), using the ·canonical mapping· of the ·item type·.
↓The ·value space· and ·lexical space· of a ·union· datatype are the union of the ·value spaces· and ·lexical spaces· of its ·member types·.↓ ↑Union types may be defined in either of two ways. When a union type is ·constructed· by ·union·, its ·value space·, ·lexical space·, and ·lexical mapping· are the "ordered unions" of the ·value spaces·, ·lexical spaces·, and ·lexical mappings· of its ·member types·. When a union type is defined by ·restricting· another ·union·, its ·value space·, ·lexical space·, and ·lexical mapping· are subsets of the ·value spaces·, ·lexical spaces·, and ·lexical mappings· of its ·base type·.↑ ·Union· datatypes are always ↓·derived·↓↑·constructed·↑↑ from other datatypes; they are never ·primitive·↑. Currently, there are no ·built-in· ·union· datatypes.
<attributeGroup name="occurs">
<attribute name="minOccurs" type="nonNegativeInteger"
use="optional" default="1"/>
<attribute name="maxOccurs"use="optional" default="1">
<simpleType>
<union>
<simpleType>
<restriction base='nonNegativeInteger'/>
</simpleType>
<simpleType>
<restriction base='string'>
<enumeration value='unbounded'/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
</union>
</simpleType>
</attribute>
</attributeGroup>
Any number (greater than ↓1↓↑0↑) of ↑ordinary ↑↑ or ·primitive· ↑↓·atomic· or ·list·↓ ↓·datatype·s ↓↑·datatypes·↑ can participate in a ·union· type.
[Definition:] The datatypes that participate in the definition of a ·union· datatype are known as the ↓memberTypes↓↑member types↑ of that ·union· datatype.
[Definition:] The transitive membership of a ·union· is the set of its own ·member types·, and the ·member types· of its members, and so on. More formally, if U is a ·union·, then (a) its ·member types· are in the transitive membership of U, and (b) for any datatypes T1 and T2, if T1 is in the transitive membership of U and T2 is one of the ·member types· of T1, then T2 is also in the transitive membership of U.
[Definition:] Those members of the ·transitive membership· of a ·union· datatype U which are themselves not ·union· datatypes are the basic members of U.
[Definition:] If a datatype M is in the ·transitive membership· of a ·union· datatype U, but not one of U's ·member types·, then a sequence of one or more ·union· datatypes necessarily exists, such that the first is one of the ·member types· if U, each is one of the ·member types· of its predecessor in the sequence, and M is one of the ·member types· of the last in the sequence. The ·union· datatypes in this sequence are said to intervene between M and U. When U and M are given by the context, the datatypes in the sequence are referred to as the intervening unions. When M is one of the ·member types· of U, the set of intervening unions is the empty set.
[Definition:] In a valid instance of any ·union·, the first of its members in order which accepts the instance as valid is the active member type. [Definition:] If the ·active member type· is itself a ·union·, one of its members will be its ·active member type·, and so on, until finally a ·basic (non-union) member· is reached. That ·basic member· is the active basic member of the union.
The order in which the ·member types· are specified in the
definition (that is, ↑in the case of
datatypes defined in a schema document, ↑the order of the
<simpleType> children of the <union>
element, or the order of the QNames in the
↓memberTypes
↓↑memberTypes
↑ attribute) is significant.
During validation, an element or attribute's value is validated against the
·member types· in the order in which they appear in the
definition until a match is found. The evaluation order can be overridden
with the use of xsi:type.
<xsd:element name='size'>
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:union>
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base='integer'/>
</xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base='string'/>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:union>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
<size>1</size> <size>large</size> <size xsi:type='xsd:string'>1</size>
The canonical-lexical-representation for a ·union· datatype is defined as the lexical form in which the values have the canonical lexical representation of the appropriate ·member types·.
The ·canonical mapping· of a ·union· datatype maps each value onto the ·canonical representation· of that value obtained using the ·canonical mapping· of the first ·member type· in whose value space it lies.
Next, we distinguish between ·primitive· and derived datatypes.
Next, we distinguish ·special·, ·primitive·, and ·ordinary· (or ·constructed·) datatypes.
For example, in this specification, float is a ↑·primitive· datatype based on a ↑well-defined mathematical concept ↓that cannot be↓↑and not↑ defined in terms of other datatypes, while↓ a↓ integer is ↓a special case of↓↑·constructed· from↑ the more general datatype decimal.
[Definition:] The simple ur-type definition is a special restriction of the ur-type definition whose name is anySimpleType in the XML Schema namespace. anySimpleType can be considered as the ·base type· of all ·primitive· datatypes. anySimpleType is considered to have an unconstrained lexical space and a ·value space· consisting of the union of the ·value spaces· of all the ·primitive· datatypes and the set of all lists of all members of the ·value spaces· of all the ·primitive· datatypes.
The datatypes defined by this specification fall into ↓both ↓ the ↑categories ·special·,↑ ·primitive·↑,↑ and ↓·derived·↓↓ categories↓↑·ordinary·↑. It is felt that a judiciously chosen set of ·primitive· datatypes will serve ↓the widest possible↓↑a wide↑ audience by providing a set of convenient datatypes that can be used as is, as well as providing a rich enough base from which ↓the↓↑a large↑ variety of datatypes needed by schema designers can be ↓·derived·↓↑·constructed·↑.
As described in more detail in XML Representation of Simple Type Definition Schema Components (§4.1.2), each ·user-derived· datatype ·must· be defined in terms of another datatype in one of three ways: 1) by assigning ·constraining facets· which serve to restrict the ·value space· of the ·user-derived· datatype to a subset of that of the ·base type·; 2) by creating a ·list· datatype whose ·value space· consists of finite-length sequences of values of its ·item type·; or 3) by creating a ·union· datatype whose ·value space· consists of the union of the ·value spaces· of its ·member types·.
[Definition:] A datatype is said to be derived by restriction from another datatype when values for zero or more ·constraining facets· are specified that serve to constrain its ·value space· and/or its ·lexical space· to a subset of those of its ·base type·.
[Definition:] A datatype is defined by facet-based restriction of another datatype (its ·base type·), when values for zero or more ·constraining facets· are specified that serve to constrain its ·value space· and/or its ·lexical space· to a subset of those of the ·base type·. The ·base type· of a ·facet-based restriction· must be a ·primitive· or ·ordinary· datatype.
[Definition:] Every datatype that is derived by ·restriction· is defined in terms of an existing datatype, referred to as its base type. Base types can be either ·primitive· or derived.
A ·list· datatype can be ↓·derived·↓↑·constructed·↑ from another datatype (its ·item type·) by creating a ·value space· that consists of a finite-length sequence of values of its ·item type·. ↑Datatypes so ·constructed· have anySimpleType as their ·base type·. Note that since the ·value space· and ·lexical space· of any ·list· datatype are necessarily subsets of the ·value space· and ·lexical space· of anySimpleType, any datatype ·constructed· as a ·list· is a ·restriction· of its base type. ↑
One datatype can be ↓·derived·↓↑·constructed·↑ from one or more datatypes by ↓·union·ing↓↑unioning↑ their ↓·value spaces·↓↑·lexical mappings·↑ and, consequently, their ↑·value spaces· and↑ ↓·lexical spaces·↓↑·lexical spaces·↑. ↑Datatypes so ·constructed· also have anySimpleType as their ·base type·. Note that since the ·value space· and ·lexical space· of any ·union· datatype are necessarily subsets of the ·value space· and ·lexical space· of anySimpleType, any datatype ·constructed· as a ·union· is a ·restriction· of its base type. ↑
Definition, derivation, restriction, and construction are conceptually distinct, although in practice they are frequently performed by the same mechanisms.
By 'definition' is meant the explicit identification of the relevant properties of a datatype, in particular its ·value space·, ·lexical space·, and ·lexical mapping·.
The properties of the ·special· and ·primitive· datatypes are defined by this specification. A Simple Type Definition is present for each of these datatypes in every valid schema; it serves as a representation of the datatype, but by itself it does not capture all the relevant information and does not suffice (without knowledge of this specification) to define the datatype.
For all other datatypes, a Simple Type Definition does suffice. The properties of an ·ordinary· datatype can be inferred from the datatype's Simple Type Definition and the properties of the ·base type·, ·item type· if any, and ·member types· if any. All ·ordinary· datatypes can be defined in this way.
By 'derivation' is meant the relation of a datatype to its ·base type·, or to the ·base type· of its ·base type·, and so on.
[Definition:] Every datatype is associated with another datatype, its base type. Base types can be ·special·, ·primitive·, or ·ordinary·.
[Definition:] A datatype T is immediately derived from another datatype X if and only if X is the ·base type· of T.
More generally, [Definition:] A datatype R is derived from another datatype B if and only if one of the following is true:
It is a consequence of these definitions that every datatype other than anySimpleType is derived from anySimpleType.
Since each datatype has exactly one ·base type·, and every datatype is derived directly or indirectly from anySimpleType, it follows that the ·base type· relation arranges all simple types into a tree structure, which is conventionally referred to as the derivation hierarchy.
By 'restriction' is meant the definition of a datatype whose ·value space· and ·lexical space· are subsets of those of its ·base type·.
