ISSUE-154: SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews?

AC review default confidenitality

SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Process Document
Raised by:
Charles McCathie Nevile
Opened on:
2015-01-30
Description:
This should be a tiny issue, so I hope we can resolve it in passing.

In section 8.1.1 on AC reviews it says [1]
[[[The Team must provide two channels for Advisory Committee review comments:

+ an archived Team-only channel; this is the default channel for reviews.
]]]

Does there need to be a default channel?

I would suggest not, others have suggested it is helpful - and others have suggested it is helpful if it is to publish it to the world.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: New Process Draft... - diff without must, should ... (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-03-06)
  2. Re: New Process Draft... (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-03-06)
  3. RESOLUTION: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-24)
  4. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from jeff@w3.org on 2015-02-09)
  5. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from singer@apple.com on 2015-02-09)
  6. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from singer@apple.com on 2015-02-09)
  7. Should there be a Public Channel for AC Review Comments (was ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154) (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-09)
  8. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-02-09)
  9. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-02-09)
  10. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from delfin@delfiramirez.info on 2015-02-09)
  11. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from schepers@w3.org on 2015-02-08)
  12. Re: ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net on 2015-02-08)
  13. ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus: Proposed Resolution of Issue-154 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-08)
  14. List of Process Document Issue Not Currently Covered in the Process 2015 Draft being reviewed (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-08)
  15. RE: w3process-ISSUE-155 (Errata Access in RECs): Errata access from TR page [Process Document] (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-07)
  16. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-02-04)
  17. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-02-04)
  18. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from singer@apple.com on 2015-02-03)
  19. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from Michael.Champion@microsoft.com on 2015-02-03)
  20. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-02-03)
  21. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from singer@apple.com on 2015-02-02)
  22. Re: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-02-01)
  23. RE: w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from Michael.Champion@microsoft.com on 2015-01-30)
  24. w3process-ISSUE-154 (AC review default confidenitality): SHould there be a default confidentiality level for AC reviews? [Process Document] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-01-30)

Related notes:

Forgot the URL:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/default/cover.html#ACReviewStart

Charles McCathie Nevile, 30 Jan 2015, 18:24:21

Resolved in the TF meeting of 2015-2-24 by removing teh default, and instead requiring that each review describe what its default is.

Charles McCathie Nevile, 25 Feb 2015, 16:10:39

Display change log ATOM feed


David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Chair, Veronica Thom <veronica@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $