XHTML™ 2.0

W3C Working Draft 26 July 2006

This version:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726

Latest version:

http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2

Previous version:

http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xhtml2-20050527

Diff-marked version:

xhtml2-diff.html

Editors:

Jonny Axelsson, Opera Software

Mark Birbeck, x-port.net

Micah Dubinko, Invited Expert

Beth Epperson, Websense

Masayasu Ishikawa , W3C

Shane McCarron , Applied Testing and Technology

Ann Navarro, WebGeek, Inc.

Steven Pemberton , CWI ( HTML Working Group Chair)

This document is also available in these non-normative formats: Single XHTML file , PostScript version , PDF version , ZIP archive , and Gzip'd TAR archive .

Copyright ©2006 W3C ^® ( MIT , ERCIM , Keio ), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability , trademark and document use rules apply.

---

Abstract

XHTML 2 is a general-purpose markup language designed for representing documents for a wide range of purposes across the World Wide Web. To this end it does not attempt to be all things to all people, supplying every possible markup idiom, but to supply a generally useful set of elements.

Status of This Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This document is the eighth public Working Draft of this specification. It should in no way be considered stable, and should not be normatively referenced for any purposes whatsoever. This version includes an early implementation of XHTML 2.0 in RELAX NG [ RELAXNG ], but does not include the implementations in DTD or XML Schema form. Those will be included in subsequent versions, once the content of this language stabilizes.

Formal issues and error reports on this specification shall be submitted to www-html-editor@w3.org ( archive ). It is inappropriate to send discussion email to this address. Public discussion may take place on www-html@w3.org ( archive ). To subscribe send an email to www-html-request@w3.org with the word subscribe in the subject line.

This document has been produced by the W3C HTML Working Group ( members only ) as part of the W3C HTML Activity . The goals of the HTML Working Group are discussed in the HTML Working Group charter .

This document was produced by a group operating under the 24 January 2002 CPP as amended by the W3C Patent Policy Transition Procedure . W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy .

Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

Quick Table of Contents

List of Issues

Full Table of Contents

1. Introduction

This section is informative .

1.1. What is XHTML 2?

XHTML 2 is a general purpose markup language designed for representing documents for a wide range of purposes across the World Wide Web. To this end it does not attempt to be all things to all people, supplying every possible markup idiom, but to supply a generally useful set of elements, with the possibility of extension using the class and role attributes on the span and div elements in combination with style sheets, and attributes from the metadata attributes collection.

1.1.1. Design Aims

In designing XHTML 2, a number of design aims were kept in mind to help direct the design. These included:

• As generic XML as possible: if a facility exists in XML, try to use that rather than duplicating it.
• Less presentation, more structure: use style sheets for defining presentation.
• More usability: within the constraints of XML, try to make the language easy to write, and make the resulting documents easy to use.
• More accessibility: some call it 'designing for our future selves' – the design should be as inclusive as possible.
• Better internationalization: since it is a World Wide Web.
• More device independence: new devices coming online, such as telephones, PDAs, tablets, televisions and so on mean that it is imperative to have a design that allows you to author once and render in different ways on different devices, rather than authoring new versions of the document for each type of device.
• Less scripting: achieving functionality through scripting is difficult for the author and restricts the type of user agent you can use to view the document. We have tried to identify current typical usage, and include those usages in markup.
• Integration with the Semantic Web: make XHTML2 amenable for processing with semantic web tools.

1.1.2. Backwards compatibility

Because earlier versions of HTML were special-purpose languages, it was necessary to ensure a level of backwards compatibility with new versions so that new documents would still be usable in older browsers. However, thanks to XML and style sheets, such strict element-wise backwards compatibility is no longer necessary, since an XML-based browser, of which at the time of writing means more than 95% of browsers in use, can process new markup languages without having to be updated. Much of XHTML 2 works already in existing browsers; much, but not all: just as when forms and tables were added to HTML, and people had to wait for new version of browsers before being able to use the new facilities, some parts of XHTML 2, principally XForms and XML Events, still require user agents that understand that functionality.

