Jump to content

This Wiki page is edited by participants of the Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force. It does not necessarily represent consensus and it may have incorrect information or information that is not supported by other Task Force participants, WAI, or W3C. It may also have some very useful information.

Old todo lists

From Cognitive Accessibility Task Force
  1. Next iteration (last chance for new patterns) mid April 2020
  2. Working group feedback Mid May (latest)
  3. Wide review draft mid June 2020 (may slip based on feedback)
  4. Start process to publish note: September 2020

Priority list Note, we need to separate the next iteration, wide review and what can be done after tthat!

wide review draft

deadline for important new patterns and scenarios

  • Editing (Lisa, Rachael with Steve)
  • Move some patterns
  • Create short names for the new patterns we added (Missing patterns)
  • Editing issues at todo for content useable marked critical
  • Steve’s comments and gaps on patterns
  • Structure (H4 and H5 appearance) (Lisa, Rachael)
  • Add scenarios to persona for voice interface, wayfinding, add user needs and patterns if missing (if not done, drop for this publication) (Steve and John K)
    • Step 1: check user needs in issue papers and then see if they are already there
  • Check if extra scenarios to persona for mental health are needed from reviews and more feedback, add user needs and patterns if missing (if not done, drop for this publication) (David)
    • Step 1: check user needs in issue papers and then see if they are already there
    • check how we handel triggers in particular
    • check "feel safe"
  • Review all text (iteration can publish possible without - but before final publication) (EA, Lisa, Steve, Jennie)
    • edit of patterns and guide for consistency
    • Edit of persona for easy read


Persona to do list

  • 90% cognitive disabilities included (Abi) OR just make sure a persona is there for needs in the gap analisis and objectives
  • Add to get to 90% of essential challenges for each disability (take from patterns or gap analisys) OR make sure there is a persona for each challange
  • make challanges more compelling and human, stronger then usability - where they give up or need help from someone else
  • remove non-coga issues
  • Integrate or reference user stories from patterns (we need to think about where and how to do this maybe as a separate table / doc for now that we integrate back in)
  • Update to include aging and exclude other disabilities (so that we can  publish without cross coordination) (janina)
  • STate that there are co-occering morbidities and point people to the right
  • Add pictures and make engaging
  • Links to video and supporting content (wish list)

then we can cross reference user stories in the design guide

Next publication iteration - (October 2019)

Making content useable and design guide

  • design guide - 1. Patterns reviewed to see if any "splitting" or "lumping" is required if so rewrite.
  • design guide - 2. shorten names or change names
  • design guide - 3. consistency each section looks like it is written by the same person (slightly dependent on design guide 1)
  • design guide - 4. user needs each map to patterns, and tables in the gap analysis. Are all user needs to be addressed in a pattern and visa versa. are there missing user needs (Dependencies: design guide 2 and 1 )
  • design guide - 5. user needs should map to a persona so the AG discusion map and why a pattern is important, (but we dont have to be religouse about it) (Dependencies: design guide 2 and 1)
  • design guide - 6. decided if need to add missing failure examples (No dependencies)
  • design guide - 7. user needs and user testing switch position (No dependencies)
  • design guide - 8. examples do not link to live sites that will change. (No critical dependencies)
  • design guide - user needs checked against other resources (wish list)
  • design Guide - "find from bbc gel" fixed (no dependencies)
  • Making content useable - user needs sections is redone and - cross referenced (Dependencies: design guided 12345)
  • Making content useable - personas improved and cross referenced (Dependencies: design guided 12345)
  • Making content useable - each section edited and improved. consistency (Dependencies: depends on the section)
  • Making content useable - new sections added (wish list?) (No dependencies)
  • Making content useable - glossary of terms integrated 1st high priority terms (wish list) (No dependencies)

Next gap analysis Version - restructure of gap analysis

  • 1. build up user needs with stories as linked to document. (see above) (Dependencies: design guided 12345)
  • apply new format to the rest of the tables and update user need (Dependencies: gap analysis 1 )
  • add references to new user need / persona repository (Dependencies: design guided 12345)
  • We also have to integrate the new version of 1.2 (No dependencies)
  • wish list
    • adding and updating references to our other documents (wish list)
    • update references in each table (wish list)
    • "pop up" definitions from Glossary ((wish list)

Iteration after that (Feb 2020) (design guided and content useable)- wide review document

  • gloassay of terms
  • add emotional disabilities into use cases, persona and patterns
  • add conversational interfaces and gps into use cases, persona and patterns
  • Issue processing
  • add image
  • testable statments for patterns?

Other activities

Old todo lists from the planning page


publication iteration (Oct 2019)

1. Decide how we handle user needs across documents

2. gap analysis

  • map user needs and persona and challenges
  • mental health paper integrated into gap analysis

3. content-usable

  • processing issues
  • redundancy in design guide addressed
  • more work on persona, user needs and user testing (how we Handel user needs across the documents will flow though)
  • confirm if more patters are needed from mental health paper
  • some consistency of standard and style of design guide items (imperative tone) ??

wish list

  • bots and wayfinding issue papers
  • editing and consistency of terms across publication documents (glossary)
  • consistency of standard and style of design guide items
  • processing more issues

wish list 2

  • testable statement for each item


old deadlines

This section has been removed from the timelines as they ar4e completed

The road map and gap analysis has user analysis, Issue papers on topics such as security, safety and how they are affected by cognitive disabilities, [table of user needs ] and a section on [making content more usable for people with learning and cognitive disabilities] .

