CSS WG Blog – Minutes New York F2F – 2015-05-18 Part I: CSS Break, Communicating the State of CSS, Grid

Minutes New York F2F – 2015-05-18 Part I: CSS Break, Communicating the State of CSS, Grid

By Dael Jackson May 27, 2015 (Permalink)
Categories: resolutions

Resolved: Don’t make the break-inside changes for level 3; in level 4 look into the “allow” keyword and defining “auto” behavior to represent the default behavior.
Resolved: Close issue 10 (allow keyword combinations in break-*) as no change, punt to next level. (Generic ‘avoid’ will solve most use cases.)
Resolved: If the cloned border is larger than the fragment, drop it. Drop bottom first; then drop top if still no space.
Resolved: box-decoration-break clones margins (note this only affects inlines)

glazou brought the feedback of from the AC group that people would like a more up to date “What is the status of CSS” method than the current snapshot.
There will be a few changes that show help the issue including some pending changes to bikeshed, and a script will be written to add an out of date watermark for /TR.
Once the changes are completed, they will be taken back to the AC group for feedback and further improvement.

Resolved: Boxes whose parent and containing block is the grid container. For these boxes, the grid container determines both their size and their static position.
Resolved: Auto line in grid-positioned abspos counts as the 0th line (for start lines) or -0th line (for end lines) for span calculation purposes.
Resolved: Proposal E wins for issue 17: Treat all out-of-range indices and missing named lines as ‘auto’. This means missing start lines will be assigned to the start padding edge, and missing end lines will be assigned to the end padding edge.
Resolved: The auto line is always at the padding edge.
Resolved: We will error-correct mis-ordered lines (in all cases).

Last updated 2015-05-27 00:21:18