1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation

The very first version of HTML was designed to represent the structure of a document, not its presentation. Even though presentation-oriented elements were later added to the language by browser manufacturers, HTML is at heart a document structuring language. XHTML 2 takes HTML back to these roots, by removing all presentation elements, and subordinating all presentation to style sheets. This gives greater flexibility, greater accessibility, more device independence, and more powerful presentation possibilities, since style sheets can do more than the presentational elements of HTML ever did.

1.1.4. XHTML 2 and Linking

The original versions of HTML relied upon built-in knowledge on the part of User Agents and other document processors. While much of this knowledge had to do with presentation (see above), the bulk of the remainder had to do with the relationships between documents — so called "linking".

A variety of W3C and other efforts, most notably [ XLINK ], attempted to create a grammar for defining the characteristings of linking. Unfortunately, these grammars all fall short of the requirements of XHTML. The community is continuing in its efforts to create a comprehensive grammar that describes link characteristics.

The HTML Working Group has determined that such a grammar, while generally useful, is not required for the definition of XHTML 2. Instead, this document is explicit in the characteristics of the elements and attributes that are used to connect to other resources. The Working Group has taken this course because 1) the problem with XHTML 2 is well bounded, 2) the general solution is slow in coming, and 3) it will be easier for implementors to support and users to rely upon.

1.2. Major Differences with XHTML 1

XHTML 2 is designed to be recognizable to the HTML and XHTML 1 author, while correcting errors and insufficiencies identified in earlier versions of the HTML family, and taking the opportunity to make improvements.

The most visible changes are the following:

• More structuring possibilities:
  • Sections and headings: in previous versions of HTML a document's structure had to be inferred from the various levels of headings in the document; this was particularly a problem when authors misused the heading elements for visual effects. XHTML 2 lets you explicitly markup the document structure with the section element, and its related header element h .
  • Separators: in previous versions of HTML, the hr element was used to separate sections of a text from each other. In retrospect, the name hr (for horizontal rule ) was misleading, because an hr was neither necessarily horizontal (in vertical text it was vertical), nor necessarily a rule (books often use other typographical methods such as a line of three asterisks to represent separators, and style sheets can be used to give you this freedom). In order to emphasize its structuring nature, to make it more widely usable, and to make it clearer that it has no essential directionality, hr has been renamed separator .
  • Line breaks: in previous versions of HTML, the br element was used to add micro-structure to text, essentially breaking a piece of text into several 'lines'. This micro-structure is now made explicit in XHTML 2 with the l element, which encloses the text to be broken. Amongst other advantages, this gives more presentational opportunities, such as the ability to automatically number lines, or to color alternate lines differently.
  • Paragraph structure: in earlier versions of HTML, a p element could only contain simple text. It has been improved to bring it closer to what people perceive as a paragraph, now being allowed to include such things as lists and tables.
• Navigation lists: Part of the design of XHTML 2 has been to observe existing use of HTML and identify what is perceived as missing, for instance by use of scripting to achieve ends not supported directly in HTML. One obvious component of very many HTML pages is the 'navigation list', consisting of a collection of links to other parts of the site, presented vertically, horizontally, or as a drop-down menu. To support this type of usage, XHTML 2 introduces the navigation list element nl , which codifies such parts of documents, and allows different presentational idioms to be applied. An additional advantage is for assistive technologies, that can allow the user to skip such elements.
• Images: the HTML img element has many shortcomings: it only allows you to specify a single resource for an image, rather than offering the fallback opportunities of the object element; the only fallback option it gives is the alt text, which can only be plain text, and not marked up in any way; the longdesc attribute which allows you to provide a long description of the image is difficult to author and seldom supported.

  XHTML 2 takes a completely different approach, by taking the premise that all images have a long description and treating the image and the text as equivalents. In XHTML 2 any element may have a src attribute, which specifies a resource (such as an image) to load instead of the element. If the resource is unavailable (because of network failure, because it is of a type that the browser can't handle, or because images have been turned off) then the element is used instead. Essentially the longdesc has been moved into the document, though this behavior also mimicks the fallback behavior of the object element. (To achieve the tooltip effect that some browsers gave with the alt attribute, as in HTML 4 you use the title attribute).

• Type: in HTML 4, the srctype attribute when referring to an external resource was purely a hint to the user agent. In XHTML 2 it is no longer a hint, but specifies the type(s) of resource the user agent must accept.
• Tables: the content model of tables has been cleaned up and simplified, while still allowing the same functionality.
• Bi-directional text: rather than use an explicit element to describe bi-directional override, new values have been added to the dir attribute that allow bi-directional override on any element.
• Edit: rather than use explicit ins and del elements to mark changes in a document, an attribute edit may be used on any element for the same purpose.
• Linking: In HTML 3, only a elements could be the source and target of hyperlinks. In HTML 4 and XHTML 1, any element could be the target of a hyperlink, but still only a elements could be the source. In XHTML 2 any element can now also be the source of a hyperlink, since href and its associated attributes may now appear on any element. So for instance, instead of <li><a href="home.html">Home</a></li> , you can now write <li href="home.html">Home</li> . Even though this means that the a element is now strictly-speaking unnecessary, it has been retained.
• Metadata: the meta and link elements have been generalized, and their relationship to RDF [ RDF ] described. Furthermore, the attributes on these two elements can be more generally applied across the language.
• Role: in order to aid adding semantics to documents, the role attribute has been added, along with an initial set of useful values, in order to classify the use of a particular element. For instance a paragraph may play the role of a note, and so may be marked up <p role="note"> .

• Events: event handling in HTML was restricted in several ways: since the event names were hard-wired in the language (such as onclick ), the only way to add new events was to change the language; many of the events (such as click ) were device-specific, rather than referring to the intent of the event (such as activating a link); you could only handle an event in one scripting language — it was not possible to supply event handlers in the same document for several different scripting languages.

  XHTML 2 uses XML Events [ XMLEVENTS ] to specify event handling, giving greater freedom in the ability to handle events. Along with this, the script element has been renamed handler to indicate its different semantics.

• Forms: HTML Forms were introduced in 1993, before the advent of the e-commerce revolution. Now with more than a decade of experience with their use, they have been thoroughly overhauled and updated to meet the needs of modern forms, in the shape of XForms [ XFORMS ], which are an integral part of XHTML 2.
• Ownership where due: since HTML 4 was a standalone application, it defined many things which no longer need to be defined now that it is an XML application. For instance the definitions of whitespace are given by XML for input, and CSS for output; similarly, the definition of values of the media attribute are relegated to the relevant style sheet language.
• Frames and Framesets: In HTML 4 multi-panel "pages" could be described using the frameset and frame elements. The Frames model is no longer defined in XHTML. Instead, if is defined through the separate [ XFRAMES ] specification.

1.3. What are the XHTML 2 Modules?

XHTML 2 is a member of the XHTML Family of markup languages. It is an XHTML Host Language as defined in XHTML Modularization. As such, it is made up of a set of XHTML Modules that together describe the elements and attributes of the language, and their content model. XHTML 2 updates many of the modules defined in XHTML Modularization 1.0 [ XHTMLMOD ], and includes the updated versions of all those modules and their semantics. XHTML 2 also uses modules from Ruby [ RUBY ], XML Events [ XMLEVENTS ], and XForms [ XFORMS ].

The modules defined in this specification are largely extensions of the modules defined in XHTML Modularization 1.0. This specification also defines the semantics of the modules it includes. So, that means that unlike earlier versions of XHTML that relied upon the semantics defined in HTML 4 [ HTML4 ], all of the semantics for XHTML 2 are defined either in this specification or in the specifications that it normatively references.

