W3C

XML Schema 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes

W3C Working Draft 24 February 2005

This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xmlschema11-2-20050224/
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/
Previous version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xmlschema11-2-20040716/
Editors:
David Peterson, invited expert (SGMLWorks!) <davep@iit.edu>
Paul V. Biron, Kaiser Permanente, for Health Level Seven <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Ashok Malhotra, Oracle Corporation <ashokmalhotra@alum.mit.edu>
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, World Wide Web Consortium <cmsmcq@w3.org>

This document is also available in these non-normative formats: XML, XHTML with changes since version 1.0 marked, XHTML with changes since previous Working Draft marked, Independent copy of the schema for schema documents, A schema for built-in datatypes only, in a separate namespace, Independent copy of the DTD for schema documents, and List of translations.


Abstract

XML Schema: Datatypes is part 2 of the specification of the XML Schema language. It defines facilities for defining datatypes to be used in XML Schemas as well as other XML specifications. The datatype language, which is itself represented in XML 1.0, provides a superset of the capabilities found in XML 1.0 document type definitions (DTDs) for specifying datatypes on elements and attributes.

Issue (RQ-152i):RQ-152 (xml1.1)

How should this specification be aligned with XML 1.1? The changes in character set and name characters, and the question of what determines which ones to use, must be addressed.

Status of this Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This is a Public Working Draft of XML Schema 1.1. It is here made available for review by W3C members and the public. It is intended to give an indication of the W3C XML Schema Working Group's intentions for this new version of the XML Schema language and our progress in achieving them. It attempts to be complete in indicating what will change from version 1.0, but does not specify in all cases how things will change.

For those primarily interested in the changes since version 1.0, the Changes since version 1.0 (§J) appendix, which summarizes both changes already made and also those in prospect, with links to the relevant sections of this draft, is the recommended starting point. Accompanying versions of this document display in color all changes to normative text since version 1.0 and since the previous Working Draft.

This draft was published on 24 February 2005. The major changes are:

Please send comments on this Working Draft to www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org (archive).

Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

This document has been produced by the W3C XML Schema Working Group as part of the W3C XML Activity. The goals of the XML Schema language version 1.1 are discussed in the Requirements for XML Schema 1.1 document. The authors of this document are the members of the XML Schema Working Group. Different parts of this specification have different editors.

Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the Working Group's Patent disclosure page in conformance with the W3C Patent Policy of 5 February 2004. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) with respect to this specification should disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.

The English version of this specification is the only normative version. Information about translations of this document is available at http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?technology=xmlschema.

The presentation of this document has been augmented to identify changes from a previous version. Changes which have Working Group consensus are marked thus: new, added text, changed text, and deleted text. Other changes, which do not now have Working Group consensus, are marked this way: tentative additions, changes, and deletions.


Table of Contents

1 Introduction
    1.1 Introduction to Version 1.1
    1.2 Purpose
    1.3 Requirements
    1.4 Scope
    1.5 Terminology
    1.6 Constraints and Contributions
2 TypeDatatype System
    2.1 Datatype
    2.2 Value space
    2.3 Lexical space
    2.4 The Lexical Space and Lexical Mapping
    2.5 Facets
    2.6 Datatype dichotomies
3 Built-in datatypes
    3.1 Namespace considerations
    3.2 Primitive datatypes
    3.3 Derived datatypes
4 Datatype components
    4.1 Simple Type Definition
    4.2 Fundamental Facets
    4.3 ·Fundamental Facets·
    4.4 Constraining Facets
    4.5 Auxiliary Components
5 Conformance

Appendices

A Schema for Datatype Definitions (normative)
B DTD for Datatype Definitions (non-normative)
C Temporary Stuff (to be added elsewhere)
D Built-up Value Spaces
    D.1 Numerical Values
    D.2 Date/time Values
E Function Definitions
    E.1 Generic Number-related Functions
    E.2 Date/time-related Definitions
F Datatypes and Facets
    F.1 Fundamental Facets
G ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats
    G.1 ISO 8601 Conventions
    G.2 Truncated and Reduced Formats
    G.3 Deviations from ISO 8601 Formats
H Adding durations to dateTimes
    H.1 Algorithm
    H.2 Commutativity and Associativity
I Regular Expressions
    I.1 Character Classes
J Changes since version 1.0
    J.1 Changes Already Made
    J.2 Specific Outstanding Issues
K Glossary (non-normative)
L References
    L.1 Normative
    L.2 Non-normative
M Acknowledgements (non-normative)


1 Introduction

Issue (RQ-21i):RQ-21 (regex/BNF for all primitive types)

Current plan is that all datatypes defined herein will have EBNF productions at least approximately defining their lexical space, and will include a nonnormative regex derived from the EBNF if a user wishes to copy it directly.

Issue (RQ-24-2i):RQ-24 (systematic facets: canonical representations for all datatypes)

It is not possible for all datatypes to have canonical representations of all values without violating the rules of derivation or adding special-purpose constraining facets which the WG does not deem appropriate.  The WG has not yet decided how to deal with datatypes whose lexical and/or canonical mappings are context sensitive.

Issue (RQ-148i):RQ-148 (clarify use of "truncation)

The word will probably be removed.

Issue (RQ-120i):RQ-120 (consistent use of "derived)

"Derivations" other than "derivations by restriction" will be renamed "constructions".

next sub-section1.1 Introduction to Version 1.1

The Working Group has two main goals for this version of W3C XML Schema:

These goals are slightly in tension with one another -- the following summarizes the Working Group's strategic guidelines for changes between versions 1.0 and 1.1:

  1. Add support for versioning (acknowledging that this may be slightly disruptive to the XML transfer syntax at the margins)
  2. Allow bug fixes (unless in specific cases we decide that the fix is too disruptive for a point release)
  3. Allow editorial changes
  4. Allow design cleanup to change behavior in edge cases
  5. Allow relatively non-disruptive changes to type hierarchy (to better support current and forthcoming international standards and W3C recommendations)
  6. Allow design cleanup to change component structure (changes to functionality restricted to edge cases)
  7. Do not allow any significant changes in functionality
  8. Do not allow any changes to XML transfer syntax except those required by version control hooks and bug fixes

The overall aim as regards compatibility is that

previous sub-section next sub-section1.2 Purpose

The [XML] specification defines limited facilities for applying datatypes to document content in that documents may contain or refer to DTDs that assign types to elements and attributes. However, document authors, including authors of traditional documents and those transporting data in XML, often require a higher degree of type checking to ensure robustness in document understanding and data interchange.

The table below offers two typical examples of XML instances in which datatypes are implicit: the instance on the left represents a billing invoice, the instance on the right a memo or perhaps an email message in XML.

Data orientedDocument oriented
<invoice>
  <orderDate>1999-01-21</orderDate>
  <shipDate>1999-01-25</shipDate>
  <billingAddress>
   <name>Ashok Malhotra</name>
   <street>123 Microsoft Ave.</street>
   <city>Hawthorne</city>
   <state>NY</state>
   <zip>10532-0000</zip>
  </billingAddress>
  <voice>555-1234</voice>
  <fax>555-4321</fax>
</invoice>
<memo importance='high'
      date='1999-03-23'>
  <from>Paul V. Biron</from>
  <to>Ashok Malhotra</to>
  <subject>Latest draft</subject>
  <body>
    We need to discuss the latest
    draft <emph>immediately</emph>.
    Either email me at <email>
    mailto:paul.v.biron@kp.org</email>
    or call <phone>555-9876</phone>
  </body>
</memo>

The invoice contains several dates and telephone numbers, the postal abbreviation for a state (which comes from an enumerated list of sanctioned values), and a ZIP code (which takes a definable regular form).  The memo contains many of the same types of information: a date, telephone number, email address and an "importance" value (from an enumerated list, such as "low", "medium" or "high").  Applications which process invoices and memos need to raise exceptions if something that was supposed to be a date or telephone number does not conform to the rules for valid dates or telephone numbers.

In both cases, validity constraints exist on the content of the instances that are not expressible in XML DTDs.  The limited datatyping facilities in XML have prevented validating XML processors from supplying the rigorous type checking required in these situations.  The result has been that individual applications writers have had to implement type checking in an ad hoc manner.  This specification addresses the need of both document authors and applications writers for a robust, extensible datatype system for XML which could be incorporated into XML processors.  As discussed below, these datatypes could be used in other XML-related standards as well.

previous sub-section next sub-section1.3 Requirements

The [XML Schema Requirements] document spells out concrete requirements to be fulfilled by this specification, which state that the XML Schema Language must:

  1. provide for primitive data typing, including byte, date, integer, sequence, SQL and Java primitive datatypes, etc.;
  2. define a type system that is adequate for import/export from database systems (e.g., relational, object, OLAP);
  3. distinguish requirements relating to lexical data representation vs. those governing an underlying information set;
  4. allow creation of user-defined datatypes, such as datatypes that are derived from existing datatypes and which may constrain certain of its properties (e.g., range, precision, length, format).

previous sub-section next sub-section1.4 Scope

This portion of the XML Schema Language discusses datatypes that can be used in an XML Schema.  These datatypes can be specified for element content that would be specified as #PCDATA and attribute values of various types in a DTD.  It is the intention of this specification that it be usable outside of the context of XML Schemas for a wide range of other XML-related activities such as [XSL] and [RDF Schema].

previous sub-section next sub-section1.5 Terminology

The terminology used to describe XML Schema Datatypes is defined in the body of this specification. The terms defined in the following list are used in building those definitions and in describing the actions of a datatype processor:

[Definition:]   for compatibility
A feature of this specification included solely to ensure that schemas which use this feature remain compatible with [XML]
Conforming documents and processors are permitted to but need not behave as described.
(Of strings or names:) Two strings or names being compared must be identical. Characters with multiple possible representations in ISO/IEC 10646 (e.g. characters with both precomposed and base+diacritic forms) match only if they have the same representation in both strings. No case folding is performed. (Of strings and rules in the grammar:) A string matches a grammatical production if and only if it belongs to the language generated by that production.
Conforming documents and processors are required to behave as described; otherwise they are in ·error·.
A violation of the rules of this specification; results are undefined. Conforming software ·may· detect and report an error and ·may· recover from it.

previous sub-section 1.6 Constraints and Contributions

This specification provides three different kinds of normative statements about schema components, their representations in XML and their contribution to the schema-validation of information items:

[Definition:]   Constraint on Schemas
Constraints on the schema components themselves, i.e. conditions components ·must· satisfy to be components at all. Largely to be found in Datatype components (§4).
[Definition:]   Schema Representation Constraint
Constraints on the representation of schema components in XML.  Some but not all of these are expressed in Schema for Datatype Definitions (normative) (§A) and DTD for Datatype Definitions (non-normative) (§B).
[Definition:]   Validation Rule
Constraints expressed by schema components which information items ·must· satisfy to be schema-valid.  Largely to be found in Datatype components (§4).

2 TypeDatatype System

This section describes the conceptual framework behind the datatype system defined in this specification.  The framework has been influenced by the [ISO 11404] standard on language-independent datatypes as well as the datatypes for [SQL] and for programming languages such as Java.

The datatypes discussed in this specification are computer representations offor the most part well known abstract concepts such as integer and date. It is not the place of this specification to thoroughly define these abstract concepts; many other publications provide excellent definitions. However, this specification will attempt to describe the abstract concepts well enough that they can be readily recognized and distinguished from other abstractions with which they may be confused.

Note: Only those operations and relations needed for schema processing are defined in this specification. Applications using these datatypes are generally expected to implement appropriate additional functions and/or relations to make the datatype generally useful.  For example, the description herein of the float datatype does not define addition or multiplication, much less all of the operations defined for that datatype in [IEEE 754-1985] on which it is based.

next sub-section2.1 Datatype

[Definition:]  In this specification, a datatype is a 3-tuple, consisting of a) a set of distinct values, called its ·value space·, b) a set of lexical representations, called its ·lexical space·, and c) a set of ·facet·s that characterize properties of the ·value space·, individual values or lexical items.

[Definition:]  In this specification, a datatype has three properties:

Note: This specification only defines the operations and relations needed for schema processing.  The choice of terminology for describing/naming the datatypes is selected to guide users and implementers in how to expand the datatype to be generally useful—i.e., how to recognize the "real world" datatypes and their variants for which the datatypes defined herein are meant to be used for data interchange.

Along with the ·lexical mapping· it is often useful to have an inverse which provides a standard ·lexical representation· for each value.  Such a ·canonical mapping· is not required for schema processing, but is described herein for the benefit of users of this specification, and other specifications which might find it useful to reference these descriptions normatively.

previous sub-section next sub-section2.2 Value space

        2.2.1 Identity
        2.2.2 Equality
        2.2.3 Order

[Definition:]  A value space is the set of values for a given datatype. Each value in the value space of a datatype is denoted by one or more literals in its ·lexical space·.

[Definition:]  The value space of a datatype is the set of values for that datatype.  Associated with each value space are selected operations and relations necessary to permit proper schema processing.  Each value in the value space of a datatype is denoted by one or more character strings in its ·lexical space·, according to ·the lexical mapping·.  (If the mapping is restricted during a derivation in such a way that a value has no denotation, that value is dropped from the value space.)

The value spaces of datatypes are abstractions, and are defined in Built-in datatypes (§3) to the extent needed to clarify them for readers.  For example, in defining the numerical datatypes, we assume some general numerical concepts such as number and integer are known.  In many cases we provide references to other documents providing more complete definitions.

Note: The value spaces and the values therein are abstractions.  This specification does not prescribe any particular internal representations that must be used when implementing these datatypes.  In some cases, there are references to other specifications which do prescribe specific internal representations; these specific internal representations must be used to comply with those other specifications, but need not be used to comply with this specification.

In addition, other applications are expected to define additional appropriate operations and/or relations on these value spaces (e.g., addition and multiplication on the various numerical datatypes' value spaces), and are permitted where appropriate to even redefine the operations and relations defined within this specification, provided that for schema processing the relations and operations used are those defined herein.

The ·value space· of a given datatype can be defined in one of the following ways:

  • defined elsewhere axiomatically from fundamental notions (intensional definition) [see ·primitive·]
  • enumerated outright from values of an already defined datatype (extensional definition) [see ·enumeration·]
  • defined by restricting the ·value space· of an already defined datatype to a particular subset with a given set of properties [see ·derived·]
  • defined as a combination of values from one or more already defined ·value space·(s) by a specific construction procedure [see ·list· and ·union·]

·value space·s have certain properties.  For example, they always have the property of ·cardinality·, some definition of equality and might be ·ordered·, by which individual values within the ·value space· can be compared to one another.  The properties of ·value space·s that are recognized by this specification are defined in Fundamental facets (§2.5.1).

The relations of identity, equality, and order are required for each value space.  A very few datatypes have other relations or operations prescribed for the purposes of this specification.

2.2.1 Identity

The identity relation is always defined. Every value space inherently has an identity relation. Two things are identical if and only if they are actually the same thing: i.e., if there is no way whatever to tell them apart.  The identity relation is used when making restrictions by enumeration, and when checking identity constraints.  These are the only uses of identity for schema processing.

In the identity relation defined herein, values from different ·primitive· datatypes' ·value spaces· are made artificially distinct if they might otherwise be considered identical.  For example, there is a number two in the decimal datatype and a number two in the float datatype.  In the identity relation defined herein, these two values are considered distinct.  Other applications making use of these datatypes may choose to consider values such as these identical, but for the view of ·primitive· datatypes' ·value spaces· used herein, they are distinct.

WARNING:  Care must be taken when identifying values across distinct primitive datatypes.  It turns out that, for example, 0.1 and 0.10000000009 are effectively identical in float but not in decimal.  (Neither 0.1 nor 0.10000000009 are in the float value space, but ·the lexical mapping· of float maps both '0.1' and '0.10000000009' to the same number (0.100000001490116119384765625) that is in the float value space.)

2.2.2 Equality

Each ·primitive· datatype has prescribed an equality relation for its value space.  The equality relation for most datatypes is the identity relation.  In the few cases where it is not, it has been carefully defined so as to be a congruence relation for most other operations of interest to the datatype.  (This means simply that if two values are equal and one is substituted for the other as an argument to any of the operations, the results will always also be equal.  For example, identity is by definition a congruence relation for all other operations of interest.)  Equality is always a congruence for the order relation.

On the other hand, equality need not cover the entire value space of the datatype (though it usually does).

The equality relation is used in conjunction with order when making restrictions involving order.  This is the only use of equality for schema processing.

Note: In the prior version of this specification (1.0), equality was always identity.  This has been changed to permit the datatypes defined herein to more closely match the "real world" datatypes for which they are intended to be used as transmission formats.

For example, the float datatype has an equality which is not the identity ( –0 = +0 , but they are not identical—although they were identical in the 1.0 version of this specification), and whose domain excludes one value, NaN, so that  NaN ≠ NaN .

For another example, the dateTime datatype previously lost any timezone information in the ·lexical representation· as the value was converted to ·UTC·; now the timezone is retained and two values representing the same "moment in time" but with different remembered timezones are now equal but not identical.

