XQuery and XPath Full-Text Use Cases

1.1 Proper Display of This Unicode Document

(1) Use a current operating system and browser.

(2) Set the character encoding in the browser to Unicode or UTF-8. Often this setting is changed from the View menu.

1.2 Introduction

The use cases listed below were created by XML Query and XSL Working Groups, to illustrate important applications of full-text querying within an XML query language. Each use case exercises a specific functionality relevant to full-text querying. A Schema and sample input data are provided. Each use case specifies a set of queries that might be applied to the input data, and the expected results for each query. In a future version, the use cases will be republished with solutions in XQuery and/or XPath.

The document supplements the XML Query Use Cases which can be found in the W3C XML Query Use Cases [XQuery-UseCases]. Use cases for character string querying are included in the XML Query Use Cases, not in this document.

The full-text queries in the following use cases are performed on text which has been tokenized, i.e., broken into a sequence of words, units of punctuation, and spaces. A word is defined as any character, n-gram, or sequence of characters returned by a tokenizer as a basic unit to be queried. Each instance of a word consists of 0 or more consecutive characters. Beyond that words are implementation defined. Note that consecutive words need not be separated by either punctuation or space, and words may overlap. Tokenization enables functions and operators which work with the relative positioning of words (e.g., proximity operators). Tokenization also enables functions and operators which operate on a part or the root of the word (e.g., wildcards, stemming).

A phrase is a sequence of ordered words. A sequence can contain any number of words.

These use cases:

(1) Present some possible functions and features for tokenized text support in XQuery and XPath. None are yet available in XQuery or XPath. Please comment on these use cases and recommend others.

(2) Illustrate simple and complex queries. The more complex queries would normally only be constructed by programmers, librarians, and other expert users, or provided for novice users via saved queries or graphical user interfaces. Each query is intended to illustrate a single functionality, although queries might overlap in their functionalities (e.g., phrases and ordered proximity queries allowing no intervening words). Overlapping and similar functionalities are noted in the comments on query behavior.

(3) Draw from sample data which are almost entirely in English. Use cases in other languages are solicited, especially where they illustrate language-specific implementations of functions and features. Among the most sought after are use cases for queries using prefix and infix wild cards, proximity queries, and operators and queries requiring functionality which may not have Western language equivalents.

(4) Include queries which in most instances can be written with pure Boolean full-text predicates or with scoring (e.g., scoring on the number of occurrences of a word or phrase, scoring on how close words are to one another within a proximity query, scoring on how similar a word is to the one being stemmed) [BYR99] [HTK00]. A few, in Section 12 (SCORE), cannot be written with Boolean full-text predicates. Scoring methodologies will not be defined in this standard. Scoring will be implementation-defined. Results are provided in document order, except those in Section 12 (SCORE). Results could be returned ordered differently, such as by relevance (based on implementation-defined scoring) or explicitly by an element.

(5) Include queries on element content and attribute values.

(6) Include queries which are case-insensitive. When returning a paragraph, the text is returned as it occurs in the data model. This approach was chosen to keep the sample data short and the expected results meaningful. It would have be equally valid to return only the character queried. An variation is found in Section 5 (CHARACTER-MANIPULATION).

(7) Include queries which when they target XML elements are understood, unless otherwise stated, to query text within any text node descendant of the element.

(8) Include queries which return only elements and attributes which meet all the conditions specified in the query. In particular, Boolean queries return results where the Boolean conditions in the query are satisfied, i.e., are used to select what is being returned to users.

Query results may be returned in different ways. From a query for books containing the word "usability", users might be interested in returning, for each book containing the word "usability", its number and its entire content. In another situtation for the same query, users might be interested in returning, for each book containing the word "usability", its number and only the elements and attributes in the content which contain the word "usability". As in this second situation, the queries in these use cases return only elements and attributes which meet all the conditions specified in the query.

The Return clause may also include additional or different elements and attributes if specified, and may construct new elements.

(9) Include queries which provide some of the basic functionality of fuzzy match querying (e.g., wildcards, stemming, dictionary and thesaurus support, proximity).

(10) Provide highlighting of found words and phrases in the expected results of queries as an aid to users. The presence of highlighting says nothing about whether highlighting will be a feature of XQuery or XPath full-text querying.

(11) Display no Solutions in XQuery because no decisions have been taken on syntax. They will be added in a future version.

Examples of full-text querying functionalities for XML query languages can be found in [FGR01], [HTK00], [MJK98], [SCH01] and [TWE00].

To make the output more readable, the output of queries has been formatted using whitespace which may not be returned by a query processor. This whitespace should not be considered normative for the correctness of results.

These use cases represent a snapshot of an ongoing work. Some important operators and features are not yet adequately covered by a use case. The XML Query and XSL Working Groups reserve the right to add, delete or modify individual queries or whole use cases as the work progresses. The presence of a query in this set of use cases does not necessarily indicate that the query will be expressible in XQuery [XQuery] and/or XPath [XPath] to be created by the XML Query and XSL Working Groups.

1.3 Explanation of Query Statements

The queries in these use cases are presented in the following format:

Query number   Query title

User statement of query

Statement of functionality illustrated by query

• Operands: Parts of words, words, phrases

• Functionality: Operators, functions, collations, other functionality

• Context: One or more XPath expressions locating the elements and attributes to be queried

• Return: One or more XPath expressions which are returned only if they meet all the conditions specified in the query, and additional or different XPath expressions if specified. These may include constructed elements.

• Comments: Comments on query behavior in general and against the sample data in particular, plus the rationale for including this query in the use cases.

• Version: Each query is marked as "For consideration in v.1" or "For consideration after v.1".

Expected Result:

Results are provided here.
Found words and phrases are highlighted. 
Three dots "..." replace elements and content to shorten results.