Even though the XHTML 2 modules are defined in this specification, they are available for use in other XHTML family markup languages. Over time, it is possible that the modules defined in this specification will migrate into the XHTML Modularization specification.

1.4. Issues

2. Terms and Definitions

This section is normative .

While some terms are defined in place, the following definitions are used throughout this document. Familiarity with the W3C XML 1.0 Recommendation [ XML ] is highly recommended.

abstract module

a unit of document type specification corresponding to a distinct type of content, corresponding to a markup construct reflecting this distinct type.

content model

the declared markup structure allowed within instances of an element type. XML 1.0 differentiates two types: elements containing only element content (no character data) and mixed content (elements that may contain character data optionally interspersed with child elements). The latter are characterized by a content specification beginning with the "#PCDATA" string (denoting character data).

deprecated

a feature marked as deprecated is in the process of being removed from this recommendation. Portable documents should not use features marked as deprecated.

document model

the effective structure and constraints of a given document type. The document model constitutes the abstract representation of the physical or semantic structures of a class of documents.

document type

a class of documents sharing a common abstract structure. The ISO 8879 [ SGML ] definition is as follows: "a class of documents having similar characteristics; for example, journal, article, technical manual, or memo. (4.102)"

document type definition (DTD)

a formal, machine-readable expression of the XML structure and syntax rules to which a document instance of a specific document type must conform; the schema type used in XML 1.0 to validate conformance of a document instance to its declared document type. The same markup model may be expressed by a variety of DTDs.

driver

a generally short file used to declare and instantiate the modules of a DTD. A good rule of thumb is that a DTD driver contains no markup declarations that comprise any part of the document model itself.

element

an instance of an element type.

element type

the definition of an element, that is, a container for a distinct semantic class of document content.

entity

an entity is a logical or physical storage unit containing document content. Entities may be composed of parseable XML markup or character data, or unparsed (i.e., non-XML, possibly non-textual) content. Entity content may be either defined entirely within the document entity ("internal entities") or external to the document entity ("external entities"). In parsed entities, the replacement text may include references to other entities.

entity reference

a mnemonic string used as a reference to the content of a declared entity (e.g., "&amp;" for "&", "&lt;" for "<", "&copy;" for "©".)

facilities

Facilities are elements , attributes , and the semantics associated with those elements and attributes .

focusable

Elements are considered "focusable" if they are visible (e.g., have the equivalent of the [ CSS2 ] property of "display" with a value other than none ) not disabled (see [ XFORMS ]), and either 1) have an href attribute or 2) are considered a form control as defined in [ XFORMS ].

fragment identifier

A portion of a [ URI ] as defined in RFC 3986.

generic identifier

the name identifying the element type of an element. Also, element type name.

hybrid document

A hybrid document is a document that uses more than one XML namespace. Hybrid documents may be defined as documents that contain elements or attributes from hybrid document types.

instantiate

to replace an entity reference with an instance of its declared content.

markup declaration

a syntactical construct within a DTD declaring an entity or defining a markup structure. Within XML DTDs, there are four specific types: entity declaration defines the binding between a mnemonic symbol and its replacement content; element declaration constrains which element types may occur as descendants within an element (see also content model); attribute definition list declaration defines the set of attributes for a given element type, and may also establish type constraints and default values; notation declaration defines the binding between a notation name and an external identifier referencing the format of an unparsed entity.

markup model

the markup vocabulary (i.e., the gamut of element and attribute names, notations, etc.) and grammar (i.e., the prescribed use of that vocabulary) as defined by a document type definition (i.e., a schema) The markup model is the concrete representation in markup syntax of the document model, and may be defined with varying levels of strict conformity. The same document model may be expressed by a variety of markup models.

