<scribe> scribe: dape
Sebastian: https://www.w3.org/2020/07/29-wot-td-minutes.html
... no objections --> minutes approved
Sebastian: no meeting August 19
... August 26 not decided yet
... Taki will inform by Email
Sebastian: Issue https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/912
... new terms
... related to binary data such as images
... JSON schema has terms contentMediaType and
contentEncoding
... information for JSON-based data exchange
... in non-JSON-based data exchange contentType on forms level
is an alternative
... TD spec should make clear when to use what
... I updated PR#896 accordingly
<kaz> PR 896
Sebastian: minLength, maxLength, ... et
cetera
... still missing an example for contentMediaType and
contentEncoding
Ege: Use example of Cristiano?
Sebastian: can do so...
... prefer having 2 examples to show the 2 possibilities
Ege: Sounds good
--> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/pull/869
Sebastian: related to previous
issue
... Daniel, status of PR?
Daniel: initial para and table added
Sebastian: Miss text contentType
... integer as text
Daniel: not sure whether this is a good example..
Sebastian: Example 34
... text/plain --> type integer
<kaz> Example 34
Daniel: will take a look
Sebastian: there is a merge conflict also
Daniel: maybe looking at dates also
Sebastian: "format" could be used
--> https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/941
Sebastian: profile introduces new
terms
... currently not covered by TD models
... new terms should not go into the profile
... maybe introduce the terms in the TD model
... and/or introduce existing definitions from existing
ontologies
<kaz> wot-profile - 5.1.2.2 Recommended practice
Ege: "loc"-terms surely covered
somewhere
... serialNumber could be like the ID
Sebastian: I do recall discussions about
this
... but I believe there are existing ontologies
<Ege> https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-ssn/#location
<sebastian> https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo-ont-20071023/
Ege: Have examples of SSN in
TD
... e.g., example 29
... w.r.t. locations are proposed words from ISO standard
... style like underscore would not nicely match
Sebastian: I believe GeoSPARQL
ontologies rely on such existing standards
... we should check that
Ege: I am against putting these
terms in core TD vocabulary
... after location some other aspects would come in ... and it
becomes very heavy
Sebastian: let's evaluate what exists
first
... looking at *common* vocabularies
<Ege> https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/
Kaz: I suggest we talk with the existing related groups and SDOs
... currently no working group in this area but there are an IG and a CG
... I think we can start with talking with Ivan and PLH
* Spatial Data on the Web IG
* Geospatial Semantic Web CG
Sebastian: During TPAC?
Kaz: Yes, one possibility
... but would suggest brief initial discussion with them first
Sebastian: Invite to calls?
Kaz: Yes for the Geospatial
Semantic Web CG guys
... regarding the former work by the WG in collaboration with OGC (and current work by the IG), I can contact PLH and Ivan via Email
<kaz> ACTION: kaz to talk with Ivan and PLH about geospatial discussion
Sebastian: back to the issue on the profile document itself
... suggest removing terms from profile document
Ege: Example 35 is not
corrct
... problem is that example uriVariables, cancellation all at
the same time
... unsubscribeId in body ... conflicting with
uriVariables
... no information how to pass the ID
... no template paramater
... and why is there cancellation and uriVariables?
... putting ID into 2 places
Sebastian: good point
Ege: believe we can remove
cancellation object
... downside: no other example with cancellation
... template mechanism like {{tag}} would be useful
Kaz: wonder whether this change impacts version 1.0 or not
Sebastian: maybe just fixing issue with
variable missing
... "?" missing only?
Ege: think so
Kaz: maybe we should create another dedicated issue for an editorial fix in the 1.0 version
Daniel: there is already a bucket GH issue 920 for editorial isses with TD v 1.0
Bucket issue 920 for editorial fixes within TD v1
https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/issues/617
Sebastian: array of responses
... "response" at the moment *not* an array
... coming from discovery
... e.g., for error codes
Ege: Error or status codes is a
problem cross task forces
... need to map WoT-specific codes to protocols/bindings
Sebastian: abstract error codes ?
Ege: Yes
... e.g., Scripting issue#200
Sebastian: Need to think about
Ege: Have issues in node-wot as well
Sebastian: htv:statusCodeValue informs about underlying protocol .. in this case HTTP
Ege: 404 used in HTTP, CoAP, MQTT
...
... error response containing information about underlying
protocol
... should take a look at scripting api issue #200
Kaz: Need to move to another call
Sebastian: Sure
... Suggest skipping binding templates topics also
Ege: OK
<kaz> Scripting issue 200
<kaz> [adjourned]