In the equality relation defined herein, values from different primitive data spaces are made artificially unequal even if they might otherwise be considered equal.  For example, there is a number two in the decimal datatype and a number two in the float datatype.  In the equality relation defined herein, these two values are considered unequal.  Other applications making use of these datatypes may choose to consider values such as these equal (and must do so if they choose to consider them identical); nonetheless, in the equality relation defined herein, they are unequal.

For the purposes of this specification, there is one equality relation for all values of all datatypes (the union of the various datatype's individual equalities, if one consider relations to be sets of ordered pairs).  The equality relation is denoted by '=' and its negation by '≠', each used as a binary infix predicate:  x = y  and  x ≠ y .  On the other hand, identity relationships are always described in words.

2.2.3 Order

Each datatype has an order relation prescribed. This order may be a partial order, which means that there may be values in the ·value space· which are neither equal, less-than, nor greater-than.  Such value pairs are incomparable.  In many cases, the prescribed order is the "null order":  the ultimate partial order, in which no pairs are less-than or greater-than; they are all equal or ·incomparable·. [Definition:]  Two values that are neither equal, less-than, nor greater-than are incomparable. Two values that are not ·incomparable· are comparable. The order relation is used in conjunction with equality when making restrictions involving order.  This is the only use of order for schema processing.

In this specification, this less-than order relation is denoted by '<' (and its inverse by '>'), the weak order by '≤' (and its inverse by '≥'), and the resulting ·incomparable· relation by '<>', each used as a binary infix predicate:  x < y ,  x ≤ y ,  x > y ,  x ≥ y , and  x <> y .

Note: The weak order "less-than-or-equal" means "less-than" or "equal" and one can tell which.  For example, the duration P1M (one month) is not less-than-or-equal P31D (thirty-one days) because P1M is not less than P31D, nor is P1M equal to P31D.  Instead, P1M is ·incomparable· with P31D.)  The formal definition of order for duration (duration (§3.2.7)) insures that this is true.

The value spaces of primitive datatypes are abstractions, which may have values in common.  In the order relation defined herein, these value spaces are made artificially ·incomparable·.  For example, the numbers two and three are values in both the pDecimal datatype and the float datatype.  In the order relation defined herein, two in the decimal datatype and three in the float datatype are incomparable values.  Other applications making use of these datatypes may choose to consider values such as these comparable.

While it is not an error to attempt to compare values from the value spaces of two different primitive datatypes, they will alway be ·incomparable· and therefore unequal:  If x and y are in the value spaces of different primitive datatypes then  x <> y  (and hence  x ≠ y ).

previous sub-section next sub-section2.3 Lexical space

In addition to its ·value space·, each datatype also has a lexical space.

[Definition:]  A lexical space is the set of valid literals for a datatype.

For example, "100" and "1.0E2" are two different literals from the ·lexical space· of float which both denote the same value. The type system defined in this specification provides a mechanism for schema designers to control the set of values and the corresponding set of acceptable literals of those values for a datatype.

Note:  The literals in the ·lexical space·s defined in this specification have the following characteristics:
Interoperability:
The number of literals for each value has been kept small; for many datatypes there is a one-to-one mapping between literals and values. This makes it easy to exchange the values between different systems. In many cases, conversion from locale-dependent representations will be required on both the originator and the recipient side, both for computer processing and for interaction with humans.
Basic readability:
Textual, rather than binary, literals are used. This makes hand editing, debugging, and similar activities possible.
Ease of parsing and serializing:
Where possible, literals correspond to those found in common programming languages and libraries.

2.3.1 Canonical Lexical Representation

While the datatypes defined in this specification have, for the most part, a single lexical representation i.e. each value in the datatype's ·value space· is denoted by a single literal in its ·lexical space·, this is not always the case.  The example in the previous section showed two literals for the datatype float which denote the same value.  Similarly, there ·may· be several literals for one of the date or time datatypes that denote the same value using different timezone indicators.

[Definition:]  A canonical lexical representation is a set of literals from among the valid set of literals for a datatype such that there is a one-to-one mapping between literals in the canonical lexical representation and values in the ·value space·.

previous sub-section next sub-section2.4 The Lexical Space and Lexical Mapping

[Definition:]  The lexical mapping for a datatype is a prescribed function whose domain is a prescribed set of character strings (the ·lexical space·) and whose range is the ·value space· of that datatype.

[Definition:]  The lexical space of a datatype is the prescribed domain of ·the lexical mapping· for that datatype.

[Definition:]  The members of the ·lexical space· are lexical representations of the values to which they are mapped.

Should a derivation be made using a derivation mechanism that removes ·lexical representations· from the·lexical space· to the extent that one or more values cease to have any ·lexical representation·, then those values are dropped from the ·value space·.

Note: This could happen by means of a pattern facet.

Conversely, should a derivation remove values then their ·lexical representations· are dropped from the ·lexical space· unless there is a facet value whose impact is defined to cause the otherwise-dropped ·lexical representation· to be mapped to another value instead.

Note: There are currently no facets with such an impact.  There may be in the future.

For example, '100' and '1.0E2' are two different ·lexical representations· from the float datatype which both denote the same value.  The datatype system defined in this specification provides mechanisms for schema designers to control the ·value space· and the corresponding set of acceptable ·lexical representations· of those values for a datatype.

2.4.1 Canonical Mapping

Issue (RQ-129i):RQ-129 (remove dependency on canonical representations)

The dependencies are in Part 1; they will be resolved there.  Text in this Part will reflect that canonical representation are provided for the benefit of other users, including other specifications that might want to reference these datatypes.

Issue (RQ-126i):RQ-126 (restricting away canonical representations)

Given the "pattern" constraining facet, restricting away canonical representations cannot be prohibited without undue processing expense.  A warning will be inserted, and RQ-129 will insure that loss of canonical representations will not affect schema processing.

While the datatypes defined in this specification generally have a single ·lexical representation· for each value (i.e., each value in the datatype's ·value space· is denoted by a single ·representation· in its ·lexical space·), this is not always the case.  The example in the previous section shows two ·lexical representations· from the float datatype which denote the same value.

[Definition:]  The canonical mapping is a prescribed subset of the inverse of a ·lexical mapping· which is one-to-one and whose domain (where possible) is the entire range of the ·lexical mapping· (the ·value space·).  Thus a ·canonical mapping· selects one ·lexical representation· for each value in the ·value space·.

[Definition:]  The canonical representation of a value in the ·value space· of a datatype is the ·lexical representation· associated with that value by the datatype's ·canonical mapping·.

·Canonical mappings· are not available for datatypes whose ·lexical mappings· are context dependent (i.e., mappings for which the value of a ·lexical representation· depends on the context in which it occurs, or for which a character string may or may not be a valid ·lexical representation· similarly depending on its context)

Note: ·Canonical representations· are provided where feasible for the use of other appilications; they are not required for schema processing itself.  A conforming schema processor implementation is not required to implement ·canonical mappings·.

previous sub-section next sub-section2.5 Facets

Issue (del-RQ-24-1i):RQ-24 (systematic approach to facets)

This decision is not yet written up herein:  The four informational facets, each of which have only one property, will be lumped into one facet having four properties.  This will represent a further technical change to the facet structure, but will not result in any additional or lost information in a schema.

[Definition:]  A facet is a single defining aspect of a ·value space·.  Generally speaking, each facet characterizes a ·value space· along independent axes or dimensions.

The facets of a datatype serve to distinguish those aspects of one datatype which differ from other datatypes. Rather than being defined solely in terms of a prose description the datatypes in this specification are defined in terms of the synthesis of facet values which together determine the ·value space· and properties of the datatype.

Facets are of two types: fundamental facets that define the datatype and non-fundamental or constraining facets that constrain the permitted values of a datatype.

2.5.1 Fundamental facets

[Definition:]   A fundamental facet is an abstract property which serves to semantically characterize the values in a ·value space·.

All fundamental facets are fully described in Fundamental Facets (§4.3).

2.5.2 Constraining or Non-fundamental facets

[Definition:]  A constraining facet is an optional property that can be applied to a datatype to constrain its ·value space·.

Constraining the ·value space· consequently constrains the ·lexical space·.  Adding ·constraining facet·s to a ·base type· is described in Derivation by restriction (§4.1.2.1).

All constraining facets are fully described in Constraining Facets (§4.4).

previous sub-section 2.6 Datatype dichotomies

It is useful to categorize the datatypes defined in this specification along various dimensions, forming a set of characterization dichotomies.

2.6.1 Atomic vs. list vs. union datatypes

The first distinction to be made is that between ·atomic·, ·list· and ·union· datatypes.

For example, a single token which ·matches· Nmtoken from [XML] could be the value of an ·atomic· datatype (NMTOKEN); while a sequence of such tokens could be the value of a ·list· datatype (NMTOKENS).

2.6.1.1 Atomic datatypes

·atomic· datatypes can be either ·primitive· or ·derived·.  The ·value space· of an ·atomic· datatype is a set of "atomic" values, which for the purposes of this specification, are not further decomposable.  ↓ An ·atomic· datatype has a ·value space· consisting of a set of "atomic" values which for purposes of this specification are not further decomposable.  The ·lexical space· of an ·atomic· datatype is a set of literals whose internal structure is specific to the datatype in question. There is one "special" atomic type (anyAtomicType) and a number of ·primitive· atomic types, which have anyAtomicType as their base type. All other atomic types are derived by restriction either from one of the primitive atomic types or from another ordinary atomic type. No user-defined type may have anyAtomicType as its base type.

2.6.1.2 List datatypes

Several type systems (such as the one described in [ISO 11404]) treat ·list· datatypes as special cases of the more general notions of aggregate or collection datatypes.

·list· datatypes are always ·derived·. The ·value space· of a ·list· datatype is a set of finite-length sequences of ·atomic· values. The ·lexical space· of a ·list· datatype is a set of literals whose internal structure is a space-separated sequence of literals of the ·atomic· datatype of the items in the ·list·.

[Definition:]   The ·atomic· or ·union· datatype that participates in the definition of a ·list· datatype is known as the itemType of that ·list· datatype.

Example
<simpleType name='sizes'>
  <list itemType='decimal'/>
</simpleType>
<cerealSizes xsi:type='sizes'> 8 10.5 12 </cerealSizes>

A ·list· datatype can be ·derived· from an ordinary ·atomic· datatype whose ·lexical space· allows space (such as string or anyURI) or a ·union· datatype any of whose {member type definitions}'s ·lexical space· allows space. In such a case, regardless of the input, list items will be separated at space boundaries.

Example
<simpleType name='listOfString'>
  <list itemType='string'/>
</simpleType>
<someElement xsi:type='listOfString'>
this is not list item 1
this is not list item 2
this is not list item 3
</someElement>
In the above example, the value of the someElement element is not a ·list· of ·length· 3; rather, it is a ·list· of ·length· 18.

When a datatype is ·derived· from a ·list· datatype, the following ·constraining facet·s apply:

For each of ·length·, ·maxLength· and ·minLength·, the unit of length is measured in number of list items.  The value of ·whiteSpace· is fixed to the value collapse.

For ·list· datatypes the ·lexical space· is composed of space-separated literals of its ·itemType·.  Hence, any ·pattern· specified when a new datatype is ·derived· from a ·list· datatype is matched against each literal of the ·list· datatype and not against the literals of the datatype that serves as its ·itemType·.

Example
<xs:simpleType name='myList'>
	<xs:list itemType='xs:integer'/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name='myRestrictedList'>
	<xs:restriction base='myList'>
		<xs:pattern value='123 (\d+\s)*456'/>
	</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
<someElement xsi:type='myRestrictedList'>123 456</someElement>
<someElement xsi:type='myRestrictedList'>123 987 456</someElement>
<someElement xsi:type='myRestrictedList'>123 987 567 456</someElement>

The canonical-lexical-representation for the ·list· datatype is defined as the lexical form in which each item in the ·list· has the canonical lexical representation of its ·itemType·.

2.6.1.3 Union datatypes

The ·value space· and ·lexical space· of a ·union· datatype are the union of the ·value space·s and ·lexical space·s of its ·memberTypes·. ·union· datatypes are always ·derived·. Currently, there are no ·built-in· ·union· datatypes.

Example
A prototypical example of a ·union· type is the maxOccurs attribute on the element element in XML Schema itself: it is a union of nonNegativeInteger and an enumeration with the single member, the string "unbounded", as shown below.
  <attributeGroup name="occurs">
    <attribute name="minOccurs" type="nonNegativeInteger"
    	use="optional" default="1"/>
    <attribute name="maxOccurs"use="optional" default="1">
      <simpleType>
        <union>
          <simpleType>
            <restriction base='nonNegativeInteger'/>
          </simpleType>
          <simpleType>
            <restriction base='string'>
              <enumeration value='unbounded'/>
            </restriction>
          </simpleType>
        </union>
      </simpleType>
    </attribute>
  </attributeGroup>

Any number (greater than 1) of ordinary ·atomic· or ·list· ·datatype·s can participate in a ·union· type.

[Definition:]   The datatypes that participate in the definition of a ·union· datatype are known as the memberTypes of that ·union· datatype.

The order in which the ·memberTypes· are specified in the definition (that is, the order of the <simpleType> children of the <union> element, or the order of the QNames in the memberTypes attribute) is significant. During validation, an element or attribute's value is validated against the ·memberTypes· in the order in which they appear in the definition until a match is found.  The evaluation order can be overridden with the use of xsi:type.

Example
For example, given the definition below, the first instance of the <size> element validates correctly as an integer (§3.3.13), the second and third as string (§3.2.1).
  <xsd:element name='size'>
    <xsd:simpleType>
      <xsd:union>
        <xsd:simpleType>
          <xsd:restriction base='integer'/>
        </xsd:simpleType>
        <xsd:simpleType>
          <xsd:restriction base='string'/>
        </xsd:simpleType>
      </xsd:union>
    </xsd:simpleType>
  </xsd:element>
  <size>1</size>
  <size>large</size>
  <size xsi:type='xsd:string'>1</size>

The canonical-lexical-representation for a ·union· datatype is defined as the lexical form in which the values have the canonical lexical representation of the appropriate ·memberTypes·.

Note:  A datatype which is ·atomic· in this specification need not be an "atomic" datatype in any programming language used to implement this specification.  Likewise, a datatype which is a ·list· in this specification need not be a "list" datatype in any programming language used to implement this specification. Furthermore, a datatype which is a ·union· in this specification need not be a "union" datatype in any programming language used to implement this specification.

2.6.2 Primitive vs. derived datatypesConstructed Datatypes

Next, we distinguish between ·primitive·, ·constructed·, and ·derived· datatypes.

  • [Definition:]  Primitive datatypes are those that are not defined in terms of other datatypes; they exist ab initio.
  • [Definition:]  Derived datatypes are those that are defined in terms of other datatypes.

    [Definition:]  Constructed datatypes are those that are defined in terms of other datatypes.

For example, in this specification, float is a well-defined mathematical concept that cannot be defined in terms of other datatypes, while a integer is a special case of the more general datatype decimal.

Issue (diff-RQ-141i):

RQ-141 (add abstract anyAtomicType) RQ-24 (systematic facets: status and value space of anySimpleType)

A new special datatype will be introduced as a child of anySimpleType and the base type of all primitive atomic datatypes.

Resolution:

None recorded.

[Definition:]   The simple ur-type definitiondefinition of anySimpleType is a special restriction of the ur-type definition whose name is anySimpleType in the XML Schema namespaceanyType. anySimpleType can be considered as the ·base type· of all ·primitive· datatypes. anySimpleType is considered to have an unconstrained lexical space and a ·value space· consisting of the union of the ·value space·s of all the ·primitive· datatypes and the set of all lists of all members of the ·value space·s of all the ·primitive· datatypes.

The datatypes defined by this specification fall into both the ·primitive· and ·derived· categories.  It is felt that a judiciously chosen set of ·primitive· datatypes will serve the widest possible audience by providing a set of convenient datatypes that can be used as is, as well as providing a rich enough base from which the variety of datatypes needed by schema designers can be ·derived·.

In the example above, integer is ·derived· from decimal.

Note:  A datatype which is ·primitive· in this specification need not be a "primitive" datatype in any programming language used to implement this specification.  Likewise, a datatype which is ·derived· in this specification need not be a "derived" datatype in any programming language used to implement this specification.

As described in more detail in XML Representation of Simple Type Definition Schema Components (§4.1.2), each ·user-derived· datatype ·must· be defined in terms of another datatype in one of three ways: 1) by assigning ·constraining facet·s which serve to restrict the ·value space· of the ·user-derived· datatype to a subset of that of the ·base type·; 2) by creating a ·list· datatype whose ·value space· consists of finite-length sequences of values of its ·itemType·; or 3) by creating a ·union· datatype whose ·value space· consists of the union of the ·value space·s of its ·memberTypes·.

2.6.2.1 Derived by restriction

[Definition:]  A datatype is said to be ·derived· by restriction from another datatype when values for zero or more ·constraining facet·s are specified that serve to constrain its ·value space· and/or its ·lexical space· to a subset of those of its ·base type·.