Formally, [Definition:] A datatype R is a restriction of another datatype B when
Note that all three forms of datatype ·construction· produce ·restrictions· of the ·base type·: ·facet-based restriction· does so by means of ·constraining facets·, while ·construction· by ·list· or ·union· does so because those ·constructions· take anySimpleType as the ·base type·. It follows that all datatypes are ·restrictions· of anySimpleType. This specification provides no means by which a datatype may be defined so as to have a larger ·lexical space· or ·value space· than its ·base type·.
By 'construction' is meant the creation of a datatype by defining it in terms of another.
[Definition:] All ·ordinary· datatypes are defined in terms of, or constructed from, other datatypes, either by ·restricting· the ·value space· or ·lexical space· of a ·base type· using zero or more ·constraining facets· or by specifying the new datatype as a ·list· of items of some ·item type·, or by defining it as a ·union· of some specified sequence of ·member types·. These three forms of ·construction· are often called "·facet-based restriction·", "·construction· by ·list·", and "·construction· by ·union·", respectively. Datatypes so constructed may be understood fully (for purposes of a type system) in terms of (a) the properties of the datatype(s) from which they are constructed, and (b) their Simple Type Definition. This distinguishes ·ordinary· datatypes from the ·special· and ·primitive· datatypes, which can be understood only in the light of documentation (namely, their descriptions elsewhere in this specification). All ·ordinary· datatypes are ·constructed·, and all ·constructed· datatypes are ·ordinary·.
Conceptually there is no difference between the ↑·ordinary·↑ ·built-in· ↓·derived·↓ datatypes included in this specification and the ↓·user-derived·↓↑·user-defined·↑ datatypes which will be created by individual schema designers. The ·built-in· ↓·derived·↓↑·constructed·↑ datatypes are those which are believed to be so common that if they were not defined in this specification many schema designers would end up ↓"reinventing"↓↑reinventing↑ them. Furthermore, including these ↓·derived·↓↑·constructed·↑ datatypes in this specification serves to demonstrate the mechanics and utility of the datatype generation facilities of this specification.
Each built-in datatype in this specification ↓(both ·primitive· and derived)↓ can be uniquely addressed via a URI Reference constructed as follows:
For example, to address the int datatype, the URI is:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int
Additionally, each facet definition element can be uniquely addressed via a URI constructed as follows:
For example, to address the maxInclusive facet, the URI is:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#maxInclusive
Additionally, each facet usage in a built-in ↓datatype definition↓ ↑Simple Type Definition↑ can be uniquely addressed via a URI constructed as follows:
.') followed by the name of the facet
For example, to address the usage of the maxInclusive facet in the definition of int, the URI is:
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int.maxInclusive
The ·built-in· datatypes defined by this specification are designed to be used with the XML Schema definition language as well as other XML specifications. To facilitate usage within the XML Schema definition language, the ·built-in· datatypes in this specification have the namespace name:
To facilitate usage in specifications other than the XML Schema definition language, such as those that do not want to know anything about aspects of the XML Schema definition language other than the datatypes, each ↑non-·special·↑ ·built-in· datatype is also defined in the namespace whose URI is:
This applies to both ·built-in· ·primitive· and ·built-in· derived datatypes.
XMLSchema-datatypes namespace and the definitions therein are deprecated as of
XML Schema 1.1.Each ↓·user-derived·↓↑·user-defined·↑ datatype is also associated with a unique namespace. However, ↓·user-derived·↓↑·user-defined·↑ datatypes do not come from the namespace defined by this specification; rather, they come from the namespace of the schema in which they are defined (see XML Representation of Schemas in [XML Schema Part 1: Structures]).
The two datatypes at the root of the hierarchy of simple types are anySimpleType and anyAtomicType.
[Definition:] The definition of anySimpleType is a special ·restriction· of anyType. anySimpleType has an unconstrained ·lexical space·, a ·value space· consisting of the union of the ·value spaces· of all the ·primitive· datatypes and the set of all lists of all members of the ·value spaces· of all the ·primitive· datatypes.
For further details of anySimpleType and its representation as a Simple Type Definition, see Built-in Simple Type Definitions (§4.1.7).
The ·value space· of anySimpleType is the union of the ·value spaces· of all the ·primitive· datatypes defined here, and of all sets of lists formed from the members of the ·primitive· datatypes.
The ·lexical space· of anySimpleType is the set of all finite-length sequences of characters (as defined in [XML]) that ·match· the Char production from [XML]. This is equivalent to the union of the ·lexical spaces· of all ·primitive· and all possible ·ordinary· datatypes.
It is implementation-defined whether an implementation of this specification supports the Char production from [XML], or that from [XML 1.0], or both. See Dependencies on Other Specifications (§1.3).
The ·lexical mapping· of anySimpleType is the union
of the ·lexical mappings· of
all ·primitive· datatypes and all list datatypes.
It will be noted that this mapping is not a function: a given
·literal· may map to one value or to several values of different
·primitive· datatypes, and it may be indeterminate which value is to
be preferred in a particular context. When the datatypes defined here
are used in the context of [XML Schema Part 1: Structures], the
xsi:type attribute defined by that specification in section
xsi:type can be used
to indicate which value a ·literal· which is the content of an element
should map to. In other contexts, other rules (such as type coercion
rules) may be employed to determine which value is to be used.
When a new datatype is defined by ·facet-based restriction·, anySimpleType must not be used as the ·base type·. So no ·constraining facets· are directly applicable to anySimpleType.
[Definition:] anyAtomicType is a special ·restriction· of anySimpleType. The ·value· and ·lexical spaces· of anyAtomicType are the unions of the ·value· and ·lexical spaces· of all the ·primitive· datatypes, and anyAtomicType is their ·base type·.
For further details of anyAtomicType and its representation as a Simple Type Definition, see Built-in Simple Type Definitions (§4.1.7).
The ·value space· of anyAtomicType is the union of the ·value spaces· of all the ·primitive· datatypes defined here.
The ·lexical space· of anyAtomicType is the set of all finite-length sequences of characters (as defined in [XML]) that ·match· the Char production from [XML]. This is equivalent to the union of the ·lexical spaces· of all ·primitive· datatypes.
It is implementation-defined whether an implementation of this specification supports the Char production from [XML], or that from [XML 1.0], or both. See Dependencies on Other Specifications (§1.3).
The ·lexical mapping· of anyAtomicType is the union
of the ·lexical mappings· of
all ·primitive· datatypes.
It will be noted that this mapping is not a function: a given
·literal· may map to one value or to several values of different
·primitive· datatypes, and it may be indeterminate which value is to
be preferred in a particular context. When the datatypes defined here
are used in the context of [XML Schema Part 1: Structures], the
xsi:type attribute defined by that specification in section
xsi:type can be used
to indicate which value a ·literal· which is the content of an element
should map to. In other contexts, other rules (such as type coercion
rules) may be employed to determine which value is to be used.
When a new datatype is defined by ·facet-based restriction·, anyAtomicType must not be used as the ·base type·. So no ·constraining facets· are directly applicable to anyAtomicType.
The ·primitive· datatypes defined by this specification are described below. For each datatype, the ·value space· ↑is described; ↑↓and ↓↑the ↑·lexical space· ↓are↓↑is↑ defined↓,↓ ↑using an extended Backus Naur Format grammar (and in most cases also a regular expression using the regular expression language of Regular Expressions (§I));↑ ·constraining facets· which apply to the datatype are listed↑;↑ and any datatypes ↓·derived·↓↑·constructed·↑ from this datatype are specified.
↓·primitive·↓↑·Primitive·↑ datatypes can only be added by revisions to this specification.
[Definition:] The string datatype represents character strings in XML.↓ The ·value space· of string is the set of finite-length sequences of characters (as defined in [XML]) that ·match· the Char production from [XML]. A character is an atomic unit of communication; it is not further specified except to note that every character has a corresponding Universal Character Set code point, which is an integer.↓
The ·value space· of string is the set of finite-length sequences of characters (as defined in [XML]) that ·match· the Char production from [XML]. A character is an atomic unit of communication; it is not further specified except to note that every character has a corresponding Universal Character Set (UCS) code point, which is an integer.
It is implementation-defined whether an implementation of this specification supports the Char production from [XML], or that from [XML 1.0], or both. See Dependencies on Other Specifications (§1.3).
Equality for string is identity. No order is prescribed.
The ·lexical space· of string is the set of finite-length sequences of characters (as defined in [XML]) that ·match· the Char production from [XML].
It is implementation-defined whether an implementation of this specification supports the Char production from [XML], or that from [XML 1.0], or both. See Dependencies on Other Specifications (§1.3).
The ·lexical mapping· for string is ·stringLexicalMap·, and the ·canonical mapping· is ·stringCanonicalMap·; each is a subset of the identity function.
↓string has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑string has the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with the values shown; these facets may be further restricted in the derivation of new types:↑
preserve↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from string↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
string has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
The following ·built-in· datatypes are ·derived· from string:
[Definition:] boolean ↓has the ·value space· required to support the mathematical concept of binary-valued logic: {true, false}↓↑represents the values of two-valued logic↑.
boolean has the ·value space· of two-valued logic: {true, false}.