1.4 Schema for Sample Data

The example queries in these use cases are based on a collection with the following Schema:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="1.0">
<xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" 
schemaLocation = "http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd"/>
   <xs:element name="books">
      <xs:annotation>
      	  <xs:documentation>A possible XML Schema for Sample Data 
      	  in XQuery and XPath  Full-Text Use Cases</xs:documentation>
      </xs:annotation>
      <xs:complexType>
      	  <xs:sequence maxOccurs="unbounded">
      	     <xs:element name="book">
      	        <xs:complexType>
      	           <xs:sequence>
      	              <xs:element name="metadata">
      	                 <xs:complexType>
      	                    <xs:complexContent>
      	                       <xs:extension base="metadataType"/>
      	                    </xs:complexContent>
      	                 </xs:complexType>
      	              </xs:element>
      	              <xs:element name="content" type="contentType"/>
      	           </xs:sequence>
      	           <xs:attribute name="number" type="xs:integer" 
      	           use="required"/>
      	        </xs:complexType>
      	     </xs:element>
      	  </xs:sequence>
      </xs:complexType>
   </xs:element>
   <xs:complexType name="anyXMLTextType" mixed="true">
      <xs:annotation>
      	  <xs:documentation>free text, contains any well-formed 
      	  XML</xs:documentation>
      </xs:annotation>
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:any processContents="skip" minOccurs="0" 
      	  maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="metadataType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="title" type="xs:string">
            <xs:complexType>
               <xs:complexContent>
                  <xs:extension base="titlesType">
                     <xs:attribute name="shortTitle" type="xs:string" 
                     use="required"/>
                  </xs:extension>
               </xs:complexContent>
            </xs:complexType>
         </xs:element>
      	  <xs:element name="authors" type="authorsType" 
      	  minOccurs="0"/>
      	  <xs:element name="publicationInfo" 
      	  type="publicationInfoType"/>
      	  <xs:element name="price" minOccurs="0">
      	     <xs:simpleType>
      	        <xs:restriction base="xs:float">
      	           <xs:minInclusive value="0"/>
      	           <xs:maxInclusive value="10000"/>
      	        </xs:restriction>
      	     </xs:simpleType>
      	  </xs:element>
      	  <xs:element name="subjects" maxOccurs="unbounded">
      	     <xs:complexType>
      	        <xs:complexContent>
      	           <xs:extension base="subjectsType">
      	              <xs:attribute ref="xml:lang" use="required"/>
      	           </xs:extension>
      	        </xs:complexContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="authorsType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="author" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" 
      	  maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="subjectsType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="subject" type="xs:string" 
      	  maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="publicationInfoType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="place" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
      	  <xs:element name="publisher" type="xs:string" 
      	  maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      	  <xs:element name="dateIssued" type="xs:string"/>
      	  <xs:element name="dateRevised" type="xs:string"/>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="contentType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="introduction" type="introductionType" 
      	  minOccurs="0"/>
      	  <xs:element name="part" maxOccurs="unbounded">
      	     <xs:complexType>
      	        <xs:complexContent>
      	           <xs:extension base="partType">
      	              <xs:attribute name="number" type="xs:string" 
      	              use="required"/>
      	           </xs:extension>
      	        </xs:complexContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="introductionType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="author" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0"/>
      	  <xs:element name="p" maxOccurs="unbounded">
      	     <xs:complexType mixed="true">
      	        <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
      	           <xs:element name="b"/>
      	           <xs:element name="emph"/>
      	           <xs:element name="i"/>
      	        </xs:choice>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="partType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="container" minOccurs="0">
      	     <xs:complexType>
      	        <xs:simpleContent>
      	           <xs:extension base="xs:string">
      	              <xs:attribute name="type" type="xs:string" 
      	              use="required"/>
      	           </xs:extension>
      	        </xs:simpleContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      	  <xs:element name="title" type="titleType" minOccurs="0"/>
      	  <xs:element name="introduction" type="introductionType" 
      	  minOccurs="0"/>
      	  <xs:element name="chapter" type="chapterType" 
      	  minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      	  <xs:element name="component" type="componentType" 
      	  minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="chapterType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="title" type="xs:string"/>
      	  <xs:element name="p" type="anyXMLTextType" 
      	  maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="footnoteType" mixed="true">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="citation" minOccurs="0" 
      	  maxOccurs="unbounded">
      	     <xs:complexType>
      	        <xs:simpleContent>
      	           <xs:extension base="xs:string">
      	              <xs:attribute name="url" type="xs:anyURI" 
      	              use="required"/>
      	           </xs:extension>
      	        </xs:simpleContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="componentType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="container" minOccurs="0">
      	     <xs:complexType>
      	        <xs:simpleContent>
      	           <xs:extension base="xs:string">
      	              <xs:attribute name="type" type="xs:string" 
      	              use="required"/>
      	           </xs:extension>
      	        </xs:simpleContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      	  <xs:element name="componentTitle">
      	     <xs:complexType mixed="true">
      	        <xs:complexContent mixed="true">
      	           <xs:extension base="componentTitleType"/>
      	        </xs:complexContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      	  <xs:element name="subComponent" type="subComponentType" 
      	  minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="titleType" mixed="true">
      <xs:all minOccurs="0">
      	  <xs:element name="date">
      	     <xs:complexType>
      	        <xs:simpleContent>
      	           <xs:extension base="xs:string">
      	              <xs:attribute name="normalize" type="xs:string" 
      	              use="required"/>
      	           </xs:extension>
      	        </xs:simpleContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      </xs:all>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="componentTitleType" mixed="true">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="componentDate" minOccurs="0">
      	     <xs:complexType>
      	        <xs:simpleContent>
      	           <xs:extension base="xs:string">
      	              <xs:attribute name="normalize" type="xs:string" 
      	              use="optional"/>
      	           </xs:extension>
      	        </xs:simpleContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="subComponentType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="container" minOccurs="0">
      	     <xs:complexType>
      	        <xs:simpleContent>
      	           <xs:extension base="xs:string">
      	              <xs:attribute name="type" type="xs:string" 
      	              use="required"/>
      	           </xs:extension>
      	        </xs:simpleContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      	  <xs:element name="componentTitle">
      	     <xs:complexType mixed="true">
      	        <xs:complexContent mixed="true">
      	           <xs:extension base="componentTitleType"/>
      	        </xs:complexContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      	  <xs:element name="subsubComponent" 
      	  type="subSubComponentType" minOccurs="0" 
      	  maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
   <xs:complexType name="subSubComponentType">
      <xs:sequence>
      	  <xs:element name="container" minOccurs="0">
      	     <xs:complexType>
      	        <xs:simpleContent>
      	           <xs:extension base="xs:string">
      	              <xs:attribute name="type" 
      	              type="xs:string" use="required"/>
      	           </xs:extension>
      	        </xs:simpleContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      	  <xs:element name="componentTitle">
      	     <xs:complexType mixed="true">
      	        <xs:complexContent mixed="true">
      	           <xs:extension base="componentTitleType"/>
      	        </xs:complexContent>
      	     </xs:complexType>
      	  </xs:element>
      </xs:sequence>
   </xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>

1.5 Sample Data

The data consists of a collection of three books. Two are primarily instructive text. The third is a guide to a manuscript collection. All contain metadata and full text.

<books>
<book number="1">
   <metadata>
      <title shortTitle="Improving Web Site Usability">Improving 
      the Usability of a Web Site Through Expert Reviews and 
      Usability Testing</title>
      <authors>
         <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
         <author>Montana Marigold</author>
      </authors>
      <publicationInfo>
         <place>New York</place>
         <publisher>Ersatz Publications</publisher>
         <dateIssued>2001</dateIssued>
         <dateRevised>2002</dateRevised>
      </publicationInfo>
      <price>25.99</price>   
      <subjects xml:lang="en">
         <subject>Usability testing</subject>
         <subject>Web site development</subject>        
         <subject>Heuristic evaluation</subject>
         <subject>Cognitive walk-through</subject>
         <subject>Web site usability</subject>
      </subjects>
      <subjects xml:lang="fr">        
         <subject>Tests d'ergonomie</subject>
         <subject>Développement de site web</subject>        
         <subject>Évaluation heuristique</subject>
         <subject>Parcours cognitif</subject>
         <subject>Ergonomie de site web</subject>     
      </subjects>
      <subjects xml:lang="zh">    
         <subject>可用性测试</subject>
         <subject>网站建置</subject>        
         <subject>启发式评价</subject>
         <subject>认知推演</subject>
         <subject>网站可用性</subject>
      </subjects>
   </metadata>
   <content>
      <introduction>
         <author>Elina Rose</author>
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must 
         feel well-served.</p> 
         <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
         methods of identifying problems in layout, 
         terminology, and navigation before they frustrate
         users and drive them away from your site.</p>
         <p>The most successful projects employ multiple 
         methods in multiple iterations. As Millicent 
         Marigold remarked during a recent conference, 
         "Don't stop. Iterate, iterate, then iterate 
         again."</p>
         <p>This book has been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association.</p>
      </introduction>
      <part number="1">
         <title>Expert Reviews</title>
         <introduction>
            <p>Expert reviewers identify problems 
            and recommend changes to web sites based 
            on research in human computer interaction 
            and their experience in the field.</p> 
            <p>Two expert review methods are discussed 
            here. They are heuristic evaluation and 
            cognitive walk-through.</p> 
            <p>Expert review methods should be 
            initiated early in the development process, 
            as soon as paper <b>p</b>rototypes 
            (hand-drawn pictures of Web pages) or 
            <b>w</b>ireframes (electronic mockups) are 
            available. They should be conducted using 
            the hardware and software similar to that 
            employed by users.</p>
         </introduction>
         <chapter>
            <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>
            <p>Expert reviewers critique an interface to 
            determine conformance with recognized 
            usability principles. <footnote>One of the 
            best known lists of heuristics is <citation 
            url="http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic
            /heuristic_list.html">Ten Usability 
            Heuristics by Jacob Nielson</citation>. Another 
            is <citation url="http://usability.gov
            /guidelines/index.html"> Research-Based Web 
            Design and Usability Guidelines</citation>
            </footnote></p> 
         </chapter>
         <chapter>
            <title>Cognitive Walk-Through</title>
            <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
            understandability and ease of learning while 
            performing specified tasks. They walk through 
            the site answering questions such as "Would a 
            user know by looking at the screen how to 
            complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
            the user completed the first step, would the 
            user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
            identifying any obstacles to completing the 
            task and assessing whether the user would 
            cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
            completing a step in the process.</p>
         </chapter>
      </part>
      <part number="2">
         <chapter>
            <title>Usability Testing</title>
            <p>Once the problems identified by expert 
            reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
            conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
            audience or audiences by conducting usability 
            testing.</p>
            <p>Users are asked to complete tasks which 
            measure the success of the information 
            architecture and navigational elements of the 
            site.</p>
            <p>Then changes are made to improve service to 
            users.</p>
         </chapter>
      </part> 
   </content>
</book>

<book number="2">
   <metadata>
      <title shortTitle="Usability Basics">Usability 
      Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct Usability Tests 
      on Web Site Thereby Improving the Usability of Your 
      Web Site</title>
      <publicationInfo>
         <place>New York</place>
         <publisher>Ersatz Publications</publisher>
         <publisher>Electronic BookWorks</publisher>         
         <dateIssued>2000</dateIssued>
         <dateRevised>2001</dateRevised>
      </publicationInfo>
      <price>174.00</price>   
      <subjects xml:lang="en">
         <subject>Usability testing</subject>
         <subject>Web site development</subject>
         <subject>Guides and finding aids</subject>
      </subjects>
      <subjects xml:lang="fr">
         <subject>Tests d'ergonomie</subject>
         <subject>Développement de site web</subject>
         <subject>Guides et outils de recherche</subject>
      </subjects>
      <subjects xml:lang="zh">
         <subject>可用性测试</subject>
         <subject>网站建置</subject>
         <subject>指南和检索工具</subject>
      </subjects>
   </metadata>
   <content>
      <introduction>
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability 
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         <p>This book has not been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association.</p>
      </introduction>
      <part number="1">
         <chapter>
            <title>Planning then Conducting Usability 
            Tests</title> 
            <p>Take the following steps to plan usability 
            testing. <step number="1">Clarify and 
            articulate the goal of the usability testing.
            </step> <step number="2">Identify tasks which 
            are critical for users to be able to complete 
            successfully. </step> <step number="3">Compile 
            a script of questions or instructions which 
            will prompt the user to attempt those 
            tasks.</step> <step number="4">Identify your 
            users and begin recruiting them.</step> <step 
            number="5">Conduct a pretest on a few users.
            </step> <step number="6">Edit the script based 
            on insights gleaned from the pretest.</step> 
            <step number="7">Resume testing.</step></p>
         </chapter>
      </part>
      <part number="2">
         <chapter>
            <title>Conducting Usability Tests</title> 
            <p>Users can be tested at any computer 
            workstation <footnote>They may be most 
            comfortable at their own workstation.
            </footnote> or in a lab.</p>
            <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
            that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
            Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
            they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
            or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
            to have two testers, <footnote>Usability 
            testing can be done at great expense or on a 
            shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
            expertise</testingProcedure> or 
            <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
            computer interaction professionals
            </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
            questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
            offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
            movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
            words should be recorded.</p>
         </chapter>
         <chapter>
            <title>Evaluating and Implementing Results</title> 
            <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
            Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
            found in Web site components which were propagating 
            the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
            Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
            users are successful in the accomplishing the 
            tasks.</p>
         </chapter>
      </part>
   </content>
</book>

