ISSUE-55: AC Meetings should not be scheduled to overlap All WG meetings
AC-WG-Meeting-Overlap
AC Meetings should not be scheduled to overlap All WG meetings
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- Process Document
- Raised by:
- Arthur Barstow
- Opened on:
- 2013-11-22
- Description:
- Chapter 2 of ProcDoc defines AC Meetings <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/organization.html#ACMeetings>. That section was created before AC meetings were added to TP and All WG Meeting weeks thus it does not explicitly state that AC meetings must not overlap All WG meeting weeks. This overlap creates problems for some Members thus this section needs to be updated to prevent such overlaps.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- List of Process Document Issue Not Currently Covered in the Process 2015 Draft being reviewed (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-08)
- Re: ISSUE-55 - can we address it after TPAC? (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-55 - can we address it after TPAC? (from singer@apple.com on 2014-10-06)
- Re: ISSUE-55 - can we address it after TPAC? (from art.barstow@gmail.com on 2014-10-06)
- Re: ISSUE-55 - can we address it after TPAC? (from singer@apple.com on 2014-10-06)
- ISSUE-55 - can we address it after TPAC? (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-10-06)
- [minutes] and summary of 13 January 2014 Revising W3C Process Community Group Teleconference (from coralie@w3.org on 2014-01-13)
- Re: Issue-55 [Was: Re: [minutes] 2013-11-25 Chapter 7 Revisions meeting] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2013-12-01)
- RE: Issue-55 [Was: Re: [minutes] 2013-11-25 Chapter 7 Revisions meeting] (from szilles@adobe.com on 2013-11-27)
- Issue-55 [Was: Re: [minutes] 2013-11-25 Chapter 7 Revisions meeting] (from art.barstow@nokia.com on 2013-11-27)
- [minutes] 2013-11-25 Chapter 7 Revisions meeting (from coralie@w3.org on 2013-11-27)
- w3process-ISSUE-55 (AC-WG-Meeting-Overlap): AC Meetings should not be scheduled to overlap All WG meetings [Process Document] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-11-22)
Related notes:
Chaals saith "I think there is an issue here we should keep open - and should be discussed with the AC. Although I suspect the resolution will be to close without a resolution one way or another."
David Singer, 28 Mar 2017, 19:03:32Transferred to https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/1
David Singer, 21 Apr 2017, 18:23:17Display change log