An instance of a datatype that is defined as ·boolean· can have the following legal literals {true, false, 1, 0}.
The ·canonical representation· for boolean is the set of literals {true, false}.
boolean's lexical space is a set of four ·literals·:
The ·lexical mapping· for boolean is ·booleanLexicalMap·; the ·canonical mapping· is ·booleanCanonicalMap·.
↓boolean has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑boolean and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from boolean↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
boolean has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] decimal represents a subset of the real numbers, which can be represented by decimal numerals. The ·value space· of decimal is the set of numbers that can be obtained by ↓multiplying↓↑dividing↑ an integer by a non-↓positive↓↑negative↑ power of ten, i.e., expressible as ↓i × 10^-n↓↑i / 10n↑ where i and n are integers and ↓n >= 0↓↑n ≥ 0↑. Precision is not reflected in this value space; the number 2.0 is not distinct from the number 2.00. ↑(The datatype precisionDecimal may be used for values in which precision is significant.)↑ The ↓·order-relation·↓↑order relation↑ on decimal is the order relation on real numbers, restricted to this subset.
decimal
has a lexical representation
consisting of a finite-length sequence of decimal digits (#x30–#x39) separated
by a period as a decimal indicator.
An optional leading sign is allowed.
If the sign is omitted,
"+"
is assumed. Leading and trailing zeroes are optional.
If the fractional part is zero, the period and following zero(es) can
be omitted.
For example:
-1.23, 12678967.543233, +100000.00,
210.
The lexical space of decimal is the set of
lexical representations which match the grammar given above, or
(equivalently) the regular expression
'-?(([0-9]+(.[0-9]*)?)|(.[0-9]+))'.
The mapping from lexical representations to values is the usual one for decimal numerals; it is given formally in:
The mapping from lexical representations to values is the usual one for decimal numerals; it is given formally in ·decimalLexicalMap·.
The mapping from values to ·canonical representations· is given formally in ·decimalCanonicalMap·.
The ·canonical representation· for decimal is defined by prohibiting certain options from the Lexical ↓representation↓↑Mapping↑ (§3.3.3.1). Specifically, the preceding optional "+" sign is prohibited. The decimal point is required. Leading and trailing zeroes are prohibited subject to the following: there must be at least one digit to the right and to the left of the decimal point which may be a zero.
The mapping from values to ·canonical representations· is given formally in ·decimalCanonicalMap·.
↓decimal has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑decimal and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from decimal↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
decimal has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
The following ·built-in· datatypes are ·derived· from decimal:
[Definition:] The precisionDecimal datatype represents the numeric value and (arithmetic) precision of decimal numbers which retain precision; it also includes special values for positive and negative infinity and "not a number", and it differentiates between "positive zero" and "negative zero". This datatype is introduced to provide a variant of decimal that closely corresponds to the floating-point decimal datatypes described by the expected forthcoming revision of IEEE/ANSI 754. Precision of values is retained, and the special values (two zeroes, infinities, and not-a-number) are included.
Precision is sometimes given in absolute, sometimes in relative terms. [Definition:] The arithmetic precision of a value is expressed in absolute quantitative terms, by indicating how many digits to the right of the decimal point are significant. "5" has an arithmetic precision of 0, and "5.01" an arithmetic precision of 2.
NaN'. Accordingly, in English text we
use 'NaN' to refer to that value. Similarly we use 'INF'
and '−INF' to refer to the two value objects whose ·numericalValue·
is positiveInfinity and negativeInfinity. These three value objects
are also informally called "not-a-number", "positive infinity",
and "negative infinity".
The latter two together are called
"the infinities".Equality and order for precisionDecimal are defined as follows:
precisionDecimal's lexical space is the set of all
decimal numerals with or without a decimal
point, numerals in scientific (exponential) notation, and
the character strings 'INF',
'+INF', '-INF',
and 'NaN'.
The ·lexical mapping· for precisionDecimal is ·precisionDecimalLexicalMap·. The ·canonical mapping· is ·precisionDecimalCanonicalMap·.
↓precisionDecimal has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑precisionDecimal and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from precisionDecimal↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
precisionDecimal has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] ↑The ↑float↑ datatype↑ is↓ patterned after↓ the IEEE single-precision 32-bit floating point ↑data↑type [IEEE 754-1985]↑ with the minor exception noted below↑.↓ The basic ·value space· of float consists of the values m × 2^e, where m is an integer whose absolute value is less than 2^24, and e is an integer between -149 and 104, inclusive. In addition to the basic ·value space· described above, the ·value space· of float also contains the following three special values: positive and negative infinity and not-a-number (NaN). The ·order-relation· on float is: x < y iff y - x is positive for x and y in the value space. Positive infinity is greater than all other non-NaN values. NaN equals itself but is incomparable with (neither greater than nor less than) any other value in the ·value space·. ↓↑ Floating point numbers are certain subsets of the rational numbers, and are often used to approximate arbitrary real numbers.↑
A ·literal· in the ·lexical space· representing a decimal number d maps to the normalized value in the ·value space· of float that is closest to d in the sense defined by [Clinger, WD (1990)]; if d is exactly halfway between two such values then the even value is chosen.
The ·value space· of float contains the non-zero numbers m × 2e , where m is an integer whose absolute value is less than 224, and e is an integer between −149 and 104, inclusive. In addition to these values, the ·value space· of float also contains the following special values: positiveZero, negativeZero, positiveInfinity, negativeInfinity, and notANumber.
NaN'. Accordingly, in English
text we generally use 'NaN' to refer to that value. Similarly,
we use 'INF' and '−INF' to refer to the two
values positiveInfinity and negativeInfinity,
and '0' and '−0' to refer to
positiveZero and negativeZero.Equality and order for float are defined as follows:
float values have a lexical representation
consisting of a mantissa followed, optionally, by the character
'E' or 'e',
followed by an exponent. The exponent ·must·
be an integer. The mantissa must be a
decimal number. The representations
for exponent and mantissa must follow the lexical rules for
integer and decimal. If the
'E' or 'e' and
the following exponent are omitted, an exponent value of 0 is assumed.
The special values
positive
and negative infinity and not-a-number have lexical representations
INF, -INF and
NaN, respectively.
Lexical representations for zero may take a positive or negative sign.
For example, -1E4, 1267.43233E12, 12.78e-2, 12
, -0, 0
and INF are all legal ·literals· for float.
The ·canonical representation· for float is defined by prohibiting certain options from the Lexical representation (§3.3.5.2). Specifically, the exponent must be indicated by "E". Leading zeroes and the preceding optional "+" sign are prohibited in the exponent. If the exponent is zero, it must be indicated by "E0". For the mantissa, the preceding optional "+" sign is prohibited and the decimal point is required. Leading and trailing zeroes are prohibited subject to the following: number representations must be normalized such that there is a single digit which is non-zero to the left of the decimal point and at least a single digit to the right of the decimal point unless the value being represented is zero. The ·canonical representation· for zero is 0.0E0.
The ·lexical space· of float is
the set of all decimal numerals with or without a decimal
point, numerals in scientific (exponential) notation, and
the ·literals· 'INF',
'-INF', and 'NaN'
The floatRep production is equivalent to this regular expression:
(-|+)?(([0-9]+(.[0-9]*)?)|(.[0-9]+))((e|E)(-|+)?[0-9]+)?|-?INF|NaN
The float datatype is designed to implement for schema processing the single-precision floating-point datatype of [IEEE 754-1985]. That specification does not specify specific ·lexical representations·, but does prescribe requirements on any ·lexical mapping· used. Any ·lexical mapping· that maps the ·lexical space· just described onto the ·value space·, satisfies the requirements of [IEEE 754-1985], and correctly handles the special values (numericalSpecialRep ·literals·), satisfies the conformance requirements of this specification.
Since IEEE allows some variation in rounding of values, processors conforming to this specification may exhibit some variation in their ·lexical mappings·.
The ·lexical mapping· ·floatLexicalMap· is provided as an example of a simple algorithm that yields a conformant mapping, and that provides the most accurate rounding possible—and is thus useful for insuring inter-implementation reproducibility and inter-implementation round-tripping. The simple rounding algorithm used in ·floatLexicalMap· may be more efficiently implemented using the algorithms of [Clinger, WD (1990)].
The ·canonical mapping· ·floatCanonicalMap· is provided as an example of a mapping that does not produce unnecessarily long ·canonical representations·. Other algorithms which do not yield identical results for mapping from float values to character strings are permitted by [IEEE 754-1985].
↓float has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑float and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from float↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
float has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] The double datatype is↓ patterned after↓ the IEEE double-precision 64-bit floating point ↑data↑type [IEEE 754-1985]↑ with the minor exception noted below↑.↓ The basic ·value space· of double consists of the values m × 2^e, where m is an integer whose absolute value is less than 253, and e is an integer between -1075 and 970, inclusive. In addition to the basic ·value space· described above, the ·value space· of double also contains the following three special values: positive and negative infinity and not-a-number (NaN). The ·order-relation· on double is: x < y iff y - x is positive for x and y in the value space. Positive infinity is greater than all other non-NaN values. NaN equals itself but is incomparable with (neither greater than nor less than) any other value in the ·value space·. ↓↑ Floating point numbers are certain subsets of the rational numbers, and are often used to approximate arbitrary real numbers.↑
A ·literal· in the ·lexical space· representing a decimal number d maps to the normalized value in the ·value space· of double that is closest to d; if d is exactly halfway between two such values then the even value is chosen. This is the best approximation of d ([Clinger, WD (1990)], [Gay, DM (1990)]), which is more accurate than the mapping required by [IEEE 754-1985].
