ISSUE-133: Are the role and make-up of the TAG adequately defined?
TAG role
Are the role and make-up of the TAG adequately defined?
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- Process Document
- Raised by:
- Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile
- Opened on:
- 2014-09-14
- Description:
- Adopted from the AB
There has been discussion over the last few years covering topics such as whether the rule about two people from the same member should be retained, whether the TAG should be a Working Group open to W3C members, etc etc.
Are the role and make up of the TAG adequately defined in the Process, or should there be changes made? (Should this be a product instead of a generic issue?) - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments (from jeff@w3.org on 2015-05-13)
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-05-13)
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments (from singer@apple.com on 2015-05-13)
- Re: Possible item for discussion for 2016 -- Charter adjustments (from jeff@w3.org on 2015-05-13)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from singer@apple.com on 2015-03-12)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-03-11)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-03-11)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from singer@apple.com on 2015-03-11)
- RE: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-03-10)
- RE: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from Michael.Champion@microsoft.com on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from dbaron@dbaron.org on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from peter.linss@hp.com on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from singer@apple.com on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from singer@apple.com on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from singer@apple.com on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from peter.linss@hp.com on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from art.barstow@gmail.com on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-03-10)
- ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-03-10)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from peter.linss@hp.com on 2015-03-09)
- Re: ISSUE-133 - TAG role / makeup (from dbaron@dbaron.org on 2015-03-09)
- List of Process Document Issue Not Currently Covered in the Process 2015 Draft being reviewed (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-02-08)
- w3process-ISSUE-133 (TAG role): Are the role and make-up of the TAG adequately defined? [Process Document] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-09-14)
Related notes:
Extensive discussion reveals that we may need to discuss the size of the TAG, how people come to be members -- how elected, how appointed, by whom -- what restrictions there might be (the 'dual representation' question), how the chair is selected (if the Director no longer wishes to be chair), whether the TAG should have any power (e.g. to force a Director decision on a spec they don't like, like a Formal Objection), and so on.
David Singer, 13 May 2015, 19:03:37Transferred to https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/4
David Singer, 21 Apr 2017, 18:26:10Display change log