[Definition:]  Every datatype that is ·derived· by ·restriction· is defined in terms of an existing datatype, referred to as its base type. base types can be either ·primitive· or ·derived·.

2.6.2.2 Derived by list

A ·list· datatype can be ·derived· from another datatype (its ·itemType·) by creating a ·value space· that consists of a finite-length sequence of values of its ·itemType·.

2.6.2.3 Derived by union

One datatype can be ·derived· from one or more datatypes by ·union·ing their ·value space·s and, consequently, their ·lexical space·s.

2.6.3 Built-in vs. user-derived datatypes

Conceptually there is no difference between the ·built-in· ·derived· datatypes included in this specification and the ·user-derived· datatypes which will be created by individual schema designers. The ·built-in· ·derived· datatypes are those which are believed to be so common that if they were not defined in this specification many schema designers would end up "reinventing" them.  Furthermore, including these ·derived· datatypes in this specification serves to demonstrate the mechanics and utility of the datatype generation facilities of this specification.

Note:  A datatype which is ·built-in· in this specification need not be a "built-in" datatype in any programming language used to implement this specification.  Likewise, a datatype which is ·user-derived· in this specification need not be a "user-derived" datatype in any programming language used to implement this specification.

3 Built-in datatypes

Built-in Datatype Hierarchy diagramanyType anyType anySimpleType anySimpleType string string pDecimal pDecimal hexBinary hexBinary anyAtomicType anyAtomicType ENTITY ENTITY ENTITIES ENTITIES ID ID IDREFS IDREFS IDREF IDREF Name Name NCName NCName NMTOKEN NMTOKEN NMTOKENS NMTOKENS language language token token normalizedString normalizedString float float double double unsignedByte unsignedByte unsignedShort unsignedShort unsignedInt unsignedInt unsignedLong unsignedLong positiveInteger positiveInteger byte byte short short int int negativeInteger negativeInteger nonPositiveInteger nonPositiveInteger long long nonNegativeInteger nonNegativeInteger integer integer decimal decimal gMonth gMonth gDay gDay gMonthDay gMonthDay gYear gYear gYearMonth gYearMonth date date time time dateTime dateTime duration duration NOTATION NOTATION QName QName anyURI anyURI base64Binary base64Binary boolean boolean

Each built-in datatype in this specification (both ·primitive· and ·derived·) can be uniquely addressed via a URI Reference constructed as follows:

  1. the base URI is the URI of the XML Schema namespace
  2. the fragment identifier is the name of the datatype

For example, to address the int datatype, the URI is:

Additionally, each facet definition element can be uniquely addressed via a URI constructed as follows:

  1. the base URI is the URI of the XML Schema namespace
  2. the fragment identifier is the name of the facet

For example, to address the maxInclusive facet, the URI is:

Additionally, each facet usage in a built-in datatype definition can be uniquely addressed via a URI constructed as follows:

  1. the base URI is the URI of the XML Schema namespace
  2. the fragment identifier is the name of the datatype, followed by a period (".") followed by the name of the facet

For example, to address the usage of the maxInclusive facet in the definition of int, the URI is:

next sub-section3.1 Namespace considerations

The ·built-in· datatypes defined by this specification are designed to be used with the XML Schema definition language as well as other XML specifications. To facilitate usage within the XML Schema definition language, the ·built-in· datatypes in this specification have the namespace name:

  • http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema

To facilitate usage in specifications other than the XML Schema definition language, such as those that do not want to know anything about aspects of the XML Schema definition language other than the datatypes, each ·built-in· datatype is also defined in the namespace whose URI is:

  • http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-datatypes

This applies to both ·built-in· ·primitive· and ·built-in· ·derived· datatypes.

Each ·user-derived· datatype is also associated with a unique namespace.  However, ·user-derived· datatypes do not come from the namespace defined by this specification; rather, they come from the namespace of the schema in which they are defined (see XML Representation of Schemas in [XML Schema Part 1: Structures]).

previous sub-section next sub-section3.2 Primitive datatypes

        3.2.1 string
        3.2.2 boolean
        3.2.3 decimal
        3.2.4 pDecimal
        3.2.5 float
        3.2.6 double
        3.2.7 duration
        3.2.8 dateTime
        3.2.9 time
        3.2.10 date
        3.2.11 gYearMonth
        3.2.12 gYear
        3.2.13 gMonthDay
        3.2.14 gDay
        3.2.15 gMonth
        3.2.16 hexBinary
        3.2.17 base64Binary
        3.2.18 anyURI
        3.2.19 QName
        3.2.20 NOTATION

The ·primitive· datatypes defined by this specification are described below.  For each datatype, the ·value space· and ·lexical space· are defined, ·constraining facet·s which apply to the datatype are listed and any datatypes ·derived· from this datatype are specified.

·primitive· datatypes can only be added by revisions to this specification.

3.2.1 string

[Definition:]  The string datatype represents character strings in XML.  The ·value space· of string is the set of finite-length sequences of characters (as defined in [XML]) that ·match· the Char production from [XML]. A character is an atomic unit of communication; it is not further specified except to note that every character has a corresponding Universal Character Set code point, which is an integer.

Note:  Many human languages have writing systems that require child elements for control of aspects such as bidirectional formating or ruby annotation (see [Ruby] and Section 8.2.4 Overriding the bidirectional algorithm: the BDO element of [HTML 4.01]). Thus, string, as a simple type that can contain only characters but not child elements, is often not suitable for representing text. In such situations, a complex type that allows mixed content should be considered. For more information, see Section 5.5 Any Element, Any Attribute of [XML Schema Language: Part 0 Primer].
Note:  As noted in ordered, the fact that this specification does not specify an ·order-relation·order relation for ·string· does not preclude other applications from treating strings as being ordered.

3.2.3 decimal

Issue (RQ-150i):RQ-150 (minimum number of digits for decimal)

The minimum number of digits implementations are required to support will be lowered to 16 digits; a health warning will be added to note that implementations of derived datatypes may support more digits of precision than the base decimal type does, but that they are not required to do so.

[Definition:]  decimal represents a subset of the real numbers, which can be represented by decimal numerals. The ·value space· of decimal is the set of numbers that can be obtained by multiplyingdividing an integer by a non-positivenegative power of ten, i.e., expressible as i × 10^-ni / 10n where i and n are integers and n >= 0n ≥ 0. Precision is not reflected in this value space; the number 2.0 is not distinct from the number 2.00. (The datatype pDecimal may be used for values in which precision is significant.) The ·order-relation·order relation on decimal is the order relation on real numbers, restricted to this subset.

Note: All ·minimally conforming· processors ·must· support decimal numbers with a minimum of 1816 decimal digits (i.e., with a ·totalDigits· of 18they must support all values which would be allowed by a simple type definition which set totalDigits to 16).  However, ·minimally conforming· processors ·may· set an application-defined limit on the maximum number of decimal digits they are prepared to support, in which case that application-defined maximum number ·must· be clearly documented.
3.2.3.1 Lexical representation

decimal has a lexical representation consisting of a finite-length sequence of decimal digits (#x30-#x39) separated by a period as a decimal indicator. An optional leading sign is allowed. If the sign is omitted, "+" is assumed.  Leading and trailing zeroes are optional. If the fractional part is zero, the period and following zero(es) can be omitted. For example: -1.23, 12678967.543233, +100000.00, 210.

The lexical space of decimal is the set of lexical representations which match the grammar given above, or (equivalently) the regular expression '-?(([0-9]+(.[0-9]*)?)|(.[0-9]+))'.

The mapping from lexical representations to values is the usual one for decimal numerals; it is given formally in:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a decimalLexicalRep onto a decimal value.

3.2.3.2 Canonical representation

The canonical representation for decimal is defined by prohibiting certain options from the Lexical representation (§3.2.3.1).  Specifically, the preceding optional "+" sign is prohibited.  The decimal point is required. Leading and trailing zeroes are prohibited subject to the following: there must be at least one digit to the right and to the left of the decimal point which may be a zero.

The mapping from values to canonical representations is given formally in:

3.2.4 pDecimal

[Definition:]  The pDecimal datatype represents the numeric value and (arithmetic) precision of decimal numbers which retain precision; it also includes special values for positive and negative infinity and "not a number", and it differentiates between "positive zero" and "negative zero".  The special values are introduced to make the datatype correspond closely to the floating-point decimal datatypes described by the forthcoming revision of IEEE/ANSI 754.

Precision is sometimes given in absolute, sometimes in relative terms. [Definition:]  The arithmetic precision of a value is expressed in absolute quantitative terms, by indicating how many digits to the right of the decimal point are significant. "5" has an arithmetic precision of 0, and "5.01" an arithmetic precision of 2.

3.2.4.1 Value Space
a decimal number, positiveInfinity, negativeInfinity or notANumber
an integer or absent; absent if and only if ·numericalValue· is a constant.
positive, negative, or absent; must be positive if ·numericalValue· is positive or positiveInfinity, must be negative if ·numericalValue· is negative or negativeInfinity, must be absent if and only if ·numericalValue· is notANumber
Note: The ·sign· property is redundant except when ·numericalValue· is zero; in other cases, the ·sign· value is fully determined by the ·numericalValue· value.
Note: As explained below, the lexical representation of the pDecimal value object whose ·numericalValue· is notANumber is 'NaN'.  Accordingly, in English text we use 'NaN' to refer to that value.  Similarly we use 'INF' and '–INF' to refer to the two value objects whose ·numericalValue· is positiveInfinity and negativeInfinity.  These three value objects are also informally called "not-a-number", "positive infinity", and "negative infinity". The latter two together are called "the infinities".

Equality and order for pDecimal are defined as follows:

  • Two numerical pDecimal values are ordered (or equal) as their ·numericalValue· values are ordered (or equal).  (This means that two zeros with different ·sign·s are equal; negative zeros are not ordered less than positive zeros.)
  • INF is equal only to itself, and is greater than –INF and all numerical pDecimal values.
  • –INF is equal only to itself, and is less than INF and all numerical pDecimal values.
  • NaN is incomparable with all values, including itself.

3.2.4.2 Lexical Mapping

pDecimal's lexical space is the set of all decimal numerals with or without a decimal point, numerals in scientific (exponential) notation, and the character strings 'INF', '+INF', '-INF', and 'NaN'.  The lexicalMappings facet can remove any one or two of the three subsets of numerals, with corresponding reductions in the value space.  Using this facet rather than pattern will change the canonical mapping to insure that the resulting datatype will still have canonical representations of all its values.

The lexical mapping and canonical mapping for pDecimal are the following functions:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a pDecimalRep onto a complete pDecimal value.

3.2.4.3 Simple Type Definition for pDecimal

The Simple Type Definition of pDecimal is present in every schema.  It has the following properties:

Simple Type Definition of pDecimal
PropertyValue
{name}'pDecimal'
{target namespace}'http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'
{base type definition}The anyAtomicType
{final}The empty set
{variety}atomic
{primitive type definition}pDecimal
{facets}{}
{fundamental facets}

{

}

{scope}global
{item type definition}absent
{member type definitions}absent
{annotations}The empty sequence

3.2.5 float

Issue (RQ-1i):RQ-1 (canonical representation of float, double)

The description of canonical representations for float and double needs to be cleaned up.

Issue (RQ-140i):RQ-140 (positive and negative zero in float and double)

Two zeros will be provided similar to those in precisionDecimal

[Definition:]  float is patterned after the IEEE single-precision 32-bit floating point type [IEEE 754-1985].  The basic ·value space· of float consists of the values m × 2^e, where m is an integer whose absolute value is less than 2^24, and e is an integer between -149 and 104, inclusive.  In addition to the basic ·value space· described above, the ·value space· of float also contains the following three special values: positive and negative infinity and not-a-number (NaN). The ·order-relation·order relation on float is: x < y iff y - x is positive for x and y in the value space. Positive infinity is greater than all other non-NaN values. NaN equals itself but is incomparable with (neither greater than nor less than) any other value in the ·value space·.

Note:  "Equality" in this Recommendation is defined to be "identity" (i.e., values that are identical in the ·value space· are equal and vice versa). Identity must be used for the few operations that are defined in this Recommendation. Applications using any of the datatypes defined in this Recommendation may use different definitions of equality for computational purposes; [IEEE 754-1985]-based computation systems are examples. Nothing in this Recommendation should be construed as requiring that such applications use identity as their equality relationship when computing.

Any value incomparable with the value used for the four bounding facets (·minInclusive·, ·maxInclusive·, ·minExclusive·, and ·maxExclusive·) will be excluded from the resulting restricted ·value space·. In particular, when "NaN" is used as a facet value for a bounding facet, since no other float values are ·comparable· with it, the result is a ·value space· either having NaN as its only member (the inclusive cases) or that is empty (the exclusive cases). If any other value is used for a bounding facet, NaN will be excluded from the resulting restricted ·value space·; to add NaN back in requires union with the NaN-only space.

This datatype differs from that of [IEEE 754-1985] in that there is only one NaN and only one zero. This makes the equality and ordering of values in the data space differ from that of [IEEE 754-1985] only in that for schema purposes NaN = NaN.

A literal in the ·lexical space· representing a decimal number d maps to the normalized value in the ·value space· of float that is closest to d in the sense defined by [Clinger, WD (1990)]; if d is exactly halfway between two such values then the even value is chosen.

3.2.5.1 Lexical representation

float values have a lexical representation consisting of a mantissa followed, optionally, by the character 'E' or 'e', followed by an exponent.  The exponent ·must· be an integer.  The mantissa must be a decimal number.  The representations for exponent and mantissa must follow the lexical rules for integer and decimal.  If the 'E' or 'e' and the following exponent are omitted, an exponent value of 0 is assumed.

The special values positive and negative infinity and not-a-number have lexical representations INF, -INF and NaN, respectively. Lexical representations for zero may take a positive or negative sign.

For example, -1E4, 1267.43233E12, 12.78e-2, 12 , -0, 0 and INF are all legal literals for float.

3.2.5.2 Canonical representation

The canonical representation for float is defined by prohibiting certain options from the Lexical representation (§3.2.5.1).  Specifically, the exponent must be indicated by "E".  Leading zeroes and the preceding optional "+" sign are prohibited in the exponent. If the exponent is zero, it must be indicated by "E0". For the mantissa, the preceding optional "+" sign is prohibited and the decimal point is required. Leading and trailing zeroes are prohibited subject to the following: number representations must be normalized such that there is a single digit which is non-zero to the left of the decimal point and at least a single digit to the right of the decimal point unless the value being represented is zero. The canonical representation for zero is 0.0E0.

NaN has the canonical form 'NaN'.  Infinity and negative infinity have the canonical forms 'INF' and '-INF' respectively.  Besides these special values, the general form of the canonical form for float is a mantissa, which is a decimal, followed by 'E' followed by an exponent which is an integer.  Leading zeroes and the preceding optional '+' sign are prohibited in the exponent.  If the exponent is zero it must be indicated by 'E0'.  For the mantissa, the preceding optional '+' sign is prohibited and the decimal point is required.  Leading and trailing zeroes are prohibited subject to the following: number representations must be normalized such that there is a single digit which is non-zero to the left of the decimal point and at least a single digit to the right of the decimal point unless the value being represented is zero. The canonical form of positive zero is 0.0E0.  The canonical form for negative zero is -0.0E0.  Beyond the one required digit after the decimal point in the mantissa, there must be as many, but only as many, additional digits as are needed to uniquely distinguish the value from all other values for the datatype after rounding.

3.2.6 double

[Definition:]  The double datatype is patterned after the IEEE double-precision 64-bit floating point type [IEEE 754-1985].  The basic ·value space· of double consists of the values m × 2^e, where m is an integer whose absolute value is less than 2^53, and e is an integer between -1075 and 970, inclusive.  In addition to the basic ·value space· described above, the ·value space· of double also contains the following three special values: positive and negative infinity and not-a-number (NaN). The ·order-relation·order relation on double is: x < y iff y - x is positive for x and y in the value space. Positive infinity is greater than all other non-NaN values. NaN equals itself but is incomparable with (neither greater than nor less than) any other value in the ·value space·.

Note:  "Equality" in this Recommendation is defined to be "identity" (i.e., values that are identical in the ·value space· are equal and vice versa). Identity must be used for the few operations that are defined in this Recommendation. Applications using any of the datatypes defined in this Recommendation may use different definitions of equality for computational purposes; [IEEE 754-1985]-based computation systems are examples. Nothing in this Recommendation should be construed as requiring that such applications use identity as their equality relationship when computing.

Any value incomparable with the value used for the four bounding facets (·minInclusive·, ·maxInclusive·, ·minExclusive·, and ·maxExclusive·) will be excluded from the resulting restricted ·value space·. In particular, when "NaN" is used as a facet value for a bounding facet, since no other double values are ·comparable· with it, the result is a ·value space· either having NaN as its only member (the inclusive cases) or that is empty (the exclusive cases). If any other value is used for a bounding facet, NaN will be excluded from the resulting restricted ·value space·; to add NaN back in requires union with the NaN-only space.

