W3C

SOAP over Java Message Service 1.0

W3C Candidate Recommendation 4 June 2009

This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-soapjms-20090604
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/soapjms
Previous version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-soapjms-20081121
Editors:
Phil Adams, IBM
Peter Easton, Progress Software
Bhakti Mehta, Sun Microsystems
Roland Merrick, IBM

Abstract

This document specifies how SOAP should bind to a messaging system that supports the Java Message Service (JMS) [Java Message Service]. Binding is specified for both SOAP 1.1 [SOAP 1.1] and SOAP 1.2 [SOAP 1.2 Messaging Framework] using the SOAP 1.2 Protocol Binding Framework.

Status of this Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.

This is the Candidate Recommentation of the SOAP over Java Message Service 1.0 specification. It has been produced by the SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group, which is part of the W3C Web Services Activity.

This document is based on the W3C Submission SOAP over Java™ Message Service 1.0. A list of changes is available in F Change Log.

A diff-marked version against the previous version of this document is available.

Only two features are marked "at risk", soapjms:WSDL11 and soapjms:WSDL20 (1.6 Conformance). Both features are optional.

The Working Group started collecting testcases and test assertions, they are compiles in the Test Suite. There is no preliminary implementation report.

The Working Group intend to submit this document for consideration as a W3C Proposed Recommendation after 31 August 2009 having met the following criteria:

  1. At least two implementations have demonstrated interoperability of each feature.

  2. All issues raised during the CR period against this document have received formal responses.

This specification is not describing the way the binding could be used with WSDL 1.1 WSDL 1.1 or WSDL 2.0 WSDL 2.0 Core Language, due to lack of support in the Working Group. As a consequence, the description of how to deal with WSDL 1.1 or 2.0 MEPs will be moved to the Working Group's FAQ.

Please send comments about this document to public-soap-jms@w3.org mailing list (public archive). The review period for this document extends until 31 August 2009.

Publication as a Candidate Recommendation does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress.

This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy.

Table of Contents

1 Introduction
    1.1 Background
    1.2 Out of Scope
    1.3 Context
    1.4 Notational Conventions
        1.4.1 XML Namespaces
    1.5 Assertions
    1.6 Conformance
2 The SOAP/JMS Underlying Protocol Binding
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Properties Affecting Binding
        2.2.1 Connection to a destination
        2.2.2 JMS Message Header properties
            2.2.2.1 Setting JMS Message Header properties
        2.2.3 JMS Message properties
            2.2.3.1 Setting JMS Message properties
        2.2.4 Binding of Properties to URI
        2.2.5 Other Properties
    2.3 Authentication for SOAP/JMS
    2.4 The JMS Message Body
        2.4.1 Considerations For Using TextMessage
    2.5 Supported Message Exchange Patterns
        2.5.1 Support for Topic destinations
    2.6 Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern
        2.6.1 Behaviour of Requesting SOAP Node
            2.6.1.1 Init
            2.6.1.2 Requesting
            2.6.1.3 Sending + Receiving
            2.6.1.4 Success and Fail
        2.6.2 Behaviour of Responding SOAP Node
            2.6.2.1 Init
            2.6.2.2 Receiving
            2.6.2.3 Receiving + Sending
            2.6.2.4 Success and Fail
    2.7 One-way Message Exchange Pattern
        2.7.1 Behaviour of Sending SOAP Node
        2.7.2 Behaviour of Receiving SOAP Node
    2.8 Faults
3 WSDL Usage
    3.1 Overview
    3.2 WSDL 1.1 Extensions Overview
    3.3 WSDL 2.0 Extensions Overview
    3.4 WSDL 1.1 Extensions Detail
        3.4.1 Example
        3.4.2 WSDL 1.1 Transport Identification
        3.4.3 WSDL 1.1 SOAP Action
        3.4.4 Specifying Properties In WSDL 1.1
        3.4.5 Specifying Properties Via the JMS URI
    3.5 WSDL 2.0 Extensions Detail
    3.6 Properties
        3.6.1 Relationship to WSDL 2.0 Component Model
            3.6.1.1 Precedence

Appendices

A References
B Schema
C SOAP/JMS Underlying Protocol Binding Examples (Non-Normative)
    C.1 SOAP Request without attachments
    C.2 SOAP Request with attachments
D Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)
E Assertion Summary (Non-Normative)
F Change Log (Non-Normative)


1 Introduction

1.1 Background

The work described in this and related documents is aimed at a set of standards for the transport of SOAP messages over JMS [Java Message Service]. The main purpose is to ensure interoperability between the implementations of different Web services vendors. It should also enable customers to implement their own Web services for part of their infrastructure, and to have this interoperate with vendor provided Web services. The main audience will be implementers of Web services stacks; in particular people who wish to extend a Web services stack with an implementation of SOAP/JMS. It should enable them to write a SOAP/JMS implementation that will interoperate with other SOAP/JMS implementations, and that will not be dependent on any specific JMS implementation.

A motivational example is a customer who has different departments that use Web services infrastructure from two different vendors, VendorA and VendorB. The customer has a need for reliable Web services interaction between the departments. Where both these vendors provide support for SOAP/JMS according to this standard, it should be possible for a client running using VendorA to interoperate with a service using VendorB.

The standards will also be of interest to providers of Web services intermediary services such as routing gateways; or SOAP/HTTP to SOAP/JMS gateways. We do not discuss any details of how such gateways should be designed and configured, but adherence to the standard will help the gateway ensure proper interoperation with SOAP/JMS clients and services.

The documents cover three major areas.

Note that the URI specification is in a separate document.

1.3 Context

This document specifies how SOAP should bind to a messaging system that supports the Java Message Service (JMS) [Java Message Service]. Binding is specified for both SOAP 1.1 [SOAP 1.1] and SOAP 1.2 [SOAP 1.2 Messaging Framework] using the SOAP 1.2 Protocol Binding Framework.

The approach taken for this specification is to model it on the binding specifications that have been created for SOAP 1.2. The first of these was for a SOAP HTTP Binding, described in section 7, SOAP HTTP binding, [SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts]. A second binding for Email [SOAP 1.2 Email Binding] is also available.

1.4 Notational Conventions

The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [IETF RFC 2119].

Parenthetic remarks about fault subcodes are mentioned throughout the document where a conformance issue may result in a error. How these subcodes should be treated is dealt with in the section "Faults".

1.4.1 XML Namespaces

This specification uses a number of namespace prefixes throughout; they are listed in Table Prefixes and Namespaces used in this specification. Properties are named with XML qualified names. Property values are determined by the Schema type of the property, as defined in the specification which introduces the property. Note that the choice of any namespace prefix is arbitrary and not semantically significant (see [XML Namespaces]).

Prefixes and Namespaces used in this specification
PrefixNamespaceSpecification
soapjmshttp://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/Defined by this specification
xsdhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema [XML Schema Structures]
wsdl11http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/[WSDL 1.1]
wsdl20http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl[WSDL 2.0 Core Language]
wsoaphttp://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap[WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts]
wsdl11soap11http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/[WSDL 1.1]
wsdl11soap12http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/[WSDL 1.1 for SOAP 1.2]

The binding defined by this specification is identified by the XML namespace URI [XML Namespaces] http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/.

