ISSUE-93: What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG?
joint specs
What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG?
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- Process Document
- Raised by:
- Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile
- Opened on:
- 2014-04-23
- Description:
- Liam Quin raised this question in the context of his Chapter 7 review.
There is a requirement in chapter 7 that editor's be a member of *the* Working Group, but there are a number of specifications that are actually produced as a joint deliverable of two (or more?) groups.
This touches on Patent Policy, Chapter 7, and perhaps other parts of the process too - what is the decision-making process for such specs... - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- List of Process Document Issue Not Currently Covered in the Process 2015 Draft being reviewed (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-08)
- Summary of Resolutions re Process 2015 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-01-13)
- Agenda Process Document Task Force 6 January 2015a (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-01-04)
- Agenda Process Document Task Force 16 December 2014; Last Telcon of 2014; correcting the date (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-16)
- Agenda Process Document Task Force 17 December 2014; Last Telcon of 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-15)
- Agenda Process Document Task Force 10 December 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-08)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 14 October (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-10-14)
- Re: Feedback from Liam Quin - Fwd: Re: Staff contacts review of draft Chapter 7 revision (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-04-23)
- w3process-ISSUE-93 (joint specs): What should the requirements be for specifications produced by more than one WG? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-04-23)
Related notes:
Transferred to https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/2
David Singer, 21 Apr 2017, 18:24:31Display change log