Meeting minutes
Preliminary
Midea group from China as an observer for TPAC vF2F
approved
Minutes
McCool: I would like to get the schedule sorted out for F2F
Quick Updates
McCool: any updates on the japanese cg
Mizushima: We will have activities in October
McCool: There is a slot in F2F
McCool: we are in contact with netzo and takenaka corporation for participation in the OpenDay
Schedule of TPAC WoT Meetings
Lagally: Conexxus presented their agenda for the F2F yesterday
<kaz> Sep-28 Use Case call minutes
Lagally: conexxus can be 10-20 minutes. they said 10
McCool: I am trying to get t2trg to join us, part of open day
McCool: anything else for the agenda?
(none)
OpenDay
McCool: arturo from netzo does not have availabilty on wednesday and thursday. Maybe a smallermeeting another time or doing the industry day on tuesday
McCool: then let's do tuesday
… we can squeeze t2trg
Kaz: only problem with tuesday is the overlap with ac meeting
McCool: we can leave takenaka on monday and do netzo on tuesday
Sebastian: asking netzo about their availability on Monday to make sure
McCool: please get registered with TPAC anyway
Kaz: this time get registered twice, one for the W3C site and second for the Cevent site
McCool: what about ECHONET?
Kaz: can join on Thursday, Oct 14
McCool: let's summarize the situation on the wiki about the participation
McCool: how much time we need for each of these
McCool: for echonet, do we have a structure
Kaz: 1h consisting of 30min pres and 30min discussion should be OK. will check with them.
McCool: t2trg and did can take long
McCool: sdw can be used for conflicts
Kaz: regarding smart cities, I'd invite the workshop participants to the breakout session instead of the OpenDay given the agenda is getting full.
McCool: it would be good to put the conflicting meetings in the schedule
Chartering
IG Charter
<kaz> IG Charter updates based on the W3M review
McCool: moving marketing to CG should be considered
Kaz: security consideration Note could have been in the IG but we published the work as a WG Note. The Security Best Practices, etc., still can be published as IG work, though.
McCool: should scripting be in ig as well
Ege: binding is also in wg but not rec track
… I still do not understand the benefits of putting spec documents into ig, wg, cg. Can cg make a rec track document?
Kaz: no
<kaz> diagram
Kaz: would suggest we don't add drastic changes at this stage but just add some clarification to PLH's questions, i.e., plugfest and marketing work based on the diagram above.
Editors call
Lagally: I have proposed to have editor's call weekly until the tpac to improve all the documents
McCool: architecture is still the hub for terminology right? the other specifications follow those
TFs
Lagally: tomorrow we have 1 hour architecture call, just a reminder that it is not cancelled
Liaison
McCool: will continue to work on OGC liaison, etc.
AOB?
Sebastian: same webex for Plugfest today?
McCool: not another dedicated one
… please see the plugfest page
[adjourned]