It is the intent of the W3C SOAP JMS Binding Working Group that the SOAP over Java Message Service 1.0 XML namespace URI will not change arbitrarily with each subsequent revision of the corresponding XML Schema documents as the specifications transition through Candidate Recommendation, Proposed Recommendation and Recommendation status. However, should the specifications revert to Working Draft status, and a subsequent revision, published as a WD, CR or PR draft, results in non-backwardly compatible changes from a previously published WD, CR or PR draft of the specification, the namespace URI will be changed accordingly.

Editorial note: plh20080501
The above paragraph will need to be removed for the publication of the Recommendation.

1.6 Conformance

This specification defines three features, each of which has conformance criteria associated with it. A conforming implementation MUST work with Java Message Service (JMS) 1.1 [Java Message Service].

  1. Feature: soapjms:Protocol [http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/Protocol]

    A conforming implementation MUST implement all the requirements of 2 The SOAP/JMS Underlying Protocol Binding. Conforming implementations MUST implement all the requirements of [URI Scheme for JMS].

  2. Feature: soapjms:WSDL11 [http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/WSDL11]

    Support for WSDL 1.1 is optional and as such an implementation MAY implement it. However, a conforming implementation of this feature MUST implement all the requirements of 3.4 WSDL 1.1 Extensions Detail.

  3. Feature: soapjms:WSDL20 [http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/WSDL20]

    Support for WSDL 2.0 is optional and as such an implementation MAY implement it. However, a conforming implementation of this feature MUST implement all the requirements of 3.5 WSDL 2.0 Extensions Detail.

2 The SOAP/JMS Underlying Protocol Binding

This section is normative.

This section describes the required feature: soapjms:Protocol [http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/Protocol]

2.2 Properties Affecting Binding

There are a number of properties that affect how the binding behaves. The following properties are grouped into related sets.

Some of the properties are optional. If the specified property is present then it MUST be processed as specified.

Properties can be obtained from a number of sources. If a given property is specified in more than one of these, the following list specifies the precedence: the first MUST be used in preference to the second.

  1. The environment (for example local program variables, system environment variables etc).

  2. WSDL elements or attributes (including those specified in an endpoint URI within the WSDL). The precedence rules for properties specified in a WSDL document are defined in 3.4.4 Specifying Properties In WSDL 1.1 and 3.4.5 Specifying Properties Via the JMS URI.

If a given property is specified more than once in the JMS URI the last instance of the property MUST be used.

2.2.1 Connection to a destination

Since the underlying JMS URI scheme defines an open-ended scheme for identifying and connecting to a destination, it is not possible to enumerate all the ways that connection information may be set. However, in the interest of specifying context information such as JNDI connection properties in such a way that they can apply to multiple services or endpoints, this specification enumerates specific properties.

[Definition: soapjms:lookupVariant ](xsd:string)
  • Specifies the technique to use for looking up the given destination name.

  • MUST be specified in the JMS URI, as the jms-variant portion of the syntax.

  • The jms-variant: jndi MUST be supported. [Definition: Use fault subcode unsupportedLookupVariant if the JMS URI specifies a lookupVariant that is not supported by the implementation.]

[Definition: soapjms:destinationName ] (xsd:string)
  • Specifies the name of the destination, for lookup as per the lookupVariant. If the variant is "jndi", this is the Java Naming and Directory Interface (JNDI) name of the destination (queue or topic).

  • MUST be specified in JMS URI, as the jms-dest portion of the syntax.

[Definition: soapjms:jndiConnectionFactoryName ] (xsd:string)
  • Specifies the JNDI name of the connection factory.

  • an optional property

  • MAY be specified in JMS URI, WSDL, or somewhere else in the environment

[Definition: soapjms:jndiInitialContextFactory ] (xsd:string)
  • Specifies the fully qualified Java class name of the InitialContextFactory to use. This is mapped to the java.naming.factory.initial property (defined by the constant javax.naming.Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY) to be set in the HashMap sent to an InitialContext constructor.

  • an optional property

  • MAY be specified in JMS URI, WSDL, or somewhere else in the environment

[Definition: soapjms:jndiURL ] (xsd:anyURI)
  • Specifies the JNDI provider URL, which is mapped to the java.naming.provider.url property (defined by the constant javax.naming.Context.PROVIDER_URL) to be set in the HashMap sent to an InitialContextconstructor.

  • an optional property

  • MAY be specified in JMS URI, WSDL, or somewhere else in the environment

[Definition: soapjms:jndiContextParameter ] (soapjms:jndiContextParameterType)
  • Provides mechanism to set additional, arbitrary JNDI environment properties, other than jndiURL and jndiInitialContextFactory, in the java.util.Hashtable sent to the InitialContext constructor for the JNDI provider.

  • An optional property that MAY be specified more than once.

  • Specifies a JNDI property name and value pair to be added to the java.util.Hashtable sent to the InitialContext.

  • The JNDI property's name MUST be included in the name attribute, its value MUST be included in the value attribute. The value is added as a java.lang.String.

  • MAY be specified in JMS URI, WSDL, or somewhere else in the environment

2.2.2 JMS Message Header properties

This set of properties provide information that will set the values of corresponding JMS Header fields. This specification assumes that the JMS provider validates the values set for the respective message header properties, rather than being explicitly constrained by this specification.

[Definition: soapjms:deliveryMode] (soapjms:deliveryModeType)
  • indicates whether the request message is persistent or not. The valid values are "PERSISTENT" and "NON_PERSISTENT". The default value is "PERSISTENT" (defaulted by JMS)

  • optional in URI, optional in WSDL, optional in environment

  • if specified MUST appear in the JMS message in the header named JMSDeliveryMode. If the value of this property is "PERSISTENT" then the JMSDeliveryMode integer value MUST be set to DeliveryMode.PERSISTENT. If the value of this property is "NON_PERSISTENT" then the JMSDeliveryMode integer value MUST be set to DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT.

[Definition: soapjms:timeToLive] (xsd:long)
  • the lifetime, in milliseconds, of the request message. A value of 0 indicates an infinite lifetime. The default value is 0 (defaulted by JMS).

  • optional in URI, optional in WSDL, optional in environment.

  • if specified, this MUST be used to generate the value of the JMS header JMSExpiration.

[Definition: soapjms:priority] (soapjms:priorityType)
  • the JMS priority associated with the request message. Valid values are integers between 0 (lowest priority) and 9 (highest priority). The default value is 4 (defaulted by JMS).

  • optional in URI, optional in WSDL, optional in environment

  • if specified MUST appear in the JMS message in the header named JMSPriority.

[Definition: soapjms:replyToName] (xsd:string)
  • Specifies the name of the destination to which a response message SHOULD be sent. If the replyToName property has a value it is used to lookup a destination using the lookupVariant. If the variant is "jndi", this is the Java Naming and Directory Interface (JNDI) name of the destination (queue or topic). If the variant is "queue" or "topic", this refers to the name of a JMS queue.

  • optional in URI, optional in WSDL, optional in environment

  • if specified, this MUST be used to derive the value to be used in the JMS header JMSReplyTo.

[Definition: soapjms:topicReplyToName] (xsd:string)
  • Specifies the name of the topic destination to which a response message SHOULD be sent.

  • if the variant is "jndi", topicReplyToName is not relevant and MUST be ignored.

  • if the replyToName is specified in the URI, WSDL, or environment, topicReplyToName is not relevant and MUST be ignored.

  • optional in URI, optional in WSDL, optional in environment

  • if specified and if relevant, this MUST be used to derive the value to be used in the JMS header JMSReplyTo.

2.2.3 JMS Message properties

[Definition: soapjms:targetService] (xsd:string)
  • Used by the service implementation to dispatch the service request.

  • optional in URI

  • if specified MUST appear in the JMS message in the JMS property named SOAPJMS_targetService.

[Definition: soapjms:bindingVersion] (xsd:string)
  • Specifies the version of SOAP JMS binding that is being used.

  • fixed value "1.0" in the implementation, MUST appear in a JMS property named SOAPJMS_bindingVersion.

    [Definition: Fault subcode unrecognizedBindingVersion MUST be generated if the value of the soapjms:bindingVersion property does not match the fixed value.]

[Definition: soapjms:contentType] (xsd:string)

Note that the contentType value also indicates the MIME type of the primary message payload. This message property, then, identifies whether the message payload uses SOAP 1.1, SOAP 1.2, SOAP Messages With Attachments [SOAP Messages with Attachments] or MTOM [SOAP 1.1 Binding for MTOM 1.0] [SOAP MTOM] as the primary payload.

  • Describes the content of the SOAP message, this has the same values as the MIME Content-Type specified for a SOAP message over HTTP [IETF RFC 2045].

  • If the value of the property is text/xml or application/soap+xml, a charset parameter may be present; if the value of the property is multipart/related, a type parameter may be present.

  • if the charset parameter is specified it is checked to ensure that it matches the encoding value from the supplied XML. If there is a mismatch then a fault MUST be generated. [Definition: Use fault subcode contentTypeMismatch in the event that the values do not match.]

  • if no charset parameter is supplied the charset MUST be inferred using the rules defined in appendix F, Autodetection of Character Encodings , [XML 1.0].

  • the contentType parameter MUST reflect the value specified in the Content-type part header for the first part (the SOAP body, so text/xml or application/xop+xml).

  • MUST appear in the JMS message in the JMS property named SOAPJMS_contentType. [Definition: Use fault subcode missingContentType if the SOAPJMS_contentType property is missing.]

[Definition: soapjms:soapAction] (xsd:anyURI)
  • as with SOAP/HTTP

  • optional in WSDL, optional in environment

  • if specified MUST appear in the JMS message in the JMS property named SOAPJMS_soapAction.

  • if using SOAP 1.2, and the contentType property has an action parameter, that parameter value MUST match this SOAPJMS_soapAction value. [Definition: Use fault subcode mismatchedSoapAction if the SOAP 1.2 action does not match.]

[Definition: soapjms:isFault] (xsd:boolean)
  • This property indicates whether a SOAP/JMS message is a fault. For senders, this property should be set to true when responding with a SOAP fault. When this property is true, the sending software SHOULD include a JMS property named SOAPJMS_isFault with a value of 1.

  • For receivers, this property is derived from the JMS property named SOAPJMS_isFault — if present and containing a value of 1, the value of soapjms:isFault is true. If omitted, or present with a value of 0, the value of soapjms:isFault is false.

[Definition: soapjms:requestURI] (xsd:string)
  • Specifies the JMS URI of the service. The client MUST create this property which is derived from the supplied URI. The client MUST remove the targetService query parameter if specified; SHOULD remove JMS Message Header properties; and MAY remove other query parameters (for example client security related properties).

  • a required property

  • MUST appear in the JMS message in the JMS property named SOAPJMS_requestURI. [Definition: Use fault subcode missingRequestURI if the SOAPJMS_requestURI is missing from the message.]

2.2.4 Binding of Properties to URI

Implementations of this specification need to allow for the setting of the above properties. Some properties, as mentioned above can be inferred from context, or provided by the application environment. Some might be put into WSDL. In many cases, it is desirable to represent those properties as part of a URL-like representation. To conform to the latest enhancements to support internationalization, this specification references the [URI Scheme for JMS]. In particular, this section describes how the properties above are used in the URI [IETF RFC 3987]. Note that the URI scheme also defines query parameters, and where the query parameter names are the same, the same meaning is intended here.

For brevity, properties are shown without the SOAPJMS prefix. The "URI representation" column describes how the property is carried in the URI. The "Client treatment" column describes how the property should be treated in the process of forming the soapjms:requestURI property. There are three options for this column:

  • As-is — the client SHOULD leave the information in the URI as is.

  • Should exclude — the client SHOULD exclude the information from the generated requestURI .

  • Must exclude — the client MUST not include the information in the generated requestURI.

Binding of Properties to URI
Specification PropertyURI RepresentationClient Treatment
deliveryMode as deliveryMode query parameterSHOULD exclude
destinationNameas jms-dest portion of URI syntax As-is
jndiConnectionFactoryName as jndiConnectionFactoryName query parameterSHOULD exclude
jndiInitialContextFactory as jndiInitialContextFactory query parameterSHOULD exclude
jndiURL as jndiURL query parameterSHOULD exclude
jndiContextParameteras a query parameter combining the string "jndi-" with the jndiContextParameter's name attributeSHOULD exclude
replyToName as replyToName query parameterMUST exclude
priority as priority query parameterSHOULD exclude
targetService as targetService query parameterMUST exclude
timeToLive as timeToLive query parameterSHOULD exclude

[Definition: Use fault subcode malformedRequestURI when the URI violates the expected syntax. ]. [Definition: Use fault subcode targetServiceNotAllowedInRequestURI when targetService parameter is included in the requestURI).]

2.4 The JMS Message Body

The contents of the JMS Message body MUST be the SOAP payload as a JMS BytesMessage or TextMessage. [Definition: Use fault subcode unsupportedJMSMessageFormat when the arriving message format is not BytesMessage or TextMessage. ].

The formatting of the SOAP payload is determined by the sending SOAP node, and should follow the same pattern as for the SOAP/HTTP binding. Based on the sending node's use of SOAP 1.1 [SOAP 1.1], SOAP 1.2 [SOAP 1.2 Messaging Framework], SOAP Messages with Attachments [SOAP Messages with Attachments], and MTOM [SOAP 1.1 Binding for MTOM 1.0] [SOAP MTOM], the contentType property MUST be set as it would be for SOAP/HTTP, and the message body MUST use the corresponding format.

For example, if the SOAP payload is formatted as a simple SOAP envelope, the contentType property value MUST be specified as "text/xml" for SOAP 1.1 or "application/soap+xml" for SOAP 1.2. On the other hand, if the SOAP payload is formatted as a MIME multipart message, the contentType property value MUST be specified as "multipart/related".

In this way, the SOAP node determines the proper formatting of the SOAP payload irrespective of the underlying JMS message type, and specifies an appropriate value for the contentType property which describes it to the receiving SOAP node. Note also that if the payload is formatted as a MIME multipart message, then the first byte or character encountered in the JMS Message body MUST be the start of the MIME boundary for the start of the first part — what MIME Part One [IETF RFC 2045] section 2.5 calls a "Body Part". If the message is formatted as "text/xml" or "application/soap+xml", then the first byte or character of the JMS Message body MUST be the start of a conforming XML document.

2.4.1 Considerations For Using TextMessage

While the use of TextMessage may be attractive in some scenarios, there are some considerations that go along with it.

Since binary data needs to be encoded to be carried as text, SOAP attachments via a TextMessage have the same concerns as the MIME specification carrying messages over a 7-bit channel [IETF RFC 2045]. The attachments will need to be encoded using one of the Content-Transfer-Encoding options specified by MIME. If the data is truly binary, such as a picture, a base64 encoding might be appropriate.

In typical scenarios, using TextMessage will almost certainly dramatically increase the memory requirements. This happens as a consequence of the JMS API TextMessage.getText(), which returns a Java String. The Java String class uses a UTF-16 representation to represent the data. This in memory representation will generally be larger than the corresponding BytesMessage representation. For example, if the message contains only US-ASCII characters, and is encoded into XML using UTF-8, the Java String representation of the message will take exactly twice as much memory.

The in memory UTF-16 representation, coupled with base64 encoding of an attachment, will consume much more memory than the equivalent BytesMessage payload. To begin with, a base64 conversion yields a ratio of 33% more characters than bytes. Combined with a UTF-16 representation of those characters, the bytes required in memory will be 167% more than the original binary data (an 8/3 ratio). As a consequence, carefully consider any scenarios that use attachments with a TextMessage.

As significant as the concerns around memory consumption may be, the effects on network payload size are more difficult to predict. Since the JMS API does not specify exactly how messages are handled, the effects on network traffic are JMS provider-specific. A JMS provider might be encoding a TextMessage with UTF-8, and may further compress such messages. With these two techniques, the data transferred via network calls may end up being no larger than a corresponding BytesMessage representation, even with attachments. However, only actual monitoring will determine specific effects of specific scenarios. Clients of this specification who are using TextMessage are encouraged to do such monitoring.

2.5 Supported Message Exchange Patterns

An instance of a binding to JMS conforming to this binding specification MUST support the following message exchange patterns:

  • Request-Response

  • One-way

In the case of SOAP 1.2 a conforming SOAP-JMS Binding instance MUST support the following message exchange patterns:

In the case of SOAP 1.1 there is no formal specification of Message Exchange Patterns. A conforming SOAP-JMS Binding instance MUST support both the generic "request/response" and "one-way" patterns and in the case of SOAP 1.1 are specified in this document.

There are tables of JMS properties, and explanations of their values, in the remainder of this section. Note that only the relevant properties (i.e. ones affected by this specification) have been included — other properties will continue to follow the normal JMS specification. For instance, the JMSMessageID header will be present on all messages, and automatically generated by the underlying JMS implementation.

2.6 Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern

The http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/request-response/ message pattern is described in section 6.2, Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern, [SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts].

For binding instances conforming to this specification:

  • A SOAP Node instantiated at the JMS interface may take on the role (i.e. the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role) of RequestingSOAPNode.

  • A SOAP Node instantiated at the JMS interface may take on the role (i.e. the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role) of RespondingSOAPNode.

The remainder of this section consists of descriptions of the MEP state machine. In the state descriptions following, the states are defined as values for the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/State.

Failure reasons as specified in the tables represent values of the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason - their values are qualified names. If an implementation enters the "Fail" state, the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason property will contain the value specified for the particular transition.

2.6.1 Behaviour of Requesting SOAP Node

The overall flow of the behaviour of a Requesting SOAP Node follows the outline state machine description contained in section 6.2, Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern, [SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts]. The following subsections describe each state in more detail and apply to both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2 unless stated otherwise.

2.6.1.1 Init

In the "Init" state, a JMS request is formulated and transmission of the request is initiated. The message MUST be created as a JMS BytesMessage or TextMessage as defined in 2.4 The JMS Message Body.

A number of the message header properties are implicitly created by the use of the JMS API, the following table specifies how the binding properties described earlier explicitly affect the message constructed.

Init State Values
FieldValue Set by Conforming Client
JMS Message Header
JMSDeliveryModethe value of the deliveryMode property or not set if not specified
JMSExpirationcalculated from the value of the timeToLive property or not set if not specified
JMSPrioritythe value of the priority property or not set if not specified
JMSDestinationderived from the destinationName property
JMSReplyToif the replyToName property is specified, this is the JMS Destination object derived from that name. Otherwise the implementation must determine the reply queue, and use the JMS Destination object which represents that queue; the queue may be a temporary queue generated as described in the JMS specification.
JMS Message properties
SOAPJMS_requestURIthis is derived from the requestURI property
SOAPJMS_bindingVersionthis is copied from the bindingVersion property
SOAPJMS_soapActionthe value of the soapAction property or not set if not specified
SOAPJMS_targetServicethe value of the targetService property or not set if not specified
SOAPJMS_contentTypeinferred from the SOAP Envelope and presence of attachments
JMS Message Body
bodyA SOAP envelope is serialized according to the media type specified in the JMS Message property SOAPJMS_contentType
2.6.1.2 Requesting

In the "Requesting" state, sending of the request continues while waiting for the start of the correlated response message. A correlated response message is one where the value of the JMSCorrelationID header field is the same as the value of the JMSMessageID of the request message. The JMSReplyTo header MUST be assigned a value. The response message will be received on the JMS Destination specified in the JMSReplyTo header above, and that Destination is where implementations should be listening.

If a correlated response message is received then a transition to "Sending + Receiving" is made.

If, for whatever reason (for example a timeout), no correlated response message is received then a failure reason receptionFailure is set and a transition to "Fail" is made.

2.6.2 Behaviour of Responding SOAP Node

The overall flow of the behaviour of a Responding SOAP Node follows the outline state machine description contained in section 6.2, Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern, [SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts]. The following subsections describe each state in more detail and apply to both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2.

2.6.2.3 Receiving + Sending

Completing Request Message reception and Response Message transmission. (Response Message sent on exit from Receiving State).

The JMS response is formulated and transmission of the response is initiated. The Response Message MUST be created using the same type as the corresponding Request Message, i.e. as a JMS BytesMessage or TextMessage. The message MUST be sent to the JMS Destination in the JMSReplyTo header of the Request Message. The value of the JMSCorrelationID header field MUST be set to the same as the value of the JMSMessageID of the request message.

A number of the message header properties are implicitly created by the use of the JMS API, the following table specifies how the binding properties described earlier explicitly affect the message constructed.

Receiving + Sending State Values
FieldValue Set by Conforming Client
JMS Message Header
JMSDeliveryModethis SHOULD be the same as that specified on the request
JMSExpirationthis is derived from the request. It is up to the responding node to decide whether to degrade for processing time.
JMSPrioritythis is copied from the request
JMSCorrelationIDthis is copied from the request JMSMessageID
JMSDestinationthis is copied from the JMSReplyTo property in the request
JMS Message properties
SOAPJMS_requestURIthis is copied from the requestURI property in the request message
SOAPJMS_bindingVersionthis is copied from the bindingVersion property
SOAPJMS_contentTypeinferred from the SOAP Envelope and presence of attachments.
JMS Message Body
bodyA SOAP envelope is serialized according to the media type specified in the JMS Message property SOAPJMS_contentType.

If a response message is successfully sent a transition to the "Success" state is made.

If there is a failure to send a response message then failure reason transmissionFailure is set and a transition to "Fail" is made.

2.7 One-way Message Exchange Pattern

The SOAP One-way MEP [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP] defines properties for the exchange of a SOAP/JMS message which does not solicit a response. For JMS messages sent to a Queue destination this MEP results in a SOAP message which may be received by zero or one receiver. For JMS messages sent to a Topic destination this MEP results in SOAP message(s) which may be received by zero, one, or many receivers.

This message exchange pattern is identified by the URI http://www.w3.org/2006/08/soap/mep/one-way/.

For binding instances conforming to this specification:

  • A SOAP Node instantiated at the sending JMS interface may take on the role (i.e. the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role, defined in Table 2, Property definitions supporting the description of MEPs), of SendingSOAPNode.

  • A SOAP Node instantiated at the receiving JMS interface takes on the role (i.e. the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/Role) of ReceivingSOAPNode.

