Talk:Web Accessibility Preliminary Evaluation

Template for draft item

[heading] Defines what is being checked

EOWG notes - importance: high/medium/low; 5min?: some/yes/no/.is this appropriate for the short list at the top?).

One or two sentences on what this is and why it is important — ideally wording directly from the Accessibility Requirements page or Understanding WCAG 2.0.

What to do

1. steps to check the item

What to look for

• What *should* happen.
• What are common failures occur when ... list or narrative, as appropriate

Notes

[can be internal notes for now or maybe will be included in final doc]

• ...

References

• link to {appropriate section in Accessibility Requirements page}
• link to Handle - Understanding Success Criteria x.x.x (Level xx)
• link to {BAD example}

Open Issues

• [closed] Do we explicitly link to success criteria?
  Decision: We link to more info in Accessibility Requirements, Understanding, or other that gives the SC and level.
• [closed] Do we say anything about Level A, AA, AAA?
  Decision: Yes, include with link

[Draft] Criteria for 5 steps:

• Doesn't require any tool download or a specific browser.
• ...

Misc

Check the Following:

• Text descriptions for images
• Headings and other semantic structure
• Keyboard access and visual focus
• Page title
• Link text
• Text enlargement
• Color contrast
• Color coding
• Content order
• Visual focus
• Time Based Media
• Forms
• Tables
• Flickering, flashing, blinking
• WAI-ARIA
• Time-dependent responses
• Valid HTML & CSS
• Usability without CSS