The presentation of this document has been augmented to identify changes from a previous version. Three kinds of changes are highlighted: new, added text, changed text, and deleted text.
This document is also available in these non-normative formats: XML and
.Copyright © 2005 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark and document use rules apply.
XML is a versatile markup language, capable of labeling the information content of diverse data sources including structured and semi-structured documents, relational databases, and object repositories. A query language that uses the structure of XML intelligently can express queries across all these kinds of data, whether physically stored in XML or viewed as XML via middleware. This specification describes a query language called XQuery, which is designed to be broadly applicable across many types of XML data sources.
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
This is a Candidate Recommendation Working Draft as described in the Process Document. This document is intended for review by W3C members and other interested parties. The publication of this document constitutes a call for implementations of this specification. This specification will remain a Candidate Recommendation until at least 2006-02-28.
This document has been produced by the XML Query Working Group (WG), which is part of the XML Activity. Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.
This draft includes corrections and changesbased on public comments recorded inthe W3Cpublic Bugzilla repository (http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/) usedforLastCall issuestracking. A listof substantive changes since the Last CallWorking Draft of 04 April 2005 can be found in J Revision Log.
Commentson this document should be made in W3C's publicBugzillasystem (instructionscan be found at http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/04/qt-bugzilla). Ifaccess to that system is not feasible, you may sendyour comments to the W3C XSLT/XPath/XQuery mailing list, public-qt-comments@w3.org. It will be very helpful if you includethe string [XQuery] in the subject line of your comment,whether made in Bugzilla or in email. Each Bugzilla entryand email message should containonly onecomment. Archivesof the commentsand responses areavailable at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/.
TheXML Query Working Group plansto submit this specificationforconsiderationasa W3C ProposedRecommendation assoon as the following conditions are met:
A test suite is available that tests each identified XQuery feature, bothrequired and optional.
Eachidentified XQuery feature has at least two implementations.
Minimal Conformance to this specification, as defined in 5.1 Minimal Conformance,has been demonstrated by atleast twodistinct implementations, at least oneof which uses the XQuery human-readable syntaxdefined in this specification,and at least one of which usesthe XQueryX XML syntax defined in [XQueryX 1.0].
TheWorking Group has respondedformally to all issues raised during the CR period against this document.
TheXMLQuery and XPath TestSuiteis under development. Implementors are encouragedto runthis testsuite and report their results. The Working Groups especially seek information regarding implementation experiences with respect to cyclic importing of XQuery library modules (see Bugzilla bug number 1705).
The following features are consideredto be at risk:
Oneor all of these features may be removed if implementationsofthem do not exist at the end of the Candidate Recommendation period.
The patent policy for this document is the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the XML Query Working Group's patent disclosure page . An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) with respect to this specification should disclose this information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.
1 Introduction
2 Basics
2.1 Expression Context
2.1.1 Static Context
2.1.2 Dynamic Context
2.2 Processing
Model
2.2.1 Data Model Generation
2.2.2 Schema Import
Processing
2.2.3 Expression
Processing
2.2.3.1 Static Analysis Phase
2.2.3.2 Dynamic Evaluation Phase
2.2.4 Serialization
2.2.5 Consistency Constraints
2.3 Error Handling
2.3.1 Kinds of Errors
2.3.2 Identifying and Reporting Errors
2.3.3 Handling Dynamic Errors
2.3.4 Errors and
Optimization
2.4 Concepts
2.4.1 Document Order
2.4.2 Atomization
2.4.3 Effective Boolean Value
2.4.4 Input Sources
2.4.5 URI Literals
2.5 Types
2.5.1 Predefined Schema Types
2.5.2 Typed Value and String Value
2.5.3 SequenceType Syntax
2.5.4 SequenceType Matching
2.5.4.1 Matching a SequenceType and a Value
2.5.4.2 Matching an ItemType and an
Item
2.5.4.3 Element Test
2.5.4.4 Schema Element Test
2.5.4.5 Attribute Test
2.5.4.6 Schema Attribute Test
2.6 Comments
3 Expressions
3.1 Primary Expressions
3.1.1 Literals
3.1.2 Variable References
3.1.3 Parenthesized Expressions
3.1.4 Context Item Expression
3.1.5 Function Calls
3.2 Path Expressions
3.2.1 Steps
3.2.1.1 Axes
3.2.1.2 Node Tests
3.2.2 Predicates
3.2.3 Unabbreviated Syntax
3.2.4 Abbreviated Syntax
3.3 Sequence Expressions
3.3.1 Constructing Sequences
3.3.2 Filter Expressions
3.3.3 Combining Node Sequences
3.4 Arithmetic Expressions
3.5 Comparison Expressions
3.5.1 Value Comparisons
3.5.2 General Comparisons
3.5.3 Node Comparisons
3.6 Logical Expressions
3.7 Constructors
3.7.1 Direct Element Constructors
3.7.1.1 Attributes
3.7.1.2 Namespace Declaration Attributes
3.7.1.3 Content
3.7.1.4 Boundary Whitespace
3.7.2 Other Direct Constructors
3.7.3 Computed
Constructors
3.7.3.1 Computed Element
Constructors
3.7.3.2 Computed Attribute
Constructors
3.7.3.3 Document Node Constructors
3.7.3.4 Text Node Constructors
3.7.3.5 Computed Processing Instruction Constructors
3.7.3.6 Computed Comment Constructors
3.7.4 In-scope Namespaces of a Constructed Element
3.8 FLWOR Expressions
3.8.1 For and Let Clauses
3.8.2 Where Clause
3.8.3 Order By and Return Clauses
3.8.4 Example
3.9 Ordered and Unordered Expressions
3.10 Conditional Expressions
3.11 Quantified Expressions
3.12 Expressions on SequenceTypes
3.12.1 Instance Of
3.12.2 Typeswitch
3.12.3 Cast
3.12.4 Castable
3.12.5 Constructor
Functions
3.12.6 Treat
3.13 Validate Expressions
3.14 Extension Expressions
4 Modules and Prologs
4.1 Version Declaration
4.2 Module Declaration
4.3 Boundary-space Declaration
4.4 Default Collation Declaration
4.5 Base URI Declaration
4.6 Construction Declaration
4.7 Ordering Mode Declaration
4.8 Empty Order Declaration
4.9 Copy-Namespaces Declaration
4.10 Schema Import
4.11 Module Import
4.12 Namespace Declaration
4.13 Default Namespace Declaration
4.14 Variable Declaration
4.15 Function Declaration
4.16 Option Declaration
5 Conformance
5.1 Minimal Conformance
5.2 Optional Features
5.2.1 Schema Import Feature
5.2.2 Schema Validation Feature
5.2.3 Static Typing Feature
5.2.3.1 Static Typing Extensions
5.2.4 Full Axis Feature
5.2.5 Module Feature
5.2.6 Serialization Feature
5.2.7 Trivial XML Embedding Feature
5.3 Data Model Conformance
A XQuery Grammar
A.1 EBNF
A.1.1 Notation
A.1.2 Extra-grammatical Constraints
A.1.3 Grammar Notes
A.2 Lexical structure
A.2.1 Terminal Symbols
A.2.2 Terminal Delimitation
A.2.3 End-of-Line Handling
A.2.3.1 XML 1.0 End-of-Line Handling
A.2.3.2 XML 1.1 End-of-Line Handling
A.2.4 Whitespace Rules
A.2.4.1 Default Whitespace Handling
A.2.4.2 Explicit Whitespace Handling
A.3 Reserved Function Names
A.4 Precedence Order
B Type Promotion and Operator Mapping
B.1 Type Promotion
B.2 Operator Mapping
C Context Components
C.1 Static Context Components
C.2 Dynamic Context Components
C.3 Serialization Parameters
D Implementation-Defined Items
E References
E.1 Normative References
E.2 Non-normative References
E.3 Background Material
F Error Conditions
G The application/xquery Media Type
G.1 Introduction
G.2 Registration of MIME Media Type application/xquery
G.2.1 Interoperability Considerations
G.2.2 Applications Using this Media Type
G.2.3 File Extensions
G.2.4 Intended Usage
G.2.5 Author/Change Controller
G.3 Encoding Considerations
G.4 Recognizing XQuery Files
G.5 Charset Default Rules
G.6 Security Considerations
H Glossary (Non-Normative)
I Example Applications (Non-Normative)
I.1 Joins
I.2 Grouping
I.3 Queries on Sequence
I.4 Recursive Transformations
I.5 Selecting Distinct Combinations
J Revision
Log (Non-Normative)
J.1 7 July 2005
J.2 15 September 2005
J.3 03 November 2005 (CR Draft)
As increasing amounts of information are stored, exchanged, and presented using XML, the ability to intelligently query XML data sources becomes increasingly important. One of the great strengths of XML is its flexibility in representing many different kinds of information from diverse sources. To exploit this flexibility, an XML query language must provide features for retrieving and interpreting information from these diverse sources.
XQuery is designed to meet the requirements identified by the W3C XML Query Working Group [XML Query 1.0 Requirements] and the use cases in [XML Query Use Cases]. It is designed to be a language in which queries are concise and easily understood. It is also flexible enough to query a broad spectrum of XML information sources, including both databases and documents. The Query Working Group has identified a requirement for both a non-XML query syntax and an XML-based query syntax. XQuery is designed to meet the first of these requirements. XQuery is derived from an XML query language called Quilt [Quilt], which in turn borrowed features from several other languages, including XPath 1.0 [XPath 1.0], XQL [XQL], XML-QL [XML-QL], SQL [SQL], and OQL [ODMG].
[Definition: XQuery operates on the abstract, logical structure of an XML document, rather than its surface syntax. This logical structure, known as the data model, is defined in [XQuery/XPath Data Model (XDM)]. ]
XQuery Version 1.0 is an extension of XPath Version 2.0. Any expression that is syntactically valid and executes successfully in both XPath 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 will return the same result in both languages. Since these languages are so closely related, their grammars and language descriptions are generated from a common source to ensure consistency, and the editors of these specifications work together closely.
XQuery also depends on and is closely related to the following specifications:
[XQuery/XPath Data Model (XDM)] defines the data model that underlies all XQuery expressions.
[XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Formal Semantics] defines the static semantics of XQuery and also contains a formal but non-normative description of the dynamic semantics that may be useful for implementors and others who require a formal definition.
The type system of XQuery is based on [XML Schema].
The built-in function library and the operators supported by XQuery are defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
One requirement in [XML Query 1.0 Requirements] is that an XML query language have both a human-readable syntax and an XML-based syntax. The XML-based syntax for XQuery is described in [XQueryX 1.0].
This document specifies a grammar for XQuery, using the same basic EBNF notation used in [XML 1.0]. Unless otherwise noted (see A.2 Lexical structure), whitespace is not significant in queries. Grammar productions are introduced together with the features that they describe, and a complete grammar is also presented in the appendix [A XQuery Grammar]. The appendix is the normative version.
In the grammar productions in this document, named symbols are underlined and literal text is enclosed in double quotes. For example, the following production describes the syntax of a function call:
| [93] | FunctionCall | ::= | QName "(" (ExprSingle ("," ExprSingle)*)? ")" |
The production should be read as follows: A function call consists of a QName followed by an open-parenthesis. The open-parenthesis is followed by an optional argument list. The argument list (if present) consists of one or more expressions, separated by commas. The optional argument list is followed by a close-parenthesis.
Certain aspects of language processing are described in this specification as implementation-defined or implementation-dependent.
[Definition: Implementation-defined indicates an aspect that may differ between implementations, but must be specified by the implementor for each particular implementation.]
[Definition: Implementation-dependent indicates an aspect that may differ between implementations, is not specified by this or any W3C specification, and is not required to be specified by the implementor for any particular implementation.]
This document normatively defines the dynamic semantics of XQuery. The static semantics of XQuery are normatively defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Formal Semantics]. In this document, examples and material labeled as "Note" are provided for explanatory purposes and are not normative.
The basic building block of XQuery is the expression, which is a string of [Unicode] characters (the version of Unicode to be used is implementation-defined.) The language provides several kinds of expressions which may be constructed from keywords, symbols, and operands. In general, the operands of an expression are other expressions. XQuery allows expressions to be nested with full generality. (However, unlike a pure functional language, it does not allow variable substitution if the variable declaration contains construction of new nodes.)
Note:
This specification contains no assumptions or requirements regarding the character set encoding of strings of [Unicode] characters.
Like XML, XQuery is a case-sensitive language. Keywords in XQuery use lower-case characters and are not reserved—that is, names in XQuery expressions are allowed to be the same as language keywords, except for certain unprefixed function-names listed in A.3 Reserved Function Names.
[Definition: In the data model, a value is always a sequence.] [Definition: A
sequence is an ordered collection of zero or more
items.]
[Definition: An
item is either an atomic value or a node.]
[Definition: An atomic
value is a value in the value space of an atomic
type, as defined in [XML Schema].]
[Definition: A node is an instance of one of the
node kinds defined in [XQuery/XPath Data Model (XDM)].]
Each node has a unique node identity, a typed value, and a string value. In addition, some nodes have a name. The typed value of a node is a sequence
of zero or more atomic values. The string value of a node is a
value of type xs:string. The name of a node is a value of type xs:QName.
[Definition: A sequence containing exactly one item is called a singleton.] An item is identical to a singleton sequence containing that item. Sequences are never nested—for example, combining the values 1, (2, 3), and ( ) into a single sequence results in the sequence (1, 2, 3). [Definition: A sequence containing zero items is called an empty sequence.]
[Definition: The term XDMinstance is used, synonymously with the term value, to denote an unconstrained sequence of nodes and/or atomic values in the data model.]
Names in XQuery are called QNames, and conform to the syntax in [XML Names]. [Definition: Lexically, a QName consists of an optional namespace prefix and a local name. If the namespace prefix is present, it is separated from the local name by a colon.] A lexical QName can be converted into an expanded QName by resolving its namespace prefix to a namespace URI, using the statically known namespaces [err:XPST0081]. [Definition: An expanded QName consists of an optional namespace URI and a local name. An expanded QName also retains its original namespace prefix (if any), to facilitate casting the expanded QName into a string.] The namespace URI value is
whitespace normalized according to the rules for the xs:anyURI type in [XML Schema]. Two expanded QNames are equal if their namespace URIs are equal and their local names are equal (even if their namespace prefixes are not equal). Namespace URIs and local names are compared on a codepoint basis, without further normalization.
Certain namespace prefixes are predeclared by XQuery and bound to fixed namespace URIs. These namespace prefixes are as follows:
xml = http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace
xs = http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
xsi = http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance
fn = http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions
xdt = http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-datatypes
local = http://www.w3.org/2005/xquery-local-functions (see 4.15 Function Declaration.)
In addition to the prefixes in the above list, this document uses the prefix err to represent the namespace URI http://www.w3.org/2005/xqt-errors (see 2.3.2 Identifying and Reporting Errors). This namespace prefix is not predeclared and its use in this document is not normative.
Element nodes have a property called in-scope namespaces. [Definition: The in-scope namespaces property of an element node is a set of namespace bindings, each of which associates a namespace prefix with a URI, thus defining the set of namespace prefixes that are available for interpreting QNames within the scope of the element. For a given element, one namespace binding may have an empty prefix; the URI of this namespace binding is the default namespace within the scope of the element.]
Note:
In [XPath 1.0], the in-scope namespaces of an element node are represented by a collection of namespace nodes arranged on a namespace axis, which is optional and deprecated in [XPath 2.0]. XQuery does not support the namespace axis and does not represent namespace bindings in the form of nodes. However, where other specifications such as [XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 Serialization] refer to namespace nodes, these nodes may be synthesized from the in-scope namespaces of an element node by interpreting each namespace binding as a namespace node.
[Definition: Within this specification, the term URI refers to a Universal Resource Identifier as defined in [RFC3986] and extended in [RFC3987] with the new name IRI.] The term URI has been retained in preference to IRI to avoid introducing new names for concepts such as "Base URI" that are defined or referenced across the whole family of XML specifications.
[Definition: The expression context for a given expression consists of all the information that can affect the result of the expression.] This information is organized into two categories called the static context and the dynamic context.
[Definition: The static context of an expression is the information that is available during static analysis of the expression, prior to its evaluation.] This information can be used to decide whether the expression contains a static error. If analysis of an expression relies on some component of the static context that has not been assigned a value, a static error is raised [err:XPST0001].
The individual components of the static context are summarized below. Rules governing the scope and initialization of these components can be found in C.1 Static Context Components.
[Definition: XPath 1.0 compatibility
mode. This
component must be set by all host languages
that include XPath 2.0 as a subset,
indicating whether rules for compatibility
with XPath 1.0 are in effect.
XQuery sets the value of this component to
false.
]
[Definition: Statically known namespaces. This is a set of (prefix,
URI) pairs that define all the namespaces that are known during static processing of a given expression.] The URI value is
whitespace normalized according to the rules for the xs:anyURI type in [XML Schema]. Note the difference between in-scope namespaces, which is a dynamic property of an element node, and statically known namespaces, which is a static property of an expression.
Some namespaces are predefined; additional namespaces can be added to the statically known namespaces by namespace declarations in a Prolog and by namespace declaration attributes in direct element constructors.
[Definition: Default element/type namespace. This is a
namespace URI or "none". The namespace URI, if present, is used for any unprefixed QName appearing in a
position where an element or type name is expected.] The URI value is
whitespace normalized according to the rules for the xs:anyURI type in [XML Schema].
[Definition: Default function namespace. This is a
namespace URI or "none". The namespace URI, if present, is used for any unprefixed QName appearing in a position where a function name is expected.] The URI value is
whitespace normalized according to the rules for the xs:anyURI type in [XML Schema].
[Definition: In-scope schema definitions. This is a generic term for all the element declarations, attribute declarations, and schema type definitions that are in scope during processing of an expression.] It includes the following three parts:
[Definition: In-scope schema types. Each schema type definition is identified either by an expanded QName (for a named type) or by an implementation-dependent type identifier (for an anonymous type). The in-scope schema types include the predefined schema types described in 2.5.1 Predefined Schema Types. If the Schema Import Feature is supported, in-scope schema types also include all type definitions found in imported schemas. ]
[Definition: In-scope element declarations. Each element declaration is identified either by an expanded QName (for a top-level element declaration) or by an implementation-dependent element identifier (for a local element declaration). If the Schema Import Feature is supported, in-scope element declarations include all element declarations found in imported schemas. ] An element declaration includes information about the element's substitution group affiliation.
[Definition: Substitution groups are defined in [XML Schema] Part 1, Section 2.2.2.2. Informally, the substitution group headed by a given element (called the head element) consists of the set of elements that can be substituted for the head element without affecting the outcome of schema validation.]
[Definition: In-scope attribute declarations. Each attribute declaration is identified either by an expanded QName (for a top-level attribute declaration) or by an implementation-dependent attribute identifier (for a local attribute declaration). If the Schema Import Feature is supported, in-scope attribute declarations include all attribute declarations found in imported schemas.]
[Definition: In-scope variables. This is a set of (expanded QName, type) pairs. It defines the set of variables that are available for reference within an expression. The expanded QName is the name of the variable, and the type is the static type of the variable.]
Variable declarations
in a Prolog are added to in-scope variables. An expression that binds a variable (such as a
let, for,
some, or every expression) extends the
in-scope variables of its subexpressions with the new bound variable
and its type. Within a function
declaration, the in-scope variables are extended by the names
and types of the function parameters.
The static type of a variable may be either declared in a query or (if the Static Typing Feature is enabled) inferred by static type inference rules as described in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Formal Semantics].
[Definition: Context item static type. This component defines the static type of the context item within the scope of a given expression.]
[Definition: Function signatures. This component defines the set of functions that are available to be called from within an expression. Each function is uniquely identified by its expanded QName and its arity (number of parameters).] In addition to the name and arity, each function signature specifies the static types of the function parameters and result.
The function signatures include the signatures of constructor functions, which are discussed in 3.12.5 Constructor Functions.
[Definition: Statically known collations. This is an implementation-defined set of (URI, collation) pairs. It defines the names of the collations that are available for use in processing queries and expressions.] [Definition: A collation is a specification of the manner in which strings and URIs are compared and, by extension, ordered. For a more complete definition of collation, see [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].]
[Definition: Default
collation. This identifies one of the collations in statically known collations as the collation to be
used by functions and operators for comparing and ordering values of type xs:string and xs:anyURI (and types derived from them) when no
explicit collation is
specified.]
[Definition: Construction mode. The
construction mode governs the behavior of element and document node constructors. If construction mode is preserve, the type of a constructed element node is xs:anyType, and all attribute and element nodes copied during node construction retain their original types. If construction mode is strip, the type of a constructed element node is xdt:untyped; all element nodes copied during node construction receive the type xdt:untyped, and all attribute nodes copied during node construction receive the type xdt:untypedAtomic.]
[Definition: Ordering mode. Ordering mode, which has the value ordered or unordered, affects the ordering of the result sequence returned by certain path expressions, union, intersect, and except expressions, and FLWOR expressions that have no order by clause.] Details are provided in the descriptions of these expressions.
[Definition: Default order for empty sequences. This component controls the processing of empty sequences and NaN values as ordering keys in an order by clause in a FLWOR expression, as described in 3.8.3 Order By and Return Clauses.] Its value may be greatest or least.
[Definition: Boundary-space
policy. This component controls the processing of boundary whitespace
by direct element constructors, as described in 3.7.1.4 Boundary Whitespace.] Its value may be preserve or strip.
[Definition: Copy-namespaces mode. This component controls the namespace bindings that
are assigned when an existing element node is copied by an element
constructor, as described in 3.7.1 Direct Element Constructors. Its value consists of two parts: preserve or no-preserve, and inherit or no-inherit.]
[Definition: Base URI. This is an absolute URI, used when necessary in the resolution of relative URIs (for example, by the fn:resolve-uri function.)] The URI value is
whitespace normalized according to the rules for the xs:anyURI type in [XML Schema].
[Definition: Statically known documents. This is a mapping
from strings onto types. The string represents the absolute URI of a
resource that is potentially available using the fn:doc
function. The type is the static type of a call to fn:doc with the given URI as its
literal argument. ]
If the argument to fn:doc is a
string literal that is not present in statically known documents, then the
static type of
fn:doc is document-node()?.
Note:
The purpose of the statically known
documents is to provide static type information, not to determine
which documents are available. A URI need not be found in the
statically known documents to be accessed using
fn:doc.
[Definition: Statically known collections. This is a
mapping from strings onto types. The string represents the absolute
URI of a resource that is potentially available using the
fn:collection function. The type is the type of the
sequence of nodes that would result from calling the
fn:collection function with this URI as its
argument.] If the argument to
fn:collection is a string literal that is not present in
statically known collections, then the static type of
fn:collection is node()*.
Note:
The purpose of the statically known
collections is to provide static type information, not to determine
which collections are available. A URI need not be found in the
statically known collections to be accessed using
fn:collection.
[Definition: Statically known default collection type. This is the type of the sequence of nodes that would result from calling the fn:collection function with no arguments.] Unless initialized to some other value by an implementation, the value of statically known default collection type is node()*.
[Definition: The dynamic context of an expression is defined as information that is available at the time the expression is evaluated.] If evaluation of an expression relies on some part of the dynamic context that has not been assigned a value, a dynamic error is raised [err:XPDY0002].
The individual components of the dynamic context are summarized below. Further rules governing the semantics of these components can be found in C.2 Dynamic Context Components.
The dynamic context consists of all the components of the static context, and the additional components listed below.
[Definition: The first three components of the dynamic context (context item, context position, and context size) are called the focus of the expression. ] The focus enables the processor to keep track of which items are being processed by the expression.
Certain language constructs, notably the path
expression E1/E2 and the filter
expression E1[E2], create a new focus
for the evaluation of a sub-expression. In these constructs, E2 is evaluated once for each item in the
sequence that results from evaluating E1. Each time E2 is evaluated, it is evaluated with a
different focus. The focus for evaluating E2 is referred to below as the inner
focus, while the focus for evaluating E1 is referred to as the outer
focus. The inner focus exists only while E2 is being evaluated. When this evaluation
is complete, evaluation of the containing expression continues with
its original focus unchanged.
[Definition: The context item
is the item currently being processed. An item is
either an atomic value or a node.][Definition: When the context item is a
node, it can also be referred to as the context
node.] The context item is returned by an expression
consisting of a single dot (.). When an expression E1/E2 or E1[E2] is evaluated, each item in the
sequence obtained by evaluating E1
becomes the context item in the inner focus for an evaluation of E2.
[Definition: The context
position is the position of the context item within the
sequence of items currently being processed.] It changes whenever the context item
changes. Its value is always an integer greater than zero. The context
position is returned by the expression fn:position(). When an expression E1/E2 or E1[E2] is evaluated, the context position in
the inner focus for an evaluation of E2
is the position of the context item in the sequence obtained by
evaluating E1. The position of the
first item in a sequence is always 1 (one). The context position is
always less than or equal to the context size.
[Definition: The context
size is the number of items in the sequence of items currently
being processed.] Its value is always an
integer greater than zero. The context size is returned by the
expression fn:last(). When an expression
E1/E2 or E1[E2] is evaluated, the context size in the
inner focus for an evaluation of E2 is
the number of items in the sequence obtained by evaluating E1.
[Definition: Variable values. This is a set of (expanded QName, value) pairs. It contains the same expanded QNames as the in-scope variables in the static context for the expression. The expanded QName is the name of the variable and the value is the dynamic value of the variable, which includes its dynamic type.]
