– DRAFT –
(MEETING TITLE)
20 March 2018
proposed: approve minutes of last meeting https://www.w3.org/2018/03/13-dxwg-minutes
<annette_g> I'm missing from regrets
+1
<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1
<LarsG> +1
<PWinstanley> +1
<annette_g> other than that, +1
<annette_g> not supre important
<Zakim> LarsG, you wanted to ask about good standing
recording regrets helps retain good standing under W3C process
to remain in good standing need to attend or send regrets
<LarsG> https://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#good-standing
Action: on DSR to add annette_g to March 13 regrets
<trackbot> Error finding 'on'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/users>.
Action: DSR to add annette_g to March 13 regrets
<trackbot> Error creating an ACTION: could not connect to Tracker. Please mail <sysreq@w3.org> with details about what happened.
PWinstanley: creative idea to avoid US/Europe venue, suggests possibly meeting in E Asia - KL, Singapore, HK
… some unis have outposts e.g. Heriot Watt, MIT have campuses near KL
… do any other WG members have affiliations which could provide a venue in or near KL?
annette_g: foreign travel is a -ve no matter how far, also others
<PWinstanley> https://www.skyscanner.net/ is a good tool to check options
<kcoyle> kcoyle: thinking about f2f is to dig into the condept of profiles and decide what we mean by guidance
SimonCOx: says AUssies are used to being inconvenienced
<PWinstanley> annette_g: the major routes and places that we've had f2f suggests Australia as a logical option
kcoyle: goal of f2f is to make progress on profiles
<kcoyle> SimonCox_: Rob is working on this
I've created some stub Wiki pages where I hope some better profile material can be created https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/wiki/DCAT-Profiles-Topics
Action: kcoyle to make proposal about f2f
<trackbot> Created ACTION-95 - Make proposal about f2f [on Karen Coyle - due 2018-03-27].
kcoyle: an alternative to f2f is to have 3 days of 4 hour telecons (for example)
https://doodle.com/poll/duqqsivqc66wmmb7
<annette_g> I can do 7:00 am
<kcoyle> proposal: keep same UTC time 21:00 and same day (Tuesday)
<kcoyle> PROPOSED: Time 20:00 UTC and on Tuesdays
<PWinstanley> +1
<annette_g> +1
<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1
+0.5
<LarsG> +1 (0.75)
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
Resolved: Time 20:00 UTC and on Tuesdays
... and every second week
jaroslav has offered two new UCs
<kcoyle> https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/jaro_relax_property_domain_range_usecase/ucr/index.html#ID51
<kcoyle> https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/jaro_real_world_context/ucr/index.html#ID52
Simon's alternative version of #51
https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/simon-jaro_relax_property_domain_range_usecase/ucr/index.html#ID51
<Jaroslav_Pullmann> https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/simon-jaro_relax_property_domain_range_usecase/ucr/index.html#ID51
<kcoyle> SimonCox_: was responding to issues of backward compatibility; make only necessary changes
proposed: add UC #ID51 using Simon's wording
<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1
+1
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
<annette_g> +1
<LarsG> +1
<PWinstanley> +1
Resolved: add UC #ID51 using https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/simon-jaro_relax_property_domain_range_usecase/ucr/index.html#ID51
This is also relevant https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp/#spatial-things-features-and-geometry
<Jaroslav_Pullmann> we are talking about this UC: https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/jaro_real_world_context/ucr/index.html#ID52
PWinstanley: many real-world-things have limited lifetime
… why treat specially?
Jaroslav_Pullmann: important rwt are sources for data
PWinstanley: worried about which rwt can be reliably and persistently identified
Jaroslav_Pullmann: often it is the type that needs to be identified, not jsut the instance
annette_g: what is special for DCAT here?
kcoyle: this is not original, of course there will be rwt involved
… rwt is too broad to be useful
Jaroslav_Pullmann: 'real world entity' is not important terminology
SimonCox_: what DCAT predicate is used to link a Dataset to a rwe?
SimonCox_: need to improve documentation in DCAT about how to link to rwe
<PWinstanley> doesn't BFO have material and immaterial entities?
<kcoyle> straw poll: ID 52
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
Jaroslav_Pullmann: possibly dct:subject and dcat:theme are too generic
+1
<annette_g> -1 not convinced this is useful
<Jaroslav_Pullmann> +1
<PWinstanley> 0
<LarsG> 0
<annette_g> It would help me to see an actual use case spelled out.
Action: Jaroslav_Pullmann and DCAT team to clarify UC
<trackbot> Created ACTION-96 - And dcat team to clarify uc [on Jaroslav Pullmann - due 2018-03-27].
<RiccardoAlbertoni> bye thanks!
RRSAgent: generate minutes
<LarsG> Bye
<Jaroslav_Pullmann> bye!
Succeeded: s/Heriott/Heriot/