This datatype differs from that of [IEEE 754-1985] in that there is only one NaN and only one zero. This makes the equality and ordering of values in the data space differ from that of [IEEE 754-1985] only in that for schema purposes NaN = NaN.

A literal in the ·lexical space· representing a decimal number d maps to the normalized value in the ·value space· of double that is closest to d; if d is exactly halfway between two such values then the even value is chosen. This is the best approximation of d ([Clinger, WD (1990)], [Gay, DM (1990)]), which is more accurate than the mapping required by [IEEE 754-1985].

3.2.6.1 Lexical representation

double values have a lexical representation consisting of a mantissa followed, optionally, by the character "E" or "e", followed by an exponent.  The exponent ·must· be an integer.  The mantissa must be a decimal number.  The representations for exponent and mantissa must follow the lexical rules for integer and decimal.  If the 'E' or 'e' and the following exponent are omitted, an exponent value of 0 is assumed.

The special values positive and negative infinity and not-a-number have lexical representations INF, -INF and NaN, respectively. Lexical representations for zero may take a positive or negative sign.

For example, -1E4, 1267.43233E12, 12.78e-2, 12 , -0, 0 and INF are all legal literals for double.

3.2.6.2 Canonical representation

The canonical representation for double is defined by prohibiting certain options from the Lexical representation (§3.2.6.1).  Specifically, the exponent must be indicated by "E".  Leading zeroes and the preceding optional "+" sign are prohibited in the exponent. If the exponent is zero, it must be indicated by "E0". For the mantissa, the preceding optional "+" sign is prohibited and the decimal point is required. Leading and trailing zeroes are prohibited subject to the following: number representations must be normalized such that there is a single digit which is non-zero to the left of the decimal point and at least a single digit to the right of the decimal point unless the value being represented is zero. The canonical representation for zero is 0.0E0.

NaN has the canonical form 'NaN'.  Infinity and negative infinity have the canonical forms 'INF' and '-INF' respectively.  Besides these special values, the general form of the canonical form for double is a mantissa, which is a decimal, followed by 'E' followed by an exponent which is an integer.  Leading zeroes and the preceding optional '+' sign are prohibited in the exponent.  If the exponent is zero it must be indicated by 'E0'.  For the mantissa, the preceding optional '+' sign is prohibited and the decimal point is required.  Leading and trailing zeroes are prohibited subject to the following: number representations must be normalized such that there is a single digit which is non-zero to the left of the decimal point and at least a single digit to the right of the decimal point unless the value being represented is zero. The canonical form of positive zero is 0.0E0.  The canonical form for negative zero is -0.0E0.  Beyond the one required digit after the decimal point in the mantissa, there must be as many, but only as many, additional digits as are needed to uniquely distinguish the value from all other values for the datatype after rounding.

3.2.7 duration

[Definition:]   duration represents a duration of time. The ·value space· of duration is a six-dimensional space where the coordinates designate the Gregorian year, month, day, hour, minute, and second components defined in § 5.5.3.2 of [ISO 8601], respectively. These components are ordered in their significance by their order of appearance i.e. as year, month, day, hour, minute, and second.

Note:

All
·minimally conforming· processors ·must· support year values with a minimum of 4 digits (i.e., YYYY) and a minimum fractional second precision of milliseconds or three decimal digits (i.e. s.sss). However, ·minimally conforming· processors ·may· set an application-defined limit on the maximum number of digits they are prepared to support in these two cases, in which case that application-defined maximum number ·must· be clearly documented.

[Definition:]  duration is a datatype that represents durations of time. The concept of duration being captured is drawn from those of [ISO 8601], specifically durations without fixed endpoints.  For example, "15 days" (whose most common lexical representation in duration is "'P15D'") is a duration value; "15 days beginning 12 July 1995" and "15 days ending 12 July 1995" are not.  duration can provide addition and subtraction operations between duration values and between duration/dateTime value pairs, and can be the result of subtracting dateTime values.  However, only addition to and subtraction from dateTime is required for XML Schema processing and is defined in Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).

3.2.7.1 Value Space

Durations can be modeled in at least two ways: as six-property tuples (similar to the seven-property model used for other date/time datatypes) or as two-property tuples (somewhat similar to the alternative one-property timeOnTimeline model especially useful for dateTime order).  For durations, it is useful to use the latter: duration values are two-property tuples.  (Note, however, that the six-property model was implicitly used in Schema 1.0.  The only effective difference to the user caused by this change is in the canonical representations.)  See The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1) for more information on the seven-property model.

Properties of duration Values
·Must· not be negative if ·month· is positive, and ·must· not be positive if ·month· is negative.

duration is partially ordered.  Equality and order are defined in terms of that of dateTime, and are determined by adding each duration value pair in turn to the following four dateTime values:

  • 1696-09-01T00:00:00Z
  • 1697-02-01T00:00:00Z
  • 1903-03-01T00:00:00Z
  • 1903-07-01T00:00:00Z

If all four resulting dateTime value pairs are ordered the same way (less than, equal, or greater than), then the original pair of duration values is ordered the same way; otherwise the original pair is incomparable.

Note: These four values are chosen so as to maximize the possible differences in results that could occur, such as the difference when adding P1M and P30D:  1697-02-01T00:00:00Z + P1M < 1697-02-01T00:00:00Z + P30D , but  1903-03-01T00:00:00Z + P1M > 1903-03-01T00:00:00Z + P30D , so that  P1M <> P30D .  If two duration values are ordered the same way when added to each of these four dateTime values, they will retain the same order when added to any other dateTime values, unless one is within a leap-second and either the other is also or is the beginning moment of the next second—in which case, the two results will be equal even though the original dateTime values were not.  Therefore, two duration values are incomparable if and only if they can ever result in different orders when added to any dateTime value not within a leap-second.

This minor anomaly is the result of having duration unaware of leap-seconds while the other date/time primitive datatypes are leap-second aware.

It turns out that under the definition just given, two duration values are equal if and only if they are identical.

Note: There are many ways to implement duration, some of which do not base the implementation on the two-component model.  This specification does not prescribe any particular implementation, as long as the visible results are isomorphic to those described herein.
3.2.7.2 Lexical representation

The lexical representation for duration is the [ISO 8601] extended format PnYn MnDTnH nMnS, where nY represents the number of years, nM the number of months, nD the number of days, 'T' is the date/time separator, nH the number of hours, nM the number of minutes and nS the number of seconds. The number of seconds can include decimal digits to arbitrary precision.

The values of the Year, Month, Day, Hour and Minutes components are not restricted but allow an arbitrary integer. Similarly, the value of the Seconds component allows an arbitrary decimal. Thus, the lexical representation of duration does not follow the alternative format of § 5.5.3.2.1 of [ISO 8601].

An optional preceding minus sign ('-') is allowed, to indicate a negative duration. If the sign is omitted a positive duration is indicated. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).

For example, to indicate a duration of 1 year, 2 months, 3 days, 10 hours, and 30 minutes, one would write: P1Y2M3DT10H30M. One could also indicate a duration of minus 120 days as: -P120D.

Reduced precision and truncated representations of this format are allowed provided they conform to the following:

  • If the number of years, months, days, hours, minutes, or seconds in any expression equals zero, the number and its corresponding designator ·may· be omitted. However, at least one number and its designator ·must· be present.
  • The seconds part ·may· have a decimal fraction.
  • The designator 'T' shall be absent if all of the time items are absent. The designator 'P' must always be present.

For example, P1347Y, P1347M and P1Y2MT2H are all allowed; P0Y1347M and P0Y1347M0D are allowed. P-1347M is not allowed although -P1347M is allowed. P1Y2MT is not allowed.

3.2.7.3 Lexical Space

The ·lexical representations· of duration are more or less based on the pattern:

PnYnMnDTnHnMnS

More precisely, the ·lexical space· of duration is the set of character strings that satisfy durationLexicalRep as defined by the following productions:

Thus, a durationLexicalRep consists of one or more of a duYearFrag, duMonthFrag, duDayFrag, duHourFrag, duMinuteFrag, and/or duSecondFrag, in order, with letters 'P' and 'T' (and perhaps a '-') where appropriate.

The durationLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression

-?P(((([0-9]+Y([0-9]+M)?)|
      (       ([0-9]+M) ) )(([0-9]+D(T(([0-9]+H([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
                                       (       ([0-9]+M) ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
                                       (                 ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S) ) ))?)|
                            (       (T(([0-9]+H([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
                                       (       ([0-9]+M) ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
                                       (                 ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S) ) )) ) )?)|
    (                      (([0-9]+D(T(([0-9]+H([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
                                       (       ([0-9]+M) ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
                                       (                 ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S) ) ))?)|
                            (       (T(([0-9]+H([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
                                       (       ([0-9]+M) ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S)?)|
                                       (                 ([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?S) ) )) ) ) ) )

once you delete the whitespace.  Redundant parentheses are shown as "ghosts"; some find them helpful in reading the expression.)

3.2.7.4 Order relation on duration

In general, the ·order-relation· on duration is a partial order since there is no determinate relationship between certain durations such as one month (P1M) and 30 days (P30D). The ·order-relation· of two duration values x and y is x < y iff s+x < s+y for each qualified dateTime s in the list below. These values for s cause the greatest deviations in the addition of dateTimes and durations. Addition of durations to time instants is defined in Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).

  • 1696-09-01T00:00:00Z
  • 1697-02-01T00:00:00Z
  • 1903-03-01T00:00:00Z
  • 1903-07-01T00:00:00Z

The following table shows the strongest relationship that can be determined between example durations. The symbol <> means that the order relation is indeterminate. Note that because of leap-seconds, a seconds field can vary from 59 to 60. However, because of the way that addition is defined in Adding durations to dateTimes (§H), they are still totally ordered.

 Relation
P1Y> P364D<> P365D <> P366D< P367D
P1M> P27D<> P28D<> P29D<> P30D<> P31D< P32D
P5M> P149D<> P150D<> P151D<> P152D<> P153D< P154D

Implementations are free to optimize the computation of the ordering relationship. For example, the following table can be used to compare durations of a small number of months against days.

 Months12345678910111213...
DaysMinimum285989120150181212242273303334365393...
Maximum316292123153184215245276306337366397...
3.2.7.6 Totally ordered durations

Certain derived datatypes of durations can be guaranteed have a total order. For this, they must have fields from only one row in the list below and the time zone must either be required or prohibited.

For example, a datatype could be defined to correspond to the [SQL] datatype Year-Month interval that required a four digit year field and a two digit month field but required all other fields to be unspecified. This datatype could be defined as below and would have a total order.

<simpleType name='SQL-Year-Month-Interval'>
    <restriction base='duration'>
      <pattern value='P\p{Nd}{4}Y\p{Nd}{2}M'/>
    </restriction>
</simpleType>

3.2.8 dateTime

[Definition:]   dateTime values may be viewed as objects with integer-valued year, month, day, hour and minute properties, a decimal-valued second property, and a boolean timezoned property. Each such object also has one decimal-valued method or computed property, timeOnTimeline, whose value is always a decimal number; the values are dimensioned in seconds, the integer 0 is 0001-01-01T00:00:00 and the value of timeOnTimeline for other dateTime values is computed using the Gregorian algorithm as modified for leap-seconds. The timeOnTimeline values form two related "timelines", one for timezoned values and one for non-timezoned values. Each timeline is a copy of the ·value space· of pDecimal, with integers given units of seconds.

dateTime represents instants of time, optionally marked with a particular timezone.  Values representing the same instant but having different timezones are equal but not identical.

The ·value space· of dateTime is closely related to the dates and times described in ISO 8601. For clarity, the text above specifies a particular origin point for the timeline. It should be noted, however, that schema processors need not expose the timeOnTimeline value to schema users, and there is no requirement that a timeline-based implementation use the particular origin described here in its internal representation. Other interpretations of the ·value space· which lead to the same results (i.e., are isomorphic) are of course acceptable.

All timezoned times are Coordinated Universal Time (·UTC·, sometimes called "Greenwich Mean Time"). Other timezones indicated in lexical representations are converted to ·UTC· during conversion of literals to values. "Local" or untimezoned times are presumed to be the time in the timezone of some unspecified locality as prescribed by the appropriate legal authority; currently there are no legally prescribed timezones which are durations whose magnitude is greater than 14 hours. The value of each numeric-valued property (other than timeOnTimeline) is limited to the maximum value within the interval determined by the next-higher property. For example, the day value can never be 32, and cannot even be 29 for month 02 and year 2002 (February 2002).

Note:

The date and time datatypes described in this recommendation were inspired by
[ISO 8601].  '0001' is the lexical representation of the year 1 of the Common Era (1 CE, sometimes written "AD 1" or "1 AD").  There is no year 0, and '0000' is not a valid lexical representation. '-0001' is the lexical representation of the year 1 Before Common Era (1 BCE, sometimes written "1 BC").

Those using this (1.0) version of this Recommendation to represent negative years should be aware that the interpretation of lexical representations beginning with a '-' is likely to change in subsequent versions.

[ISO 8601] makes no mention of the year 0; in [ISO 8601:1998 Draft Revision] the form '0000' was disallowed and this recommendation disallows it as well. However, [ISO 8601:2000 Second Edition], which became available just as we were completing version 1.0, allows the form '0000', representing the year 1 BCE.  A number of external commentators have also suggested that '0000' be allowed, as the lexical representation for 1 BCE, which is the normal usage in astronomical contexts.  It is the intention of the XML Schema Working Group to allow '0000' as a lexical representation in the dateTime, date, gYear, and gYearMonth datatypes in a subsequent version of this Recommendation. '0000' will be the lexical representation of 1 BCE (which is a leap year), '-0001' will become the lexical representation of 2 BCE (not 1 BCE as in this (1.0) version), '-0002' of 3 BCE, etc.

Note: See the conformance note in (§C) which applies to this datatype as well.
3.2.8.1 Value Space

dateTime uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with no properties except ·timezone· permitted to be absent. The ·timezone· property remains ·optional·.

Constraint: Day-of-month Values
The ·day· value must be no more than 30 if ·month· is one of 4, 6, 9, or 11; no more than 28 if ·month· is 2 and ·year· is not divisible 4, or is divisible by 100 but not by 400; and no more than 29 if ·month· is 2 and ·year· is divisible by 400, or by 4 but not by 100.
Constraint: Leap-second Values
The ·second· value must be less than 60 if ·timezone· is absent or if the remaining values do not correspond to a dateTime at which a leap-second was introduced into ·UTC· by the responsible authorities; if the hour and minute in the specified timezone allow a real leap-second then the value must be less than 60 plus the number of leap-seconds introduced on that date.  (At the time of publication of this specification, no more than one leap-second has ever been introduced at a timeand it appears unlikely that this will ever happen.  No negative leap-seconds have been introduced, but if any should be introduced in future, "adding" that negative number will result in a value limit of 59 or lower.)
Note: See the conformance note in (§C) which applies to the ·year· and ·second· values of this datatype.

Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1)dateTime values are ordered by their ·timeOnTimeline· value.

Note: Since the order of a dateTime value having a ·timezone· with another value whose ·timezone· is absent is determined by imputing timezones of both +14:00 and –14:00 to the untimezoned value, many such combinations will be ·incomparable· because the two imputed timezones yield different orders.

Although dateTime and other types related to dates and times have only a partial order, it is possible for datatypes derived from dateTime to have total orders, if they are restricted (e.g. using the pattern facet) to the subset of values with, or the subset of values without, timezones. Similar restrictions on other date- and time-related types will similarly produce totally ordered subtypes. Note, however, that such restrictions do not affect the value shown, for a given Simple Type Definition, in the ordered facet.

Note: Order and equality are essentially the same for dateTime in this version of this specification as they were in version 1.0.  However, since values now distinguish timezones, equal values with different ·timezone·s are not identical, and values with extreme ·timezone·s may no longer be equal to any value with a smaller ·timezone·.
3.2.8.2 Lexical representation

The ·lexical space· of dateTime consists of finite-length sequences of characters of the form: '-'? yyyy '-' mm '-' dd 'T' hh ':' mm ':' ss ('.' s+)? (zzzzzz)?, where

  • '-'? yyyy is a four-or-more digit optionally negative-signed numeral that represents the year; if more than four digits, leading zeros are prohibited, and '0000' is prohibited (see the Note above (§3.2.8); also note that a plus sign is not permitted);
  • the remaining '-'s are separators between parts of the date portion;
  • the first mm is a two-digit numeral that represents the month;
  • dd is a two-digit numeral that represents the day;
  • 'T' is a separator indicating that time-of-day follows;
  • hh is a two-digit numeral that represents the hour; '24' is permitted if the minutes and seconds represented are zero, and the dateTime value so represented is the first instant of the following day (the hour property of a dateTime object in the ·value space· cannot have a value greater than 23);
  • ':' is a separator between parts of the time-of-day portion;
  • the second mm is a two-digit numeral that represents the minute;
  • ss is a two-integer-digit numeral that represents the whole seconds;
  • '.' s+ (if present) represents the fractional seconds;
  • zzzzzz (if present) represents the timezone (as described below).