[Definition: Function implementations. Each function in function signatures has a function implementation that enables the function to map instances of its parameter types into an instance of its result type. For a user-defined function, the function implementation is an XQuery expression. For a built-in function or external function, the function implementation is implementation-dependent.]
[Definition: Current dateTime. This information represents
an implementation-dependent point in time during the processing of a query, and includes an explicit timezone. It can be retrieved by the fn:current-dateTime function. If invoked multiple times during the execution of a query,
this function always returns the same result.]
[Definition: Implicit timezone. This is the timezone to be used when a date,
time, or dateTime value that does not have a timezone is used in a
comparison or arithmetic operation. The implicit timezone is an implementation-defined value of type
xdt:dayTimeDuration. See [XML Schema] for the range of legal values
of a timezone.]
[Definition: Available
documents. This is a mapping of
strings onto document nodes. The string
represents the absolute URI of a
resource. The document node is the root of a tree that represents that resource using the data model. The document node is returned by the fn:doc function when applied to that URI.] The set of available
documents is not limited to the set of statically known
documents, and it may be
empty.
[Definition: Available
collections. This is a mapping of
strings onto sequences of nodes. The string
represents the absolute URI of a
resource. The sequence of nodes represents
the result of the fn:collection
function when that URI is supplied as the
argument. ] The set of available
collections is not limited to the set of statically known
collections, and it may be empty.
[Definition: Default collection. This is the sequence of nodes that would result from calling the fn:collection function with no arguments.] The value of default collection may be initialized by the implementation.
XQuery is defined in terms of the data model and the expression context.

Figure 1: Processing Model Overview
Figure 1 provides a schematic overview of the processing steps that are discussed in detail below. Some of these steps are completely outside the domain of XQuery; in Figure 1, these are depicted outside the line that represents the boundaries of the language, an area labeled external processing. The external processing domain includes generation of an XDMinstance that represents the data to be queried (see 2.2.1 Data Model Generation), schema import processing (see 2.2.2 Schema Import Processing) and serialization (see 2.2.4 Serialization). The area inside the boundaries of the language is known as the query processing domain, which includes the static analysis and dynamic evaluation phases (see 2.2.3 Expression Processing). Consistency constraints on the query processing domain are defined in 2.2.5 Consistency Constraints.
Before a query can be processed, its input data must be represented as an XDMinstance. This process occurs outside the domain of XQuery, which is why Figure 1 represents it in the external processing domain. Here are some steps by which an XML document might be converted to an XDMinstance:
A document may be parsed using an XML parser that generates an XML Information Set (see [XML Infoset]). The parsed document may then be validated against one or more schemas. This process, which is described in [XML Schema], results in an abstract information structure called the Post-Schema Validation Infoset (PSVI). If a document has no associated schema, its Information Set is preserved. (See DM1 in Fig. 1.)
The Information Set or PSVI may be transformed into an XDMinstance by a process described in [XQuery/XPath Data Model (XDM)]. (See DM2 in Fig. 1.)
The above steps provide an example of how an XDMinstance might be constructed. AnXDM instance might also be synthesized directly from a relational database, or constructed in some other way (see DM3 in Fig. 1.) XQuery is defined in terms of the data model, but it does not place any constraints on how XDMinstances are constructed.
[Definition: Each element node and attribute node in an XDMinstance has a type annotation (referred to in [XQuery/XPath Data Model (XDM)] as its type-name property.) The type annotation of a node is a schema type that describes the relationship between the string value of the node and its typed value.] If the XDMinstance was derived from a validated XML document as described in Section
3.3 Construction from a PSVIDM, the type annotations of the element and attribute nodes are derived from schema
validation. XQuery does
not provide a way to directly access the type annotation of an element
or attribute node.
The value of an attribute is represented directly within the
attribute node. An attribute node whose type is unknown (such as might
occur in a schemaless document) is given the type annotation
xdt:untypedAtomic.
The value of an element is represented by the children of the
element node, which may include text nodes and other element
nodes. The type annotation of an element node indicates how the values in
its child text nodes are to be interpreted. An element that has not been validated (such as might occur in a schemaless document) is annotated
with the schema type xdt:untyped. An element that has been validated and found to be partially valid is annotated with the schema type xs:anyType. If an element node is annotated as xdt:untyped, all its descendant element nodes are also annotated as xdt:untyped. However, if an element node is annotated as xs:anyType, some of its descendant element nodes may have a more specific type annotation.
The in-scope schema definitions in the static context may be extracted from actual XML schemas as described in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Formal Semantics] (see step SI1 in Figure 1) or may be generated by some other mechanism (see step SI2 in Figure 1). In either case, the result must satisfy the consistency constraints defined in 2.2.5 Consistency Constraints.
XQuery defines two phases of processing called the static analysis phase and the dynamic evaluation phase (see Fig. 1). During the static analysis phase, static errors, dynamic errors, or type errors may be raised. During the dynamic evaluation phase, only dynamic errors or type errors may be raised. These kinds of errors are defined in 2.3.1 Kinds of Errors.
Within each phase, an implementation is free to use any strategy or algorithm whose result conforms to the specifications in this document.
[Definition: The static analysis phase depends on the expression itself and on the static context. The static analysis phase does not depend on input data (other than schemas).]
During the static analysis phase, the query is parsed into an internal representation called the operation tree (step SQ1 in Figure 1). A parse error is raised as a static error [err:XPST0003]. The static context is initialized by the implementation (step SQ2). The static context is then changed and augmented based on information in the prolog (step SQ3). If the Schema Import Feature is supported, the in-scope schema definitions are populated with information from imported schemas. If the Module Feature is supported, the static context is extended with function declarations and variable declarations from imported modules. The static context is used to resolve schema type names, function names, namespace prefixes, and variable names (step SQ4). If a name of one of these kinds in the operation tree is not found in the static context, a static error ([err:XPST0008] or [err:XPST0017]) is raised (however, see exceptions to this rule in 2.5.4.3 Element Test and 2.5.4.5 Attribute Test.)
The operation tree is then normalized by making explicit the implicit operations such as atomizationand extraction of Effective Boolean Values (step SQ5). The normalization process is described in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Formal Semantics].
Each expression is then assigned a static type (step SQ6). [Definition: The static type of an expression is a type such that, when the expression is evaluated, the resulting value will always conform to the static type.] If the Static Typing Feature is supported, the static types of various expressions are inferred according to the rules described in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Formal Semantics]. If the Static Typing Feature is not supported, the static types that are assigned are implementation-dependent.
During the static analysis phase, if the Static Typing Feature is in effect and an operand of an expression is found to have a static type that is not appropriate for that operand, a type error is raised [err:XPTY0004]. If static type checking raises no errors and assigns a static type T to an expression, then execution of the expression on valid input data is guaranteed either to produce a value of type T or to raise a dynamic error.
The purpose of the Static Typing Feature is to provide early detection of type errors and to infer type information that may be useful in optimizing the evaluation of an expression.
[Definition: The dynamic evaluation phase is the phase during which the value of an expression is computed.] It occurs after completion of the static analysis phase.
The dynamic evaluation phase can occur only if no errors were detected during the static analysis phase. If the Static Typing Feature is in effect, all type errors are detected during static analysis and serve to inhibit the dynamic evaluation phase.
The dynamic evaluation phase depends on the operation tree of the expression being evaluated (step DQ1), on the input data (step DQ4), and on the dynamic context (step DQ5), which in turn draws information from the external environment (step DQ3) and the static context (step DQ2). The dynamic evaluation phase may create new data-model values (step DQ4) and it may extend the dynamic context (step DQ5)—for example, by binding values to variables.
[Definition: A dynamic type is associated with each value as it is computed. The dynamic type of a value may be more specific than the static type of the expression that computed it (for example, the static type of an expression might be xs:integer*, denoting a sequence of zero or more integers, but at evaluation time its value may have the dynamic type xs:integer, denoting exactly one integer.)]
If an operand of an expression is found to have a dynamic type that is not appropriate for that operand, a type error is raised [err:XPTY0004].
Even though static typing can catch many type errors before an expression is executed, it is possible for an expression to raise an error during evaluation that was not detected by static analysis. For example, an expression may contain a cast of a string into an integer, which is statically valid. However, if the actual value of the string at run time cannot be cast into an integer, a dynamic error will result. Similarly, an expression may apply an arithmetic operator to a value whose static type is xdt:untypedAtomic. This is not a static error, but at run time, if the value cannot be successfully cast to a numeric type, a dynamic error will be raised.
When the Static Typing Feature is in effect, it is also possible for static analysis of an expression to raise a type error, even though execution of the expression on certain inputs would be successful. For example, an expression might contain a function that requires an element as its parameter, and the static analysis phase might infer the static type of the function parameter to be an optional element. This case is treated as a type error and inhibits evaluation, even though the function call would have been successful for input data in which the optional element is present.
[Definition: Serialization is the process of converting an XDMinstance into a sequence of octets (step DM4 in Figure 1.) ] The general framework for serialization is described in [XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 Serialization].
An XQuery implementation is not required to provide a serialization interface. For example, an implementation may only provide a DOM interface (see [Document Object Model]) or an interface based on an event stream. In these cases, serialization would be outside of the scope of this specification.
[XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 Serialization]
defines a set of serialization parameters that govern the
serialization process. If an XQuery implementation provides a serialization interface, it may support (and may expose to users) any of the serialization parameters listed (with default values) in C.3 Serialization Parameters. An XQuery implementation that provides a serialization interface must support some combination of serialization parameters in which method = "xml" and version = "1.0".
Note:
The data model permits an element node to have fewer in-scope namespaces than its parent. Correct serialization of such an element node would require "undeclaration" of namespaces, which is a feature of [XML Names 1.1]. An implementation that does not support [XML Names 1.1] is permitted to serialize such an element without "undeclaration" of namespaces, which effectively causes the element to inherit the in-scope namespaces of its parent.
In order for XQuery to be well defined, the input XDMinstance, the static context, and the dynamic context must be mutually consistent. The consistency constraints listed below are prerequisites for correct functioning of an XQuery implementation. Enforcement of these consistency constraints is beyond the scope of this specification. This specification does not define the result of a query under any condition in which one or more of these constraints is not satisfied.
Some of the consistency constraints use the term data model schema. [Definition: For a given node in an XDMinstance, the data model schema is defined as the schema from which the type annotation of that node was derived.] For a node that was constructed by some process other than schema validation, the data model schema consists simply of the schema type definition that is represented by the type annotation of the node.
For every node that has a type annotation, if that type annotation is found in the in-scope schema definitions (ISSD), then its definition in the ISSD must be equivalent to its definition in the data model schema. Furthermore, all types that are derived by extension from the given type in the data model schema must also be known by equivalent definitions in the ISSD.
For every element name EN that is found both in an XDMinstance and in the in-scope schema definitions (ISSD), all elements that are known in the data model schema to be in the substitution group headed by EN must also be known in the ISSD to be in the substitution group headed by EN.
Every element name, attribute name, or schema type name referenced in in-scope variables or function signatures must be in the in-scope schema definitions, unless it is an element name referenced as part of an ElementTest or an attribute name referenced as part of an AttributeTest.
Any reference to a global element, attribute, or type name in the in-scope schema definitions must have a corresponding element, attribute or type definition in the in-scope schema definitions.
For each mapping of a string to a document node in available documents, if there exists a mapping of the same string to a document type in statically known documents, the document node must match the document type, using the matching rules in 2.5.4 SequenceType Matching.
For each mapping of a string to a sequence of nodes in available collections, if there exists a mapping of the same string to a type in statically known collections, the sequence of nodes must match the type, using the matching rules in 2.5.4 SequenceType Matching.
The sequence of nodes in the default collection must match the statically known default collection type, using the matching rules in 2.5.4 SequenceType Matching.
The value of the context item must match the context item static type, using the matching rules in 2.5.4 SequenceType Matching.
For each (variable, type) pair in in-scope variables and the corresponding (variable, value) pair in variable values such that the variable names are equal, the value must match the type, using the matching rules in 2.5.4 SequenceType Matching.
For each variable declared as external: If the variable declaration includes a declared type, the external environment must provide a value for the variable that matches the declared type, using the matching rules in 2.5.4 SequenceType Matching. If the variable declaration does not include a declared type, the external environment must provide a type and a matching value, using the same matching rules.
For a given query, define a participating ISSD as the in-scope schema definitions of a module that is used in evaluating the query. If two participating ISSDs contain a definition for the same schema type, element name, or attribute name, the definitions must be equivalent in both ISSDs. Furthermore, if two participating ISSDs each contain a definition of a schema type T, the set of types derived by extension from T must be equivalent in both ISSDs. Also, if two participating ISSDs each contain a definition of an element name E, the substitution group headed by E must be equivalent in both ISSDs.
In the statically known namespaces, the prefix xml must not be bound to any namespace URI other than http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace, and no prefix other than xml may be bound to this namespace URI.
As described in 2.2.3 Expression Processing, XQuery defines a static analysis phase, which does not depend on input data, and a dynamic evaluation phase, which does depend on input data. Errors may be raised during each phase.
[Definition: A static error is an error that must be detected during the static analysis phase. A syntax error is an example of a static error.]
[Definition: A dynamic error is an error that must be detected during the dynamic evaluation phase and may be detected during the static analysis phase. Numeric overflow is an example of a dynamic error. ]
[Definition: A type error may be raised during the static analysis phase or the dynamic evaluation phase. During the static analysis phase, a type error occurs when the static type of an expression does not match the expected type of the context in which the expression occurs. During the dynamic evaluation phase, a type error occurs when the dynamic type of a value does not match the expected type of the context in which the value occurs. ]
The outcome of the static analysis phase is either success or one or more type errors, static errors, or statically-detected dynamic errors. The result of the dynamic evaluation phase is either a result value, a type error, or a dynamic error.
During the static
analysis phase, if the Static Typing Feature is in effect and the static type assigned to an expression other than () or data(()) is empty-sequence(), a static error is raised [err:XPST0005]. This catches cases in which a query refers to an element or attribute that is not present in the in-scope schema definitions, possibly because of a spelling error.
Independently of whether the Static Typing Feature is in effect, if an implementation can determine during the
static
analysis phase that an expression, if evaluated, would necessarily
raise a type
error or a dynamic error, the implementation may (but is not required to) report that
error during the static
analysis phase. However, the
fn:error() function must not be evaluated during the
static analysis
phase.
[Definition: In addition to static errors, dynamic errors, and type errors, an XQuery implementation may raise warnings, either during the static analysis phase or the dynamic evaluation phase. The circumstances in which warnings are raised, and the ways in which warnings are handled, are implementation-defined.]
In addition to the errors defined in this specification, an implementation may raise a dynamic error for a reason beyond the scope of this specification. For example, limitations may exist on the maximum numbers or sizes of various objects. Any such limitations, and the consequences of exceeding them, are implementation-dependent.
The errors defined in this specification are identified by QNames that have the form err:XXYYnnnn, where:
err denotes the namespace for XPath and XQuery errors, http://www.w3.org/2005/xqt-errors. This binding of the namespace prefix err is used for convenience in this document, and is not normative.
XX denotes the language in which the error is defined, using the following encoding:
XP denotes an error defined by XPath. Such an error may also occur XQuery since XQuery includes XPath as a subset.
XQ denotes an error defined by XQuery.
YY denotes the error category, using the following encoding:
ST denotes a static error.
DY denotes a dynamic error.
TY denotes a type error.
nnnn is a unique numeric code.
Note:
The namespace URI for XPath and XQuery errors is not expected to change from one version of XQuery to another. However, the contents of this namespace may be extended to include additional error definitions.
The method by which an XQuery processor reports error information to the external environment is implementation-defined.
An error can be represented by a URI reference that is derived from the error QName as follows: an error with namespace URI NS and local part LP can be represented as the URI reference NS#LP. For example, an error whose QName is err:XPST0017 could be represented as http://www.w3.org/2005/xqt-errors#XPST0017.
Note:
Along with a code identifying an error, implementations may wish to return additional information, such as the location of the error or the processing phase in which it was detected. If an implementation chooses to do so, then the mechanism that it uses to return this information is implementation-defined.
Except as noted in this document, if any operand of an expression
raises a dynamic error, the expression also raises a dynamic error.
If an expression can validly return a value or raise a dynamic
error, the implementation may choose to return the value or raise
the dynamic error. For example, the logical expression
expr1 and expr2 may return the value false
if either operand returns false,
or may raise a dynamic error if either operand raises a dynamic
error.
If more than one operand of an expression raises an error, the implementation may choose which error is raised by the expression. For example, in this expression:
($x div $y) + xs:decimal($z)
both the sub-expressions ($x div $y) and xs:decimal($z) may
raise an error. The
implementation may choose which error is raised by the "+"
expression. Once one operand raises an error, the implementation is
not required, but is permitted, to evaluate any other operands.
[Definition: In addition to its identifying QName, a dynamic error may also carry a descriptive string and one or more additional values called error values.] An implementation may provide a mechanism whereby an application-defined error handler can process error values and produce diagnostic messages.
A dynamic error may be raised by a built-in
function or operator. For example,
the div operator raises an error if its operands are xs:decimal values and its second operand
is equal to zero. Errors raised by built-in functions and operators are defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
A dynamic error can also be raised explicitly by calling the
fn:error function, which only raises an error and never
returns a value. This function is defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators]. For example, the following
function call raises a dynamic
error, providing a QName that identifies the error, a descriptive string, and a diagnostic value (assuming that the prefix app is bound to a namespace containing application-defined error codes):
fn:error(xs:QName("app:err057"), "Unexpected value", fn:string($v))Because different implementations may choose to evaluate or optimize an expression in different ways, certain aspects of the detection and reporting of dynamic errors are implementation-dependent, as described in this section.
An implementation is always free to evaluate the operands of an operator in any order.
In some cases, a processor can determine the result of an expression without accessing all the data that would be implied by the formal expression semantics. For example, the formal description of filter expressions suggests that $s[1] should be evaluated by examining all the items in sequence $s, and selecting all those that satisfy the predicate position()=1. In practice, many implementations will recognize that they can evaluate this expression by taking the first item in the sequence and then exiting. If $s is defined by an expression such as //book[author eq 'Berners-Lee'], then this strategy may avoid a complete scan of a large document and may therefore greatly improve performance. However, a consequence of this strategy is that a dynamic error or type error that would be detected if the expression semantics were followed literally might not be detected at all if the evaluation exits early. In this example, such an error might occur if there is a book element in the input data with more than one author subelement.
The extent to which a processor may optimize its access to data, at the cost of not detecting errors, is defined by the following rules.
Consider an expression Q that has an operand (sub-expression) E. In general the value of E is a sequence. At an intermediate stage during evaluation of the sequence, some of its items will be known and others will be unknown. If, at such an intermediate stage of evaluation, a processor is able to establish that there are only two possible outcomes of evaluating Q, namely the value V or an error, then the processor may deliver the result V without evaluating further items in the operand E. For this purpose, two values are considered to represent the same outcome if their items are pairwise the same, where nodes are the same if they have the same identity, and values are the same if they are equal and have exactly the same type.
There is an exception to this rule: a processor is required to establish that the actual value of the operand E does not violate any constraints on its cardinality. For example, the expression $e eq 0 results in a type error if the value of $e contains two or more items. A processor is not allowed to decide, after evaluating the first item in the value of $e and finding it equal to zero, that the only possible outcomes are the value true or a type error caused by the cardinality violation. It must establish that the value of $e contains no more than one item.
