Important note: This Wiki page is edited by participants of the EOWG. It does not necessarily represent consensus and it may have incorrect information or information that is not supported by other Working Group participants, WAI, or W3C. It may also have some very useful information.
Talk:Web Accessibility Preliminary Evaluation
From Education & Outreach
Contents
Template for draft item
[heading] Defines what is being checked
EOWG notes - importance: high/medium/low; 5min?: some/yes/no/.is this appropriate for the short list at the top?).
One or two sentences on what this is and why it is important — ideally wording directly from the Accessibility Requirements page or Understanding WCAG 2.0.
What to do
- steps to check the item
What to look for
- What *should* happen.
- What are common failures occur when ... list or narrative, as appropriate
Notes
[can be internal notes for now or maybe will be included in final doc]
- ...
References
- link to {appropriate section in Accessibility Requirements page}
- link to Handle - Understanding Success Criteria x.x.x (Level xx)
- link to {BAD example}
Open Issues
- [closed] Do we explicitly link to success criteria?
Decision: We link to more info in Accessibility Requirements, Understanding, or other that gives the SC and level. - [closed] Do we say anything about Level A, AA, AAA?
Decision: Yes, include with link
[Draft] Criteria for 5 steps:
- Doesn't require any tool download or a specific browser.
- ...
Misc
Check the Following:
- Text descriptions for images
- Headings and other semantic structure
- Keyboard access and visual focus
- Page title
- Link text
- Text enlargement
- Color contrast
- Color coding
- Content order
- Visual focus
- Time Based Media
- Forms
- Tables
- Flickering, flashing, blinking
- WAI-ARIA
- Time-dependent responses
- Valid HTML & CSS
- Usability without CSS
