[recording in progress]
<vivien> Slides "KITE for webrtc testing 04-2018 Update"
<vivien> KITE project on GitHub
<vivien> DrAlex++ for giving a great presentation and super work on KITE
<vivien> Issue 1834
decision: we should throw if unsigned
shall we check boundaries?
it s difficult to think about all the possible use case.....
<vivien> Issue 1839
the proposed resolution
seems amenable to the group
a PR should be developed based on that.
<vivien> Issue 1840
proposed solution is accepted, with removal of the red text.
<vivien> Issue 1852
apart from testing, there does not seem to be a lot of use case for receiving simulcast.
The question is then, do we really need 5.1 at all?
mozilla: we don t have interest in receiving simulcast
<vivien> Issue 1858
Since Bundle spec states that you get them all or reject them all. we should respect that (hta)
<hta> Bundle spec text: If the criterium above is fulfilled the answerer can not reject the "m=" section in the answer. The answerer can either reject the whole offer, reject each bundled "m=" section within the BUNDLE group, or keep the "m=" section within the BUNDLE group in the answer and later create an offer where the "m=" section is disabled within the BUNDLE group [Section 7.5.3].
RESOLUTION: we reject both audio and video. PR to come from Harald and Taylor
<vivien> Issue 1872
consensus reached.
<vivien> [meeting adjourned, next meeting on June 19-20 F2F in Stockholm]