The ·value space· of double contains the non-zero numbers m × 2e , where m is an integer whose absolute value is less than 253, and e is an integer between −1074 and 971, inclusive. In addition to these values, the ·value space· of double also contains the following special values: positiveZero, negativeZero, positiveInfinity, negativeInfinity, and notANumber.
NaN'. Accordingly, in English
text we generally use 'NaN' to refer to that value. Similarly,
we use 'INF' and '−INF' to refer to the two
values positiveInfinity and negativeInfinity,
and '0' and '−0' to refer to
positiveZero and negativeZero.Equality and order for double are defined as follows:
double values have a lexical representation
consisting of a mantissa followed, optionally, by the character "E" or
"e", followed by an exponent. The exponent ·must· be
an integer. The mantissa must be
a decimal number. The representations
for exponent and mantissa must follow the lexical rules for
integer and
decimal. If the 'E' or 'e' and
the following exponent are omitted, an exponent value of 0 is assumed.
The special values
positive
and negative infinity and not-a-number have lexical representations
INF, -INF and
NaN, respectively.
Lexical representations for zero may take a positive or negative sign.
For example, -1E4, 1267.43233E12, 12.78e-2, 12
, -0, 0
and INF
are all legal ·literals· for double.
The ·canonical representation· for double is defined by prohibiting certain options from the Lexical representation (§3.3.6.2). Specifically, the exponent must be indicated by "E". Leading zeroes and the preceding optional "+" sign are prohibited in the exponent. If the exponent is zero, it must be indicated by "E0". For the mantissa, the preceding optional "+" sign is prohibited and the decimal point is required. Leading and trailing zeroes are prohibited subject to the following: number representations must be normalized such that there is a single digit which is non-zero to the left of the decimal point and at least a single digit to the right of the decimal point unless the value being represented is zero. The ·canonical representation· for zero is 0.0E0.
The ·lexical space· of double is
the set of all decimal numerals with or without a decimal
point, numerals in scientific (exponential) notation, and
the ·literals· 'INF',
'-INF', and 'NaN'
The doubleRep production is equivalent to this regular expression:
(-|+)?(([0-9]+(.[0-9]*)?)|(.[0-9]+))((e|E)(-|+)?[0-9]+)?|-?INF|NaN
The double datatype is designed to implement for schema processing the double-precision floating-point datatype of [IEEE 754-1985]. That specification does not specify specific ·lexical representations·, but does prescribe requirements on any ·lexical mapping· used. Any ·lexical mapping· that maps the ·lexical space· just described onto the ·value space·, satisfies the requirements of [IEEE 754-1985], and correctly handles the special values (numericalSpecialRep ·literals·), satisfies the conformance requirements of this specification.
Since IEEE allows some variation in rounding of values, processors conforming to this specification may exhibit some variation in their ·lexical mappings·.
The ·lexical mapping· ·doubleLexicalMap· is provided as an example of a simple algorithm that yields a conformant mapping, and that provides the most accurate rounding possible—and is thus useful for insuring inter-implementation reproducibility and inter-implementation round-tripping. The simple rounding algorithm used in ·doubleLexicalMap· may be more efficiently implemented using the algorithms of [Clinger, WD (1990)].
The ·canonical mapping· ·doubleCanonicalMap· is provided as an example of a mapping that does not produce unnecessarily long ·canonical representations·. Other algorithms which do not yield identical results for mapping from float values to character strings are permitted by [IEEE 754-1985].
↓double has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑double and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from double↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
double has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] duration represents a duration of time. The ·value space· of duration is a six-dimensional space where the coordinates designate the Gregorian year, month, day, hour, minute, and second components defined in § 5.5.3.2 of [ISO 8601], respectively. These components are ordered in their significance by their order of appearance i.e. as year, month, day, hour, minute, and second.
Note:
All ·minimally conforming· processors ·must· support year values with a minimum of 4 digits (i.e.,YYYY) and a minimum fractional second precision of
milliseconds or three decimal digits (i.e. s.sss).
However, ·minimally conforming· processors
·may· set an application-defined limit on the maximum number
of digits they are prepared to support in these two cases, in which
case that application-defined maximum number ·must·
be clearly documented.
[Definition:] duration
is a datatype that represents
durations of time. The concept of duration being captured is
drawn from those of [ISO 8601], specifically
durations without fixed endpoints. For example,
"15 days" (whose most common lexical representation
in duration is "'P15D'") is
a duration value; "15 days beginning 12 July
1995" and "15 days ending 12 July 1995" are
not. duration can provide addition and
subtraction operations between duration values and
between duration/dateTime value pairs,
and can be the result of subtracting dateTime
values. However, only addition to dateTime
is required for XML Schema processing and is
defined in
the function ·dateTimePlusDuration·.
Duration values can be modelled as two-property tuples. Each value consists of an integer number of months and a decimal number of seconds. The ·seconds· value must not be negative if the ·months· value is positive and must not be positive if the ·months· is negative.
duration is partially ordered. Equality of duration is defined in terms of equality of dateTime; order for duration is defined in terms of the order of dateTime. Specifically, the equality or order of two duration values is determined by adding each duration in the pair to each of the following four dateTime values:
If all four resulting dateTime value pairs are ordered the same way (less than, equal, or greater than), then the original pair of duration values is ordered the same way; otherwise the original pair is ·incomparable·.
Under the definition just given, two duration values are equal if and only if they are identical.
Note:
Two totally ordered datatypes (yearMonthDuration and dayTimeDuration) are derived from duration in ↓Derived datatypes↓↑Other Built-in Datatypes↑ (§3.4).The lexical representation for duration is the [ISO 8601] extended format PnYn MnDTnH nMnS, where nY represents the number of years, nM the number of months, nD the number of days, 'T' is the date/time separator, nH the number of hours, nM the number of minutes and nS the number of seconds. The number of seconds can include decimal digits to arbitrary precision.
The values of the Year, Month, Day, Hour and Minutes components are not restricted but allow an arbitrary integer. Similarly, the value of the Seconds component allows an arbitrary decimal. Thus, the lexical representation of duration does not follow the alternative format of § 5.5.3.2.1 of [ISO 8601].
An optional preceding minus sign ('-') is allowed, to indicate a negative duration. If the sign is omitted a positive duration is indicated. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).
For example, to indicate a duration of 1 year, 2 months, 3 days, 10
hours, and 30 minutes, one would write: P1Y2M3DT10H30M.
One could also indicate a duration of minus 120 days as:
-P120D.
Reduced precision and truncated representations of this format are allowed provided they conform to the following:
For example, P1347Y, P1347M and P1Y2MT2H are all allowed; P0Y1347M and P0Y1347M0D are allowed. P-1347M is not allowed although -P1347M is allowed. P1Y2MT is not allowed.
The ·lexical representations· of duration are more or less based on the pattern:
PnYnMnDTnHnMnS
More precisely, the ·lexical space· of duration is the set of character strings that satisfy durationLexicalRep as defined by the following productions:
T' ((duHourFrag duMinuteFrag? duSecondFrag?) |
(duMinuteFrag duSecondFrag?) |
duSecondFrag)
Thus, a durationLexicalRep consists of one or more of a duYearFrag,
duMonthFrag, duDayFrag, duHourFrag,
duMinuteFrag, and/or duSecondFrag, in order, with letters
'P' and 'T' (and perhaps a '-')
where appropriate.
The language accepted by the durationLexicalRep production is the set of strings which satisfy all of the following three regular expressions:
-?P([0-9]+Y)?([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+D)?(T([0-9]+H)?([0-9]+M)?((([0-9]+(.[0-9]*)?)|(.[0-9]+))S)?)?' matches only strings in which the fields occur in the proper order..*[YMDHS].*' matches only
strings in which at least one field occurs..*[^T]' matches
only strings in which 'T' is not the final character, so that
if 'T' appears, something follows it. The first rule
ensures that what follows 'T' will be an hour,
minute, or second field.The intersection of these three regular expressions is equivalent to the following (after removal of the white space inserted here for legibility):
-?P(((([0-9]+Y([0-9]+M)?)|
( ([0-9]+M) ) )(([0-9]+D(T(([0-9]+H([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
( ([0-9]+M) ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
( ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S) ) ))?)|
( (T(([0-9]+H([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
( ([0-9]+M) ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
( ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S) ) )) ) )?)|
( (([0-9]+D(T(([0-9]+H([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
( ([0-9]+M) ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
( ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S) ) ))?)|
( (T(([0-9]+H([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
( ([0-9]+M) ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
( ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S) ) )) ) ) ) )
The ·lexical mapping· for duration is ·durationMap·.
·The canonical mapping· for duration is ·durationCanonicalMap·.