The remainder of this section consists of descriptions of the MEP. Failure reasons represent values of the property http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason — their values are qualified names. If a MEP instance terminates with a fault, then the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason property will contain an value identifying the fault.

2.7.1 Behaviour of Sending SOAP Node

The message MUST be created as a JMS BytesMessage or TextMessage as defined in 2.4 The JMS Message Body.

The JMSReplyTo header MUST NOT be assigned a value.

If the Sender receives a message transmission failure, then the http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindingFramework/ExchangeContext/FailureReason property is set to transmissionFailure and the message exchange is terminated with a fault.

A number of the message header properties are implicitly created by the use of the JMS API, the following table specifies how the binding properties described earlier explicitly affect the message constructed.

Sending SOAP Node Values
FieldValue Set by Conforming Client
JMS Message Header
JMSDeliveryModethe value of the deliveryMode property or not set if not specified
JMSExpirationcalculated from the value of the timeToLive property or not set if not specified
JMSPrioritythe value of the priority property or not set if not specified
JMSDestinationderived from the destinationName property
JMS Message properties
SOAPJMS_requestURIthis is derived from the requestURI property
SOAPJMS_bindingVersionthis is copied from the bindingVersion property
SOAPJMS_soapActionthe value of the soapAction property or not set if not specified
SOAPJMS_targetServicethe value of the targetService property or not set if not specified
SOAPJMS_contentTypeinferred from the SOAP Envelope and presence of attachments.
JMS Message Body
bodyA SOAP envelope is serialized according to the media type specified in the JMS Message property SOAPJMS_contentType.

2.8 Faults

The SOAP fault subcodes listed throughout this document, and consolidated here, include:

The above subcodes are the local name in the soapjms namespace, appearing, for example, as soapjms:malformedRequestURI.

In SOAP 1.2, the subcodes above are used as-is in the env:Value element of the env:Subcode for a SOAP Fault. The following shows an example of a SOAP 1.2 Fault payload with the contentTypeMismatch subcode:

This specification does not mandate any particular text for the env:Text child element of the env:Reason element.

The SOAP 1.1 specification does not support subcodes directly. In that scenario, the detail element should have a single child element with the namespace and local name of that matches the subcode for SOAP 1.2. The same error as above, shown in SOAP 1.1:

An implementation MAY choose to put a textual description as the contents of the element within the detail section. A portion of the above example with this change follows:

3 WSDL Usage

3.4 WSDL 1.1 Extensions Detail

This section is normative.

This section describes the optional feature: soapjms:WSDL11 [http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/WSDL11]

3.4.1 Example

The [WSDL 1.1] specification includes in section 1.2, WSDL Document Example, the example Example 1 SOAP 1.1 Request/Response via HTTP.

The following example illustrates a new service description which assumes the original service available over HTTP is also made available over JMS.

Lines 14-33 are a new binding for specifying that JMS is to be used, line 15 shows the transport URI in <wsdl11soap11:binding>, and lines 17-22 show the extension properties in the <wsdl11soap11:binding>.

Lines 40-42 are also additions to specify the location at which this new implementation exists. Line 41 shows the JMS URI Scheme jms: in the <wsdl11soap11::address>.

1     <wsdl11:binding name="StockQuoteSoapBinding" type="tns:StockQuotePortType">
2        <wsdl11soap11:binding style="document" 
                transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
3         <wsdl11:operation name="GetLastTradePrice">
4            <wsdl11soap11:operation soapAction="http://example.com/GetLastTradePrice"/>
5           <wsdl11:input>
6               <wsdl11soap11:body use="literal"/>
7            </wsdl11:input>
8           <wsdl11:output>
9               <wsdl11soap11:body use="literal"/>
10          </wsdl11:output>
11        </wsdl11:operation>
12    </wsdl11:binding>
13
14   <wsdl11:binding name="StockQuoteSoapJMSBinding" type="tns:StockQuotePortType" 
              xmlns:soapjms="http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/">
15       <wsdl11soap11:binding style="document" 
              transport="http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/"/>
16
17       <!-- We want this binding to use a particular CF class -->
18       <soapjms:jndiConnectionFactoryName>
19         sample.jms.ConnectionFactory
20       </soapjms:jndiConnectionFactoryName>
21       <!-- Specify PERSISTENT delivery mode -->
22       <soapjms:deliveryMode>PERSISTENT</soapjms:deliveryMode>
23
24       <wsdl11:operation name="GetLastTradePrice">
25         <wsdl11soap11:operation soapAction="http://example.com/GetLastTradePrice"/>
26         <wsdl11:input>
27             <wsdl11soap11:body use="literal"/>
28         </wsdl11:input>
29         <wsdl11:output>
30             <wsdl11soap11:body use="literal"/>
31          </wsdl11:output>
32       </wsdl11:operation>
33   </wsdl11:binding>
34
35   <wsdl11:service name="StockQuoteService">
36       <wsdl11:documentation>My first service</wsdl11:documentation>
37       <wsdl11:port name="StockQuotePort" binding="tns:StockQuoteSoapBinding">
38           <wsdl11soap11:address location="http://example.com/stockquote"/>
39       </wsdl11:port>
40       <wsdl11:port name="StockQuotePort_jms" binding="tns:StockQuoteSoapJMSBinding">
41           <wsdl11soap11:address location="jms:jndi:myQueue?targetService=stockquote"/>
42       </wsdl11:port>
43   </wsdl11:service>

The key points to notice are:

3.4.2 WSDL 1.1 Transport Identification

The wsdl11soap11:binding element has a transport attribute. The developer indicates the use of the SOAP/JMS binding by putting http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/ as the value of the transport.

3.4.3 WSDL 1.1 SOAP Action

The wsdl11soap11:operation portion of the WSDL specification explicitly disallows use of the soapAction attribute in non-HTTP bindings. This specification supersedes that requirement, and allows the use of soapAction in the wsdl11soap11:operation element for SOAP/JMS bindings. This value corresponds to the property soapAction.

3.4.5 Specifying Properties Via the JMS URI

Some of the above information can be put in the URI [URI Scheme for JMS]. When expressing properties from the SOAP/JMS binding in the URI, you do not need the namespace prefix — just use the property name, such as "priority".

This URI, in turn, is represented as the location attribute on the <wsdl11soap11:address> element. Note that with SOAP 1.2, the same pattern applies, although the "soap" prefix corresponds to the SOAP 1.2 binding namespace http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/ as established by [WSDL 1.1 for SOAP 1.2].

Properties expressed in the URI [IETF RFC 3987] MUST override any values set in the markup as described above.

3.5 WSDL 2.0 Extensions Detail

This section is normative.