These rules apply to all the operands of an expression considered in combination: thus if an expression has two operands E1 and E2, it may be evaluated using any samples of the respective sequences that satisfy the above rules.
The rules cascade: if A is an operand of B and B is an operand of C, then the processor needs to evaluate only a sufficient sample of B to determine the value of C, and needs to evaluate only a sufficient sample of A to determine this sample of B.
The effect of these rules is that the processor is free to stop examining further items in a sequence as soon as it can establish that further items would not affect the result except possibly by causing an error. For example, the processor may return true as the result of the expression S1 = S2 as soon as it finds a pair of equal values from the two sequences.
Another consequence of these rules is that where none of the items in a sequence contributes to the result of an expression, the processor is not obliged to evaluate any part of the sequence. Again, however, the processor cannot dispense with a required cardinality check: if an empty sequence is not permitted in the relevant context, then the processor must ensure that the operand is not an empty sequence.
Examples:
If an implementation can find (for example, by using an index) that at
least one item returned by $expr1 in the following example has the value 47, it is allowed to
return true as the result of the some expression, without searching for
another item returned by $expr1 that would raise an error if it were evaluated.
some $x in $expr1 satisfies $x = 47
In the following example, if an implementation can find (for example, by using an index) the
product element-nodes that have an id child with the value 47, it is allowed to return these nodes as the
result of the path expression, without searching for another product node that
would raise an error because it has an id child whose value is not an integer.
//product[id = 47]
For a variety of reasons, including optimization, implementations are free to rewrite expressions into equivalent expressions. Other than the raising or not raising of errors, the result of evaluating an equivalent expression must be the same as the result of evaluating the original expression. Expression rewrite is illustrated by the following examples.
Consider the expression //part[color eq "Red"]. An implementation might
choose to rewrite this expression as //part[color = "Red"][color eq
"Red"]. The implementation might then process the expression as follows:
First process the "=" predicate by probing an index on parts by color to
quickly find all the parts that have a Red color; then process the "eq"
predicate by checking each of these parts to make sure it has only a
single color. The result would be as follows:
Parts that have exactly one color that is Red are returned.
If some part has color Red together with some other color, an error is raised.
The existence of some part that has no color Red but has multiple non-Red colors does not trigger an error.
The expression in the following example cannot raise a casting error if it is evaluated exactly as written (i.e., left to right). An implementation is permitted, however, to reorder the predicates to achieve better performance (for example, by taking advantage of an index). This reordering could cause the expression to raise an error.
$N[@x castable as xs:date][xs:date(@x) gt xs:date("2000-01-01")]To avoid unexpected errors caused by expression rewrite,
tests that are designed to prevent dynamic errors should be expressed
using conditional or typeswitch expressions. Conditional and typeswitch expressions raise only dynamic errors that occur in the branch that is actually selected. Thus, unlike the previous example, the following example cannot raise a dynamic error if @x is not castable into an xs:date:
$N[if (@x castable as xs:date)
then xs:date(@x) gt xs:date("2000-01-01")
else false()]This section explains some concepts that are important to the processing of XQuery expressions.
An ordering called document order is defined among all the nodes accessible during processing of a given query, which may consist of one or more trees (documents or fragments). Document order is defined in [XQuery/XPath Data Model (XDM)], and its definition is repeated here for convenience. [Definition: The node ordering that is the reverse of document order is called reverse document order.]
Document order is a total ordering, although the relative order of some nodes is implementation-dependent. [Definition: Informally, document order is the order in which nodes appear in the XML serialization of a document.] [Definition: Document order is stable, which means that the relative order of two nodes will not change during the processing of a given query, even if this order is implementation-dependent.]
Within a tree, document order satisfies the following constraints:
The root node is the first node.
Every node occurs before all of its children and descendants.
Attribute nodes immediately follow the element node with which they are associated. The relative order of attribute nodes is stable but implementation-dependent.
The relative order of siblings is the order in which they occur
in the children property of their parent node.
Children and descendants occur before following siblings.
The relative order of nodes in distinct trees is stable but implementation-dependent, subject to the following constraint: If any node in a given tree T1 is before any node in a different tree T2, then all nodes in tree T1 are before all nodes in tree T2.
The semantics of some
XQuery operators depend on a process called atomization. Atomization is
applied to a value when the value is used in a context in which a
sequence of atomic values is required. The result of atomization is
either a sequence of atomic values or a type error [err:FOTY0012]. [Definition: Atomization of a sequence
is defined as the result of invoking the fn:data function
on the sequence, as defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].]
The semantics of
fn:data are repeated here for convenience. The result of
fn:data is the sequence of atomic values produced by
applying the following rules to each item in the input
sequence:
If the item is an atomic value, it is returned.
If the item is a node, its typed value is returned (err:FOTY0012 is raised if the node has no typed value.)
Atomization is used in processing the following types of expressions:
Arithmetic expressions
Comparison expressions
Function calls and returns
Cast expressions
Constructor expressions for various kinds of nodes
order by clauses in FLWOR expressions
Under certain circumstances (listed below), it is necessary to find
the effective boolean value of a
value. [Definition: The
effective boolean value of a value is defined as the result
of applying the fn:boolean function to the value, as
defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].]
The dynamic semantics of fn:boolean are repeated here for convenience:
If its operand is an empty sequence, fn:boolean returns false.
If its operand is a sequence whose first item is a node, fn:boolean returns true.
If its operand is a singleton value of type xs:boolean or derived from xs:boolean, fn:boolean returns the value of its operand unchanged.
If its operand is a singleton value of type xs:string, xdt:untypedAtomic, or a type derived from one of these, fn:boolean returns false if the operand value has zero length; otherwise it returns true.
If its operand is a singleton value of any numeric type or derived from a numeric type, fn:boolean returns false if the operand value is NaN or is numerically equal to zero; otherwise it returns true.
In all other cases, fn:boolean raises a type error [err:FORG0006].
Note:
The static semantics of fn:boolean are defined in Section
7.2.4 The fn:boolean functionFS.
Note:
The effective boolean value of a sequence that contains at least one node and at least one atomic value is nondeterministic in regions of a query where ordering mode is unordered.
The effective boolean value of a sequence is computed implicitly during processing of the following types of expressions:
Logical expressions (and, or)
The fn:not function
The where clause of a FLWOR expression
Certain types of predicates, such as a[b]
Conditional expressions (if)
Quantified expressions (some, every)
Note:
The definition of effective boolean value