In general, the ·order-relation· on duration is a partial order since there is no determinate relationship between certain durations such as one month (P1M) and 30 days (P30D). The ·order-relation· of two duration values x and y is x < y iff s+x < s+y for each qualified dateTime s in the list below. These values for s cause the greatest deviations in the addition of dateTimes and durations. Addition of durations to time instants is defined in Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).
The following table shows the strongest relationship that can be determined between example durations. The symbol <> means that the order relation is indeterminate. Note that because of leap-seconds, a seconds field can vary from 59 to 60. However, because of the way that addition is defined in Adding durations to dateTimes (§H), they are still totally ordered.
| Relation | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1Y | > P364D | <> P365D | <> P366D | < P367D | |||
| P1M | > P27D | <> P28D | <> P29D | <> P30D | <> P31D | < P32D | |
| P5M | > P149D | <> P150D | <> P151D | <> P152D | <> P153D | < P154D | |
Implementations are free to optimize the computation of the ordering relationship. For example, the following table can be used to compare durations of a small number of months against days.
| Months | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ... | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days | Minimum | 28 | 59 | 89 | 120 | 150 | 181 | 212 | 242 | 273 | 303 | 334 | 365 | 393 | ... |
| Maximum | 31 | 62 | 92 | 123 | 153 | 184 | 215 | 245 | 276 | 306 | 337 | 366 | 397 | ... |
In comparing duration values with minInclusive, minExclusive, maxInclusive and maxExclusive facet values, indeterminate comparisons should be considered as "false".
Certain derived datatypes of durations can be guaranteed have a total order. For this, they must have fields from only one row in the list below and the time zone must either be required or prohibited.
For example, a datatype could be defined to correspond to the [SQL] datatype Year-Month interval that required a four digit year field and a two digit month field but required all other fields to be unspecified. This datatype could be defined as below and would have a total order.
<simpleType name='SQL-Year-Month-Interval'>
<restriction base='duration'>
<pattern value='P\p{Nd}{4}Y\p{Nd}{2}M'/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>↓duration has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑duration and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from duration↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
duration has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
The following ·built-in· datatypes are ·derived· from duration:
[Definition:] dateTime values may be viewed as objects with integer-valued year, month, day, hour and minute properties, a decimal-valued second property, and a boolean timezoned property. Each such object also has one decimal-valued method or computed property, timeOnTimeline, whose value is always a decimal number; the values are dimensioned in seconds, the integer 0 is 0001-01-01T00:00:00 and the value of timeOnTimeline for other dateTime values is computed using the Gregorian algorithm as modified for leap-seconds. The timeOnTimeline values form two related "timelines", one for timezoned values and one for non-timezoned values. Each timeline is a copy of the ·value space· of decimal, with integers given units of seconds.
dateTime represents instants of time, optionally marked with a particular timezone. Values representing the same instant but having different timezones are equal but not identical.
The ·value space· of dateTime is closely related to the dates and times described in ISO 8601. For clarity, the text above specifies a particular origin point for the timeline. It should be noted, however, that schema processors need not expose the timeOnTimeline value to schema users, and there is no requirement that a timeline-based implementation use the particular origin described here in its internal representation. Other interpretations of the ·value space· which lead to the same results (i.e., are isomorphic) are of course acceptable.
All timezoned times are Coordinated Universal Time (·UTC·, sometimes called "Greenwich Mean Time"). Other timezones indicated in lexical representations are converted to ·UTC· during conversion of literals to values. "Local" or untimezoned times are presumed to be the time in the timezone of some unspecified locality as prescribed by the appropriate legal authority; currently there are no legally prescribed timezones which are durations whose magnitude is greater than 14 hours. The value of each numeric-valued property (other than timeOnTimeline) is limited to the maximum value within the interval determined by the next-higher property. For example, the day value can never be 32, and cannot even be 29 for month 02 and year 2002 (February 2002).
Note:
The date and time datatypes described in this recommendation were inspired by [ISO 8601]. '0001' is the lexical representation of the year 1 of the Common Era (1 CE, sometimes written "AD 1" or "1 AD"). There is no year 0, and '0000' is not a valid lexical representation. '-0001' is the lexical representation of the year 1 Before Common Era (1 BCE, sometimes written "1 BC").Those using this (1.0) version of this Recommendation to represent negative years should be aware that the interpretation of lexical representations beginning with a'-' is likely to change in
subsequent versions.
[ISO 8601]
makes no mention of the year 0; in [ISO 8601:1998 Draft Revision]
the form '0000' was disallowed and this recommendation disallows it as well.
However, [ISO 8601:2000 Second Edition], which became
available just as we were completing version
1.0, allows the form '0000', representing the year
1 BCE. A number of external commentators
have also suggested that '0000' be
allowed, as the lexical representation for 1 BCE,
which is the normal usage in
astronomical contexts.
It is the intention of the XML Schema
Working Group to allow '0000' as a lexical representation in the
dateTime, date, gYear, and
gYearMonth datatypes in a subsequent version
of this Recommendation. '0000' will be the lexical representation of 1
BCE (which is a leap year), '-0001' will become the lexical representation of 2
BCE (not 1 BCE as in this (1.0) version), '-0002' of 3 BCE, etc.
dateTime uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with no properties except ·timezone· permitted to be absent. The ·timezone· property remains ·optional·.
Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1). dateTime values are ordered by their ·timeOnTimeline· value.
The ·lexical space· of dateTime consists of
finite-length sequences of characters of the form:
'-'? yyyy '-' mm '-' dd 'T' hh ':' mm ':' ss ('.' s+)? (zzzzzz)?,
where
For example, 2002-10-10T12:00:00-05:00 (noon on 10 October 2002, Central Daylight Savings Time as well as Eastern Standard Time in the U.S.) is 2002-10-10T17:00:00Z, five hours later than 2002-10-10T12:00:00Z.
For further guidance on arithmetic with dateTimes and durations, see Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).
Except for trailing fractional zero digits in the seconds representation, '24:00:00' time representations, and timezone (for timezoned values), the mapping from literals to values is one-to-one. Where there is more than one possible representation, the ·canonical representation· is as follows:
24';0';Z' (All timezoned dateTime values are
·UTC·.).
The lexical representations for dateTime are as follows:
-' monthFrag '-' dayFrag 'T' ((hourFrag ':' minuteFrag ':' secondFrag) |
endOfDayFrag) timezoneFrag? Constraint: Day-of-month Representations
3' or be '29'
unless the value to
which it would map would satisfy the value constraint on
·day· values
("Constraint: Day-of-month Values") given above.In such representations:
0' digits are prohibited except to bring the
digit count up to four.
It represents the ·year· value.-', 'T', and
':', separate the various numerals.Z' is an alternative representation of the timezone of
UTC, which is, of course, zero minutes from UTC.For example, 2002-10-10T12:00:00−05:00
(noon on 10 October 2002, Central Daylight
Savings Time as well as Eastern Standard Time
in the U.S.) is equal to 2002-10-10T17:00:00Z,
five hours later than 2002-10-10T12:00:00Z.
The dateTimeLexicalRep production is equivalent to this regular expression once whitespace is removed.
\-?([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]+)|(0[0-9][0-9][0-9])\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])\-(0[1-9])([12][0-9])|(3[01])
T(([01][0-9])|(2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9]:([0-5][0-9])(\.[0-9]+)?)|(24:00:00(\.0+)?)
([+\-](0[0-9])|(1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?
Note that neither the dateTimeLexicalRep production nor this regular expression alone enforce the constraint on dateTimeLexicalRep given above.
The ·lexical mapping· for dateTime is ·dateTimeLexicalMap·. The ·canonical mapping· is ·dateTimeCanonicalMap·.
Timezones are durations with (integer-valued) hour and minute properties (with the hour magnitude limited to at most 14, and the minute magnitude limited to at most 59, except that if the hour magnitude is 14, the minute value must be 0); they may be both positive or both negative.
The lexical representation of a timezone is a string of the form:
(('+' | '-') hh ':' mm) | 'Z',
where
The mapping so defined is one-to-one, except that '+00:00', '-00:00', and 'Z' all represent the same zero-length duration timezone, ·UTC·; 'Z' is its ·canonical representation·.
When a timezone is added to a ·UTC· dateTime, the result is the date and time "in that timezone". For example, 2002-10-10T12:00:00+05:00 is 2002-10-10T07:00:00Z and 2002-10-10T00:00:00+05:00 is 2002-10-09T19:00:00Z.
dateTime value objects on either timeline are totally ordered by their timeOnTimeline values; between the two timelines, dateTime value objects are ordered by their timeOnTimeline values when their timeOnTimeline values differ by more than fourteen hours, with those whose difference is a duration of 14 hours or less being incomparable.
In general, the ·order-relation· on dateTime is a partial order since there is no determinate relationship between certain instants. For example, there is no determinate ordering between (a) 2000-01-20T12:00:00 and (b) 2000-01-20T12:00:00Z. Based on timezones currently in use, (c) could vary from 2000-01-20T12:00:00+12:00 to 2000-01-20T12:00:00-13:00. It is, however, possible for this range to expand or contract in the future, based on local laws. Because of this, the following definition uses a somewhat broader range of indeterminate values: +14:00..-14:00.
The following definition uses the notation S[year] to represent the year field of S, S[month] to represent the month field, and so on. The notation (Q & "-14:00") means adding the timezone -14:00 to Q, where Q did not already have a timezone. This is a logical explanation of the process. Actual implementations are free to optimize as long as they produce the same results.