This section describes the optional feature: soapjms:WSDL20 [http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/WSDL20]

Section 3.4 WSDL 1.1 Extensions Detail illustrates how a service originally available over HTTP is made available over JMS using WSDL 1.1. This section illustrates how to indicate the configuration for using SOAP over JMS with WSDL 2.0

(01) <wsdl20:binding
(02)    name="StockQuoteSoapJMSBinding" interface="tns:StockQuoteInterface" 
(03)    type="http://www.w3.org/2006/01/wsdl/soap"
(04)    wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/"
   xmlns:soapjms="http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soap/bindings/JMS/">
(05)   
(06)   <!-- We want this binding to use a particular CF class -->
(07)   <soapjms:jndiConnectionFactoryName>
(08)     sample.jms.ConnectionFactory
(09)   </soapjms:jndiConnectionFactoryName>
(10)   <!-- Specify PERSISTENT delivery mode -->
(11)   <soapjms:deliveryMode>PERSISTENT</soapjms:deliveryMode>
(12) </wsdl20:binding>
(13) 
(14) <wsdl20:service name="StockQuoteService" interface="tns:StockQuoteInterface">
(15)   <wsdl20:documentation>My first service</wsdl20:documentation>
(16)   <wsdl20:endpoint name="SOAPHTTP" binding="tns:StockQuoteSoapHTTPBinding"
(17) 	    address="http://example.com/stockquote"/>
(18)   <wsdl20:endpoint name="JMS" binding="tns:StockQuoteSoapJMSBinding"
(19) 	    address="jms:jndi:myQueue/stockquote"/>
(20) </wsdl20:service>

Line 4 shows the protocol URI in the wsoap:protocol attribute of the <binding>, which indicates that this SOAP over JMS binding is in use.

Lines 7-11 show the use of WSDL 2.0 extension elements to set some of the properties of the connection. In this case, you see the <soapjms:jndiConnectionFactoryName> and <soapjms:deliveryMode> elements defining the values for the jndiConnectionFactoryName and deliveryMode properties. More generally, each allowed property may be expressed as a WSDL 2.0 extension element, typed appropriately for that property's value space. For example, on line 11 above, <soapjms:deliveryMode> is of type xsd:string. This XML representation then surfaces in the WSDL 2.0 Component Model (see next section) as an extension property.

Lines 18-19 are also additions to specify the location at which this new implementation exists. Line 19 showing the JMS URI Scheme jms: in the address attribute of the <endpoint> element. As with the WSDL 1.1 binding, you may also set connection properties in the URI.

3.6 Properties

Table SOAP/JMS properties which are declarable in WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 documents lists the SOAP/JMS properties which are declarable in WSDL documents.

SOAP/JMS properties which are declarable in WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 documents
Property localNameValid WSDL Locations
jndiConnectionFactoryNameservice, port/endpoint, binding
jndiInitialContextFactoryservice, port/endpoint, binding
jndiURLservice, port/endpoint, binding
deliveryModeservice, port/endpoint, binding
priorityservice, port/endpoint, binding
timeToLiveservice, port/endpoint, binding
replyToNameservice, port/endpoint, binding
soapActionbinding operation

3.6.1 Relationship to WSDL 2.0 Component Model

WSDL 2.0 is described abstractly in terms of a component model. Extensions such as the SOAP/JMS binding extend the predefined components with new properties and/or components.

For this specification, each property in the table above adds a WSDL Component Model Property with the same name to the containing WSDL 2.0 component. For instance, if the <deliveryMode> extension element appeared underneath the <service> element in a WSDL 2.0 description, it would result in a deliveryMode property added to the Service component.

3.6.1.1 Precedence

Since the same property can be specified in multiple places, we need precedence rules, and in fact they are exactly as specified in section 3.4.4 Specifying Properties In WSDL 1.1. The most-specific setting overrides less-specific ones, so endpoint wins over service, which wins over binding. For a particular interaction, you may search for a given property on the Endpoint component, then Service, then Binding, taking whichever value you find first.

A References

[IETF RFC 2045]
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies, N. Freed, N. Borenstein, Authors. Internet Engineering Task Force, November 1996. Available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt.
[IETF RFC 2119]
Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels, S. Bradner, Author. Internet Engineering Task Force, March 1997. Available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt.
[IETF RFC 3987]
Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) , M. Duerst and M. Suignard, Authors. Internet Engineering Task Force, January 2005. Available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt.
[Java Message Service]
Java Message Service (JMS) 1.1, M. Hapner, et. al., Authors. Sun Microsystems, Inc., 12 April 2002. Available at http://java.sun.com/products/jms/docs.html
[URI Scheme for JMS]
URI Scheme for Java Message Service 1.0, R. Merrick, P. Easton, and D. Rokicki, E. Johnson, Authors. Internet Engineering Task Force, 18 November 2008. Available at http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-merrick-jms-uri-05.txt
[SOAP Messages with Attachments]
SOAP Messages with Attachments, John Barton, Satish Thatte, and Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, Authors. Hewlett Packard Labs, Microsoft Corporation, 11 December 2000. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP-attachments
[SOAP 1.1 Binding for MTOM 1.0]
SOAP 1.1 Binding for MTOM 1.0, Dimitar Angelov, et. al., Authors. International Business Machines Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Inc., Oracle Corp. and SAP AG, 5 April 2006. Available at http://www.w3.org/Submission/soap11mtom10/
[SOAP MTOM]
SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism, N. Mendelsohn, M. Nottingham, and H. Ruellan, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, W3C Recommendation, 25 January 2005. This version of SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism is http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-soap12-mtom-20050125/. The latest version of the "SOAP Message Transmission Optimization Mechanism" document is available from http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-mtom/.
[SOAP 1.2 Email Binding]
SOAP Version 1.2 Email Binding, Highland Mary Mountain, Jacek Kopecky, Stuart Williams, Glen Daniels, and Noah Mendelsohn, Authors. World Wide Web Consortium, 3 July 2002. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/NOTE-soap12-email-20020703
[SOAP 1.1]
Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1, D. Box, et al, Editors. DevelopMentor, International Business Machines Corporation, Lotus Development Corporation, Microsoft, and UserLand Software, 8 May 2000. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/.
[SOAP 1.2 Messaging Framework]
SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework, M. Gudgin, M. Hadley, N. Mendelsohn, J-J. Moreau, H. Frystyk Nielsen, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 24 June 2003, revised 27 April 2007. This version of the SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part1-20070427/. The latest version of SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/.
[SOAP 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts]
SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts (Second Edition), M. Gudgin, et al., Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 24 June 2006, revised 27 April 2007. This version of the "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts (Second Edition)" Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-soap12-part2-20070427/. The latest version of "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts" is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/.
[SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP]
SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP, David Orchard, Author. World Wide Web Consortium, 2 July 2007. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-soap12-part3-20070702/
[WSDL 1.1]
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1, E. Christensen, et al, Authors. Ariba, International Business Machines Corporation, and Microsoft, 15 March 2001. Available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315.
[WSDL 1.1 for SOAP 1.2]
WSDL 1.1 Binding Extension for SOAP 1.2, D. Angelov, et al, Authors. International Business Machines Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Inc., Oracle Corp. and SAP AG, 5 April 2006.  Available at http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/SUBM-wsdl11soap12-20060405/.
[WSDL 2.0 Core Language]
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language, R. Chinnici, J. J. Moreau, A. Ryman, S. Weerawarana, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 26 June 2007. This version of the WSDL 2.0 specification is http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626/. The latest version of WSDL 2.0 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20/.
[WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts]
Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts, R. Chinnici, H. Haas, A. Lewis, J-J. Moreau, D. Orchard, S. Weerawarana, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 26 June 2007. This version of the "Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts" Recommendation is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-adjuncts-20070626. The latest version of "Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 2: Adjuncts" is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl20-adjuncts.
[XML 1.0]
Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition), T. Bray, J. Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, E. Maler, and François Yergeau, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 10 February 1998, revised 16 August 2006. This version of the XML 1.0 Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816. The latest version of XML 1.0 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.
[XML Namespaces]
Namespaces in XML 1.0, T. Bray, D. Hollander, A. Layman, and R. Tobin, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 14 January 1999, revised 16 August 2006. This version of the Namespaces in XML Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816/. The latest version of Namespaces in XML is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names.
[XML Schema Structures]
XML Schema Part 1: Structures Second Edition, H. Thompson, D. Beech, M. Maloney, and N. Mendelsohn, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 2 May 2001, revised 28 October 2004. This version of the XML Schema Part 1 Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-1-20041028. The latest version of XML Schema Part 1 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1.
[XML Schema Datatypes]
XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes Second Edition, P. Byron and A. Malhotra, Editors. World Wide Web Consortium, 2 May 2001, revised 28 October 2004. This version of the XML Schema Part 2 Recommendation is http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028. The latest version of XML Schema Part 2 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2.