module

an abstract unit within a document model expressed as a DTD fragment, used to consolidate markup declarations to increase the flexibility, modifiability, reuse and understanding of specific logical or semantic structures.

modularization

an implementation of a modularization model; the process of composing or de-composing a DTD by dividing its markup declarations into units or groups to support specific goals. Modules may or may not exist as separate file entities (i.e., the physical and logical structures of a DTD may mirror each other, but there is no such requirement).

modularization model

the abstract design of the document type definition (DTD) in support of the modularization goals, such as reuse, extensibility, expressiveness, ease of documentation, code size, consistency and intuitiveness of use. It is important to note that a modularization model is only orthogonally related to the document model it describes, so that two very different modularization models may describe the same document type.

parameter entity

an entity whose scope of use is within the document prolog (i.e., the external subset/DTD or internal subset). Parameter entities are disallowed within the document instance.

parent document type

A parent document type of a hybrid document is the document type of the root element.

tag

descriptive markup delimiting the start and end (including its generic identifier and any attributes) of an element.

unavailable resource

any resource that is referenced as a URI in an attribute, but that cannot be accessed for any reason, is considered unavailable. Example reasons include, but are not limited to: network unavailable, no resource available at the URI given, inability of the user agent to process the type of resource, etc.

user agent

any software that retrieves and renders Strictly Conforming Documents for users. This may include browsers, media players, plug-ins, and other programs — including assistive technologies — that help in retrieving and rendering such documents. See also Conforming User Agent .

3. Conformance Definition

This section is normative .

The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [ RFC2119 ].

3.1. Document Conformance

In this document, the use of the word 'schema' refers to any definition of the syntax of XHTML 2, regardless of the definition language used.

3.1.1. Strictly Conforming Documents

A strictly conforming XHTML 2.0 document is a document that requires only the facilities described as mandatory in this specification. Such a document must meet all the following criteria:

1. The document must conform to the constraints expressed in the schemas in Appendix B - XHTML 2.0 RELAX NG Definition , Appendix D - XHTML 2.0 Schema and Appendix F - XHTML 2.0 Document Type Definition .

2. The local part of the root element of the document must be html .

3. The start tag of the root element of the document must explicitly contain an xmlns declaration for the XHTML 2.0 namespace [ XMLNS ]. The namespace URI for XHTML 2.0 is defined to be http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/ .

   The start tag may also contain an xsi:schemaLocation attribute that associates this namespace with the XML Schema at the URI http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/SCHEMA/xhtml2.xsd .

   Sample root element

   <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/" xml:lang="en"
         xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/
                             http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/SCHEMA/xhtml2.xsd"
   >
   

4. There should be a DOCTYPE declaration in the document prior to the root element. If present, the public identifier included in the DOCTYPE declaration must reference the DTD found in Appendix F using its Public Identifier. The system identifier may be modified appropriately.

   <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 2.0//EN"
       "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml2.dtd">
   

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" 
                    href="http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/style/xhtml2.css"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 2.0//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml2.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/" xml:lang="en"
      xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
      xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/
                          http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/SCHEMA/xhtml2.xsd"
>
  <head>
    <title>Virtual Library</title>
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Moved to <a href="http://example.org/">example.org</a>.</p>
  </body>
</html>

Note that in this example, the XML declaration is included. An XML declaration like the one above is not required in all XML documents. XHTML document authors should use XML declarations in all their documents. XHTML document authors must use an XML declaration when the character encoding of the document is other than the default UTF-8 or UTF-16 and no encoding is specified by a higher-level protocol.

3.2. XHTML 2 User Agent Conformance

A conforming user agent must meet all of the following criteria, as well as other requirements found throughout this specification:

1. The user agent must parse and evaluate an XHTML 2 document for well-formedness. If the user agent claims to be a validating user agent, it must also validate documents against a referenced schema according to [ XML ].