The ordering between two dateTimes P and Q is defined by the following algorithm:
A.Normalize P and Q. That is, if there is a timezone present, but it is not Z, convert it to Z using the addition operation defined in Adding durations to dateTimes (§H)
B. If P and Q either both have a time zone or both do not have a time zone, compare P and Q field by field from the year field down to the second field, and return a result as soon as it can be determined. That is:
C.Otherwise, if P contains a time zone and Q does not, compare as follows:
D. Otherwise, if P does not contain a time zone and Q does, compare as follows:
Examples:
| Determinate | Indeterminate |
|---|---|
| 2000-01-15T00:00:00 < 2000-02-15T00:00:00 | 2000-01-01T12:00:00 <> 1999-12-31T23:00:00Z |
| 2000-01-15T12:00:00 < 2000-01-16T12:00:00Z | 2000-01-16T12:00:00 <> 2000-01-16T12:00:00Z |
| 2000-01-16T00:00:00 <> 2000-01-16T12:00:00Z |
Certain derived types from dateTime can be guaranteed have a total order. To do so, they must require that a specific set of fields are always specified, and that remaining fields (if any) are always unspecified. For example, the date datatype without time zone is defined to contain exactly year, month, and day. Thus dates without time zone have a total order among themselves.
↓dateTime has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑dateTime and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from dateTime↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
dateTime has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] time represents an instant of time that recurs every day. The ·value space· of time is the space of time of day values as defined in § 5.3 of [ISO 8601]. Specifically, it is a set of zero-duration daily time instances.
time represents instants of time that recur at the same point in each calendar day, or that occur in some arbitrary calendar day.
Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, time values are partially ordered because it may not be able to determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not. The order relation on time values is the Order relation on dateTime (§3.3.8.6) using an arbitrary date. See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H). Pairs of time values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.
time uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·year·, ·month·, and ·day· required to be absent. ·timezone· remains ·optional·.
Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1). time values (points in time in an "arbitrary" day) are ordered taking into account their ·timezone·.
A calendar ( or "local time") day with an early timezone begins earlier than the same calendar day with a later timezone. Since the timezones allowed spread over 28 hours, there are timezone pairs for which a given calendar day in the two timezones are totally disjoint—the earlier day ends before the same day starts in the later timezone. The moments in time represented by a single calendar day are spread over a 52-hour interval, from the beginning of the day in the +14:00 timezone to the end of that day in the −14:00 timezone.
The lexical representation for time is the left truncated lexical representation for dateTime: hh:mm:ss.sss with optional following time zone indicator. For example, to indicate 1:20 pm for Eastern Standard Time which is 5 hours behind Coordinated Universal Time (·UTC·), one would write: 13:20:00-05:00. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).
The ·canonical representation· for time is defined by prohibiting certain options from the Lexical representation (§3.3.9.2). Specifically, either the time zone must be omitted or, if present, the time zone must be Coordinated Universal Time (·UTC·) indicated by a "Z". Additionally, the ·canonical representation· for midnight is 00:00:00.
The lexical representations for time are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:
The timeLexicalRep production is equivalent to this regular expression, once whitespace is removed:
(((([01][0-9])|(2[0-3])):([0-5][0-9]):(([0-5][0-9])(\.[0-9]+)?))
|(24:00:00(\.0+)?))
(Z|((+|-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9]))?
Note that neither the timeLexicalRep production nor this regular expression alone enforce the constraint on timeLexicalRep given above.
The ·lexical mapping· for time is ·timeLexicalMap·; the ·canonical mapping· is ·timeCanonicalMap·.
↓time has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑time and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from time↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
time has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] ↓The ·value space· of date consists of top-open intervals of exactly one day in length on the timelines of dateTime, beginning on the beginning moment of each day (in each timezone), i.e. '00:00:00', up to but not including '24:00:00' (which is identical with '00:00:00'↓↑date represents top-open intervals of exactly one day in length on the timelines of dateTime, beginning on the beginning moment of each day (in each timezone), up to but not including the beginning moment↑ of the next day). For nontimezoned values, the top-open intervals disjointly cover the nontimezoned timeline, one per day. For timezoned values, the intervals begin at every minute and therefore overlap.
A "date object" is an object with year, month, and day properties just like those of dateTime objects, plus an optional timezone-valued timezone property. (As with values of dateTime timezones are a special case of durations.) Just as a dateTime object corresponds to a point on one of the timelines, a date object corresponds to an interval on one of the two timelines as just described.
Timezoned date values track the starting moment of their day, as determined by their timezone; said timezone is generally recoverable for ·canonical representations·. [Definition:] The recoverable timezone is that duration which is the result of subtracting the first moment (or any moment) of the timezoned date from the first moment (or the corresponding moment) ·UTC· on the same date. ·recoverable timezone·s are always durations between '+12:00' and '-11:59'. This "timezone normalization" (which follows automatically from the definition of the date ·value space·) is explained more in Lexical representation (§3.3.10.2).
For example: the first moment of 2002-10-10+13:00 is 2002-10-10T00:00:00+13, which is 2002-10-09T11:00:00Z, which is also the first moment of 2002-10-09-11:00. Therefore 2002-10-10+13:00 is 2002-10-09-11:00; they are the same interval.
date uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent. ·timezone· remains ·optional·.
Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).
For the following discussion, let the "date portion" of a dateTime or date object be an object similar to a dateTime or date object, with similar year, month, and day properties, but no others, having the same value for these properties as the original dateTime or date object.
The ·lexical space· of
date consists of finite-length
sequences of characters of the form:
'-'? yyyy '-' mm '-' dd zzzzzz?
where the date and optional timezone are represented exactly the
same way as they are for dateTime. The first moment of the
interval is that represented by:
'-' yyyy '-' mm '-' dd 'T00:00:00' zzzzzz?
and the least upper bound of the interval is the timeline point represented
(noncanonically) by:
'-' yyyy '-' mm '-' dd 'T24:00:00' zzzzzz?.
Given a member of the date ·value space·, the date portion of the ·canonical representation· (the entire representation for nontimezoned values, and all but the timezone representation for timezoned values) is always the date portion of the dateTime ·canonical representation· of the interval midpoint (the dateTime representation, truncated on the right to eliminate 'T' and all following characters). For timezoned values, append the canonical representation of the ·recoverable timezone·.
The lexical representations for date are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:
-' monthFrag '-' dayFrag timezoneFrag? Constraint: Day-of-month Representations
3' or be '29'
unless the value to
which it would map would satisfy the value constraint on
·day· values
("Constraint: Day-of-month Values") given above.The dateLexicalRep production is equivalent to this regular expression:
\-?([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]+)|(0[0-9][0-9][0-9])\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])\-([0-2][0-9])|(3[01])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?
Note that neither the dateLexicalRep production nor this regular expression alone enforce the constraint on dateLexicalRep given above.
The ·lexical mapping· for date is ·dateLexicalMap·. The ·canonical mapping· is ·dateCanonicalMap·.
[Definition:] gYearMonth represents a specific gregorian month in a specific gregorian year. The ·value space· of gYearMonth is the set of Gregorian calendar months as defined in § 5.2.1 of [ISO 8601]. Specifically, it is a set of one-month long, non-periodic instances e.g. 1999-10 to represent the whole month of 1999-10, independent of how many days this month has.
gYearMonth represents specific whole Gregorian months in specific Gregorian years.
Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gYearMonth values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not. If gYearMonth values are considered as periods of time, the order relation on gYearMonth values is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.3.8.6). See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H). Pairs of gYearMonth values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.
gYearMonth uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·day·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent. ·timezone· remains ·optional·.
Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).
The lexical representation for gYearMonth is the reduced (right truncated) lexical representation for dateTime: CCYY-MM. No left truncation is allowed. An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed. To accommodate year values outside the range from 0001 to 9999, additional digits can be added to the left of this representation and a preceding "-" sign is allowed.
For example, to indicate the month of May 1999, one would write: 1999-05. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).
The lexical representations for gYearMonth are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:
The gYearMonthLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:
\-?([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]+)|(0[0-9][0-9][0-9])\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?
The ·lexical mapping· and ·canonical mapping· for gYearMonth are the following functions:
The ·lexical mapping· for gYearMonth is ·gYearMonthLexicalMap·. The ·canonical mapping· is ·gYearMonthCanonicalMap·.
↓gYearMonth has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑gYearMonth and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from gYearMonth↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
gYearMonth has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] gYear represents a gregorian calendar year. The ·value space· of gYear is the set of Gregorian calendar years as defined in § 5.2.1 of [ISO 8601]. Specifically, it is a set of one-year long, non-periodic instances e.g. lexical 1999 to represent the whole year 1999, independent of how many months and days this year has.
gYear represents Gregorian calendar years.
Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gYear values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not. If gYear values are considered as periods of time, the order relation on gYear values is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.3.8.6). See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H). Pairs of gYear values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.
gYear uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·month·, ·day·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent. ·timezone· remains ·optional·.
Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).