B Schema

C SOAP/JMS Underlying Protocol Binding Examples (Non-Normative)

The JMS message consists of three parts, the first of these is the Message Header that contains a set of fields defined in the JMS specification, the second part is a set of properties that represent optional header fields the last part is the Message Body.

C.2 SOAP Request with attachments

The URI in Example JMS URI will become:

JMS Message Header Values
Fieldvaluecomments
JMSMessage classjms_bytesa fixed value
JMSTypenull
JMSDeliveryMode2
JMSExpiration0
JMSPriority8
JMSMessageIDID:d438e0000001
JMSTimestamp1092110476167
JMSCorrelationIDnull
JMSDestinationA Destination object resolved by JNDI from the destination name news
JMSReplyToA Destination object resolved by JNDI from the destination name interested
JMSRedeliveredfalse
JMS Message Properties Values
Fieldvaluecomments
SOAPJMS_bindingVersion1.0
SOAPJMS_targetServicecurrent-affairsderived from the targetService property
SOAPJMS_requestURIjms:jndi:news?userprop=mystuffderived from the requestURI property
SOAPJMS_contentTypemultipart/related type="application/xop+xml"; boundary="--MIME_boundary"inferred from the SOAP Envelope and presence attachments. In this case it is SOAP 1.2

The following represents a human readable version of the JMS message body:

D Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)

This document is the work of the W3C SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group.

Members of the Working Group are (at the time of writing, and by alphabetical order): Phil Adams (IBM Corporation), Peter Easton (Progress Software), Mark Hapner (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), Eric Johnson (TIBCO Software, Inc.), Yves Lafon (W3C), Amelia Lewis (TIBCO Software, Inc.), Bhakti Mehta (Sun Microsystems, Inc.), Roland Merrick (IBM Corporation), Mark Phillips (IBM Corporation), Derek Rokicki (Software AG), Nathan Sowatskey (Cisco).

Previous members of the Working Group were: Glen Daniels, Philippe Le Hégaret, Dongbo Xiao.

The people who have contributed to discussions on public-soap-jms@w3.org are also gratefully acknowledged.

The original contributors to the SOAP over Java™ Message Service 1.0 W3C Member Submission: Phil Adams (IBM); Glen Daniels (WSO2); Peter Easton (Progress Software); Tim Frank (Software AG); Lei Jin (BEA Systems, Inc.); Eric Johnson (TIBCO Software Inc.); Vinod Kumar (BEA Systems, Inc.); Amelia A. Lewis (TIBCO Software Inc.); David Orchard (BEA Systems, Inc.); Roland Merrick (IBM); Mark Phillips (IBM); Stephen Todd (IBM); Dongbo Xiao (BEA Systems, Inc.) and Prasad Yendluri (Software AG).

E Assertion Summary (Non-Normative)

This appendix summarizes assertions made by this specification. Each assertion is assigned a unique identifier.

Summary of Assertions
IdAssertion
Conformance-1000 A conforming implementation MUST work with Java Message Service (JMS) 1.1 [Java Message Service].
Conformance-1001 A conforming implementation MUST implement all the requirements of 2 The SOAP/JMS Underlying Protocol Binding.
Conformance-1002 Conforming implementations MUST implement all the requirements of [URI Scheme for JMS].
Conformance-1003 Support for WSDL 1.1 is optional and as such an implementation MAY implement it. However, a conforming implementation of this feature MUST implement all the requirements of 3.4 WSDL 1.1 Extensions Detail.
Conformance-1004 Support for WSDL 2.0 is optional and as such an implementation MAY implement it. However, a conforming implementation of this feature MUST implement all the requirements of 3.5 WSDL 2.0 Extensions Detail.
Protocol-2001 Properties can be obtained from a number of sources. If a given property is specified in more than one of these, the following list specifies the precedence: the first MUST be used in preference to the second.
Protocol-2002 If a given property is specified more than once in the JMS URI the last instance of the property MUST be used.
Protocol-2003 (lookupVariant) MUST be specified in the JMS URI, as the jms-variant portion of the syntax.
Protocol-2004 (destinationName) MUST be specified in JMS URI, as the jms-dest portion of the syntax.
Protocol-2005 (deliveryMode) if specified MUST appear in the JMS message in the header named JMSDeliveryMode. If the value of this property is "PERSISTENT" then the JMSDeliveryMode integer value MUST be set to DeliveryMode.PERSISTENT. If the value of this property is "NON_PERSISTENT" then the JMSDeliveryMode integer value MUST be set to DeliveryMode.NON_PERSISTENT.
Protocol-2006 (timeToLive) if specified, this MUST be used to generate the value of the JMS header JMSExpiration.
Protocol-2007 (priority) if specified MUST appear in the JMS message in the header named JMSPriority.
Protocol-2008 (replyToName) if specified, this MUST be used to derive the value to be used in the JMS header JMSReplyTo.
Protocol-2009 (targetService) if specified MUST appear in the JMS message in the JMS property named SOAPJMS_targetService.
Protocol-2010 (bindingVersion) fixed value "1.0" in the implementation, MUST appear in a JMS property named SOAPJMS_bindingVersion.
Protocol-2011 Fault subcode unrecognizedBindingVersion MUST be generated if the value of the soapjms:bindingVersion property does not match the fixed value.
Protocol-2012 (contentType) if the charset parameter is specified it is checked to ensure that it matches the encoding value from the supplied XML. If there is a mismatch then a fault MUST be generated.
Protocol-2013 Use fault subcode contentTypeMismatch in the event that the values do not match.
Protocol-2014 if no charset parameter is supplied the charset MUST be inferred using the rules defined in appendix F, Autodetection of Character Encodings , [XML 1.0].
Protocol-2015 the contentType parameter MUST reflect the value specified in the Content-type part header for the first part (the SOAP body, so text/xml or application/xop+xml).
Protocol-2016 (contentType) MUST appear in the JMS message in the JMS property named SOAPJMS_contentType.
Protocol-2017 Use fault subcode missingContentType if the SOAPJMS_contentType property is missing.
Protocol-2018 (soapAction) if specified MUST appear in the JMS message in the JMS property named SOAPJMS_soapAction.
Protocol-2019 if using SOAP 1.2, and the contentType property has an action parameter, that parameter value MUST match this SOAPJMS_soapAction value.
Protocol-2020 (soapAction) Use fault subcode mismatchedSoapAction if the SOAP 1.2 action does not match.
Protocol-2021 Specifies the JMS URI of the service. The client MUST create this property which is derived from the supplied URI. The client MUST remove the targetService query parameter if specified; SHOULD remove JMS Message Header properties; and MAY remove other query parameters (for example client security related properties).
Protocol-2022 (requestURI) MUST appear in the JMS message in the JMS property named SOAPJMS_requestURI.
Protocol-2023 Use fault subcode missingRequestURI if the SOAPJMS_requestURI is missing from the message.
Protocol-2024 Binding of Properties to URI
Protocol-2025 Use fault subcode malformedRequestURI when the URI violates the expected syntax.
Protocol-2026 Use fault subcode targetServiceNotAllowedInRequestURI when targetService parameter is included in the requestURI).
Protocol-2027 The contents of the JMS Message body MUST be the SOAP payload as a JMS BytesMessage or TextMessage.
Protocol-2028 Use fault subcode unsupportedJMSMessageFormat when the arriving message format is not BytesMessage or TextMessage.
Protocol-2029 Note also that if the payload is formatted as a MIME multipart message, then the first byte or character encountered in the JMS Message body MUST be the start of the MIME boundary for the start of the first part — what MIME Part One [IETF RFC 2045] section 2.5 calls a "Body Part".
Protocol-2030 If the message is formatted as "text/xml" or "application/soap+xml", then the first byte or character of the JMS Message body MUST be the start of a conforming XML document.
Protocol-2031 An instance of a binding to JMS conforming to this binding specification MUST support the following message exchange patterns:
Protocol-2032 In the case of SOAP 1.2 a conforming SOAP-JMS Binding instance MUST support the following message exchange patterns:
Protocol-2033 In the case of SOAP 1.1 there is no formal specification of Message Exchange Patterns. A conforming SOAP-JMS Binding instance MUST support both the generic "request/response" and "one-way" patterns and in the case of SOAP 1.1 are specified in this document.
Protocol-2034 (request-response MEP - requesting node) The message MUST be created as a JMS BytesMessage or TextMessage as defined in 2.4 The JMS Message Body.
Protocol-2035 (request-response MEP - requesting node during init) the following table specifies how the binding properties described earlier explicitly affect the message constructed.
Protocol-2036 The Response Message MUST be created using the same type as the corresponding Request Message, i.e. as a JMS BytesMessage or TextMessage.
Protocol-2037 The message MUST be sent to the JMS Destination in the JMSReplyTo header of the Request Message.
Protocol-2038 The value of the JMSCorrelationID header field MUST be set to the same as the value of the JMSMessageID of the request message.
Protocol-2039 (request-response MEP - responding node during receiving and sending) the following table specifies how the binding properties described earlier explicitly affect the message constructed.
Protocol-2040 (one-way MEP - sending node) The message MUST be created as a JMS BytesMessage or TextMessage as defined in 2.4 The JMS Message Body.
Protocol-2041 (One-way MEP - sending node) the following table specifies how the binding properties described earlier explicitly affect the message constructed.
Protocol-2050 The JMSReplyTo header MUST be assigned a value.
Protocol-2051 The JMSReplyTo header MUST NOT be assigned a value.
Protocol-2060 (lookupVariant) The jms-variant: jndi MUST be supported.
Protocol-2070 (topicReplyToName) if specified and if relevant, this MUST be used to derive the value to be used in the JMS header JMSReplyTo.
Protocol-2071 Use fault subcode unsupportedLookupVariant if the JMS URI specifies a lookupVariant that is not supported by the implementation.
WSDLUsage-3001 Various JMS properties described in the SOAP/JMS binding specification may be set in three places in the WSDL — the binding, the service, and the port. Values specified at the service will propagate to all ports/endpoints. Values specified at the binding will propagate to all ports/endpoints using that binding.
WSDLUsage-3002 If a property is specified at multiple levels, the most specific setting MUST take precedence (port first, then service, then binding).
WSDLUsage-3003 Properties expressed in the URI [IETF RFC 3987] MUST override any values set in the markup as described above.
WSDLUsage-3004 SOAP/JMS properties which are declarable in WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 documents