<book number="3">
   <metadata>
      <title shortTitle="Usabilityguy Manuscript 
      Guide">John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
      Papers</title>
      <authors>
         <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
         <author>Morty Marigold</author>
      </authors>
      <publicationInfo>      
         <publisher>Ersatz Manuscript Library</publisher>
         <dateIssued>1998</dateIssued>
         <dateRevised>2002</dateRevised>
      </publicationInfo>
      <price>21.49</price>   
      <subjects xml:lang="en">
         <subject>Computers</subject>
         <subject>Software evaluation</subject>
         <subject>Usability testing</subject>
         <subject>Manuscript collections</subject>
      </subjects>
      <subjects xml:lang="fr">
         <subject>Ordinateurs</subject>
         <subject>Évaluation de logiciels</subject>
         <subject>Tests d'ergonomie</subject>
         <subject>Collections de manuscrits</subject>
      </subjects>
      <subjects xml:lang="zh">
         <subject>计算机</subject>
         <subject>软件评价</subject>
         <subject>可用性测试</subject>
         <subject>手稿专藏</subject>
      </subjects>
   </metadata>
   <content>
      <introduction>
         <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
         years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
         concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
         papers feature his career as a developer of software 
         applications and usability specialist. The collection 
         consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
         speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
         graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
         photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
      </introduction>
      <part number="1"> <container type="box">1-12</container>
         <title>Subject File, <date normalize="1930/1974">
         1930-1974</date></title>
         <introduction>
            <p>Correspondence, telegrams, memoranda, journals, 
            logs, testimony, approved travel orders, invitations, 
            charts, graphs, forms, biographical data, photographs, 
            book drafts, clippings and other printed matter, 
            résumés and miscellaneous material. Organized by 
            name of person or organization, topic, or type of 
            material.</p>
         </introduction>
         <component><container type="box">1</container>
           <componentTitle>Computers</componentTitle>
           <subComponent>
              <componentTitle>Software, 
              <componentDate normalize="1946/1947">1946-1947
              </componentDate>
              </componentTitle>
           </subComponent>
           <subComponent>
              <componentTitle>Human Computer Interaction 
              research, <componentDate normalize="1945/1952">
              1945-1952</componentDate>
              </componentTitle>
              <subsubComponent>
                 <componentTitle>Flow diagram, 
                 <componentDate normalize="1950">1950
                 </componentDate>
                 </componentTitle>
              </subsubComponent>
              <subsubComponent>
                 <componentTitle>General, 
                 <componentDate normalize="1947/1951">1947-1951
                 </componentDate>
                 </componentTitle>
              </subsubComponent>
              <subsubComponent><container type="box">2</container>
                 <componentTitle>Eye Movement research,
                 <componentDate normalize="1949/1950">1949-1950
                 </componentDate>
                 </componentTitle>
              </subsubComponent> 
              <subsubComponent>
                 <componentTitle>User profiling, 
                 <componentDate normalize="1950/1959">1950s
                 </componentDate>
                 </componentTitle>
              </subsubComponent>
            </subComponent>
         </component>
         <component>
           <componentTitle>Web User Appreciation Award, 
           <componentDate normalize="1956">1956</componentDate>
           </componentTitle>
         </component>
      </part>
      <part number="2"><container type="box">3-5</container>
         <title>Writings File, 
         <date normalize="1985/1999">1985-1999</date>
         </title>
         <introduction>
            <p>Correspondence, articles, book drafts, notes, 
            contracts, clippings, and printed matter. Arranged 
            alphabetically by type (articles, books, reports, 
            and miscellaneous) and therein alphabetically by 
            type of material, subject, or title.</p>
         </introduction>
         <component>
            <componentTitle>Writings by Usabilityguy
            </componentTitle>
            <subComponent>
               <componentTitle><componentDate normalize="1996">
               1996</componentDate>
               </componentTitle> 
               <subsubComponent>
                  <componentTitle>"How Many Users Are Enough 
                  for User Testing?"</componentTitle>
               </subsubComponent> 
               <subsubComponent>
                  <componentTitle>"How to Evaluate Results from 
                  User Tests."</componentTitle>
               </subsubComponent>
               <subsubComponent>
                  <container type="box">5</container>
                  <componentTitle>"When Are You Done Testing?"
                  </componentTitle>
               </subsubComponent>
               <subsubComponent>
                  <componentTitle>"Do-It-Yourself User Testing"
                  </componentTitle>
               </subsubComponent> 
            </subComponent>
         </component>
         <component>
            <componentTitle>Charitable Contributions
            </componentTitle> 
            <subComponent>
               <componentTitle>Diseases: AIDS, Hepatitis, 
               Tuberculosis <componentDate normalize=
               "1990/1999">1990-1999</componentDate>
               </componentTitle>
            </subComponent> 
            <subComponent>
               <componentTitle>Environmental Conservation: 
               Rivers <componentDate normalize="1995">1995
               </componentDate>
               </componentTitle>
            </subComponent>
         </component>
      </part>
   </content>
</book>
</books>

2.1 Description

These use cases begin with the simplest queries possible--queries on a single word or phrase. Phrase queries are queries on one or more sequences of words. A sequence can contain any number of words. One of these queries is on Chinese characters.

Refer to Section 9 (BOOLEAN) for multiple word and phrase queries with Boolean full-text predicates. Refer to Section 12 (SCORE) for multiple word and phrase queries with score.

2.2 Queries and Results

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>

<subject>Usability testing</subject>
						
<subject>Usability testing</subject>

<subject>Usability testing</subject>

<content>
   ...
      <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
      understandability and ease of learning while 
      performing specified tasks. They walk through 
      the site answering questions such as "Would a 
      user know by looking at the screen how to
      complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
      the user completed the first step, would the 
      user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
      identifying any obstacles to completing the 
      task and assessing whether the user would 
      cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
      completing a step in the process.</p>
   ...
</content>

<subject>网站建置</subject>      
<subject>网站可用性</subject>

<subject>网站建置</subject>

3.1 Description

These use cases query XML elements, including instances of an element and multiple elements, attributes, and elements and attributes. They use a single XPath statement to locate the elements or attributes to be queried.

Some queries return additional or different elements than were queried. Another queries an element and its descendants. Another queries across element boundaries. They are in this section only because they are very common queries and necessary for writing meaningful full-text queries. Refer to Section 13 (STRUCTURE) for queries which more fully exploit the complexity and hierarchy of XML structure and Section 14 (IGNORE) for queries across element boundaries which ignore tags and content.

3.2 Queries and Results

<book number="1">
   <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
   understandability and ease of learning while 
   performing specified tasks. They walk through 
   the site answering questions such as "Would a 
   user know by looking at the screen how to 
   complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
   the user completed the first step, would the 
   user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
   identifying any obstacles to completing the 
   task and assessing whether the user would 
   cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
   completing a step in the process.</p>
</book>

<book number="1">
   <subject>Web site usability</subject>
</book>

<book number="1">
   <subject>Usability testing</subject>
   <subject>Web site development</subject>        
   <subject>Web site usability</subject>  
</book>
   
<book number="2">
   <subject>Usability testing</subject>
   <subject>Web site development</subject>
</book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site 
Through Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
  <publisher>Ersatz Publications</publisher>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
   <author>Montana Marigold</author>
   <dateRevised>2002</dateRevised>
   
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>	
   <dateRevised>2001</dateRevised> 
     
<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>
   <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
   <author>Morty Marigold</author>
   <dateRevised>2002</dateRevised>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <title>Planning then Conducting Usability
      Tests</title> 
   <title>Conducting Usability Tests</title>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <title>Usability Testing</title>
         <p>Once the problems identified by expert 
         reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
         conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
         audience or audiences by conducting usability 
         testing.</p>
      ...
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Once the problems identified by expert 
         reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
         conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
         audience or audiences by conducting usability 
         testing.</p>
      ...
   </content>   
   
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <content>
      ...	
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability 
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         ...
            <title>Planning then Conducting Usability 
            Tests</title>   
      ...
   </content>   

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>        
   <content>
      ...	
            <componentTitle>"How to Evaluate Results from 
            User Tests."</componentTitle> 
      ...
   </content>

<book number="1">
   <title shortTitle="Improving
Web Site Usability">Improving 
   the Usability of a Web Site Through Expert Reviews and Usability 
   Testing</title>
</book>

<book number="3">
   <title shortTitle="Usabilityguy Manuscript 
   Guide">John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
   Papers</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <componentTitle>User profiling, 
         <componentDate normalize="1950/1959">1950s
         </componentDate>
         </componentTitle>
      ...  
   </content>
</book>

4.1 Description

These use cases identify commonly used words which have been saved to a stop word list. Words on this list are routinely ignored during querying. Some of the queries override the stop word identification of a word, making it available again for querying.

4.2 Queries and Results

No results returned.

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability 
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         ...
            <title>Planning then Conducting Usability
            Tests</title> 
      ...
   </content>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <subject>Guides and finding aids</subject>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>	
   <content>
      ...			
         <p>This book has been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association</p>	
      ...		
 </content>  				

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <content>
      ...		
         <p>This book has not been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association</p>
      ...     
   </content> 

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>   
   <content>
      ...		
         <p>Correspondence, telegrams, memoranda, journals, 
         logs, testimony, approved travel orders, invitations, 
         charts, graphs, forms, biographical data, photographs, 
         book drafts, clippings and other printed matter, 
         résumés and miscellaneous material. Organized by 
         name of person or organization, topic, or type of 
         material.</p>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This book has not been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association</p>
      ...     
   </content>

5.1 Description

These use cases illustrate queries manipulating normalized characters and tokenized words, spaces, and punctuation. Depending on the desired result, they may consider or ignore diacritics, case, and special characters.

They query words entered with diacritics sometimes returning the same; other times returning words with and without diacritics. They query words entered in upper case sometimes returning the same; other times returning words in both upper and lower case. Other queries find words containing a hyphen or two words with a space separating them.

5.2 Queries and Results

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>   
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
         years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
         concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
         papers feature his career as a developer of software 
         applications and usability specialist. The collection 
         consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
         speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
         graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
         photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
         ...
            <p>Correspondence, telegrams, memoranda, journals, 
            logs, testimony, approved travel orders, invitations, 
            charts, graphs, forms, biographical data, photographs, 
            book drafts, clippings and other printed matter, 
            résumés and miscellaneous material. Organized by 
            name of person or organization, topic, or type of 
            material.</p>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Take the following steps to plan usability 
         testing. <step number="1">Clarify and 
         articulate the goal of the usability testing.
         </step> <step number="2">Identify tasks which 
         are critical for users to be able to complete 
         successfully. </step> <step number="3">Compile 
         a script of questions or instructions which 
         will prompt the user to attempt those 
         tasks.</step> <step number="4">Identify your 
         users and begin recruiting them.</step> <step 
         number="5">Conduct a pretest on a few users.
         </step> <step number="6">Edit the script based 
         on insights gleaned from the pretest.</step> 
         <step number="7">Resume testing.</step></p>
      ...     
   </content>       
   
<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>   
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
         years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
         concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
         papers feature his career as a developer of software 
         applications and usability specialist. The collection 
         consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
         speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
         graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
         photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
         ...
            <p>Correspondence, telegrams, memoranda, journals, 
            logs, testimony, approved travel orders, invitations, 
            charts, graphs, forms, biographical data, photographs, 
            book drafts, clippings and other printed matter, 
            résumés and miscellaneous material. Organized by 
            name of person or organization, topic, or type of 
            material.</p>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>
   <book>
      ...
         <componentTitle>Diseases: AIDS, Hepatitis, 
         Tuberculosis <componentDate normalize=
         "1990/1999">1990-1999</componentDate>
         </componentTitle>
      ...
    </book>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <book>
      ...
         <subject>Guides and finding aids</subject>
      ...      
   </book>     
   
<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>
   <book>
      ...
         <componentTitle>Diseases: AIDS, Hepatitis, 
         Tuberculosis <componentDate normalize=
         "1990/1999">1990-1999</componentDate>
         </componentTitle>
      ...
   </book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <book>
      ...
        <subject>Cognitive walk-through</subject>
        ...
        <p>Two expert review methods are discussed 
        here. They are heuristic evaluation and 
        cognitive walk-through.</p>
        ...
        <title>>Cognitive Walk-Through</title>
     ...
   </book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <book>
     ...
        <subject>Cognitive walk-through</subject>
        ...
        <p>Two expert review methods are discussed 
        here. They are heuristic evaluation and 
        cognitive walk-through.</p>
        ...
        <title>Cognitive Walk-Through</title>
        <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
        understandability and ease of learning while 
        performing specified tasks. They walk through 
        the site answering questions such as "Would a 
        user know by looking at the screen how to 
        complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
        the user completed the first step, would the 
        user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
        identifying any obstacles to completing the 
        task and assessing whether the user would 
        cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
        completing a step in the process.</p>
     ...
   </book>

6.1 Description

These use cases illustrate queries which allow a character or sequence of characters to be inserted into or appended to a word or a part of a word. Character wildcards can be prefix (added before the first character), infix (inserted within a word), or suffix (added after the last character).

These use cases also illustrate queries which allow a word or words to be inserted into or appended to a phrase.

6.2 Queries and Results

<book number="1">
   <content>	
      ...				    
       <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
       methods of identifying problems in layout, 
       terminology, and navigation before they frustrate
       users and drive them away from your site.</p>
      ...	
   </content>	
</book>

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Once the problems identified by expert 
         reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
         conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
         audience or audiences by conducting usability 
         testing.</p>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>      

<book number="2">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability 
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         ...
            <title>Planning then Conducting Usability 
            Tests</title> 
         ...
            <title>Conducting Usability Tests</title> 				
      ...     
   </content> 
</book>     
   
<book number="3">
   <content>
      ...
         <componentTitle>"How to Evaluate Results from 
         User Tests."</componentTitle>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...					    
        <p>The most successful projects employ multiple 
        methods in multiple iterations. As Millicent 
        Marigold remarked during a recent conference, 
        "Don't stop. Iterate, iterate, then iterate 
        again."</p>
        ...
           <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
           understandability and ease of learning while 
           performing specified tasks. They walk through 
           the site answering questions such as "Would a 
           user know by looking at the screen how to 
           complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
           the user completed the first step, would the 
           user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
           identifying any obstacles to completing the 
           task and assessing whether the user would 
           cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
           completing a step in the process.</p>  
     ...
   </content>
</book>	

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <step number="5">Conduct a pretest on a few 
         users.</step>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
         methods of identifying problems in layout, 
         terminology, and navigation before they frustrate
         users and drive them away from your site.</p>
         ...
            <title>Usability Testing</title>
            <p>Once the problems identified by expert 
            reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
            conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
            audience or audiences by conducting usability 
            testing.</p>
      ...     
   </content>      						

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>	
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability 
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         ...
            <title>Planning then Conducting Usability 
            Tests</title> 
            <p>Take the following steps to plan usability 
            testing. <step number="1">Clarify and 
            articulate the goal of the usability testing.
            </step> <step number="2">Identify tasks which 
            are critical for users to be able to complete 
            successfully. </step> <step number="3">Compile 
            a script of questions or instructions which 
            will prompt the user to attempt those 
            tasks.</step> <step number="4">Identify your 
            users and begin recruiting them.</step> <step 
            number="5">Conduct a pretest on a few users.
            </step> <step number="6">Edit the script based 
            on insights gleaned from the pretest.</step> 
            <step number="7">Resume testing.</step></p>
            ...
            <title>Conducting Usability Tests</title> 
            <p>Users can be tested at any computer 
            workstation <footnote>They may be most 
            comfortable at their own workstation.
            </footnote> or in a lab.</p>
            <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
            that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
            Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
            they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
            or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
            to have two testers, <footnote>Usability 
            testing can be done at great expense or on a 
            shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
            expertise</testingProcedure> or 
            <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
            computer interaction professionals
            </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
            questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
            offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
            movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
            words should be recorded.</p>
            ...
            <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
            Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
            found in Web site components which were propagating 
            the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
            Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
            users are successful in the accomplishing the 
            tasks.</p>
      ...     
   </content>      

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>
   <content>
      ...           
         <p>Correspondence, telegrams, memoranda, journals, 
         logs, testimony, approved travel orders, invitations, 
         charts, graphs, forms, biographical data, photographs, 
         book drafts, clippings and other printed matter, 
         résumés and miscellaneous material. Organized by 
         name of person or organization, topic, or type of 
         material.</p>
         ...
               <componentTitle>"How Many Users Are Enough 
               for User Testing?"</componentTitle>
               ...   
               <componentTitle>"How to Evaluate Results from 
               User Tests."</componentTitle>
               ...
               <container type="box">5</container>
               <componentTitle>"When Are You Done Testing?"
               </componentTitle>
               ...
               <componentTitle>"Do-It-Yourself User Testing"
               </componentTitle>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
         methods of identifying problems in layout, 
         terminology, and navigation before they frustrate
         users and drive them away from your site.</p>
         ...
            <title>Usability Testing</title> 
            <p>Once the problems identified by expert 
            reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
            conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
            audience or audiences by conducting usability
            testing.</p>     
      ...     
   </content>      
   
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         ...
            <p>Take the following steps to plan usability
            testing. <step number="1">Clarify and 
            articulate the goal of the usability testing.
            </step> <step number="2">Identify tasks which 
            are critical for users to be able to complete 
            successfully. </step> <step number="3">Compile 
            a script of questions or instructions which 
            will prompt the user to attempt those 
            tasks.</step> <step number="4">Identify your 
            users and begin recruiting them.</step> <step 
            number="5">Conduct a pretest on a few users.
            </step> <step number="6">Edit the script based 
            on insights gleaned from the pretest.</step> 
            <step number="7">Resume testing.</step></p>
            ...
            <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
            that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
            Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
            they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
            or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
            to have two testers, <footnote>Usability
            testing can be done at great expense or on a 
            shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
            expertise</testingProcedure> or 
            <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
            computer interaction professionals
            </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
            questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
            offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
            movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
            words should be recorded.</p>
      ...     
   </content>      

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <componentTitle>"How Many Users Are Enough 
         for User Testing?"</componentTitle>
         ...
         <componentTitle>"Do-It-Yourself User Testing"
         </componentTitle>
         </subsubComponent>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
          <p>Then changes are made to improve service to 
          users.</p> 	
      ...     
   </content>

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
         methods of identifying problems in layout, 
         terminology, and navigation before they frustrate
         users and drive them away from your site.</p>
         ...
            <title>Usability Testing</title>
            <p>Once the problems identified by expert 
            reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
            conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
            audience or audiences by conducting usability 
            testing.</p>
      ...     
   </content> 
</book>     						

<book number="2">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability 
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         ...
            <p>Take the following steps to plan usability 
            testing. <step number="1">Clarify and 
            articulate the goal of the usability testing.
            </step> <step number="2">Identify tasks which 
            are critical for users to be able to complete 
            successfully. </step> <step number="3">Compile 
            a script of questions or instructions which 
            will prompt the user to attempt those 
            tasks.</step> <step number="4">Identify your 
            users and begin recruiting them.</step> <step 
            number="5">Conduct a pretest on a few users.
            </step> <step number="6">Edit the script based 
            on insights gleaned from the pretest.</step> 
            <step number="7">Resume testing.</step></p>
            ...
            <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
            that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
            Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
            they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
            or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
            to have two testers, <footnote>Usability 
            testing can be done at great expense or on a 
            shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
            expertise</testingProcedure> or 
            <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
            computer interaction professionals
            </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
            questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
            offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
            movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
            words should be recorded.</p>
            ...
            <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
            Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
            found in Web site components which were propagating 
            the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
            Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
            users are successful in the accomplishing the 
            tasks.</p>
      ...     
   </content> 
</book>     

<book number="3">
   <content>
      ...
         <componentTitle>"How Many Users Are Enough 
         for User Testing?"</componentTitle>
         ...
         <container type="box">5</container>
         <componentTitle>"When Are You Done Testing?"
         </componentTitle>
         ...
         <componentTitle>"Do-It-Yourself User Testing"
         </componentTitle>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must 
         feel well-served.</p> 
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must 
         feel well-served.</p> 
      ...     
   </content>  
   
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
         Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
         found in Web site components which were propagating
         the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
         Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
         users are successful in the accomplishing the 
         tasks.</p>
      ...     
   </content>

7.1 Description

These use cases invoke a stemming algorithm (e.g., Porter) which returns noun, verb, adjective, and adverb forms of a word or root of a word in singular and plural.

7.2 Queries and Results

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
         methods of identifying problems in layout, 
         terminology, and navigation before they frustrate
         users and drive them away from your site.</p>
         ...
            <title>Usability Testing</title>
            <p>Once the problems identified by expert 
            reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
            conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
            audience or audiences by conducting usability 
            testing.</p>
      ...     
   </content>      						

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>	
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability 
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         ...
            <title>Planning then Conducting Usability 
            Tests</title> 
            <p>Take the following steps to plan usability 
            testing. <step number="1">Clarify and 
            articulate the goal of the usability testing.
            </step> <step number="2">Identify tasks which 
            are critical for users to be able to complete 
            successfully. </step> <step number="3">Compile 
            a script of questions or instructions which 
            will prompt the user to attempt those 
            tasks.</step> <step number="4">Identify your 
            users and begin recruiting them.</step> <step 
            number="5">Conduct a pretest on a few users.
            </step> <step number="6">Edit the script based 
            on insights gleaned from the pretest.</step> 
            <step number="7">Resume testing.</step></p>
            ...
            <title>Conducting Usability Tests</title> 
            <p>Users can be tested at any computer 
            workstation <footnote>They may be most 
            comfortable at their own workstation.
            </footnote> or in a lab.</p>
            ...
            <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
            that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
            Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
            they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
            or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
            to have two testers, <footnote>Usability 
            testing can be done at great expense or on a 
            shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
            expertise</testingProcedure> or 
            <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
            computer interaction professionals
            </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
            questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
            offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
            movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
            words should be recorded.</p>
            ...
            <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
            Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
            found in Web site components which were propagating 
            the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
            Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
            users are successful in the accomplishing the 
            tasks.</p>
      ...     
   </content>      

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>
   <content>
      ...           
         <componentTitle>"How Many Users Are Enough 
         for User Testing?"</componentTitle>
         ...
         <componentTitle>"How to Evaluate Results from 
         User Tests."</componentTitle>
         ...
         <container type="box">5</container>
         <componentTitle>"When Are You Done Testing?"
         </componentTitle>
         ...
         <componentTitle>"Do-It-Yourself User Testing"
         </componentTitle>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
         methods of identifying problems in layout, 
         terminology, and navigation before they frustrate
         users and drive them away from your site.</p>
         ...
            <title>Usability Testing</title> 
            <p>Once the problems identified by expert 
            reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
            conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
            audience or audiences by conducting usability
            testing.</p>     
      ...     
   </content>      
   
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         ...
            <p>Take the following steps to plan usability
            testing. <step number="1">Clarify and 
            articulate the goal of the usability testing.
            </step> <step number="2">Identify tasks which 
            are critical for users to be able to complete 
            successfully. </step> <step number="3">Compile 
            a script of questions or instructions which 
            will prompt the user to attempt those 
            tasks.</step> <step number="4">Identify your 
            users and begin recruiting them.</step> <step 
            number="5">Conduct a pretest on a few users.
            </step> <step number="6">Edit the script based 
            on insights gleaned from the pretest.</step> 
            <step number="7">Resume testing.</step></p>
            ...
            <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
            that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
            Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
            they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
            or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
            to have two testers, <footnote>Usability
            testing can be done at great expense or on a 
            shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
            expertise</testingProcedure> or 
            <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
            computer interaction professionals
            </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
            questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
            offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
            movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
            words should be recorded.</p>
      ...     
   </content>      

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <componentTitle>"How Many Users Are Enough 
         for User Testing?"</componentTitle>
         ...
         <componentTitle>"Do-It-Yourself User Testing"
         </componentTitle>
      ...     
   </content>

8.1 Description

These use cases illustrate queries which return synonyms or related words identified by thesauri, dictionaries, and taxonomies.

8.2 Queries and Results

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>  
      <introduction>
        <p>The most successful projects employ multiple 
        methods in multiple iterations. As Millicent 
        Marigold remarked during a recent conference, 
        "Don't stop. Iterate, iterate, then iterate 
        again."</p>
      </introduction>
    ...	
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
         methods of identifying problems in layout, 
         terminology, and navigation before they frustrate
         users and drive them away from your site.</p>
      ...     
   </content>      
      
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
         Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
         found in Web site components which were propagating 
         the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
         Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
         users are successful in the accomplishing the 
         tasks.</p>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
         years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
         concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
         papers feature his career as a developer of software 
         applications and usability specialist. The collection 
         consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
         speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
         graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
         photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
         ...
            <p>Correspondence, telegrams, memoranda, journals, 
            logs, testimony, approved travel orders, invitations, 
            charts, graphs, forms, biographical data, photographs, 
            book drafts, clippings and other printed matter, 
            résumés and miscellaneous material. Organized by 
            name of person or organization, topic, or type of 
            material.</p>
            ...
            <p>Correspondence, articles, book drafts, notes, 
            contracts, clippings, and printed matter. Arranged 
            alphabetically by type (articles, books, reports, 
            and miscellaneous) and therein alphabetically by 
            type of material, subject, or title.</p>
      ...
   </content>    

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <book>
      ...
         <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
         <author>Montana Marigold</author>
         ...
         <p>The most successful projects employ multiple 
         methods in multiple iterations. As Millicent 
         Marigold remarked during a recent conference, 
         "Don't stop. Iterate, iterate, then iterate 
         again."</p>
      ...
   </book>
   
<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>
   <book>
      ...
         <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
      ...
   </book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <book>
      ...
         <p>The most successful projects employ multiple 
         methods in multiple iterations. As Millicent 
         Marigold remarked during a recent conference, 
         "Don't stop. Iterate, iterate, then iterate 
         again."</p>
         ...
            <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
            understandability and ease of learning while 
            performing specified tasks. They walk through 
            the site answering questions such as "Would a 
            user know by looking at the screen how to 
            complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
            the user completed the first step, would the 
            user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
            identifying any obstacles to completing the 
            task and assessing whether the user would 
            cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
            completing a step in the process.</p>
      ...
   </book>	 

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the Usability of
Your Web Site</title>
   <book>
      ...
         <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
         Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
         found in Web site components which were propagating 
         the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
         Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
         users are successful in the accomplishing the 
         tasks.</p>
      ...
   </book>

<book number="3"> 
   <component>   
      <componentTitle>Charitable Contributions</componentTitle> 
      <subComponent>
         <componentTitle>Diseases: AIDS, Hepatitis, 
         Tuberculosis<componentDate normalize=
         "1990/1999">1990-1999</componentDate>
         </componentTitle>
      </subComponent> 
   <component>
</book>

9.1 Description

These use cases include Boolean queries using or, and, the unary not, and not, and mild not.

9.2 Queries and Results

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must 
         feel well-served.</p> 
         ...
         <p>This book has been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association.</p>
         ...
            <p>Expert reviewers identify problems 
            and recommend changes to web sites based 
            on research in human computer interaction 
            and their experience in the field.</p> 
            ...
            <p>Expert review methods should be 
            initiated early in the development process, 
            as soon as paper <b>p</b>rototypes 
            (hand-drawn pictures of Web pages) or 
            <b>w</b>ireframes (electronic mockups) are 
            available. They should be conducted using 
            the hardware and software similar to that 
            employed by users.</p>
            ...
            <p>Expert reviewers critique an interface to 
            determine conformance with recognized 
            usability principles. <footnote>One of the 
            best known lists of heuristics is <citation 
            url="http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic
            /heuristic_list.html">Ten Usability 
            Heuristics by Jacob Nielson</citation>. Another 
            is <citation url="http://usability.gov
            /guidelines/index.html"> Research-Based Web 
            Design and Usability Guidelines</citation>
            </footnote></p> 
            ...
            <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
            understandability and ease of learning while 
            performing specified tasks. They walk through 
            the site answering questions such as "Would a 
            user know by looking at the screen how to 
            complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
            the user completed the first step, would the 
            user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
            identifying any obstacles to completing the 
            task and assessing whether the user would 
            cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
            completing a step in the process.</p>
      ...     
   </content> 
        
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability 
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         <p>This book has not been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association.</p>
         ...
            <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
            that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
            Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
            they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
            or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
            to have two testers, <footnote>Usability 
            testing can be done at great expense or on a 
            shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
            expertise</testingProcedure> or 
            <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
            computer interaction professionals
            </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
            questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
            offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
            movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
            words should be recorded.</p>
            ...
            <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
            Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
            found in Web site components which were propagating 
            the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
            Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
            users are successful in the accomplishing the 
           tasks.</p>
      ...     
   </content>     
    
<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>   
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
         years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
         concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
         papers feature his career as a developer of software 
         applications and usability specialist. The collection 
         consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
         speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
         graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
         photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
         ...
            <componentTitle>Software, 
            <componentDate normalize="1946/1947">1946-1947
            </componentDate>
            </componentTitle>
            ...
            <componentTitle>Web User Appreciation Award, 
            <componentDate normalize="1956">1956</componentDate>
            </componentTitle>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
       ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must 
         feel well-served.</p> 
         ...
         <p>This book has been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association.</p>
         ...
            <p>Expert reviewers identify problems 
            and recommend changes to web sites based 
            on research in human computer interaction 
            and their experience in the field.</p> 
            ...
            <p>Expert review methods should be 
            initiated early in the development process, 
            as soon as paper <b>p>/b>rototypes 
            (hand-drawn pictures of Web pages) or 
            <b>w</b>ireframes (electronic mockups) are 
            available. They should be conducted using 
            the hardware and software similar to that 
            employed by users.</p>
            ...
            <p>Expert reviewers critique an interface to 
            determine conformance with recognized 
            usability principles. <footnote>One of the 
            best known lists of heuristics is <citation 
            url="http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic
            /heuristic_list.html">Ten Usability 
            Heuristics by Jacob Nielson</citation>. Another 
            is <citation url="http://usability.gov
            /guidelines/index.html"> Research-Based Web 
            Design and Usability Guidelines</citation>
            </footnote></p> 
            ...
            <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
            understandability and ease of learning while 
            performing specified tasks. They walk through 
            the site answering questions such as "Would a 
            user know by looking at the screen how to 
            complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
            the user completed the first step, would the 
            user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
            identifying any obstacles to completing the 
            task and assessing whether the user would 
            cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
            completing a step in the process.</p>
      ...     
   </content> 
        
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 
   <content>
      ...
         <p>This is a basic handbook for planning and 
         conducting usability tests on Web sites. Usability 
         testing should be used in conjunction with other 
         expert review methods.</p>
         <p>This book has not been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association.</p>
         ...
            <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
            that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
            Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
            they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
            or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
            to have two testers, <footnote>Usability 
            testing can be done at great expense or on a 
            shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
            expertise</testingProcedure> or 
            <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
            computer interaction professionals
            </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
            questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
            offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
            movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
            words should be recorded.</p>
            ...
            <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
            Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
            found in Web site components which were propagating 
            the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
            Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
            users are successful in the accomplishing the 
            tasks.</p>
      ...     
   </content>     
    
<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>   
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
         years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
         concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
         papers feature his career as a developer of software 
         applications and usability specialist. The collection 
         consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
         speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
         graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
         photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
         ...
            <componentTitle>Software, 
            <componentDate normalize="1946/1947">1946-1947
            </componentDate>
            </componentTitle>
            ...
            <componentTitle>Web User Appreciation Award, 
            <componentDate normalize="1956">1956</componentDate>
            </componentTitle>
      ...     
   </content>

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Two expert review methods are discussed 
         here. They are heuristic evaluation and 
         cognitive walk-through.</p> 
         <title>Cognitive Walk-Through</title>
         <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>  
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must 
         feel well-served.</p> 
         ...
         <p>This book has been approved by the Web Site 
         Users Association.</p>
         ...
            <p>Expert reviewers identify problems 
            and recommend changes to web sites based 
            on research in human computer interaction 
            and their experience in the field.</p> 
            ...
            <p>Expert review methods should be 
            initiated early in the development process, 
            as soon as paper <b>p</b>rototypes 
           (hand-drawn pictures of Web pages) or 
            <b>w</b>ireframes (electronic mockups) are 
            available. They should be conducted using 
            the hardware and software similar to that 
            employed by users.</p>
            ...
            <p>Expert reviewers critique an interface to 
            determine conformance with recognized 
            usability principles. <footnote>One of the 
            best known lists of heuristics is <citation 
            url="http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic
            /heuristic_list.html">Ten Usability 
            Heuristics by Jacob Nielson</citation>. Another 
            is <citation url="http://usability.gov
            /guidelines/index.html"> Research-Based Web 
            Design and Usability Guidelines</citation>
            </footnote></p> 
            ...
            <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
            understandability and ease of learning while 
            performing specified tasks. They walk through 
            the site answering questions such as "Would a 
            user know by looking at the screen how to 
            complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
            the user completed the first step, would the 
            user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
            identifying any obstacles to completing the 
            task and assessing whether the user would 
            cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
            completing a step in the process.</p>
      ...     
   </content>   
    
<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>   
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
         years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
         concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
         papers feature his career as a developer of software 
         applications and usability specialist. The collection 
         consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
         speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
         graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
         photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
         ...
            <componentTitle>Software, 
            <componentDate normalize="1946/1947">1946-1947
            </componentDate>
            </componentTitle>
            ...
            <componentTitle>Web User Appreciation Award, 
            <componentDate normalize="1956">1956</componentDate>
            </componentTitle>
      ...     
   </content> 

No results returned.

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Two expert review methods are discussed 
         here. They are heuristic evaluation and 
         cognitive walk-through.</p> 
         <title>Cognitive Walk-Through</title>
         <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title>  
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

No results returned.

<metadata>
   <title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
   Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
</metadata>

No results returned.

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of 
His Papers</title>
   <content>
    <introduction>
       <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
       years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
       concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
       papers feature his career as a developer of software 
       applications and usability specialist. The collection 
       consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
       speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
       graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
       photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
    </introduction>
    ...
</content>

10.1 Description

These use cases illustrate unordered, ordered, and nested proximity queries which look for sequences of words allowing up to a specified number of intervening words. They also include queries within unordered and ordered windows of a specified number of words, within a sentence, and within a paragraph.

10.2 Queries and Results

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of 
His Papers</title>
   <content>
      <introduction>
         <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
         years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
         concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
         papers feature his career as a developer of software 
         applications and usability specialist. The collection 
         consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
         speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
         graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
         photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
      </introduction>
      ...
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must 
         feel well-served.</p>
      ...     
   </content>

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Once the problems identified by expert
         reviews have been corrected, it is time to 
         conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
         audience or audiences by conducting usability 
         testing.</p>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must
         feel well-served.</p>
      ...     
   </content>

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
         understandability and ease of learning while 
         performing specified tasks. They walk through 
         the site answering questions such as "Would a
         user know by looking at the screen how to
         complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
         the user completed the first step, would the 
         user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
         identifying any obstacles to completing the 
         task and assessing whether the user would 
         cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
         completing a step in the process.</p>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

No results found.

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the
         site supports the user in achieving specified
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning,
         and enable efficient and effective task
         completion, while propagating few errors.
         Satisfaction with the site is also important.
         The user must not only be well-served, but must
         feel well-served.</p>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must
         feel well-served.</p>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

11.1 Description

These use cases illustrate advanced word and phrase queries. They specify order of multiple words searched, find a phrase based on number of occurrences, find a phrase only when it starts an element, and find a phrase only when it is the entire content of the element.

11.2 Queries and Results

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
        <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
        understandability and ease of learning while 
        performing specified tasks. They walk through 
        the site answering questions such as "Would a 
        user know by looking at the screen how to 
        complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
        the user completed the first step, would the 
        user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
        identifying any obstacles to completing the 
         task and assessing whether the user would 
       cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
        completing a step in the process.</p>
      ...
   </content>
</book>

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...     
         <p>Two expert review methods are discussed 
         here. They are heuristic evaluation and 
         cognitive walk-through.</p> 
         <p>Expert review methods should be 
         initiated early in the development process, 
         as soon as paper <b>p</b>rototypes 
         (hand-drawn pictures of Web pages) or 
         <b>w</b>ireframes (electronic mockups) are 
         available. They should be conducted using 
         the hardware and software similar to that 
         employed by users.</p>
      ...
   </content>
</book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>

12.1 Description

These queries exploit score and can not be written as a query with a pure Boolean full-text predicate. Among these queries are multiple word and phrase queries without operators, a query that computes and returns only scores, a query which returns only results over a specified threshold, a query which filters by score, and a query which returns all the documents ordered.

All the queries in these Use Cases may use scoring. The Use Cases in this section are merely a small subset that focuses on score. Scoring methodologies will not be defined in this standard. Scoring will be implementation-defined.

12.2 Queries and Results

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few errors. 
         Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must 
         feel well-served.</p> 
         ..
            <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
            understandability and ease of learning while 
            performing specified tasks. They walk through 
            the site answering questions such as "Would a 
            user know by looking at the screen how to 
            complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
            the user completed the first step, would the 
            user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
            identifying any obstacles to completing the 
            task and assessing whether the user would 
            cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
            completing a step in the process.</p>
            ...
            <p>Users are asked to complete tasks which 
            measure the success of the information 
            architecture and navigational elements of the 
            site.</p>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>  
                  
<book number="2">
   <content>
      ...              
         <p>Take the following steps to plan usability 
         testing. <step number="1">Clarify and 
         articulate the goal of the usability testing.
         </step> <step number="2">Identify tasks which 
         are critical for users to be able to complete 
         successfully. </step> <step number="3">Compile 
         a script of questions or instructions which 
         will prompt the user to attempt those 
         tasks.</step> <step number="4">Identify your 
         users and begin recruiting them.</step> <step 
         number="5">Conduct a pretest on a few users.
         </step> <step number="6">Edit the script based 
         on insights gleaned from the pretest.</step> 
         <step number="7">Resume testing.</step></p>
         ...
         <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
         that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
         Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
         they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
         or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
         to have two testers, <footnote>Usability 
         testing can be done at great expense or on a 
         shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
         expertise</testingProcedure> or 
         <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
         computer interaction professionals
         </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
         questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
         offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
         movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
         words should be recorded.</p>
         ...
         <p>Compile the results and review collectively. 
         Make changes to the site to alleviate the problems 
         found in Web site components which were propagating 
         the largest number of or the most devastating errors. 
         Begin new iterations of testing and changes, until 
         users are successful in the accomplishing the 
         tasks.</p>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

<book number="1">
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Two expert review methods are discussed 
         here. They are heuristic evaluation and 
         cognitive walk-through.</p> 
         ...
         <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title> 
         ...
         <title>Cognitive Walk-Through</title>
      ...     
   </content>
</book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <score>.12</score>
   
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <score>.11</score>

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His 
Papers</title>   
   <score>.02</score>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   
<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title> 

<book number="1"> 
   <content>
       ...
        <p>Expert review methods should be
        initiated early in the development process, 
        as soon as paper <b>p</b>rototypes
        (hand-drawn pictures of Web pages) or
        <b>w</b>ireframes (electronic mockups) are
        available. They should be conducted using
        the hardware and software similar to that 
        employed by users.</p>
     ...   
  </content>
</book>

<book number="3"> 
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
         years 1946-2001, with the bulk of the items 
         concentrated in the period from 1985 to 2001. The 
         papers feature his career as a developer of software 
         applications and usability specialist. The collection 
         consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
         speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
         graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
         photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
      ...      
   </content>
</book> 

<book number="2"> ... </book>

13.1 Description

These use cases illustrate full-text queries that use XPath axes to query parent, children, ancestors, descendants, and siblings of XML elements.

13.2 Queries and Results

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <chapter>
      <title>Conducting Usability Tests</title> 
      <p>Users can be tested at any computer
      workstation <footnote>They may be most 
      comfortable at their own workstation.</footnote> 
      or in a lab.</p>
   </chapter>

<book number="2">
   <step number="1">Clarify and 
   articulate the goal of the usability testing.
   </step> 
   <step number="2">Identify tasks which 
   are critical for users to be able to complete 
   successfully.</step>
</book>

<book number="2">      
   <p>Users can be tested at any computer 
   workstation<footnote>They may be most 
   comfortable at their own 
   workstation.</footnote> or in a lab.</p>
</book>  

<book number="3">
     <componentTitle>Human Computer Interaction 
     research, </componentTitle>
     ...
        <componentTitle>Flow diagram, 
        </componentTitle>            
</book>

<book number="3">
     <componentTitle>Human Computer Interaction 
     research, </componentTitle>
     ...
        <componentTitle>Flow diagram, 
        </componentTitle>             
</book>

<book number="1">
   <chapter>
      <title>Usability Testing</title>
      <p>Once the problems identified by expert
      reviews have been corrected, it is time to
      conduct some tests of the site with your unique 
      audience or audiences by conducting usability
      testing.</p>
      <p>Users are asked to complete tasks which 
      measure the success of the information 
      architecture and navigational elements of the 
      site.</p>
      ...
   </chapter>
</book>

<book number="1">
   <introduction>
      <p>Expert reviewers identify problems and recommend changes 
      to web sites based on research in human computer interaction 
      and their experience in the field.</p> 
      ...
   </introduction>
   ...
   <chapter>
      ...
      <p>Once the problems identified by expert reviews have been 
      corrected, it is time to conduct some tests of the site with your 
      unique audience or audiences by conducting usability testing.</p>
      ...
   </chapter>
</book> 

<book number="1">      
   <introduction>
      ...
       <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
       methods of identifying problems in layout, 
       terminology, and navigation before they frustrate
       users and drive them away from your site.</p>
      ...
    </introduction>
    ...
    <part number="1">
      ...
         <introduction>
           <p>Expert reviewers identify problems 
           and recommend changes to web sites based 
           on research in human computer interaction 
           and their experience in the field.</p> 
              ...
          </introduction>
      ...
   </part>
</book> 

<book number="1">  
   <title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
   Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>    
   <introduction>
      ...   
         <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
         site supports the user in achieving specified 
         goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
         and enable efficient and effective task 
         completion, while propagating few 
         errors. Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
         The user must not only be well-served, but must 
         feel well-served.</p>
      ...
   </introduction>
   <part number="1">
      ...
       <introduction>
          <p>Expert reviewers identify problems and recommend changes 
          to web sites based on research in human computer interaction 
          and their experience in the field.</p> 
          ...
       </introduction>
   </part>         
</book> 

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
       <p>The most successful projects employ multiple 
       methods in multiple iterations. As Millicent 
         Marigold remarked during a recent conference, 
       "Don't stop. Iterate, iterate, then iterate again."</p>
      ...
   </content>	

<book number="3"> 
   <container type="box">1</container>
      <componentTitle>Human Computer Interaction research</componentTitle>
      ...
         <componentTitle>Flow diagrams</componentTitle>
         ...
         <componentTitle>General</componentTitle>
         <container type="box">2</container>
         ...
         <componentTitle>Eye Movement research</componentTitle>
         ...
         <componentTitle>User profiling research</componentTitle>
</book>

14.1 Description

These queries cross element boundaries when finding a word or a sequence of words, ignoring tags that appear within a word or a sequence of words or ignoring the content of elements that appear within the sequence of words. Some queries ignore any tag or specified tags. Tags to ignore may be specified as an explicit list of tags or using an XPath query that identifies them. Other queries ignore the content of any element or specified elements. Elements whose content is ignored may be specified as an explicit list of elements or using an XPath query that identifies them. Other queries combine Boolean queries and proximity queries when looking for words or sequences of words.

Ignored Tags and Content are treated as non-existent when matching a phrase in the current use cases. An extension to this semantics might allow users to override this semantics and specify which markup should be replaced by whitespace, paragraph break, etc., and have a default semantics.

These queries combine mechanisms to identify descendant elements, a full-text query, and a mechanism to ignore tags or content.

14.2 Queries and Results

<book number="1"> 
   <introduction>
      ...
         <p>Expert review methods should be
         initiated early in the development process, 
         as soon as paper <b>p</b>rototypes
         (hand-drawn pictures of Web pages) or
         <b>w</b>ireframes (electronic mockups) are
         available. They should be conducted using
         the hardware and software similar to that 
         employed by users.</p>
      ...      
   </introduction>
</book>

<book number="1"> 
   <introduction>
      ...
         <p>Expert review methods should be
         initiated early in the development process, 
         as soon as paper <b>p</b>rototypes
         (hand-drawn pictures of Web pages) or
         <b>w</b>ireframes (electronic mockups) are
         available. They should be conducted using
         the hardware and software similar to that 
         employed by users.</p>
      ...
   </introduction>
</book>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <chapter> 
      <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title> 
      <p>Expert reviewers critique an interface to
      determine conformance with recognized 
      usability principles. <footnote>One of the
      best known lists of heuristics is <citation
      url="http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic
      /heuristic_list.html"> Ten Usability 
      Heuristics by Jacob Nielson</citation>. Another
      is <citation url="http://usability.gov
      /guidelines/index.html"> Research-Based Web
      Design and Usability Guidelines</citation>
      </footnote></p> 
   </chapter>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <chapter> 
      <title>Heuristic Evaluation</title> 
      <p>Expert reviewers critique an interface to
      determine conformance with recognized 
      usability principles. <footnote>One of the
      best known lists of heuristics is <citation
      url="http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic
      /heuristic_list.html"> Ten Usability 
      Heuristics by Jacob Nielson</citation>. Another
      is <citation url="http://usability.gov
      /guidelines/index.html"> Research-Based Web
      Design and Usability Guidelines</citation>
      </footnote></p> 
   </chapter>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <chapter>
      ...
      <p>Users can be tested at any computer  
      workstation <footnote>They may be most 
      comfortable at their own workstation.
      </footnote> or in a lab.</p> 
      ...
   </chapter>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <chapter>
      ...
       <p>Users can be tested at any computer 
       workstation <footnote>They may be most 
       comfortable at their own workstation.
       </footnote> or in a lab.</p> 
      ...   
   </chapter>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <chapter>
      ...
       <p>Users can be tested at any computer
         workstation<footnote>They may be most
       comfortable at their own workstation.
       </footnote>or in a lab.</p>
      ...
   </chapter>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <chapter>
      ...
      <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
      that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
      Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as
      they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
      or someone takes notes. It is often preferable
      to have two testers, <footnote>Usability 
      testing can be done at great expense or on a 
      shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
      expertise</testingProcedure> or 
      <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
      computer interaction professionals 
      </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
      questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
      offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
      movements, typing, expressions, and the user's
      words should be recorded.</p> 
      ...  
   </chapter>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <subject>Usability testing</subject>
   <chapter>
      <title>Conducting Usability Tests</title>
      ...
      <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
      that you are testing the Web site, not them. 
      Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
      they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
      or someone takes notes. It is often preferable 
      to have two testers, <footnote>Usability 
      testing can be done at great expense or on a 
      shoe string, using <testingProcedure>in-house 
      expertise</testingProcedure> or 
      <testingProcedure>contracting with human 
      computer interaction professionals
      </testingProcedure>.</footnote> one to ask the 
      questions, another to take notes. Testers should 
      offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse 
      movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
      words should be recorded.</p>
   </chapter>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <subject>Usability testing</subject>
   <chapter>
      <title>Conducting Usability Tests</title> 
      ...
      <p>Give the user the script, then assure them 
      that you are testing the Web site, not them. Users are 
      asked to verbalize their thoughts as 
      they complete the tasks. The event is recorded 
      or an observer takes notes. <footnote>Usability 
      testing can be done at great expense or 
      on a shoe string, using in-house 
      expertise or contracting with human 
      computer interaction professionals. 
      </footnote> Testers should offer no guidance or 
      comments to the user. Mouse 
      movements, typing, expressions, and the user's 
      words should be recorded.</p>
      ...   
   </chapter>

15.1 Description

These queries combine full text queries with other XQuery functionality. We use some of the XQuery functions and operators defined in [FandO].

15.2 Queries and Results

<result>
   <title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
   Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
   <author>Montana Marigold</author>
</result>
   
<result>
   <title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
   Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
   Usability of Your Web Site</title>
</result>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <title>Usability Testing</title>
   <number-of-steps>0</number-of-steps>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <title>Planning then Conducting Usability
   Tests</title>
   <number-of-steps>7</number-of-steps>
   <title>Conducting Usability Tests</title>
   <number-of-steps>0</number-of-steps>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
   <author>Montana Marigold</author>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <publisher>Ersatz Publications</publisher>
   <publisher>Electronic BookWorks</publisher>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <price>26</price>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <price>174</price>

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His Papers</title>
   <introduction>
      <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
      years 1946-1999, with the bulk of the items
      concentrated in the period from 1985 to 1999. The 
      papers feature his career as a developer of software 
      applications and usability specialist. The collection 
      consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
      speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
      graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
      photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
   </introduction>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <has-publisher>false</has-publisher>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <has-publisher>true</has-publisher>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
   <author>Morley Marigold</author>
   <subject>Usability testing</subject>

16.1 Description

The use cases illustrate a multi-lingual query and queries which use multiple full-text functionalities, full-text functionalities and other XQuery functionalities, and multiple XPath statements.

16.2 Queries and Results

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <subject>网站可用性</subject>
   <author>Elina Rose</author>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>The most successful projects employ multiple methods in multiple 
         iterations. As Millicent Marigold remarked during a recent conference, 
         "Don't stop. Iterate, iterate, then iterate again."</p>
      ...
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Expert reviewers evaluate Web site 
         understandability and ease of learning while 
         performing specified tasks. They walk through 
         the site answering questions such as "Would a 
         user know by looking at the screen how to 
         complete the first step of the task?" and "If 
         the user completed the first step, would the 
         user know what to do next?," with the goal of 
         identifying any obstacles to completing the 
         task and assessing whether the user would 
         cognitively be aware that he was successful in 
         completing a step in the process.</p>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>
   <content>
      ...
         <p>Expert reviews and usability testing are 
         methods of identifying problems in layout, 
         terminology, and navigation before they frustrate 
         users and drive them away from your site.</p> 
         <p>The most successful projects employ multiple 
         methods in multiple iterations. As Millicent
         Marigold remarked during a recent conference, 
         "Don't stop. Iterate, iterate, then iterate          
         again."</p>
      ...     
   </content>

<title>Usability Basics: How to Plan for and Conduct 
Usability Tests on Web Site Thereby Improving the 
Usability of Your Web Site</title>
   <author>Montana Marigold</author>
   <content> 
      ...
      <p>Give the user the script, then assure them that you are testing
      the Web site, not them. Users are asked to verbalize their thoughts 
      as they complete the tasks. The event is recorded or an observer 
      takes notes. <footnote> Usability testing can be done at great
      expense or on a shoe string, using in-house expertise or contracting
      with human computer interaction professionals. </footnote> Testers
      should offer no guidance or comments to the user. Mouse movements, 
      typing, expressions, and the user's words should be recorded.</p>
      ...
   </content>

<title>Improving the Usability of a Web Site Through 
Expert Reviews and Usability Testing</title>    
   <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
   <author>Montana Marigold</author>   
   <introduction>
      ...
       <p>The usability of a Web site is how well the 
       site supports the user in achieving specified 
       goals. A Web site should facilitate learning, 
       and enable efficient and effective task 
       completion, while propagating few 
       errors. Satisfaction with the site is also important. 
       The user must not only be well-served, but must 
       feel well-served.</p>
     ...
  </introduction>
  ...
  <part>
     <introduction>
        <p>Expert reviewers identify problems and recommend changes 
        to web sites based on research in human computer interaction 
        and their experience in the field.</p>
        ...
     </introduction> 
  ...    
  </part>

<title>John Wesley Usabilityguy: A Register of His Papers</title>
   <author>Millicent Marigold</author>
   <author>Montana Marigold</author>
   <introduction>
      <p>The papers of John Wesley Usabilityguy span the 
      years 1946-1999, with the bulk of the items
      concentrated in the period from 1985 to 1999. The 
      papers feature his career as a developer of software 
      applications and usability specialist. The collection 
      consists of correspondence, memoranda, journals, 
      speeches, article drafts, book drafts, notes, charts, 
      graphs, family papers, clippings, printed matter, 
      photographs, résumés and other materials.</p>
   </introduction>