The lexical representation for gYear is the reduced (right truncated) lexical representation for dateTime: CCYY. No left truncation is allowed. An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed as for dateTime. To accommodate year values outside the range from 0001 to 9999, additional digits can be added to the left of this representation and a preceding "-" sign is allowed.
For example, to indicate 1999, one would write: 1999. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).
The lexical representations for gYear are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:
The gYearLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:
\-?([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]+)|(0[0-9][0-9][0-9])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?
The ·lexical mapping· and ·canonical mapping· for gYear are the following functions:
The ·lexical mapping· for gYear is ·gYearLexicalMap·. The ·canonical mapping· is ·gYearCanonicalMap·.
↓gYear has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑gYear and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from gYear↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
gYear has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] gMonthDay is a gregorian date that recurs, specifically a day of the year such as the third of May. Arbitrary recurring dates are not supported by this datatype. The ·value space· of gMonthDay is the set of calendar dates, as defined in § 3 of [ISO 8601]. Specifically, it is a set of one-day long, annually periodic instances.
gMonthDay represents whole calendar days that recur at the same point in each calendar year, or that occur in some arbitrary calendar year.
This datatype can be used, for example, to record birthdays; an instance of the datatype could be used to say that someone's birthday occurs on the 14th of September every year.
Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gMonthDay values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not. If gMonthDay values are considered as periods of time, in an arbitrary leap year, the order relation on gMonthDay values is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.3.8.6). See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H). Pairs of gMonthDay values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.
gMonthDay uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·year·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent. ·timezone· remains ·optional·.
Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).
The lexical representation for gMonthDay is the left truncated lexical representation for date: --MM-DD. An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed as for date. No preceding sign is allowed. No other formats are allowed. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).
The lexical representations for gMonthDay are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:
--' monthFrag '-' dayFrag timezoneFrag? Constraint: Day-of-month Representations
3' or be '29'
unless the value to
which it would map would satisfy the value constraint on
·day· values
("Constraint: Day-of-month Values") given above.The gMonthDayLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:
\-\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])\-([0-2][0-9])|(3[01])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?
Note that neither the gMonthDayLexicalRep production nor this regular expression alone enforce the constraint on gMonthDayLexicalRep given above.
This datatype can be used to represent a specific day in a month. To say, for example, that my birthday occurs on the 14th of September ever year.
The ·lexical mapping· and ·canonical mapping· for gMonthDay are the following functions:
The ·lexical mapping· for gMonthDay is ·gMonthDayLexicalMap·. The ·canonical mapping· is ·gMonthDayCanonicalMap·.
↓gMonthDay has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑gMonthDay and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from gMonthDay↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
gMonthDay has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] gDay is a gregorian day that recurs, specifically a day of the month such as the 5th of the month. Arbitrary recurring days are not supported by this datatype. The ·value space· of gDay is the space of a set of calendar dates as defined in § 3 of [ISO 8601]. Specifically, it is a set of one-day long, monthly periodic instances.
↑[Definition:] gDay represents whole days within an arbitrary month—days that recur at the same point in each (Gregorian) month.↑ This datatype ↓can be↓↑is↑ used to represent a specific day of the month. To ↓say, for example, that I get my paycheck↓↑indicate, for example, that an employee gets a paycheck↑ on the 15th of each month. ↑(Obviously, days beyond 28 cannot occur in all months; they are nonetheless permitted, up to 31.)↑
Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gDay values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not. If gDay values are considered as periods of time, in an arbitrary month that has 31 days, the order relation on gDay values is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.3.8.6). See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H). Pairs of gDay values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.
gDay uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·year·, ·month·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent. ·timezone· remains ·optional· and ·day· must be between 1 and 31 inclusive.
Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1). Since gDay values (days) are ordered by their first moments, it is possible for apparent anomalies to appear in the order when ·timezone· values differ by at least 24 hours. (It is possible for ·timezone· values to differ by up to 28 hours.)
Examples that may appear anomalous (see Lexical Mappings (§3.3.14.3) for the notations):
The lexical representation for gDay is the left truncated lexical representation for date: ---DD . An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed as for date. No preceding sign is allowed. No other formats are allowed. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).
The lexical representations for gDay are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:
The gDayLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:
\-\-\-([0-2][0-9]|3[01])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?
The ·lexical mapping· for gDay is ·gDayLexicalMap·. The ·canonical mapping· is ·gDayCanonicalMap·.
↓gDay has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑gDay and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from gDay↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
gDay has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] gMonth is a gregorian month that recurs every year. The ·value space· of gMonth is the space of a set of calendar months as defined in § 3 of [ISO 8601]. Specifically, it is a set of one-month long, yearly periodic instances.
↓This datatype can be used to represent a specific month. To say, for example, that Thanksgiving falls in the month of November.↓↑gMonth represents whole (Gregorian) months within an arbitrary year—months that recur at the same point in each year. It might be used, for example, to say what month annual Thanksgiving celebrations fall in different countries (--11 in the United States, --10 in Canada, and possibly other months in other countries).↑
Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gMonth values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not. If gMonth values are considered as periods of time, the order relation on gMonth is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.3.8.6). See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H). Pairs of gMonth values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.
gMonth uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·year·, ·day·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent. ·timezone· remains ·optional·.
Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).
The lexical representation for gMonth is the left and right truncated lexical representation for date: --MM. An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed as for date. No preceding sign is allowed. No other formats are allowed. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).
The lexical representations for gMonth are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:
The gMonthLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:
\-\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?
The ·lexical mapping· and ·canonical mapping· for gMonth are defined as follows:
The ·lexical mapping· for gMonth is ·gMonthLexicalMap·. The ·canonical mapping· is ·gMonthCanonicalMap·.
↓gMonth has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑gMonth and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from gMonth↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
gMonth has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] hexBinary represents arbitrary hex-encoded binary data.
The ·value space· of hexBinary is the set of finite-length sequences of binary octets.
hexBinary has a ·lexical representation· where
each binary octet is encoded as a character tuple, consisting of two
hexadecimal digits ([0-9a-fA-F]) representing the octet code. For example,
'0FB7' is a hex encoding for the 16-bit integer 4023
(whose binary representation is 111110110111).
The set recognized by hexBinary is the same as that recognized by the regular
expression '([0-9a-fA-F]{2})*'.
The ·lexical mapping· of hexBinary is ·hexBinaryMap·.
The ·canonical representation· for hexBinary is defined by prohibiting certain options from the Lexical Representation (§3.3.16.2). Specifically, the lower case hexadecimal digits ([a-f]) are not allowed.
The ·canonical mapping· of hexBinary is given formally in ·hexBinaryCanonical·.
↓hexBinary has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑hexBinary and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from hexBinary↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
hexBinary has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] base64Binary represents ↑arbitrary↑ Base64-encoded ↓arbitrary↓ binary data.↓ The ·value space· of base64Binary is the set of finite-length sequences of binary octets.↓ For base64Binary data the entire binary stream is encoded using the Base64 ↓Alphabet in [RFC 2045]↓↑Encoding defined in [RFC 3548], which is derived from the encoding described in [RFC 2045]↑.
The ·value space· of base64Binary is the set of finite-length sequences of binary octets.
The ↓lexical forms↓↑·lexical representations·↑ of base64Binary values are
limited to the 65 characters of the Base64 Alphabet defined in
↓[RFC 2045]↓↑[RFC 3548]↑, i.e., a-z, A-Z,
0-9, the plus sign (+), the forward slash (/) and the
equal sign (=), together with
↓the characters defined in [XML] as
white space↓↑the space character
(#x20)↑. No other characters are allowed.
For compatibility with older mail gateways, [RFC 2045] suggests that ↓b↓↑B↑ase64 data should have lines limited to at most 76 characters in length. This line-length limitation is not ↑required by [RFC 3548] and is not↑ mandated in the ↓lexical forms↓↑·lexical representations·↑ of base64Binary data↓ and ↓↑. It↑ ↓must not↓↑must not↑ be enforced by XML Schema processors.
The ·lexical space· of base64Binary is ↓given by the following grammar (the notation is that used in [XML]); legal lexical forms must match↓↑the set of literals which ·match·↑ the Base64Binary production.
Base64Binary ::= ((B64S B64S B64S B64S)*
((B64S B64S B64S B64) |
(B64S B64S B16S '=') |
(B64S B04S '=' #x20? '=')))?
B64S ::= B64 #x20?
B16S ::= B16 #x20?
B04S ::= B04 #x20?
B04 ::= [AQgw]
B16 ::= [AEIMQUYcgkosw048]
B64 ::= [A-Za-z0-9+/]
Note that this grammar requires the number of non-whitespace characters in the ↓lexical form↓↑·lexical representation·↑ to be a multiple of four, and for equals signs to appear only at the end of the ↓lexical form↓↑·lexical representation·↑; ↓strings↓↑literals↑ which do not meet these constraints are not legal ↓lexical forms↓↑·lexical representations·↑ of base64Binary because they cannot successfully be decoded by ↓b↓↑B↑ase64 decoders.
The ·lexical mapping· for base64Binary is as given in [RFC 2045] and [RFC 3548].
The canonical ↓lexical form↓↑·lexical representation·↑ of a base64Binary data value is the ↓b↓↑B↑ase64 encoding of the value which matches the Canonical-base64Binary production in the following grammar:
Canonical-base64Binary ::= (B64
B64 B64 B64)*
((B64 B64 B16 '=') | (B64 B04 '=='))?