F Change Log (Non-Normative)

DateEditorDescription
2009-05-06rmerric change section heading from Request-Response MEP to Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern as per derek suggestion that we be consistent with One-way Message Exchange Pattern
2009-05-06rmerric change how assertions Protocol-2035, Protocol-2039, and Protocol-2041 appear in the assertion summary.
2009-05-05rmerric Improve summary text for assertions Protocol-34 & Protocol-40
2009-05-05rmerric remove assertion Protocol-2042 that is a duplicate of its constituent parts
2009-04-29rmerric mark usage of rfc2119 terms where required, tweak assertions so that the assertion summary is clearer.
2009-04-28rmerric expand scope of text inside assertions 1003 and 1004.
2009-04-23rmerric fix syntax error in example "Setting JMS Message Header properties"
2009-04-16rmerric ACTION-82 apply agreed changes to contentType
2009-04-14padams2 Added new fault subcode: unsupportedLookupVariant
2009-04-14rmerric editorial tweak to previous precedence change
2009-04-08rmerric clarify precedence rules for binding properties
2009-03-25rmerric change NONPERSISTENT to NON_PERSISTENT
2009-03-23peaston Clarify the wording and scope of the jndiContext Parameter property
2009-03-19rmerric tweak wording for topicReplyToName
2009-03-19rmerric add topicReplytoName definition
2009-02-10padams2 Added myself as an editor
2009-02-10padams2 Minor wording change re: use of java naming-related properties (Action-61)
2009-01-29rmerric make support for lookupVariant = jndi required. Response to Last Call comment LC03.
2009-01-29rmerric Add support for JMS 1.1 to conformance criteria. Response to Last Call comment LC02.
2008-11-18rmerric point to November draft of URI Scheme
2008-11-12rmerric add precedence question to status section.
2008-10-29rmerric add note about handling of precedence. more minor typos.
2008-10-29rmerric create named types in schema and use them in "Properties affecting binding"
2008-10-29rmerric remove references to the obsolete "context" variant +fix two minor typos
2008-10-22rmerric Remove Editor Note
2008-10-22rmerric add jndiContextParameter
2008-10-22rmerric Add XML Schema as an appendix
2008-10-15rmerric simplify conformance criteria for JMS URI support
2008-10-15rmerric clarify fault: unsupportedJMSMessageFormat
2008-10-14rmerric correct feature URIs
2008-10-14rmerric change conformance criteria
2008-10-09padams2 Modified soapjms.xml with minor edits related to TextMessage.
2008-10-09rmerric fix rfc2045 reference
2008-10-09rmerric Add support for TextMessage and considerations for use of said type.
2008-08-18bmehta Made changes to the spec to show snippets in JMS Message Header and Message properties based on code shown by Eric
2008-07-29rmerric add examples of how to set message properties
2008-07-23ylafon <p> were out of balance as a block level element was in the middle
2008-07-23rmerric Remove Java TM
2008-07-17rmerric Added a non-normative code snippet to DeliveryMode
2008-07-14plehegar Fixed language information
2008-07-11rmerric editorial nits before FPWD
2008-06-25rmerric make valid as well as well-formed!
2008-06-25rmerric MUST & MUST NOT for JMSReplyTo
2008-06-25rmerric Editorial changes identified by Eric and Peter
2008-06-23rmerric fix pointer to IETF JMS URI spec
2008-06-22bmehta Fixed some places where I missed the iri
2008-06-22bmehta Updated with changes based on discussions in meetings and Eric's feedback
2008-06-12peaston Add support for assertion markups
2008-06-10rmerric add the authors as a test
2008-05-01plehegar Using latest version for WSDL 2.0 references
2008-05-01plehegar Added support for CVS changelog
2008-05-01plehegar Moved section 2.9 into non-normative appendix. Updated the references section (now normative). Added table and example headers. Fixed/added bibref. Using SOAP 1.2 instead of SOAP 1.1 in example. Added XML Namespaces section.
2008-04-22plehegar New