W3C QA - Two weeks on the QA mailing lists
September 1 to September 15

About the "weekinqa" QA Mailing-lists bi-weekly summary

Jump to: Previous version (August 2002) | Latest version

"WeekinQA" is a bi-weekly summary of the main topics discussed on www-qa@w3.org, the public mailing-list of W3C QA Interest Group and www-qa-wg@w3.org, the public mailing-list of W3C's QA Working Group. See the calendar, initial requirements for this resource. Please contact Karl Dubost if you want to participate in this effort.

Topics for this period

Survey on document technologies

Lofton Henderson and Dominique Hazaël-Massieux have prepared together a questionnaire which has been sent to editors of W3C specifications. The survey is a first step in determining what, if anything, we might be able to provide in terms of common tools and techniques to help authors. Depending on the outcome, QAWG may put resources into prototype(s).

See Thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2002Sep/0003.html

Show and Tell in Tokyo

The next QA F2F meeting is approaching. We remind to people that it's a joint meeting WG and IG and that it is open to the participation of every people. The location and the agenda of the meeting will give you details if you wish to attend.

The Show and Tell part will help you to understand technologies and methodologies related to EARL and Test Suites. It's a unique oppotunity for you to learn a bit more about quality work applied to W3C technologies.

Specification Guidelines : a good specification?

To promote the Specification Guidelines, it has been decided by the QA Working Group to apply to the specifications we are writing to apply the QA Specification Guidelines itself. It will help to illustrate the quality of the specification and raises hidden issues.

See Thread :
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002Sep/0007.html

Testability Definition

The language being the vehicle of our ideas, it is very important to be as exact as possible for the definitions we use in the specifications we are writing. The discussion is trying to define the testability of a specification and to not, by definition, classify some specifications out of scope by their nature.

See Thread :
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2002Sep/thread.html#21

Bedside table readings for Web developpers

Just a reminder for people who wants to integrate quality in their Web sites production and development. The QA Team has produced some articles that might help you.

Meeting Minutes and Documentation Released

Final minutes QA WG September 4th, 2002, Scribe Mark Skall.


Valid XHTML 1.0!

Created Date: 2002-09-15 by Karl Dubost
Last modified $Date: 2011/12/16 02:57:04 $ by $Author: gerald $

Copyright © 2000-2003 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Your interactions with this site are in accordance with our public and Member privacy statements.