W3C | TAG | Previous: 9 Sep | Next: 7 Oct

Agenda for 16 September 2002 TAG teleconference

Nearby: Teleconference details · issues list · www-tag archive

Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (15min)

1. Confirm scribe and Chair (SW)
2. Roll call. Regrets: IJ
3. Accept 9 Sep minutes
4. Accept this agenda
5. Next meeting? Proposed 7th October (after F2F).
6. F2F Arrangements update.

1.2 Completed actions?

• Action PC 2002/09/09 to review updates to finding regarding 'cautionary' words about the nature of the advised registration process.

2. Technical (75min)

2.1 Findings in progress, architecture document (20min)

See also: findings.

1. Findings in progress:
   1. deepLinking-25
      • Action TB 2002/09/09: Revise draft as a result of feedback.
      • Action DC 2002/09/09: Request Joe Reagle to review "Deep Linking".
   2. Internet Media Type registration, consistency of use.
      • Does PC's action change/close issue RFC3023Charset-21? (We didn't answer this question last week).
      • Action SW 2002/09/09: Discuss approach the updating of accepted findings with Ian (pending Ian's return).
2. Architecture document
   1. Action DC 2002/09/09: Summarize public feedback on WD (due before F2F).
   2. Action DC 2002/09/09: Write up alternate view of URI properties table [decision tree->scheme].

2.2 Priority issues (55min)

1. xlinkScope-23
   1. Action CL 2002/08/30: Request that the HTML WG to publish their recent work related to linking (through HTML CG, WG, or whatever works).
2. uriMediaType-9:
   • Action DC 2002/08/30: Write a draft Internet Draft based on this finding (Deadline 30 Sep). This action probably subsumes the action on TBL to get a reply from the IETF on the TAG finding.
   • [Question from the chair: Is this the same as the ID that DanC is working with volunteer?]
3. Status of URIEquivalence-15. Relation to Character Model of the Web (chapter 4)? See text from TimBL on URI canonicalization and email from Martin in particular. See more comments from Martin.
   1. Action DC 2002/08/30: Redraft section 2.2.1 of Arch Document to address this issue.
   2. Action CL 2002/08/30: Ask Martin Duerst for suggestions for good practice regarding URI canonicalization issues, such as %7E v. &7e and suggested use of lower case.
4. httpRange-14
   • Discussion has been pending TBL's return. Is there anything we can do ahead of the F2F that will help us conclude on this issue. Summary of positions:
     1. HTTP URI (without frag) identify documents and SHOULD NOT be used to identify abstract concepts or non-network connected real-world things like people, mountains or cars.
     2. HTTP URI (without frags) MAY identify be used to identify any kind of thing, including abstract concepts and real-world things like people, mountains or cars.
5. Status of discussions with WSA WG about SOAP/WSDL/GET/Query strings?
   • Action TB 2002/09/09: Refer TAG to Paul Prescod's message on problems with WSDL URI encoding.

2.3 New issues?

• Use of frags in SVG v. in XML
  • Action DC 2002/08/26: Describe this issue in more detail for the TAG.