Minutes Telecon 2024-04-17
- Issue #8738: Figure out whether we’re fine with “shifting up” bare declarations after rules-
- TabAtkins introduced the proposal for issue #8738 (Figure out whether we’re fine with “shifting up” bare declarations after rules) and proposed moving serialization into a separate issue
- There were some concerns raised about author confusion given that it’s easy to make a small change that would alter behavior.
- The proposal was viewed as an improvement over the current spec text and there was a desire to make a change now before the current spec text becomes relied upon by authors.
- The group discussed the likelihood of this being used by authors and the value of having it as something an author (especially in a tooling use case) could access vs the value of having well-defined and predictable magic.
- Though there was some pushback to magic, the principle of taking the least user-facing approach had wide agreement.
- Resolved: Tab specs @nest, with a note about @nest rules as a usable syntactic construct being something we might want to get rid of
Full Meeting Minutes
« Previous article
Next article »