2. When the user agent claims to support facilities defined within this specification or required by this specification through normative reference, it must do so in ways consistent with the facilities' definition.

3. A user agent must only recognize attributes of type ID (e.g., the id or xml:id attribute on most XHTML 2 elements) as fragment identifiers.

4. If a user agent encounters an element it does not recognize, it must continue to process the content of that element. If this "unrecognized" element uses recognized attributes, those attributes must be processed with their usual semantics.

5. If a user agent encounters an attribute it does not recognize, it must ignore the entire attribute specification (i.e., the attribute and its value).

6. If a user agent encounters an attribute value it doesn't recognize, it must use the default attribute value.

7. When rendering content, user agents that encounter characters or character entity references that are recognized but not renderable should display the document in such a way that it is obvious to the user that normal rendering has not taken place.

8. White space must be handled according to the rules of [ XML ]. All XHTML 2 elements preserve whitespace.

   The user agent must use the definition from CSS for processing white space characters [ CSS3-TEXT ].

9. In the absence of a style-sheet, including user agents that do not process style sheets, the default visual presentation should be as if the user agent used the CSS style sheet specified in Appendix H.

Note that this specification does not generally specify the behavior of conforming implementations when presented with non-conforming documents. This is either defined by an underlying specification (e.g., [ XML ]) or left to the implementor.

3.3. Issues

4. The XHTML 2.0 Document Type

This section is normative .

The XHTML 2.0 document type is a fully functional document type with rich semantics. It is a collection of XHTML-conforming modules (most of which are defined in this specification). The Modules and their elements are listed here for information purposes, but the definitions in their base documents should be considered authoritative. In the on-line version of this document, the module names in the list below link into the definitions of the modules within the relevant version of the authoritative specification.

Document Module

body, head, html, title

Structural Module

address, blockcode, blockquote, div, h, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p, pre, section, separator

Text Module

abbr, cite, code, dfn, em, kbd, l, q, samp, span, strong, sub, sup, var

Hypertext Module

a

List Module

dl, dt, dd, label, nl, ol, ul, li

Core Attributes Module

class , id , and title attributes

Hypertext Attributes Module

href , hreftype , cite , target , rel , rev , access , nextfocus , prevfocus , and xml:base attributes

Internationalization Attribute Module

xml:lang attribute

Bi-directional Text Module

dir attribute

Edit Attributes Module

edit and datetime attributes

Embedding Attributes Module

src and type attributes

Handler Module

handler

Image Map Attributes Module

usemap, ismap, shape , and coords attributes

Media Attribute Module

media attribute

Metainformation Attributes Module

about , content , datatype , property , rel , resource , restype , and rev attributes

Metainformation Module

meta , link

Object Module

object, param, standby

Style Attribute Module

style attribute

Stylesheet Module

style element

Tables Module

caption, col, colgroup, summary, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr

XHTML 2.0 also uses the following externally defined modules:

Ruby Annotation Module [ RUBY ]

ruby, rbc, rtc, rb, rt, rp

XForms Module [ XFORMS ]

action, alert, bind, case, choices, copy, delete, dispatch, extension, filename, group, help, hint, input, insert, instance, item, itemset, label, load, mediatype, message, model, output, range, rebuild, recalculate, refresh, repeat, reset, revalidate, secret, select, select1, send, setfocus, setindex, setvalue, submission, submit, switch, textarea, toggle, trigger, upload , and value elements, and repeat-model, repeat-bind, repeat-nodeset, repeat-startindex , and repeat-number attributes

XML Events Module [ XMLEVENTS ]

listener element, and defaultAction, event, handler, objserver, phase, propagate , and target attributes in the [ XMLEVENTS ] namespace

An implementation of this document type as a RELAX NG grammar is defined in Appendix B , as an XML Schema in Appendix D , and as a DTD in Appendix F .

4.1. Issues

5. Module Definition Conventions

This section is normative .

This document defines a variety of XHTML modules and the semantics of those modules. This section describes the conventions used in those module definitions.

5.1. Module Structure

Each module in this document is structured in the following way:

• An abstract definition of the module's elements, attributes, and content models, as appropriate.
• A sub-section for each element in the module; These sub-sections contain the following components:
  • A brief description of the element,
  • A definition of each attribute or attribute collection usable with the element, and
  • A detailed description of the behavior of the element, if appropriate.

  Note that attributes are fully defined only the first time they are used in each module. After that, only a brief description of the attribute is provided, along with a link back to the primary definition.

5.2. Abstract Module Definitions

An abstract module is a definition of an XHTML module using prose text and some informal markup conventions. While such a definition is not generally useful in the machine processing of document types, it is critical in helping people understand what is contained in a module. This section defines the way in which XHTML abstract modules are defined. An XHTML-conforming module is not required to provide an abstract module definition. However, anyone developing an XHTML module is encouraged to provide an abstraction to ease in the use of that module.

5.3. Syntactic Conventions

The abstract modules are not defined in a formal grammar. However, the definitions do adhere to the following syntactic conventions. These conventions are similar to those of XML DTDs, and should be familiar to XML DTD authors. Each discrete syntactic element can be combined with others to make more complex expressions that conform to the algebra defined here.

element name

When an element is included in a content model, its explicit name will be listed.

content set

Some modules define lists of explicit element names called content sets . When a content set is included in a content model, its name will be listed.

expr ?

Zero or one instances of expr are permitted.

expr +

One or more instances of expr are required.

expr *

Zero or more instances of expr are permitted.

a , b

Expression a is required, followed by expression b .

a | b

Either expression a or expression b is required.

a - b

Expression a is permitted, omitting elements in expression b.

parentheses

When an expression is contained within parentheses, evaluation of any subexpressions within the parentheses take place before evaluation of expressions outside of the parentheses (starting at the deepest level of nesting first).

extending pre-defined elements

In some instances, a module adds attributes to an element. In these instances, the element name is followed by an ampersand ( & ).

defining required attributes

When an element requires the definition of an attribute, that attribute name is followed by an asterisk ( * ).

defining the type of attribute values

When a module defines the type of an attribute value, it does so by listing the type in parentheses after the attribute name.

defining the legal values of attributes

When a module defines the legal values for an attribute, it does so by listing the explicit legal values (enclosed in quotation marks), separated by vertical bars ( | ), inside of parentheses following the attribute name. If the attribute has a default value, that value is followed by an asterisk ( * ). If the attribute has a fixed value, the attribute name is followed by an equals sign ( = ) and the fixed value enclosed in quotation marks.

5.4. Content Models

Abstract module definitions define minimal, atomic content models for each module. These minimal content models reference the elements in the module itself. They may also reference elements in other modules upon which the abstract module depends. Finally, the content model in many cases requires that text be permitted as content to one or more elements. In these cases, the symbol used for text is PCDATA (parsed characted data). This is a term, defined in the XML 1.0 Recommendation, that refers to processed character data. A content type can also be defined as EMPTY , meaning the element has no content in its minimal content model.

5.5. Attribute Types

In some instances, it is necessary to define the types of attribute values or the explicit set of permitted values for attributes. The following attribute types (defined in the XML 1.0 Recommendation) are used in the definitions of the abstract modules:

In addition to these pre-defined data types, XHTML Modularization defines the following data types and their semantics (as appropriate):

5.6. Issues

6. XHTML Attribute Collections

This section is normative .

Many of the modules in this document define the required attributes for their elements. The elements in those modules may also reference zero or more attribute collections. Attribute collections are defined in their own modules, but the meta collection "Common" is defined in this section. The table below summarizes the attribute collections available.

Implementation: RELAX NG

Each of the attributes defined in an XHTML attribute collection is available when its corresponding module is included in an XHTML Host Language or an XHTML Integration Set (see [ XHTMLMOD ]). In such a situation, the attributes are available for use on elements that are NOT in the XHTML namespace when they are referenced using their namespace-qualified identifier (e.g., xhtml:id ). The semantics of the attributes remain the same regardless of whether they are referenced using their qualified identifier or not. If both the qualified and non-qualified identifier for an attribute are used on the same XHTML namespace element, the behavior is unspecified.

6.1. Issues

7. XHTML Document Module

This section is normative .

The Document Module defines the major structural elements for XHTML. These elements effectively act as the basis for the content model of many XHTML family document types. The elements and attributes included in this module are:

This module is the basic structural definition for XHTML content. The html element acts as the root element for all XHTML Family Document Types.

Note that the value of the xmlns declaration is defined to be "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/". Also note that because the xmlns declaration is treated specially by XML namespace-aware parsers [ XMLNS ], it is legal to have it present as an attribute of each element. However, any time the xmlns declaration is used in the context of an XHTML module, whether with a prefix or not, the value of the declaration must be http://www.w3.org/2002/06/xhtml2/ .

Implementation: RELAX NG

7.1. The html element

The html element is the root element for all XHTML Family Document Types. The xml:lang attribute is required on this element.

7.2. The head element

The head element contains information about the current document, such as its title, that is not considered document content. The default presentation of the head is not to display it; however that can be overridden with a style sheet for special purpose use. User agents may however make information in the head available to users through other mechanisms.

<head>
    <title>My Life</title>
</head>

7.3. The title element

Every XHTML document must have a title element in the head section.

The title element is used to identify the document. Since documents are often consulted out of context, authors should provide context-rich titles. Thus, instead of a title such as "Introduction", which doesn't provide much contextual background, authors should supply a title such as "Introduction to Medieval Bee-Keeping" instead.

For reasons of accessibility, user agents must always make the content of the title element available to users. The mechanism for doing so depends on the user agent (e.g., as a caption, spoken).

<title>A study of population dynamics</title>

The title of a document is metadata about the document, and so a title like <title>About W3C</title> is equivalent to <meta about="" property="title">About W3C</meta> .

7.4. The body element

The body of a document contains the document's content. The content may be processed by a user agent in a variety of ways. For example by visual browsers it can be presented as text, images, colors, graphics, etc., an audio user agent may speak the same content, and a search engine may create an index prioritized according to properties of the text.

<body id="theBody">
    <p>A paragraph</p>
</body>

8. XHTML Structural Module

This section is normative .

This module defines all of the basic text container elements, attributes, and their content models that are structural in nature.

The content model for this module defines some content sets:

Heading

h | h1 | h2 | h3 | h4 | h5 | h6

Structural

address | blockcode | blockquote | div | link | List | meta | p | pre | handler | section | separator | table

Flow

Heading | Structural | Text

Implementation: RELAX NG

8.1. The address element

The address element may be used by authors to supply contact information for a document or a major part of a document such as a form.

<address href="mailto:webmaster@example.net">Webmaster</address>

8.2. The blockcode element

This element indicates that its contents are a block of "code" (see the code element). This element is similar to the pre element, in that whitespace in the enclosed text has semantic relevance. As a result, the default value of the layout attribute is relevant .

<blockcode class="Perl">
sub squareFn {
    my $var = shift;
    return $var * $var ;
}
</blockcode>

Here is how this might be rendered:

sub squareFn {
    my $var = shift;
    return $var * $var ;
}

8.3. The blockquote element

This element designates a block of quoted text.

<blockquote cite="http://www.example.com/tolkien/twotowers.html">
<p>They went in single file, running like hounds on a strong scent,
and an eager light was in their eyes. Nearly due west the broad
swath of the marching Orcs tramped its ugly slot; the sweet grass
of Rohan had been bruised and blackened as they passed.</p>
</blockquote>

8.4. The div element

The div element, in conjunction with the id , class and