W3C | TAG | Previous: 28 Oct teleconf | Next: 11 Nov

Agenda for 4 Nov 2002 TAG teleconference

Nearby: Teleconference details · issues list · www-tag archive

Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (30min)

1. Confirm Chair (SW) and Scribe (IJ)
2. Roll call. Regrets: DO, CL
3. Accept 28 Oct minutes
4. Accept this agenda
5. Next meeting? Proposed 11 Nov

1.1 Meeting planning

TAG presentation at AC meeting

• Confirm TAG summary for AC (TAG-only).
• Action SW, TB, DO: Send slides for AC discussion to TAG for review by 11 November. Review to take place primarily by email.

TAG face-to-face meeting

• Agenda items? See proposal from Tim Bray (TAG-only)
• Action TB 2002/10/28: invite Jonathan Borden to the meeting (afternoon) to discuss RDDL.

2. Technical (60min)

2.1 New issues?

• Potential TAG issue re consistency XQuery/XSchema from Tim Bray
• Use of frags in SVG v. in XML
  • Action DC 2002/09/26: Describe this issue in more detail for the TAG. Done

2.2 Findings in progress, architecture document

See also: findings.

1. Findings in progress:
   1. deepLinking-25
      1. TB 2002/09/09: Revise "Deep Linking" in light of 9 Sep minutes. Status of finding?
2. Findings versioning
   1. SW 2002/09/09: Discuss with IJ versioning of findings. Done.
3. 29 Oct 2002 Architecture document
   1. Action RF 2002/09/25: Propose a rewrite of a principle (rationale -> principle -> constraint) to see whether the TAG prefers this approach. It was suggested that the example be about HTTP/REST, as part of section 4.
   2. Action TBL 2002/09/25: Propose text on information hiding. (From 24-25 Sep TAG ftf: "The principle of information-hiding is contrary to global identifiers....Shall we put in the document something about information hiding/independent design of orthogonal specs? You should should not be able to write an xpath to peek into http headers....") [Done]
   3. Action CL 2002/09/25: Redraft section 3, incorporating CL's existing text and TB's structural proposal (see minutes of 25 Sep ftf meeting on formats).
   4. Action NW 2002/09/25: Write some text for a section on namespaces (docs at namespace URIs, use of RDDL-like thing).
   5. Action DC 2002/10/31: Resend redraft of arch doc section 2.2.1 on URIEquivalence-15. DC and IJ discussed on 30 October. Should IJ incorporate those comments in next draft?
   6. Completed Action IJ 2002/10/28: Include link to IRI issue from this point; leave as good practice note. Done in 29 Oct 2002 Architecture document.

2.3 Priority issues

1. IRIEverywhere-27
   1. Completed Action NW 2002/10/28: Ask Core WG their opinion on haste required for this issue. Done, see reply from Paul Grosso (asking the TAG to do this quickly).
2. Status of URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on URI canonicalization and email from Martin in particular. See more comments from Martin.
   1. CL 2002/08/30: Ask Martin Duerst for suggestions for good practice regarding URI canonicalization issues, such as %7E v. &7e and suggested use of lower case. At 16 Sep meeting, CL reports pending; action to send URI to message to TAG.
3. xlinkScope-23
   1. Action SW 2002/10/21: Starting from email from SW to TAG develop a summary of technical discussion and send to www-tag. Include more rationale for original TAG email to HTML WG.
   2. Coordination with XML CG? See Notes from XML CG call 10 Oct 2002 (Member-only)
4. namespaceDocument-8
   1. Action TB 2002/09/24: Revise the RDDL document to use RDF rather than XLink. Goal of publication as W3C Note.
5. contentPresentation-26
   1. Action CL 2002/09/24: Draft text on the principle of separation of content and presentation for the Arch Doc.
6. rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
   1. The Schema WG is making progress; they will get back to us when they're done. See XML Schema thread on this topic.
7. uriMediaType-9:
   • Action DC 2002/08/30: Write a draft Internet Draft based on this finding (Deadline 11n Nov). This action probably subsumes the action on TBL to get a reply from the IETF on the TAG finding.
8. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query strings?
   • DO 2002/06/24: Contact WSDL WG about this issue (bindings, query strings and schemas) to ensure that it's on their radar. See discussions from 9 Sep TAG teleconf.