ISSUE-129: Should the Process define Coordination Groups?
CoordGroups
Should the Process define Coordination Groups?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Process Document
- Raised by:
- Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile
- Opened on:
- 2014-09-13
- Description:
- Adopted from the AB, where it was discussed several times.
Should the Process document define Coordination Groups, other than as a Working Group whose charter is explicitly directed at coordination? - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-34 on Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile to Open issue on removing coordination groups - due 2014-10-07, closedACTION-45 on Steve Zilles to Communicate the resolution of issue-129 to judy brewer - due 2014-12-23, closedACTION-44 on Steve Zilles to Draft text on coordiantion responsibility for the process document and edit guide to begin collecting best practicres for same - due 2015-01-23, closed- Related emails:
- Re: Call for Review, W3C Process2015 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2015-03-20)
- Re: New Process Draft... - diff without must, should ... (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-03-06)
- Re: New Process Draft... (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2015-03-06)
- Call for Review, W3C Process2015 (from jeff@w3.org on 2015-03-06)
- 2nd Draft Announcement of Process2015 Wide Review (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-03-03)
- Draft Announcement of Process2015 Wide Review (from szilles@adobe.com on 2015-03-02)
- w3process-ACTION-45: Communicate the resolution of issue-129 to judy brewer (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-12-16)
- newdraft (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-12-16)
- Agenda Process Document Task Force 16 December 2014; Last Telcon of 2014; correcting the date (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-16)
- Agenda Process Document Task Force 17 December 2014; Last Telcon of 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-15)
- Agenda Process Document Task Force 10 December 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-12-08)
- Re: Agenda Process Document Task Force 25 November 2014 (from jeff@w3.org on 2014-11-25)
- Re: Issue-129 Coordination Groups (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-11-25)
- RE: Issue-129 Coordination Groups (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-11-25)
- Re: Issue-129 Coordination Groups (from Michael.Champion@microsoft.com on 2014-11-25)
- Re: Issue-129 Coordination Groups (from wayne.carr@linux.intel.com on 2014-11-24)
- Issue-129 Coordination Groups (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-11-24)
- Agenda Process Document Task Force 25 November 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-11-24)
- Update on the Process Document Task Force (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-11-19)
- Re: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014 (from jeff@w3.org on 2014-11-18)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014 (from singer@apple.com on 2014-11-17)
- RE: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014 (from szilles@adobe.com on 2014-11-17)
- Re: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014 (from jeff@w3.org on 2014-11-17)
- Re: Process Task Force Telcon on 18 November, 2014 (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-11-17)
- Re: ISSUE-129 - coordination groups (from Michael.Champion@microsoft.com on 2014-11-14)
- ISSUE-129 - coordination groups (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-11-14)
- Re: Agenda Process Task Force Telcon on 11 November, 2014 (from singer@apple.com on 2014-11-11)
- New draft - Fwd: Please Review: Working Draft for new Process Document (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-09-30)
- Re: w3process-ISSUE-129 (CGs): Should the Process define Coordination Groups? [Process Document] (from chaals@yandex-team.ru on 2014-09-14)
- w3process-ISSUE-129 (CGs): Should the Process define Coordination Groups? [Process Document] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2014-09-13)
Related notes:
Coordination groups were removed in 2014-12-21 editor's draft https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/AB/raw-file/3c4bc56ce16b/cover.html
Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile, 11 Jan 2015, 00:29:27Display change log