For example, 2002-10-10T12:00:00-05:00 (noon on 10 October 2002, Central Daylight Savings Time as well as Eastern Standard Time in the U.S.) is 2002-10-10T17:00:00Z, five hours later than 2002-10-10T12:00:00Z.

For further guidance on arithmetic with dateTimes and durations, see Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).

3.2.8.4 Lexical Mappings

The lexical representations for dateTime are as follows:

Lexical Space
dateTimeLexicalRep ::= yearFrag '-monthFrag '-dayFrag 'T' ((hourFrag ':minuteFrag ':secondFrag) | endOfDayFrag) timezoneFrag?   Constraint:  Day-of-month Representations   Constraint:  Leap-second Representations

Constraint: Day-of-month Representations
Within a dateTimeLexicalRep, a dayFrag must not begin with the digit '3' or be '29' unless the value to which it would map would satisfy the value constraint on ·day· values ("Constraint: Day-of-month Values") given above.

Constraint: Leap-second Representations
Within a dateTimeLexicalRep, a secondFrag must not begin with the digit '6' unless the value to which it would map, in conjunction with the rest of the values, would satisfy the value constraint on leap-second values ("Constraint: Leap-second Values") given above.  Should a negative leap-second be declared, the secondFrag is further limited to those which would satisfy the even-tighter value constraint on ·second·.

The dateTimeLexicalRep production is equivalent to this regular expression once whitespace is removed.

\-?([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]+)|(0[0-9][0-9][0-9])\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])\-(0[1-9])([12][0-9])|(3[01])
 T(([01][0-9])|(2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9]:(([0-5][0-9])|(60))(.[0-9]+)?)|(24:00:00(.[0-9]+)?)
   ([+\-](0[0-9])|(1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?

Note that neither the dateTimeLexicalRep production nor this regular expression alone enforce the constraints on dateTimeLexicalRep given above.

The lexical mapping and canonical mapping for dateTime are the following functions:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a dateTimeLexicalRep to a dateTime value.

Canonical Mapping
Maps a dateTime value to a dateTimeLexicalRep.

3.2.8.6 Order relation on dateTime

dateTime value objects on either timeline are totally ordered by their timeOnTimeline values; between the two timelines, dateTime value objects are ordered by their timeOnTimeline values when their timeOnTimeline values differ by more than fourteen hours, with those whose difference is a duration of 14 hours or less being incomparable.

In general, the ·order-relation· on dateTime is a partial order since there is no determinate relationship between certain instants. For example, there is no determinate ordering between (a) 2000-01-20T12:00:00 and (b) 2000-01-20T12:00:00Z. Based on timezones currently in use, (c) could vary from 2000-01-20T12:00:00+12:00 to 2000-01-20T12:00:00-13:00. It is, however, possible for this range to expand or contract in the future, based on local laws. Because of this, the following definition uses a somewhat broader range of indeterminate values: +14:00..-14:00.

The following definition uses the notation S[year] to represent the year field of S, S[month] to represent the month field, and so on. The notation (Q & "-14:00") means adding the timezone -14:00 to Q, where Q did not already have a timezone. This is a logical explanation of the process. Actual implementations are free to optimize as long as they produce the same results.

The ordering between two dateTimes P and Q is defined by the following algorithm:

A.Normalize P and Q. That is, if there is a timezone present, but it is not Z, convert it to Z using the addition operation defined in Adding durations to dateTimes (§H)

  • Thus 2000-03-04T23:00:00+03:00 normalizes to 2000-03-04T20:00:00Z

B. If P and Q either both have a time zone or both do not have a time zone, compare P and Q field by field from the year field down to the second field, and return a result as soon as it can be determined. That is:

  1. For each i in {year, month, day, hour, minute, second}
    1. If P[i] and Q[i] are both not specified, continue to the next i
    2. If P[i] is not specified and Q[i] is, or vice versa, stop and return P <> Q
    3. If P[i] < Q[i], stop and return P < Q
    4. If P[i] > Q[i], stop and return P > Q
  2. Stop and return P = Q

C.Otherwise, if P contains a time zone and Q does not, compare as follows:

  1. P < Q if P < (Q with time zone +14:00)
  2. P > Q if P > (Q with time zone -14:00)
  3. P <> Q otherwise, that is, if (Q with time zone +14:00) < P < (Q with time zone -14:00)

D. Otherwise, if P does not contain a time zone and Q does, compare as follows:

  1. P < Q if (P with time zone -14:00) < Q.
  2. P > Q if (P with time zone +14:00) > Q.
  3. P <> Q otherwise, that is, if (P with time zone +14:00) < Q < (P with time zone -14:00)

Examples:

DeterminateIndeterminate
2000-01-15T00:00:00 < 2000-02-15T00:00:002000-01-01T12:00:00 <> 1999-12-31T23:00:00Z
2000-01-15T12:00:00 < 2000-01-16T12:00:00Z2000-01-16T12:00:00 <> 2000-01-16T12:00:00Z
 2000-01-16T00:00:00 <> 2000-01-16T12:00:00Z

3.2.9 time

[Definition:]  time represents an instant of time that recurs every day.  The ·value space· of time is the space of time of day values as defined in § 5.3 of [ISO 8601].  Specifically, it is a set of zero-duration daily time instances.

time represents instants of time that recur at the same point in each calendar day, or that occur in some arbitrary calendar day.

Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, time values are partially ordered because it may not be able to determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not.  The order relation on time values is the Order relation on dateTime (§3.2.8.6) using an arbitrary date. See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).  Pairs of time values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.

Note: See the conformance note in (§C) which applies to the seconds part of this datatype as well.
3.2.9.1 Value Space

time uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·year·, ·month·, and ·day· required to be absent·timezone· remains ·optional·.

Constraint: Leap-second Values
The ·second· value must be less than 60 if ·timezone· is absent or if the remaining values do not correspond to a time at which, on some day, a leap-second has been introduced into ·UTC· by the responsible authorities; if the hour and minute in the specified timezone allow a real leap-second then the value must be less than 60 plus the largest number of leap-seconds introduced on any date.  (At the time of publication of this specification, no more than one leap-second has ever been introduced at a time and it appears unlikely that this will ever occur.  No negative leap-seconds have been introduced, but if any should be introduced in future, "adding" that negative number will result in a value limit of 59 or lower.)
Note: See the conformance note in (§C) which applies to the ·second· value of this datatype.
Issue (RQ-13i-time-copy):RQ-13 (time zone crosses date line)

The "seven property model" rewrite of date/time datatype descriptions includes a carefully crafted definition of order that insures that for repeating datatypes (time, gDay, etc.), timezoned values will be compared as though they are on the same "calendar day" ("local" property values) so that in any given timezone, the days start at "local" 00:00:00 and end immediately before "local" 24:00:00. Days in timezones other than Z do not run from 00:00:00Z to 24:00:00Z.

Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1)time values (points in time in an "arbitrary" day) are ordered taking into account their ·timezone·.

A calendar ( or "local time") day with an early timezone begins earlier than the same calendar day with a later timezone.  Since the timezones allowed spread over 28 hours, there are timezone pairs for which a given calendar day in the two timezones are totally disjoint—the earlier day ends before the same day starts in the later timezone.  The moments in time represented by a single calendar day are spread over a 52-hour interval, from the beginning of the day in the +14:00 timezone to the end of that day in the –14:00 timezone.

Note: Since the order of a time value having a ·timezone· with another value whose ·timezone· is absent is determined by imputing timezones of both +14:00 and –14:00 to the untimezoned value, many such combinations will be ·incomparable· because the two imputed timezones yield different orders.  However, for a given untimezoned value, there will always be timezoned values at one or both ends of the 52-hour interval that are ·comparable· (because the interval of ·incomparability· is only 24 hours wide).

Examples that show the difference from version 1.0 of this specification (see Lexical Mappings (§3.2.9.4) for the notations):

  • A day is a calendar (or "local time") day in each timezone.

    08:00:00+10:00 < 17:00:00+10:00  (just as 08:00:00Z has always been less than 17:00:00Z, but in version 1.0  08:00:00+10:00 > 17:00:00+10:00 )

  • A time value in a calendar day with an early timezone may precede every value in a later calendar day:

    00:00:00+01:00 is less than every value with ·timezone· Z

  • A calendar day with a very early timezone may be completely disjoint from a calendar day with a very late timezone:

    Each value with ·timezone· +13:00 is less than every value with ·timezone· –13:00

  • time values do not always convert to ·UTC· in the same way as in 1.0, since a time in a timezone may convert to a ·UTC· time on a different day (whereas time conversions in version 1.0 "wrapped around" by ignoring the day during conversion):

    22:00:00Z > 03:00:00+05:00 (since 1971-12-31T03:00:00+05 is 1979-12-30T22:00:00Z, not 1979-12-31T22:00:00Z); in the previous version of this specification  22:00:00Z = 03:00:00+05:00 )

3.2.9.2 Lexical representation

The lexical representation for time is the left truncated lexical representation for dateTime: hh:mm:ss.sss with optional following time zone indicator.  For example, to indicate 1:20 pm for Eastern Standard Time which is 5 hours behind Coordinated Universal Time (·UTC·), one would write: 13:20:00-05:00. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).

3.2.9.3 Canonical representation

The canonical representation for time is defined by prohibiting certain options from the Lexical representation (§3.2.9.2).  Specifically, either the time zone must be omitted or, if present, the time zone must be Coordinated Universal Time (·UTC·) indicated by a "Z". Additionally, the canonical representation for midnight is 00:00:00.

3.2.9.4 Lexical Mappings

The lexical representations for time are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:

Lexical Space
timeLexicalRep ::= ((hourFrag ':minuteFrag ':secondFrag) | endOfDayFrag) timezoneFrag?   Constraint:  Leap-second Representations

Constraint: Leap-second Representations
An secondFrag must not begin with the digit '6' unless the value to which it would map would satisfy the value constraint on leap-second values given above.

The timeLexicalRep production is equivalent to this regular expression, once whitespace is removed:

(([01][0-9])|(2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9]:[0-6][0-9])|(24:00:00)
(([01][0-9])|(2[0-3]):[0-5][0-9]:(([0-5][0-9])|(60))(.[0-9]+)?)|(24:00:00(.[0-9]+)?)
   ([+\-](0[0-9])|(1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?

Note that neither the timeLexicalRep production nor this regular expression alone enforce the constraint on timeLexicalRep given above.

The lexical mapping and canonical mapping for time are the following functions:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a timeLexicalRep to a time value.

Canonical Mapping
Maps a time value to a timeLexicalRep.

3.2.10 date

[Definition:]   The ·value space· of date consists of top-open intervals of exactly one day in length on the timelines of dateTime, beginning on the beginning moment of each day (in each timezone), i.e. '00:00:00', up to but not including '24:00:00' (which is identical with '00:00:00'date represents top-open intervals of exactly one day in length on the timelines of dateTime, beginning on the beginning moment of each day (in each timezone), up to but not including the beginning moment of the next day).  For nontimezoned values, the top-open intervals disjointly cover the nontimezoned timeline, one per day.  For timezoned values, the intervals begin at every minute and therefore overlap.

A "date object" is an object with year, month, and day properties just like those of dateTime objects, plus an optional timezone-valued timezone property. (As with values of dateTime timezones are a special case of durations.) Just as a dateTime object corresponds to a point on one of the timelines, a date object corresponds to an interval on one of the two timelines as just described.

Timezoned date values track the starting moment of their day, as determined by their timezone; said timezone is generally recoverable for canonical representations. [Definition:]   The recoverable timezone is that duration which is the result of subtracting the first moment (or any moment) of the timezoned date from the first moment (or the corresponding moment) ·UTC· on the same date. ·recoverable timezone·s are always durations between '+12:00' and '-11:59'.  This "timezone normalization" (which follows automatically from the definition of the date ·value space·) is explained more in Lexical representation (§3.2.10.2).

For example: the first moment of 2002-10-10+13:00 is 2002-10-10T00:00:00+13, which is 2002-10-09T11:00:00Z, which is also the first moment of 2002-10-09-11:00. Therefore 2002-10-10+13:00 is 2002-10-09-11:00; they are the same interval.

Note:  For most timezones, either the first moment or last moment of the day (a dateTime value, always ·UTC·) will have a date portion different from that of the date itself! However, noon of that date (the midpoint of the interval) in that (normalized) timezone will always have the same date portion as the date itself, even when that noon point in time is normalized to ·UTC·.  For example, 2002-10-10-05:00 begins during 2002-10-09Z and 2002-10-10+05:00 ends during 2002-10-11Z, but noon of both 2002-10-10-05:00 and 2002-10-10+05:00 falls in the interval which is 2002-10-10Z.
3.2.10.1 Value Space

date uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent·timezone· remains ·optional·.

Constraint: Day-of-month Values
The ·day· value must be no more than 30 if ·month· is one of 4, 6, 9, or 11, no more than 28 if ·month· is 2 and ·year· is not divisble 4, or is divisible by 100 but not by 400, and no more than 29 if ·month· is 2 and ·year· is divisible by 400, or by 4 but not by 100.
Note: See the conformance note in (§C) which applies to the ·year· value of this datatype.

Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).

Note: In version 1.0 of this specification, date values did not retain a timezone explicitly, but for timezones not too far from ·UTC· their timezone could be recovered based on their value's first moment on the timeline.  The date/timeSevenPropertyModel retains all timezones.

Examples that show the difference from version 1.0 (see Lexical Mappings (§3.2.10.4) for the notations):

  • A day is a calendar (or "local time") day in each timezone, including the timezones outside of +12:00 through -11:59 inclusive:

    2000-12-12+13:00 < 2000-12-12+11:00  (just as 2000-12-12+12:00 has always been less than 2000-12-12+11:00, but in version 1.0  2000-12-12+13:00 > 2000-12-12+11:00 , since 2000-12-12+13:00's "recoverable timezone" was –11:00)

  • Similarly:

    2000-12-12+13:00 = 2000-12-13–11:00  (whereas under 1.0, as just stated,  2000-12-12+13:00 = 2000-12-12–11:00)

3.2.10.2 Lexical representation

For the following discussion, let the "date portion" of a dateTime or date object be an object similar to a dateTime or date object, with similar year, month, and day properties, but no others, having the same value for these properties as the original dateTime or date object.

The ·lexical space· of date consists of finite-length sequences of characters of the form: '-'? yyyy '-' mm '-' dd zzzzzz? where the date and optional timezone are represented exactly the same way as they are for dateTime.  The first moment of the interval is that represented by: '-' yyyy '-' mm '-' dd 'T00:00:00' zzzzzz? and the least upper bound of the interval is the timeline point represented (noncanonically) by: '-' yyyy '-' mm '-' dd 'T24:00:00' zzzzzz?.

Note:  The ·recoverable timezone· of a date will always be a duration between '+12:00' and '11:59'.  Timezone lexical representations, as explained for dateTime, can range from '+14:00' to '-14:00'. The result is that literals of dates with very large or very negative timezones will map to a "normalized" date value with a ·recoverable timezone· different from that represented in the original representation, and a matching difference of +/- 1 day in the date itself.
3.2.10.3 Canonical representation

Given a member of the date ·value space·, the date portion of the canonical representation (the entire representation for nontimezoned values, and all but the timezone representation for timezoned values) is always the date portion of the dateTime canonical representation of the interval midpoint (the dateTime representation, truncated on the right to eliminate 'T' and all following characters). For timezoned values, append the canonical representation of the ·recoverable timezone·.

3.2.10.4 Lexical Mappings

The lexical representations for date are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:

Lexical Space
dateLexicalRep ::= yearFrag '-monthFrag '-dayFrag timezoneFrag?   Constraint:  Day-of-month Representations

Constraint: Day-of-month Representations
Within a dateLexicalRep, a dayFrag must not begin with the digit '3' or be '29' unless the value to which it would map would satisfy the value constraint on ·day· values ("Constraint: Day-of-month Values") given above.

The dateLexicalRep production is equivalent to this regular expression:

\-?([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]+)|(0[0-9][0-9][0-9])\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])\-([0-2][0-9])|(3[01])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?

Note that neither the dateLexicalRep production nor this regular expression alone enforce the constraint on dateLexicalRep given above.

The lexical mapping and canonical mapping for date are the following functions:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a dateLexicalRep to a date value.

Canonical Mapping
Maps a date value to a dateLexicalRep.

3.2.11 gYearMonth

[Definition:]   gYearMonth represents a specific gregorian month in a specific gregorian year.  The ·value space· of gYearMonth is the set of Gregorian calendar months as defined in § 5.2.1 of [ISO 8601].  Specifically, it is a set of one-month long, non-periodic instances e.g. 1999-10 to represent the whole month of 1999-10, independent of how many days this month has.

gYearMonth represents specific whole Gregorian months in specific Gregorian years.

Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gYearMonth values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not.  If gYearMonth values are considered as periods of time, the order relation on gYearMonth values is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.2.8.6).  See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).  Pairs of gYearMonth values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.

Note: Because month/year combinations in one calendar only rarely correspond to month/year combinations in other calendars, values of this type are not, in general, convertible to simple values corresponding to month/year combinations in other calendars.  This type should therefore be used with caution in contexts where conversion to other calendars is desired.
Note: See the conformance note in (§C) which applies to the year part of this datatype as well.
3.2.11.1 Value Space

gYearMonth uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·day·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent·timezone· remains ·optional·.

Note: See the conformance note in (§C) which applies to the ·year· value of this datatype.

Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).

Note: In version 1.0 of this specification, gYearMonth values did not retain a timezone explicitly, but timezones not too far from ·UTC· could be recovered based on the gYearMonth value's first moment on the timeline.  The date/timeSevenPropertyModel simply retains all timezones.

An example that shows the difference from version 1.0 (see Lexical representationMappings (§3.2.11.2) for the notations):

  • A day is a calendar (or "local time") day in each timezone, including the timezones outside of +12:00 through –11:59 inclusive:

    2000-12+13:00 < 2000-12+11:00  (just as 2000-12+12:00 has always been less than 2000–12+11:00, but in version 1.0  2000-12+13:00 > 2000-12+11:00 , since 2000–12+13:00's "recoverable timezone" was –11:00)

3.2.11.2 Lexical representationMappings

The lexical representation for gYearMonth is the reduced (right truncated) lexical representation for dateTime: CCYY-MM.  No left truncation is allowed.  An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed.  To accommodate year values outside the range from 0001 to 9999, additional digits can be added to the left of this representation and a preceding "-" sign is allowed.

For example, to indicate the month of May 1999, one would write: 1999-05. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).

The lexical representations for gYearMonth are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:

The gYearMonthLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:

\-?([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]+)|(0[0-9][0-9][0-9])\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?

The lexical mapping and canonical mapping for gYearMonth are the following functions:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a gYearMonthLexicalRep to a gYearMonth value.

3.2.12 gYear

[Definition:]   gYear represents a gregorian calendar year.  The ·value space· of gYear is the set of Gregorian calendar years as defined in § 5.2.1 of [ISO 8601]. Specifically, it is a set of one-year long, non-periodic instances e.g. lexical 1999 to represent the whole year 1999, independent of how many months and days this year has.

gYear represents Gregorian calendar years.

Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gYear values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not.  If gYear values are considered as periods of time, the order relation on gYear values is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.2.8.6).  See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).  Pairs of gYear values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.

Note:  Because years in one calendar only rarely correspond to years in other calendars, values of this type are not, in general, convertible to simple values corresponding to years in other calendars.  This type should therefore be used with caution in contexts where conversion to other calendars is desired.
Note: See the conformance note in (§C) which applies to the year part of this datatype as well.
3.2.12.1 Value Space

gYear uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·month·, ·day·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent·timezone· remains ·optional·.

Note: See the conformance note in (§C) which applies to the ·year· value of this datatype.

Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).

Note: In version 1.0 of this specification, gYear values did not retain a timezone explicitly, but timezones not too far from ·UTC· could be recovered based on the gYear value's first moment on the timeline.  The date/timeSevenPropertyModel simply retains all timezones.

An example that shows the difference from version 1.0 (see Lexical representationMappings (§3.2.12.2) for the notations):

  • A day is a calendar (or "local time") day in each timezone, including the timezones outside of +12:00 through –11:59 inclusive:

    2000+13:00 < 2000+11:00  (just as 2000+12:00 has always been less than 2000+11:00, but in version 1.0  2000+13:00 > 2000+11:00 , since 2000+13:00's "recoverable timezone" was –11:00)

3.2.12.2 Lexical representationMappings

The lexical representation for gYear is the reduced (right truncated) lexical representation for dateTime: CCYY. No left truncation is allowed.  An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed as for dateTime.  To accommodate year values outside the range from 0001 to 9999, additional digits can be added to the left of this representation and a preceding "-" sign is allowed.

For example, to indicate 1999, one would write: 1999. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).

The lexical representations for gYear are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:

The gYearLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:

\-?([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]+)|(0[0-9][0-9][0-9])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?

The lexical mapping and canonical mapping for gYear are the following functions:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a gYearLexicalRep to a gYear value.

Canonical Mapping
Maps a gYear value to a gYearLexicalRep.

3.2.13 gMonthDay

[Definition:]   gMonthDay is a gregorian date that recurs, specifically a day of the year such as the third of May.  Arbitrary recurring dates are not supported by this datatype.  The ·value space· of gMonthDay is the set of calendar dates, as defined in § 3 of [ISO 8601].  Specifically, it is a set of one-day long, annually periodic instances.

gMonthDay represents whole calendar days that recur at the same point in each calendar year, or that occur in some arbitrary calendar year.

This datatype can be used, for example, to record birthdays; an instance of the datatype could be used to say that someone's birthday occurs on the 14th of September every year.

Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gMonthDay values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not.  If gMonthDay values are considered as periods of time, in an arbitrary leap year, the order relation on gMonthDay values is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.2.8.6).  See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).  Pairs of gMonthDay values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.

Note:  Because day/month combinations in one calendar only rarely correspond to day/month combinations in other calendars, values of this type do not, in general, have any straightforward or intuitive representation in terms of most other calendars. This type should therefore be used with caution in contexts where conversion to other calendars is desired.
3.2.13.1 Value Space

gMonthDay uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·year·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent·timezone· remains ·optional·.

Constraint: Day-of-month Values
The ·day· value must be no more than 30 if ·month· is one of 4, 6, 9, or 11, and no more than 29 if ·month· is 2.

Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).

Note: In version 1.0 of this specification, gMonthDay values did not retain a timezone explicitly, but for timezones not too far from ·UTC· their timezone could be recovered based on their value's first moment on the timeline.  The date/timeSevenPropertyModel retains all timezones.

An example that shows the difference from version 1.0 (see Lexical representationMappings (§3.2.13.2) for the notations):

  • A day is a calendar (or "local time") day in each timezone, including the timezones outside of +12:00 through –11:59 inclusive:

    --12-12+13:00 < --12-12+11:00  (just as --12-12+12:00 has always been less than --12-12+11:00, but in version 1.0  --12-12+13:00 > --12-12+11:00 , since --12-12+13:00's "recoverable timezone" was –11:00)

3.2.13.2 Lexical representationMappings

The lexical representation for gMonthDay is the left truncated lexical representation for date: --MM-DD. An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed as for date. No preceding sign is allowed.  No other formats are allowed. See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).

The lexical representations for gMonthDay are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:

Lexical Space
gMonthDayLexicalRep ::= '--monthFrag '-dayFrag timezoneFrag?   Constraint:  Day-of-month Representations

Constraint: Day-of-month Representations
Within a gMonthDayLexicalRep, a dayFrag must not begin with the digit '3' or be '29' unless the value to which it would map would satisfy the value constraint on ·day· values ("Constraint: Day-of-month Values") given above.

The gMonthDayLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:

\-\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])\-([0-2][0-9])|(3[01])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?

Note that neither the gMonthDayLexicalRep production nor this regular expression alone enforce the constraint on gMonthDayLexicalRep given above.

This datatype can be used to represent a specific day in a month. To say, for example, that my birthday occurs on the 14th of September ever year.

The lexical mapping and canonical mapping for gMonthDay are the following functions:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a gMonthDayLexicalRep to a gMonthDay value.

Canonical Mapping
Maps a gMonthDay value to a gMonthDayLexicalRep.

3.2.14 gDay

[Definition:]   gDay is a gregorian day that recurs, specifically a day of the month such as the 5th of the month.  Arbitrary recurring days are not supported by this datatype.  The ·value space· of gDay is the space of a set of calendar dates as defined in § 3 of [ISO 8601].  Specifically, it is a set of one-day long, monthly periodic instances.

[Definition:]  gDay represents whole days within an arbitrary month—days that recur at the same point in each (Gregorian) month. This datatype can beis used to represent a specific day of the month. To say, for example, that I get my paycheckindicate, for example, that an employee gets a paycheck on the 15th of each month.  (Obviously, days beyond 28 cannot occur in all months; they are nonetheless permitted, up to 31.)

Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gDay values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not.  If gDay values are considered as periods of time, in an arbitrary month that has 31 days, the order relation on gDay values is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.2.8.6).  See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).  Pairs of gDay values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.

Note: Because days in one calendar only rarely correspond to days in other calendars, gday values of this type do not, in general, have any straightforward or intuitive representation in terms of most othernon-Gregorian calendars. This typegday should therefore be used with caution in contexts where conversion to other calendars is desired.
3.2.14.1 Value Space

gDay uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·year·, ·month·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent·timezone· remains ·optional· and ·day· must be between 1 and 31 inclusive.

Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).  Since gDay values (days) are ordered by their first moments, it is possible for apparent anomalies to appear in the order when ·timezone· values differ by at least 24 hours.  (It is possible for ·timezone· values to differ by up to 28 hours.)

Examples that may appear anomalous (see Lexical Mappings (§3.2.14.3) for the notations):

  • ---15 < ---16 , but  ---15–13:00 > ---16+13:00
  • ---15–11:00 = ---16+13:00
  • ---15–13:00 <> ---16 , because  ---15–13:00 > ---16+14:00  and ---15–13:00 < 16–14:00

Note:  Timezones do not cause wrap-around at the end of the month:  the last day of a given month in timezone –13:00 may start after the first day of the next month in timezone +13:00, as measured on the global timeline, but nonetheless  ---01+13:00 < ---31–13:00 .
3.2.14.2 Lexical representation

The lexical representation for gDay is the left truncated lexical representation for date: ---DD . An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed as for date.  No preceding sign is allowed. No other formats are allowed.  See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).

3.2.14.3 Lexical Mappings

The lexical representations for gDay are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:

The gDayLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:

\-\-\-([0-2][0-9]|3[01])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?

The lexical mapping and canonical mapping for gDay are defined as follows:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a gDayLexicalRep to a gDay value.

Canonical Mapping
Maps a gDay value to a gDayLexicalRep.

3.2.15 gMonth

[Definition:]   gMonth is a gregorian month that recurs every year. The ·value space· of gMonth is the space of a set of calendar months as defined in § 3 of [ISO 8601].  Specifically, it is a set of one-month long, yearly periodic instances.

This datatype can be used to represent a specific month. To say, for example, that Thanksgiving falls in the month of November.gMonth represents whole (Gregorian) months within an arbitrary year—months that recur at the same point in each year.  It might be used, for example, to say what month annual Thanksgiving celebrations fall in different countries (--11 in the United States, --10 in Canada, and possibly other months in other countries).

Since the lexical representation allows an optional time zone indicator, gMonth values are partially ordered because it may not be possible to unequivocally determine the order of two values one of which has a time zone and the other does not.  If gMonth values are considered as periods of time, the order relation on gMonth is the order relation on their starting instants. This is discussed in Order relation on dateTime (§3.2.8.6).  See also Adding durations to dateTimes (§H).  Pairs of gMonth values with or without time zone indicators are totally ordered.

Note:  Because months in one calendar only rarely correspond to months in other calendars, values of this type do not, in general, have any straightforward or intuitive representation in terms of most other calendars. This type should therefore be used with caution in contexts where conversion to other calendars is desired.
3.2.15.1 Value Space

gMonth uses the date/timeSevenPropertyModel, with ·year·, ·day·, ·hour·, ·minute·, and ·second· required to be absent·timezone· remains ·optional·.

Equality and order are as prescribed in The Seven-property Model (§D.2.1).

Note: In version 1.0 of this specification, gMonth values did not retain a timezone explicitly, but for timezones not too far from ·UTC· their timezone could be recovered based on their value's first moment on the timeline.  The date/timeSevenPropertyModel retains all timezones.

An example that shows the difference from version 1.0 (see Lexical representationMappings (§3.2.15.2) for the notations):

  • A month is a calendar (or "local time") month in each timezone, including the timezones outside of +12:00 through –11:59 inclusive:

    --12+13:00 < --12+11:00  (just as --12+12:00 has always been less than --12+11:00, but in version 1.0  --12+13:00 > --12+11:00 , since --12+13:00's "recoverable timezone" was –11:00)

3.2.15.2 Lexical representationMappings

The lexical representation for gMonth is the left and right truncated lexical representation for date: --MM. An optional following time zone qualifier is allowed as for date.  No preceding sign is allowed. No other formats are allowed.  See also ISO 8601 Date and Time Formats (§G).

The lexical representations for gMonth are "projections" of those of dateTime, as follows:

The gMonthLexicalRep is equivalent to this regular expression:

\-\-(0[1-9])|(1[0-2])((+|\-)(0[0-9]|1[0-4]):[0-5][0-9])?

The lexical mapping and canonical mapping for gMonth are defined as follows:

Lexical Mapping
Maps a gMonthLexicalRep to a gMonth value.

Canonical Mapping
Maps a gMonth value to a gMonthLexicalRep.

3.2.17 base64Binary

[Definition:]   base64Binary represents Base64-encoded arbitrary binary data.  The ·value space· of base64Binary is the set of finite-length sequences of binary octets. For base64Binary data the entire binary stream is encoded using the Base64 Alphabet in [RFC 2045].

The lexical forms of base64Binary values are limited to the 65 characters of the Base64 Alphabet defined in [RFC 2045], i.e., a-z, A-Z, 0-9, the plus sign (+), the forward slash (/) and the equal sign (=), together with the characters defined in [XML] as white space. No other characters are allowed.

For compatibility with older mail gateways, [RFC 2045] suggests that base64 data should have lines limited to at most 76 characters in length.  This line-length limitation is not mandated in the lexical forms of base64Binary data and must not be enforced by XML Schema processors.

The lexical space of base64Binary is given by the following grammar (the notation is that used in [XML]); legal lexical forms must match the Base64Binary production.

Base64Binary  ::=  ((B64S B64S B64S B64S)*
                     ((B64S B64S B64S B64) |
                      (B64S B64S B16S '=') |
                      (B64S B04S '=' #x20? '=')))?

B64S         ::= B64 #x20?

B16S         ::= B16 #x20?

B04S         ::= B04 #x20?


B04         ::=  [AQgw]
B16         ::=  [AEIMQUYcgkosw048]
B64         ::=  [A-Za-z0-9+/]

Note that this grammar requires the number of non-whitespace characters in the lexical form to be a multiple of four, and for equals signs to appear only at the end of the lexical form; strings which do not meet these constraints are not legal lexical forms of base64Binary because they cannot successfully be decoded by base64 decoders.

Note: The above definition of the lexical space is more restrictive than that given in [RFC 2045] as regards whitespace -- this is not an issue in practice.  Any string compatible with the RFC can occur in an element or attribute validated by this type, because the ·whiteSpace· facet of this type is fixed to collapse, which means that all leading and trailing whitespace will be stripped, and all internal whitespace collapsed to single space characters, before the above grammar is enforced.

The canonical lexical form of a base64Binary data value is the base64 encoding of the value which matches the Canonical-base64Binary production in the following grammar:

Canonical-base64Binary  ::=  (B64 B64 B64 B64)*
                               ((B64 B64 B16 '=') | (B64 B04 '=='))?

Note: For some values the canonical form defined above does not conform to [RFC 2045], which requires breaking with linefeeds at appropriate intervals.

The length of a base64Binary value is the number of octets it contains. This may be calculated from the lexical form by removing whitespace and padding characters and performing the calculation shown in the pseudo-code below:

lex2    := killwhitespace(lexform)    -- remove whitespace characters
lex3    := strip_equals(lex2)         -- strip padding characters at end
length  := floor (length(lex3) * 3 / 4)         -- calculate length

Note on encoding: [RFC 2045] explicitly references US-ASCII encoding.  However, decoding of base64Binary data in an XML entity is to be performed on the Unicode characters obtained after character encoding processing as specified by [XML]

3.2.18 anyURI

[Definition:]   anyURI represents a Uniform Resource Identifier Reference (URI).  An anyURI value can be absolute or relative, and may have an optional fragment identifier (i.e., it may be a URI Reference).  This type should be used to specify the intention that the value fulfills the role of a URI as defined by [RFC 2396], as amended by [RFC 2732].

The mapping from anyURI values to URIs is as defined by the URI reference escaping procedure defined in Section 5.4 Locator Attribute of [XML Linking Language] (see also Section 87 Character Encoding in URI References of [Character Model]).  This means that a wide range of internationalized resource identifiers can be specified when an anyURI is called for, and still be understood as URIs per [RFC 2396], as amended by [RFC 2732], where appropriate to identify resources.

Note:  Section 5.4 Locator Attribute of [XML Linking Language] requires that relative URI references be absolutized as defined in [XML Base] before use.  This is an XLink-specific requirement and is not appropriate for XML Schema, since neither the ·lexical space· nor the ·value space· of the anyURI type are restricted to absolute URIs.  Accordingly absolutization must not be performed by schema processors as part of schema validation.
Note:  Each URI scheme imposes specialized syntax rules for URIs in that scheme, including restrictions on the syntax of allowed fragment identifiers. Because it is impractical for processors to check that a value is a context-appropriate URI reference, this specification follows the lead of [RFC 2396] (as amended by [RFC 2732]) in this matter: such rules and restrictions are not part of type validity and are not checked by ·minimally conforming· processors. Thus in practice the above definition imposes only very modest obligations on ·minimally conforming· processors.
3.2.18.1 Lexical representation

The ·lexical space· of anyURI is finite-length character sequences which, when the algorithm defined in Section 5.4 of [XML Linking Language] is applied to them, result in strings which are legal URIs according to [RFC 2396], as amended by [RFC 2732].

Note:  Spaces are, in principle, allowed in the ·lexical space· of anyURI, however, their use is highly discouraged (unless they are encoded by %20).

3.2.19 QName

[Definition:]   QName represents XML qualified names. The ·value space· of QName is the set of tuples {namespace name, local part}, where namespace name is an anyURI and local part is an NCName. The ·lexical space· of QName is the set of strings that ·match· the QName production of [Namespaces in XML].

Note:  The mapping between literals in the ·lexical space· and values in the ·value space· of QName requires a namespace declaration to be in scope for the context in which QName is used.
3.2.19.1 Constraining facets

QName has the following ·constraining facets·:

The use of ·length·, ·minLength· and ·maxLength· on datatypes ·derived· from QName is deprecated.  Future versions of this specification may remove these facets for this datatype.

3.2.20 NOTATION

[Definition:]   NOTATION represents the NOTATION attribute type from [XML]. The ·value space· of NOTATION is the set of QNames of notations declared in the current schema. The ·lexical space· of NOTATION is the set of all names of notations declared in the current schema (in the form of QNames).

Schema Component Constraint: enumeration facet value required for NOTATION
It is an ·error· for NOTATION to be used directly in a schema.  Only datatypes that are ·derived· from NOTATION by specifying a value for ·enumeration· can be used in a schema.

For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.5)) NOTATION should be used only on attributes and should only be used in schemas with no target namespace.

3.2.20.1 Constraining facets

NOTATION has the following ·constraining facets·:

The use of ·length·, ·minLength· and ·maxLength· on datatypes ·derived· from NOTATION is deprecated.  Future versions of this specification may remove these facets for this datatype.

previous sub-section 3.3 Derived datatypes

        3.3.1 normalizedString
        3.3.2 token
        3.3.3 language
        3.3.4 NMTOKEN
        3.3.5 NMTOKENS
        3.3.6 Name
        3.3.7 NCName
        3.3.8 ID
        3.3.9 IDREF
        3.3.10 IDREFS
        3.3.11 ENTITY
        3.3.12 ENTITIES
        3.3.13 integer
        3.3.14 nonPositiveInteger
        3.3.15 negativeInteger
        3.3.16 long
        3.3.17 int
        3.3.18 short
        3.3.19 byte
        3.3.20 nonNegativeInteger
        3.3.21 unsignedLong
        3.3.22 unsignedInt
        3.3.23 unsignedShort
        3.3.24 unsignedByte
        3.3.25 positiveInteger
        3.3.26 yearMonthDuration
        3.3.27 dayTimeDuration

This section gives conceptual definitions for all ·built-in· ·derived· datatypes defined by this specification. The XML representation used to define ·derived· datatypes (whether ·built-in· or ·user-derived·) is given in section XML Representation of Simple Type Definition Schema Components (§4.1.2) and the complete definitions of the ·built-in·  ·derived· datatypes are provided in Appendix A Schema for Datatype Definitions (normative) (§A).

3.3.1 normalizedString

[Definition:]   normalizedString represents white space normalized strings. The ·value space· of normalizedString is the set of strings that do not contain the carriage return (#xD), line feed (#xA) nor tab (#x9) characters. The ·lexical space· of normalizedString is the set of strings that do not contain the carriage return (#xD), line feed (#xA) nor tab (#x9) characters. The ·base type· of normalizedString is string.

3.3.2 token

[Definition:]   token represents tokenized strings. The ·value space· of token is the set of strings that do not contain the carriage return (#xD), line feed (#xA) nor tab (#x9) characters, that have no leading or trailing spaces (#x20) and that have no internal sequences of two or more spaces. The ·lexical space· of token is the set of strings that do not contain the carriage return (#xD), line feed (#xA) nor tab (#x9) characters, that have no leading or trailing spaces (#x20) and that have no internal sequences of two or more spaces. The ·base type· of token is normalizedString.

3.3.3 language

[Definition:]   language represents natural language identifiers as defined by by [RFC 3066] . The ·value space· of language is the set of all strings that are valid language identifiers as defined [RFC 3066] . The ·lexical space· of language is the set of all strings that conform to the pattern [a-zA-Z]{1,8}(-[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,8})* . The ·base type· of language is token.

3.3.4 NMTOKEN

[Definition:]   NMTOKEN represents the NMTOKEN attribute type from [XML]. The ·value space· of NMTOKEN is the set of tokens that ·match· the Nmtoken production in [XML]. The ·lexical space· of NMTOKEN is the set of strings that ·match· the Nmtoken production in [XML].  The ·base type· of NMTOKEN is token.

For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.5)) NMTOKEN should be used only on attributes.

3.3.5 NMTOKENS

[Definition:]   NMTOKENS represents the NMTOKENS attribute type from [XML]. The ·value space· of NMTOKENS is the set of finite, non-zero-length sequences of ·NMTOKEN·s.  The ·lexical space· of NMTOKENS is the set of space-separated lists of tokens, of which each token is in the ·lexical space· of NMTOKEN.  The ·itemType· of NMTOKENS is NMTOKEN.

For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.5)) NMTOKENS should be used only on attributes.

3.3.7 NCName

[Definition:]   NCName represents XML "non-colonized" Names.  The ·value space· of NCName is the set of all strings which ·match· the NCName production of [Namespaces in XML].  The ·lexical space· of NCName is the set of all strings which ·match· the NCName production of [Namespaces in XML].  The ·base type· of NCName is Name.

3.3.8 ID

[Definition:]   ID represents the ID attribute type from [XML].  The ·value space· of ID is the set of all strings that ·match· the NCName production in [Namespaces in XML].  The ·lexical space· of ID is the set of all strings that ·match· the NCName production in [Namespaces in XML]. The ·base type· of ID is NCName.

For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.5)) ID should be used only on attributes.

3.3.9 IDREF

[Definition:]   IDREF represents the IDREF attribute type from [XML].  The ·value space· of IDREF is the set of all strings that ·match· the NCName production in [Namespaces in XML].  The ·lexical space· of IDREF is the set of strings that ·match· the NCName production in [Namespaces in XML]. The ·base type· of IDREF is NCName.

For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.5)) this datatype should be used only on attributes.

3.3.10 IDREFS

[Definition:]   IDREFS represents the IDREFS attribute type from [XML].  The ·value space· of IDREFS is the set of finite, non-zero-length sequences of IDREFs. The ·lexical space· of IDREFS is the set of space-separated lists of tokens, of which each token is in the ·lexical space· of IDREF. The ·itemType· of IDREFS is IDREF.

For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.5)) IDREFS should be used only on attributes.

3.3.11 ENTITY

[Definition:]   ENTITY represents the ENTITY attribute type from [XML].  The ·value space· of ENTITY is the set of all strings that ·match· the NCName production in [Namespaces in XML] and have been declared as an unparsed entity in a document type definition. The ·lexical space· of ENTITY is the set of all strings that ·match· the NCName production in [Namespaces in XML]. The ·base type· of ENTITY is NCName.

Note:  The ·value space· of ENTITY is scoped to a specific instance document.

For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.5)) ENTITY should be used only on attributes.

3.3.12 ENTITIES

[Definition:]   ENTITIES represents the ENTITIES attribute type from [XML]. The ·value space· of ENTITIES is the set of finite, non-zero-length sequences of ·ENTITY·s that have been declared as unparsed entities in a document type definition. The ·lexical space· of ENTITIES is the set of space-separated lists of tokens, of which each token is in the ·lexical space· of ENTITY. The ·itemType· of ENTITIES is ENTITY.

Note:  The ·value space· of ENTITIES is scoped to a specific instance document.

For compatibility (see Terminology (§1.5)) ENTITIES should be used only on attributes.

3.3.26 yearMonthDuration

[Definition:]   yearMonthDuration is a datatype ·derived· from duration by restricting its ·lexical representations· to instances of yearMonthDurationLexicalRep.  The ·value space· of yearMonthDuration is therefore that of duration restricted to those whose ·second· property is 0.  This results in a duration datatype which is totally ordered.

Note: The always-zero ·second· is formally retained in order that yearMonthDuration's (abstract) value space truly be a subset of that of duration  An obvious implementation optimization is to ignore the zero and implement yearMonthDuration values simply as integer values.
3.3.26.1 The yearMonthDuration Lexical Mapping

The lexical space is reduced from that of duration by disallowing duDayFrag and duTimeFrag fragments in the ·lexical representations·.

The regular expression '-?P([0-9]+Y)?([0-9]+M)?' has instances that are not in the lexical space—but they are not in the lexical space of duration either, so it serves as a relatively simple regular expression that extracts from the ·lexical space· of duration those representations that are instances of yearMonthDuration.

The ·canonical mapping· is that of duration restricted in its range to the ·lexical space· (which reduces its domain to omit any values not in the yearMonthDuration value space).

Note: The yearMonthDuration value whose ·month· and ·second· are both zero has no ·canonical representation· in this datatype since its ·canonical representation· in duration ('PT0S') is not in the ·lexical space· of yearMonthDuration.
3.3.26.2 Constraining Facets

yearMonthDuration has the following ·constraining facets·:

  • pattern
  • eunmeration
  • whitespace
  • minInclusive
  • minExclusive
  • maxInclusive
  • maxExclusive

3.3.27 dayTimeDuration

[Definition:]   dayTimeDuration is a datatype ·derived· from duration by restricting its ·lexical representations· to instances of dayTimeDurationLexicalRep. The ·value space· of dayTimeDuration is therefore that of duration restricted to those whose ·month· property is 0.  This results in a duration datatype which is totally ordered.

3.3.27.1 The dayTimeDuration Lexical Space

The lexical space is reduced from that of duration by disallowing duYearFrag and duMonthFrag fragments in the ·lexical representations·.

The regular expression '-?P([0-9]+D)?(T([0-9]+H)?([0-9]+M)?([0-9]+(.[0-9]+)?S)?)?' has several instances that are not in the lexical space—but they are not in the lexical space of duration either, so it serves as a relatively simple regular expression that extracts from the ·lexical space· of duration those representations that are instances of dayTimeDurationLexicalRep.

The ·canonical mapping· is that of duration restricted to the ·value space· The ·canonical mapping· is that of duration restricted in its range to the ·lexical space· (which reduces its domain to omit any values not in the yearMonthDuration value space).

3.3.27.2 Constraining Facets

dayTimeDuration has the following ·constraining facets·:

  • pattern
  • eunmeration
  • whitespace
  • minInclusive
  • minExclusive
  • maxInclusive
  • maxExclusive

4 Datatype components

The following sections provide full details on the properties and significance of each kind of schema component involved in datatype definitions. For each property, the kinds of values it is allowed to have is specified.  Any property not identified as optional is required to be present; optional properties which are not present have absent as their value. Any property identified as a having a set, subset or ·list· value may have an empty value unless this is explicitly ruled out: this is not the same as absent. Any property value identified as a superset or a subset of some set may be equal to that set, unless a proper superset or subset is explicitly called for.

For more information on the notion of datatype (schema) components, see Schema Component Details of [XML Schema Part 1: Structures].

next sub-section4.1 Simple Type Definition

Simple Type definitions provide for:

  • In the case of ·primitive· datatypes, identifying a datatype with its definition in this specification.
  • In the case of ·constructed· datatypes, defining the datatype in terms of other datatypes.
  • Attaching a QName to the datatype.

4.1.1 The Simple Type Definition Schema Component

The Simple Type Definition schema component has the following properties:

Datatypes are identified by their {name} and {target namespace}.  Except for anonymous datatypes (those with no {name}), datatype definitions ·must· be uniquely identified within a schema.

If {variety} is ·atomic· then the ·value space· of the datatype defined will be a subset of the ·value space· of {base type definition} (which is a subset of the ·value space· of {primitive type definition}). If {variety} is ·list· then the ·value space· of the datatype defined will be the set of finite-length sequence of values from the ·value space· of {item type definition}. If {variety} is ·union· then the ·value space· of the datatype defined will be the union of the ·value space·s of each datatype in {member type definitions}.

If {variety} is ·atomic· then the {variety} of {base type definition} must be ·atomic·. If {variety} is ·list· then the {variety} of {item type definition} must be either ·atomic· or ·union·. If {variety} is ·union· then {member type definitions} must be a list of datatype definitions.

The value of {facets} consists of the set of ·facet·s·fundamental facets· and ·constraining facets· specified directly in the datatype definition unioned with the possibly empty set of {facets} of {base type definition}.

The value of {fundamental facets} consists of the set of ·fundamental facet·s and their values.

If {final} is the empty set then the type can be used in deriving other types; the explicit values restriction, list and union prevent further derivations by ·restriction·, ·list· and ·union· respectively.

4.1.2 XML Representation of Simple Type Definition Schema Components

The XML representation for a Simple Type Definition schema component is a <simpleType> element information item. The correspondences between the properties of the information item and properties of the component are as follows:

XML Representation SummarysimpleType Element Information Item

<simpleType
  final = (#all | List of (list | union | restriction))
  id = ID
  name = NCName
  {any attributes with non-schema namespace . . .}>
  Content: (annotation?, (restriction | list | union))
</simpleType>

Simple Type Definition Schema Component
PropertyRepresentation
{name} The actual value of the name [attribute], if present, otherwise null
{final} A set corresponding to the actual value of the final [attribute], if present, otherwise the actual value of the finalDefault [attribute] of the ancestor schema element information item, if present, otherwise the empty string, as follows:
the empty string
the empty set;
#all
{restriction, list, union};
otherwise
a set with members drawn from the set above, each being present or absent depending on whether the string contains an equivalently named space-delimited substring.
Note: Although the finalDefault [attribute] of schema may include values other than restriction, list or union, those values are ignored in the determination of {final}
Note: Although the finalDefault attribute of a schema may include character strings other than 'restriction', 'list' or 'union', those other values are ignored in the determination of {final}.
{target namespace} The actual value of the targetNamespace [attribute] of the parent schema element information item.
{annotations} The annotation corresponding to the <annotation> element information item in the [children], if present, otherwise null

A ·derived· datatype can be ·derived· from a ·primitive· datatype or another ·derived· datatype by one of three means: by restriction, by list or by union.

4.1.2.1 Derivation by restriction

<restriction
  base = QName
  id = ID
  {any attributes with non-schema namespace . . .}>
  Content: (annotation?, (simpleType?, (minExclusive | minInclusive | maxExclusive | maxInclusive | totalDigits | fractionDigits | maxScale | minScale | length | minLength | maxLength | enumeration | whiteSpace | pattern)*))
</restriction>

Simple Type Definition Schema Component
PropertyRepresentation
{variety} The {variety} of {base type definition}
{facets} The union of the set of Facets (§2.5)·fundamental facets· and ·constraining facets· components resolved to by the facet [children] merged with {facets} from {base type definition}, subject to the Facet Restriction Validapplicable facet constraints specified in Facets (§2.5)Constraints on Simple Type Definition Schema Components (§4.1.5).
{base type definition} The Simple Type Definition component resolved to by the actual value of the base [attribute] or the <simpleType> [children], whichever is present.
Example
An electronic commerce schema might define a datatype called Sku (the barcode number that appears on products) from the ·built-in· datatype string by supplying a value for the ·pattern· facet.
<simpleType name='Sku'>
    <restriction base='string'>
      <pattern value='\d{3}-[A-Z]{2}'/>
    </restriction>
</simpleType>
In this case, Sku is the name of the new ·user-derived· datatype, string is its ·base type· and ·pattern· is the facet.
4.1.2.2 Derivation by list

<list
  id = ID
  itemType = QName
  {any attributes with non-schema namespace . . .}>
  Content: (annotation?, simpleType?)
</list>

Simple Type Definition Schema Component
PropertyRepresentation
{variety} list
{item type definition} The Simple Type Definition component resolved to by the actual value of the itemType [attribute] or the <simpleType> [children], whichever is present.

A ·list· datatype must be ·derived· from an ·atomic· or a ·union· datatype, known as the ·itemType· of the ·list· datatype. This yields a datatype whose ·value space· is composed of finite-length sequences of values from the ·value space· of the ·itemType· and whose ·lexical space· is composed of space-separated lists of literals of the ·itemType·.

Example
A system might want to store lists of floating point values.
<simpleType name='listOfFloat'>
  <list itemType='float'/>
</simpleType>
In this case, listOfFloat is the name of the new ·user-derived· datatype, float is its ·itemType· and ·list· is the derivation method.

As mentioned in List datatypes (§2.6.1.2), when a datatype is ·derived· from a ·list· datatype, the following ·constraining facet·s can be used:

regardless of the ·constraining facet·s that are applicable to the ·atomic· datatype that serves as the ·itemType· of the ·list·.

For each of ·length·, ·maxLength· and ·minLength·, the unit of length is measured in number of list items. The value of ·whiteSpace· is fixed to the value collapse.

4.1.2.3 Derivation by union

<union
  id = ID
  memberTypes = List of QName
  {any attributes with non-schema namespace . . .}>
  Content: (annotation?, simpleType*)
</union>

Simple Type Definition Schema Component
PropertyRepresentation
{variety} union
{member type definitions} The sequence of Simple Type Definition components resolved to by the items in the actual value of the memberTypes [attribute], if any, in order, followed by the Simple Type Definition components resolved to by the <simpleType> [children], if any, in order. If {variety} is union for any Simple Type Definition components resolved to above, then the Simple Type Definition is replaced by its {member type definitions}.

A ·union· datatype can be ·derived· from one or more ordinary ·atomic·, ·list· or other ·union· datatypes, known as the ·memberTypes· of that ·union· datatype.

Example
As an example, taken from a typical display oriented text markup language, one might want to express font sizes as an integer between 8 and 72, or with one of the tokens "small", "medium" or "large".  The ·union· type definition below would accomplish that.
<xsd:attribute name="size">
  <xsd:simpleType>
    <xsd:union>
      <xsd:simpleType>
        <xsd:restriction base="xsd:positiveInteger">
          <xsd:minInclusive value="8"/>
          <xsd:maxInclusive value="72"/>
        </xsd:restriction>
      </xsd:simpleType>
      <xsd:simpleType>
        <xsd:restriction base="xsd:NMTOKEN">
          <xsd:enumeration value="small"/>
          <xsd:enumeration value="medium"/>
          <xsd:enumeration value="large"/>
        </xsd:restriction>
      </xsd:simpleType>
    </xsd:union>
  </xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:attribute>
<p>
<font size='large'>A header</font>
</p>
<p>
<font size='12'>this is a test</font>
</p>

As mentioned in Union datatypes (§2.6.1.3), when a datatype is ·derived· from a ·union· datatype, the only following ·constraining facet·s can be used:

regardless of the ·constraining facet·s that are applicable to the datatypes that participate in the ·union·

4.1.4 Simple Type Definition Validation Rules

Validation Rule: Facet Valid
A value in a ·value space· is facet-valid with respect to a ·constraining facet· component if and only if:
1 the value is facet-valid with respect to the particular ·constraining facet· as specified below.
Validation Rule: Datatype Valid
A string is datatype-valid with respect to a datatype definition if and only if:
1 it ·match·es a literal in the ·lexical space· of the datatype, determined as follows:
1.1 if ·pattern· is a member of {facets}, then the string must be pattern valid (§4.4.4.4);
1.2 if ·pattern· is not a member of {facets}, then
1.2.1 if {variety} is ·atomic· then the string must ·match· a literal in the ·lexical space· of {base type definition}
1.2.2 if {variety} is ·list· then the string must be a sequence of space-separated tokens, each of which ·match·es a literal in the ·lexical space· of {item type definition}
1.2.3 if {variety} is ·union· then the string must ·match· a literal in the ·lexical space· of at least one member of {member type definitions}
2 the value denoted by the literal ·match·ed in the previous step is a member of the ·value space· of the datatype, as determined by it being Facet Valid (§4.1.4) with respect to each member of {facets} (except for ·pattern·).

4.1.5 Constraints on Simple Type Definition Schema Components

Schema Component Constraint: applicable facets
The ·constraining facet·s which are allowed to be members of {facets} are dependent on {base type definition} as specified in the following table:
{base type definition}applicable {facets}
If {variety} is list, then
[all datatypes]length, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace
If {variety} is union, then
[all datatypes]pattern, enumeration
else if {variety} is atomic, then
stringlength, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace
booleanpattern, whiteSpace
floatpattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
doublepattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
decimaltotalDigits, fractionDigits, pattern, whiteSpace, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
pDecimaltotalDigits, maxScale, minScale, pattern, whiteSpace, enumeration, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive, lexicalMappings
durationpattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
dateTimepattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
timepattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
datepattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
gYearMonthpattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
gYearpattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
gMonthDaypattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
gDaypattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
gMonthpattern, enumeration, whiteSpace, maxInclusive, maxExclusive, minInclusive, minExclusive
hexBinarylength, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace
base64Binarylength, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace
anyURIlength, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace
QNamelength, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace
NOTATIONlength, minLength, maxLength, pattern, enumeration, whiteSpace

4.1.7 Built-in Simple Type Definitions

The definition of anySimpleType is present in every schema.  It has the following properties:

Simple Type Definition of anySimpleType
PropertyValue
{name}'anySimpleType'
{target namespace}http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
{base type definition}anyType
{final}The empty set
{variety}absent
{primitive type definition}absent
{facets}The empty set
{fundamental facets}The empty set
{scope}global
{item type definition}absent
{member type definitions}absent
{annotations}The empty sequence

The definition of anySimpleType is the root of the Simple Type Definition hierarchy, and as such mediates between the other simple type definitions, which all eventually trace back to it via their {base type definition} properties, and thus to the definition of anyType, which is its {base type definition}.

Simple Type Definition of anyAtomicType
PropertyValue
{name}'anyAtomicType'
{target namespace}http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
{base type definition}anySimpleType
{final}The empty set
{variety}atomic
{primitive type definition}absent
{facets}The empty set
{fundamental facets}The empty set
{scope}global
{item type definition}absent
{member type definitions}absent
{annotations}The empty sequence

Simple type definitions for all the built-in primitive datatypes, namely string, boolean, float, double, decimal, pDecimal, dateTime, duration, time, date, gMonth, gMonthDay, gDay, gYear, gYearMonth, hexBinary, base64Binary, anyURI are present by definition in every schema.  All are in the XML Schema namespace (http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema), have an atomic {variety} with an empty {facets} (unless otherwise specified in this specification) and anyAtomicType as their {base type definition}, and themselves as {primitive type definition}.

Similarly, simple type definitions for all the built-in derived datatypes are present by definition in every schema, with properties as specified in Derived datatypes (§3.3) and as represented in XML in Schema for Datatype Definitions (normative) (§A).

previous sub-section next sub-section4.2 Fundamental Facets

4.2.1 equal

Every ·value space· supports the notion of equality, with the following rules:

  • for any a and b in the ·value space·, either a is equal to b, denoted a = b, or a is not equal to b, denoted a != b
  • there is no pair a and b from the ·value space· such that both a = b and a != b
  • for all a in the ·value space·, a = a
  • for any a and b in the ·value space·, a = b if and only if b = a
  • for any a, b and c in the ·value space·, if a = b and b = c, then a = c
  • for any a and b in the ·value space· if a = b, then a and b cannot be distinguished (i.e., equality is identity)
  • the ·value space·s of all ·primitive· datatypes are disjoint (they do not share any values)

On every datatype, the operation Equal is defined in terms of the equality property of the ·value space·: for any values a, b drawn from the ·value space·, Equal(a,b) is true if a = b, and false otherwise.

Note that in consequence of the above:

Note:  There is no schema component corresponding to the equal ·fundamental facet·.

previous sub-section next sub-section4.3 ·Fundamental Facets·

        4.3.1 ordered
        4.3.2 bounded
        4.3.3 cardinality
        4.3.4 numeric
Issue (RQ-24-1i):RQ-24 (systematic approach to facets)

The decision that the four informational facets, each of which have only one property, will be lumped into one facet having four properties has been rescinded by the WG before it made it into the text of this specification.

[Definition:]  Each fundamental facet is a schema component that provides a limited piece of information about some aspect of each datatype.  For example, cardinality is a ·fundamental facet·.  Most ·fundamental facets· are given a value fixed with each primitive datatype's definition, and this value is not changed by subsequent ·derivations· (even when it would perhaps be reasonable to expect an application to give a more accurate value based on the constraining facets used to define the ·derivation·).  The cardinality and bounded facets are exceptions to this rule; their values may change as a result of certain ·derivations·.

Note: Schema components are identified by kind.  "Fundamental" is not a kind of component.  Each kind of ·fundamental facet· ("ordered", "bounded", etc.) is a separate kind of schema component.

A ·fundamental facet· can occur only in the {fundamental facets} of a Simple Type Definition, and this is the only place where ·fundamental facet· components occur.  [Definition:]  A Simple Type Definition in whose {fundamental facets} a ·fundamental facet· component occurs is that component's owner.  Each kind of ·fundamental facet· component occurs (once) in each Simple Type Definition's {fundamental facets} set.

Note: The value of any ·fundamental facet· component can always be calculated from other properties of its ·owner·.  Fundamental facets are not required for schema processing, but some applications use them.

4.3.1 ordered

[Definition:]  An order relation on a ·value space· is a mathematical relation that imposes a ·total order· or a ·partial order· on the members of the ·value space·.

[Definition:]  A ·value space·, and hence a datatype, is said to be ordered if there exists an ·order-relation· defined for that ·value space·.

[Definition:]   A partial order is an ·order-relation· that is irreflexive, asymmetric and transitive.

A ·partial order· has the following properties:

The notation a <> b is used to indicate the case when a != b and neither a < b nor b < a. For any values a and b from different ·primitive· ·value space·s, a <> b.

[Definition:]  When a <> b, a and b are incomparable,[Definition:]  otherwise they are comparable.

[Definition:]   A total order is an ·partial order· such that for no a and b is it the case that a <> b.

A ·total order· has all of the properties specified above for ·partial order·, plus the following property:

Note:  The fact that this specification does not define an ·order-relation· for some datatype does not mean that some other application cannot treat that datatype as being ordered by imposing its own order relation.

·ordered· provides for:

Some datatypes have a nontrivial order relation associated with their value spaces (see Order (§2.2.3)).  (There is always a trivial partial ordering wherein every value pair that is not equal is incomparable, which could be associated with any value space.)  The ordered facet value is a "near-boolean": one of false, partial, and total, as prescribed in Fundamental Facets (§F.1) for ·primitive· datatypes; all ·derived· datatypes inherit this value without change.  The value for a ·list· is always false and the value for a ·union· is computed as described below.

A false value means no order is prescribed; a total value assures that the prescribed order is a total order; a partial value means that the prescribed order is a partial order, but not (for the primitive type in question) a total order. Derivation of new datatypes from datatypes with partial orders may impose constraints which make the effective ordering either a trivial order or a non-trivial total order, but the value of the ordered facet is not changed to reflect this.

[Definition:]  A ·value space·, and hence a datatype, is said to be ordered if this specification prescribes a non-trivial order for that ·value space·.

Note: Some of the "real-world" datatypes which are the basis for those defined herein are ordered in some applications, even though no order is prescribed for schema-processing purposes.  For example, boolean is sometimes ordered, and string and ·list· datatypes ·constructed· from ordered ·atomic· datatypes are sometimes given "lexical" orderings.  They are not ordered for schema-processing purposes.
4.3.1.1 The ordered Schema Component

{value} depends on {variety}, {facets} and {member type definitions} in the Simple Type Definition component in which a ·ordered· component appears as a member of {fundamental facets}.

When {variety} is ·atomic·, {value} is inherited from {value} of {base type definition}. For all ·primitive· types {value} is as specified in the table in Fundamental Facets (§F.1).

When {variety} is ·list·, {value} is false.

When {variety} is ·union·, {value} is partial unless one of the following:

{value} depends on the ·owner's· {variety}, {facets}, and {member type definitions}.

The appropriate case among the following must be true:
1 If the ·owner's· {variety} is atomic, then the appropriate case among the following must be true:
1.1 If the ·owner· is ·primitive·, then {value} is as specified in the table in Fundamental Facets (§F.1).
2 If the ·owner's· {variety} is list, then {value} is false.
3 otherwise the ·owner's· {variety} is union; the appropriate case among the following must be true:
3.1 If every member of the ·owner's· {member type definitions} has {variety} atomic and has the same {primitive type definition}, then {value} is the same as the ordered component's {value} in that primitive type definition's {fundamental facets}.
3.2 If each member of the ·owner's· {member type definitions} has an ordered component in its {fundamental facets} whose {value} is false, then {value} is false.
3.3 otherwise {value} is partial.

4.3.2 bounded

[Definition:]   A value u in an ·ordered·  ·value space· U is said to be an inclusive upper bound of a ·value space· V (where V is a subset of U) if for all v in V, u >= v.

[Definition:]   A value u in an ·ordered·  ·value space· U is said to be an exclusive upper bound of a ·value space· V (where V is a subset of U) if for all v in V, u > v.

[Definition:]   A value l in an ·ordered·  ·value space· L is said to be an inclusive lower bound of a ·value space· V (where V is a subset of L) if for all v in V, l <= v.

[Definition:]   A value l in an ·ordered·  ·value space· L is said to be an exclusive lower bound of a ·value space· V (where V is a subset of L) if for all v in V, l < v.

·bounded· provides for:

Some ordered datatypes have the property that there is one value greater than or equal to every other value, and another that less than or equal to every other value.  (In the case of derived datatypes, these two values are not necessarily in the value space of the derived datatype, but they must be in the value space of the primitive datatype from which they have been derived.) The bounded facet value is boolean and is generally true for such bounded datatypes.  However, it will remain false when the mechanism for imposing such a bound is difficult to detect, as, for example, when the boundedness occurs because of derivation using a pattern component.

4.3.2.1 The bounded Schema Component

{value} depends on the ·owner's· {variety}, {facets} and {member type definitions} in the Simple Type Definition component in which a bounded component appears as a member of {fundamental facets}.

When the ·owner· is ·primitive·, {value} is as specified in the table in Fundamental Facets (§F.1).  Otherwise, when the ·owner's· {variety} is atomic, if one of minInclusive or minExclusive and one of maxInclusive or maxExclusive are among {facets}members of the ·owner's· {facets} set, then {value} is true; elseotherwise {value} is false.

When the ·owner's· {variety} is list, if ·length· or both of ·minLength· and ·maxLength· are among {facets}, then {value} is true; else {value} is false.

When the ·owner's· {variety} is union, if {value} is true for every member of {member type definitions}and all members of {member type definitions}the ·owner's· {member type definitions} set and all of these share a common ancestor, then {value} is true; elseotherwise {value} is false.

4.3.3 cardinality

[Definition:]  Every ·value space· has associated with it the concept of cardinality.  Some ·value space·s are finite, some are countably infinite while still others could conceivably be uncountably infinite (although no ·value space· defined by this specification is uncountable infinite). A datatype is said to have the cardinality of its ·value space·.

It is sometimes useful to categorize ·value space·s (and hence, datatypes) as to their cardinality.  There are two significant cases:

·cardinality· provides for:

Every value space has a specific number of members.  This number can be characterized as finite or infinite.  (Currently there are no datatypes with infinite value spaces larger than countable.)  The cardinality facet value is either finite or countably infinite and is generally finite for datatypes with finite value spaces.  However, it will remain countably infinite when the mechanism for causing finiteness is difficult to detect, as, for example, when finiteness occurs because of a derivation using a pattern component.

4.3.3.1 The cardinality Schema Component

{value} depends on the ·owner's· {variety}, {facets}, and {member type definitions} in the Simple Type Definition component in which a cardinality component appears as a member of {fundamental facets}.

When {variety} is ·atomic· and {value} of {base type definition} is finite, then {value} is finite.

When {variety} is ·atomic· and {value} of {base type definition} is countably infinite and either of the following conditions are true, then {value} is finite; else {value} is countably infinite:

  1. one of ·length·, ·maxLength·, ·totalDigits· is among {facets},
  2. all of the following are true:
    1. one of ·minInclusive· or ·minExclusive· is among {facets}
    2. one of ·maxInclusive· or ·maxExclusive· is among {facets}
    3. either of the following are true:
      1. ·fractionDigits· is among {facets}
      2. {base type definition} is one of date, gYearMonth, gYear, gMonthDay, gDay or gMonth or any type ·derived· from them

When the ·owner· is ·primitive·, {value} is as specified in the table in Fundamental Facets (§F.1).  Otherwise, when the ·owner's· {variety} is atomic, {value} is countably infinite unless any of the following conditions are true, in which case {value} is finite:

  1. the ·owner's· {base type definition}'s cardinality {value} is finite,
  2. at least one of length, maxLength, or totalDigits is a member of the ·owner's· {facets} set,
  3. all of the following are true:
    1. one of minInclusive or minExclusive is a member of the ·owner's· {facets} set
    2. one of maxInclusive or maxExclusive is a member of the ·owner's· {facets} set
    3. either of the following are true:
      1. fractionDigits is a member of the ·owner's· {facets} set
      2. {primitive type definition} is one of date, gYearMonth, gYear, gMonthDay, gDay or gMonth

When the ·owner· {variety} is list, if length or both of minLength and maxLength are among {facets}members of the ·owner's· {facets} set and the ·owner's· {item type definition}'s cardinality {value} is finite then {value} is finite; elseotherwise {value} is countably infinite.

When the ·parent's