That is, the ·canonical representation· of a base64Binary value is the ·lexical representation· which maps to that value and contains no whitespace. The ·canonical mapping· for base64Binary is thus the encoding algorithm for Base64 data given in [RFC 2045] and [RFC 3548], with the proviso that no characters except those in the Base64 Alphabet are to be written out.
The length of a base64Binary value is the number of octets it contains. This may be calculated from the ↓lexical form↓↑·lexical representation·↑ by removing whitespace and padding characters and performing the calculation shown in the pseudo-code below:
lex2 := killwhitespace(lexform) -- remove whitespace characters
lex3 := strip_equals(lex2) -- strip padding characters at end
length := floor (length(lex3) * 3 / 4) -- calculate length
Note on encoding: [RFC 2045] ↑and [RFC 3548]↑ explicitly reference↓s↓ US-ASCII encoding. However, decoding of base64Binary data in an XML entity is to be performed on the Unicode characters obtained after character encoding processing as specified by [XML].
↓base64Binary has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑base64Binary and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from base64Binary↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
base64Binary has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] anyURI represents ↓a Uniform Resource Identifier Reference (URI)↓↑an Internationalized Resource Identifier Reference (IRI)↑. An anyURI value can be absolute or relative, and may have an optional fragment identifier (i.e., it may be ↓a URI↓↑an IRI↑ Reference). This type should be used ↓to specify the intention that↓↑when↑ the value fulfills the role of ↓a URI as defined by [RFC 2396], as amended by [RFC 2732]↓↑an IRI, as defined in [RFC 3987] or its successor(s) in the IETF Standards Track↑.
The ·lexical space· of anyURI is finite-length character sequences↓ which, when the algorithm defined in Section 5.4 of [XML Linking Language] is applied to them, result in strings which are legal URIs according to [RFC 2396], as amended by [RFC 2732]↓.
%20').
The ·lexical mapping· for anyURI is the identity mapping.
↓anyURI has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑anyURI and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from anyURI↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
anyURI has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] QName represents XML qualified names. The ·value space· of QName is the set of tuples {namespace name, local part}, where namespace name is an anyURI and local part is an NCName. The ·lexical space· of QName is the set of strings that ·match· the QName production of [Namespaces in XML].
It is implementation-defined whether an implementation of this specification supports the QName production from [Namespaces in XML], or that from [Namespaces in XML 1.0], or both. See Dependencies on Other Specifications (§1.3).
↓QName has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑QName and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from QName↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
QName has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
The use of ·length·, ·minLength· and ·maxLength· on ↑QName or↑ datatypes derived from QName is deprecated. Future versions of this specification may remove these facets for this datatype.
[Definition:] NOTATION represents the NOTATION attribute type from [XML]. The ·value space· of NOTATION is the set of QNames of notations declared in the current schema. The ·lexical space· of NOTATION is the set of all names of notations declared in the current schema (in the form of QNames).
For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.6)) NOTATION should be used only on attributes and should only be used in schemas with no target namespace.
↓NOTATION has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑NOTATION and all datatypes derived from it by restriction have the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with fixed values; these facets must not be changed from the values shown:↑
collapse (fixed)↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from NOTATION↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
NOTATION has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
The use of ·length·, ·minLength· and ·maxLength· on ↑NOTATION or↑ datatypes derived from NOTATION is deprecated. Future versions of this specification may remove these facets for this datatype.
This section gives conceptual definitions for all ·built-in· ↓·derived·↓↑·ordinary·↑ datatypes defined by this specification. The XML representation used to define ↓·derived·↓ datatypes (whether ·built-in· or ↓·user-derived·↓↑·user-defined·↑) is given in ↓section ↓XML Representation of Simple Type Definition Schema Components (§4.1.2) and the complete definitions of the ·built-in· ↓·derived·↓↑·ordinary·↑ datatypes are provided in ↓Appendix A↓↑the appendix↑ Schema for ↑Schema Documents (Datatypes)↑ ↓Datatype Definitions↓ (normative) (§A).
[Definition:] normalizedString represents white space normalized strings. The ·value space· of normalizedString is the set of strings that do not contain the carriage return (#xD), line feed (#xA) nor tab (#x9) characters. The ·lexical space· of normalizedString is the set of strings that do not contain the carriage return (#xD), line feed (#xA) nor tab (#x9) characters. The ·base type· of normalizedString is string.
↓normalizedString has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑normalizedString has the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with the values shown; these facets may be further restricted in the derivation of new types:↑
replace↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from normalizedString↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
normalizedString has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
The following ·built-in· datatypes are ·derived· from normalizedString:
[Definition:] token represents tokenized strings. The ·value space· of token is the set of strings that do not contain the carriage return (#xD), line feed (#xA) nor tab (#x9) characters, that have no leading or trailing spaces (#x20) and that have no internal sequences of two or more spaces. The ·lexical space· of token is the set of strings that do not contain the carriage return (#xD), line feed (#xA) nor tab (#x9) characters, that have no leading or trailing spaces (#x20) and that have no internal sequences of two or more spaces. The ·base type· of token is normalizedString.
↓token has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑token has the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with the values shown; these facets may be further restricted in the derivation of new types:↑
collapse↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from token↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
token has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
The following ·built-in· datatypes are ·derived· from token:
[Definition:] language represents ↑formal↑ natural language identifiers↑,↑ as defined by [RFC 3066]↑or its successor(s) in the IETF Standards Track↑. ↓The ·value space· of language is the set of all strings that are valid language identifiers as defined [RFC 3066]. ↓The ↑·value space· and ↑·lexical space· of language ↓is↓↑are↑ the set of all strings that conform to the pattern
[a-zA-Z]{1,8}(-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,8})*
↑, This is the set of strings accepted by the grammar given in [RFC 3066]↑. The ·base type· of language is token.
MN' and
'mn' therefore correspond to distinct values and
have distinct canonical forms. Users of this specification should be
aware of this fact, the consequence of which is that the
case-insensitive treatment of language values prescribed by
[RFC 3066] does not follow from the definition of
this datatype given here; applications which require
case-sensitivity should make appropriate adjustments.↓language has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑language has the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with the values shown; these facets may be further restricted in the derivation of new types:↑
[a-zA-Z]{1,8}(-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,8})*↑collapse↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from language↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
language has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] NMTOKEN represents the NMTOKEN attribute type from [XML]. The ·value space· of NMTOKEN is the set of tokens that ·match· the Nmtoken production in [XML]. The ·lexical space· of NMTOKEN is the set of strings that ·match· the Nmtoken production in [XML]. The ·base type· of NMTOKEN is token.
It is implementation-defined whether an implementation of this specification supports the NMTOKEN production from [XML], or that from [XML 1.0], or both. See Dependencies on Other Specifications (§1.3).
For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.6)) NMTOKEN should be used only on attributes.
↓NMTOKEN has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑NMTOKEN has the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with the values shown; these facets may be further restricted in the derivation of new types:↑
\c+↑collapse↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from NMTOKEN↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
NMTOKEN has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
The following ·built-in· datatypes are ·constructed· from NMTOKEN:
[Definition:] NMTOKENS represents the NMTOKENS attribute type from [XML]. The ·value space· of NMTOKENS is the set of finite, non-zero-length sequences of ·NMTOKEN·s. The ·lexical space· of NMTOKENS is the set of space-separated lists of tokens, of which each token is in the ·lexical space· of NMTOKEN. The ·item type· of NMTOKENS is .
For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.6)) NMTOKENS should be used only on attributes.
↓NMTOKENS has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑NMTOKENS has the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with the values shown; these facets may be further restricted in the derivation of new types:↑
1↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from NMTOKENS↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
NMTOKENS has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] Name represents XML Names. The ·value space· of Name is the set of all strings which ·match· the Name production of [XML]. The ·lexical space· of Name is the set of all strings which ·match· the Name production of [XML]. The ·base type· of Name is token.
It is implementation-defined whether an implementation of this specification supports the Name production from [XML], or that from [XML 1.0], or both. See Dependencies on Other Specifications (§1.3).
↓Name has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑Name has the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with the values shown; these facets may be further restricted in the derivation of new types:↑
\i\c*↑collapse↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from Name↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
Name has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·:
[Definition:] NCName represents XML "non-colonized" Names. The ·value space· of NCName is the set of all strings which ·match· the NCName production of [Namespaces in XML]. The ·lexical space· of NCName is the set of all strings which ·match· the NCName production of [Namespaces in XML]. The ·base type· of NCName is Name.
It is implementation-defined whether an implementation of this specification supports the NCName production from [Namespaces in XML], or that from [Namespaces in XML 1.0], or both. See Dependencies on Other Specifications (§1.3).
↓NCName has the following ·constraining facets·:↓
↑NCName has the following ·constraining facets·↑↑ with the values shown; these facets may be further restricted in the derivation of new types:↑
\i\c* ∩ [\i-[:]][\c-[:]]*↑collapse↑↑Datatypes derived by restriction from NCName↑ may also specify values for the following↑ ·constraining facets·:↑
NCName has the following values for its ·fundamental facets·: