Meeting minutes
https://
https://
https://
https://
Agenda for today
Ege: Marcus would like to give presentation today
kaz: that's fine but I'm wondering if we would like to ask all the project participants to give talks (if we could that would be ideal, though)
How to wrap up the Plugfest results
kaz: would suggest we ask all the participants to summarize their projects within a few mins (5mins at max)
… and then review the final results on the interop testing GH issue
mm: (updates the agenda for the Oct-28 meeting)
mm: or we could do the report on each project during the Open Day on Monday, Oct 11
kaz: assuming the proposed T2TRG joint discussion won't happen?
mm: right
kaz: in that case, the interop testing part should be also handled on Monday, Oct 11
… and we can concentrate on Testing results on 28th
mm: ok
… (moved both the project reports and interop testing report to Oct 11)
… anything else to be updated?
(none)
mm: is this OK?
ek: yes
… note that we used to have presentations from each project participant
kaz: right. that's why I asked about possible presentations in general at the beginning
Summary of the results
mm: the network diagram has been updated
PRs
Update 2021.09.Online Plugfest TD Testing Results #186
mm: copy of manual assertions
… (shoes the update.log)
<Ege> https://
<sebastian> sorry, I need to go. Bye
mm: will read the documentation...
… maybe I'm still looking at an old version of playground
kaz: so you (McCool) will work with Ege to fix the problem. right?
mm: yes
… note that more than one organization might use the same implementation, e.g., node-wot
kaz: do you have information on who uses what?
… maybe you can ask the participants for clarification, can't you?
mm: there is some information there
… within the impl.csv
kaz: maybe we can ask all the participants to add an additional column to that file, e.g., "base of implementation"
ek: yeah, we can use "basis" or something like that
mm: if that column is empty the implementation is that organization's original one
kaz: and you can provide a few candidate categories for the "basis" field
mm: yeah
… would call the current "Implementations" "Systems"
… and "basis" as "Implementations"
kaz: this is a same issue as the browser engines, e.g., Chrome-based and Webkit-based
… so this change is the right direction
mm: ok
… will update the script to handle this change
kaz: and you can ask all the participants to clarify their implementation basis :)
mm: yeah
<McCool> https://
mm: (creating a PR to update the imple.csv template)
AOB
kaz: Ege and Marcus, would it be OK for you to to give your presentation on your project on Monday, Oct 11?
… actually, that would be more beneficial to do that on Monday :)
ek_ms: ok
ms: btw, if you want me to test some more Intel devices, e.g., camera device, please let me know
mm: (shows the TD for camera)
… using digest security option
… will send the schedule update to the WoT Members lists (and the IE list)
[adjourned]