Works in progress are also available at Gap Analysis Issue Papers.

We hope to have publications at the end of February/March, May/June and September and october and to be able to move to note form 3 month after that.

  • The first publication to have updates on work already completed such as the tables of user needs and summary issue papers that are done .* We expect the second publication to contain summary of on making inclusive content for people with cognitive disabilities including user testing and additional updates to the tables of user needs and issue papers. This was done in the first version although more work is needed
  • We expect the third publication had Wayfinding of the document and more work in the design requirements

wish list items are: updating the tables according to the editors notes, get section 1.2 back in, background on disabilities section

Here is our List for Gap Analysis V2

Here is our List for Gap Analysis V3 Hope to publish in Aug/Sept

  • finding your way around the document and
  • more work in the design requirements
  • process some issues

wish list items are:

  • updating the tables according to the editors notes,
  • get section 1.2 back in,
  • background on disabilities section
  • editorial review

Next version of the research - May 2018 (Needs a lot of editorial work)

  • The second publication and third publications to also address any comments and editorial concern Wishlist items. Hopefully, we will also be able to add:
  • summaries of new issue papers on wayfinding and voice/conversational interfaces (if ready) (was done in May version)
  • research module emotional disabilities, initially addressing stress, anxiety and depression(summary added - more work needed )
  • Integrate the new work into gap analysis and appendix



Editorial Group todo list ( see [restucture_ideas https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sCqyayfnZNjaLHUq0AqXb_sn0ItHipsZBCSF_DBivJg/edit#])

  • Rachael: fresh eyes to see where the tone is inconsistent. And make a proposal for tone level and tense and how we handle content under devlopment.
  • Steve: do a diff between changes to the online version
  • Lisa - Please review [Design_Guide_Title_Mapping

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18gkODnzy_8BzZAieJ_IOQX1dmjcf9MZsC7vC9glKQvI/edit#gid=0] and provide comments (Duplicate)

  • then
    • Roy? set up sub directory for web version and coding for content mining
    • Work on names chaeck names and overlaps/redundancies
    • Compare SC with patterns to help determine granularity
    • Group - simple lang review of page (depentent on above)

updated time line -April 2020

  • November 2020: Userneeds updated and edited
  • November 2020: Userneeds mapped to identify missing challenges in persona and missing patterns
  • End december 2020: mental health paper finished
  • End december 2020: new persona/challenges and patterns
  • End January 2020: mental health paper, identify gaps in persona and challenges. proposed new persona/challenges and persona
  • End January 2020 Improvement of sections on policy, testing in content useable
  • Febuary 2020: respond to some issues
  • Febuary 2020: Edit of patterns and guide for consistency redundancy

maybe: make a table of what applies to media / vioce menues and other? ---next iteration before CSUN!!!March 10

  • March 2020: glossary, and bots and wayfinding issue papers
  • April 2020: Proceing issues
  • April 2020: Second round of editing
  • May 2020: improvement of other sections

---Wide review iteration processing issues, editing August - publish as note

Issues and current proposals

Gap analysis does not meet the need

  • Janina is making a restructuring proposal

Content is hard to find

  • Landing page with what documents are available for what intended audience.
  • The current resources
  • This content should be edited and made appropriate for a W3C WAI landing page
  • We have separated content intended for different audiences

Terms are not used consistently

  • Abi, Jennie and Steve are collecting terms that need to be clarified
  • Hope to work on consistency across our documents the publications May 2019
  • risk that the terms are not being collected

Editorial quality

Design Guide guidelines are hard to follow

  • Have an official version in the TR note but an easier to follow version with collapsible content that mines the note as a resource
  • See Design Guide mock ups . Mock up with element open (2) is the preferred option
  • Similar interactive format is WCAC QuickRef
  • Expected in next iteration of publication.(see timlines for when this is expected)

What to do with user research document

  • User Research - find two or three editors to work on it as a sub team without detracting and defocusing the main group

What to do with issue papers

  • Build as needed
  • Publish summaries in gap analysis
  • Possibly publish full drafts as resource (low priority)

Silver

  • Help support Silver by testing prototypes with hard cases from coga

Outstanding other issues

  • Recruiting people with disabilities, and people who can perform writing tasks - keeping the balance
  • We are waiting for approval to have a research group liaison
  • Do we need other liaisons?
  • To keep momentum we need to publish often and have FTF meetings

We need to work on helping people understand the problems.

  • So far we have the user research, issue papers user needs and personas.
  • We are also going to add content on this in the gap analysis.
  • We need to ad references and Link to our user descriptions from different places
  • Videos and similar resources are needed for the use cases. We have an outline but no funding to make them
  • Before and after pages are also needed for the use cases