Important note: This Wiki page is edited by participants of the EOWG. It does not necessarily represent consensus and it may have incorrect information or information that is not supported by other Working Group participants, WAI, or W3C. It may also have some very useful information.


Feedback: Developing Organizational Policies on Web Accessibility

From Education & Outreach
Jump to: navigation, search

For review: Organizational Policies

Please provide your comments inline below.

Comment template:

  • summary — comment {name, date}

Comments for December 2nd, 2014

General feedback

Document is ready for all feedback including more detailed comments.

  • summary — comment {name, date}
  • {Done, Kevin, 4 Oct}: version — I thought that we generally suggset that people do not include a version number, so that it can take up the newest version? old doc said: "Organizations wishing to require conformance to the latest version of the standards may specify conformance without specifying a version number." and the examples there are version-number-less {Shawn, 5 October 2014}
  • {Done, Kevin, 26 Sep}: Example style — I find the 3D curved effect for the examples disconcerting when trying to read, possibly just give them a raised appearance instead? {Andrew, 2014.09.19}

Comments from Sylvie on 13 November 2014

  1. Introduction, example of simple policy:
    Current text: "ACME Inc. is committed to ensuring the accessibility of its website for people with disabilities."
    Suggested change: add "and older people".
    Rationale: It would include more people who may benefit from the web site's accessibility.
  2. {Clarified point, Kevin 14 Nov 2014} In "define Scope of Policy", section examles, second sub-bullet is not clear, is it possible to make it easier to understand?
    "Providing incentives to providers of WCAG 2.0 Level AA conformant content;"
  3. {Raised as issue 22 in github, Kevin, 26 Nov}, In "set conformance milestones", "examples" I am not sure it is clear enough, visually or from the content, that these are seperated examples. The first two examples are two proposals for limit date for reaching conformance. I would like to know EOWG's mind about the clarity of those two examples:
    " By February 27, 2015, ACME Inc's websites will meet WCAG 2.0, Level AA conformance.
    By November 7, 2014, ACME Inc's websites will meet WCAG 2.0, Level A conformance; and by May 29, 2015 websites will meet WCAG 2.0, Level AA conformance."