Planning/Mockup/Feedback

10 April Survey

This mock-up was raised for initial feedback in the 10 April Survey and discussed on 17 Apr meeting.

It's difficult to see how much content is on the page and difficult to navigate to a specific section, because there's no navigation menu. {Melody, 15 Apr 2015}
- I will look at structural navigation, although I was deliberately avoiding a left-hand navigation as it really wouldn't have added that much. {Kevin, 16 Apr 2015}
Definitely better than most W3C documents, but still a wall of text. I can't put my finger on it, but the design is not quite right, especially on the desktop view for the level 1 and 2 pages. It's functional, but not beautiful. I'll have my designers have a look and provide me with their perspective {Paul, 15 Apr 2015}
- Any design input would be welcomed! {Kevin, 16 Apr 2015}

Think I preferred the 'tabbed' approach {Andrew, 15 Apr 2015}
- I have been thinking about the navigation problem, and I think that I may have been ... hasty in removing the tabs. They do actually help as a navigation element. I might suggest keeping the overview page, but on the category page and activity page, use tabs to provide navigation. I have put some alternative approaches of this in Planning/Design#Version 2 and Planning/Design#Version 3 {Kevin, 17 Apr 2015}
On the landing page seems OK but on sub-pages may need to change lay-out (did we not discuss expand/collapse for the sub sections? {Sharron, 15 Apr 2015}
There is a little too much scrolling on the home and first level pages. Can it be compressed a bit more or made more graphical (not with icons, but with boxes or containers). {Brent, 15 Apr 2015}
The header banner isn't aligned with the content which makes it really discombobulated. {Jon, 16 Apr 2015}