+present

<janina> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/Meetings/TPAC_2017#Agenda

<lisa> scribe: thaddeus

updates, new wiki pages

Introductions - new to the task force

Becky Gibson

Becky has worked on WCAG 2.1 and ARIA and now works for Knowbility

<lisa> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki

<lisa> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Implementations-In-Development

Please put implementation on URL 2 - Wiki

along with feature name

Please add implementation with associated feature name

<lisa> https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/TPAC2017

Lisa suggests collecting questions for groups at TPAC

- Are the comfortable with the vocabulary

- Process of making an ARIA module

In general need to discuss personalization as an ARIA implementation including attribute syntax

<janina> Suggest p13n

<clapierre> right personalization is kinda long :)

Currently the prefix is coga which is temporary to avoid collision

<clapierre> per-?

<lisa> cntx-

<lisa> contex

<lisa> ctx

we need a prefix that is not limited to accessibility. It is unlikely that we can come to final consensus during TPAC

Lisa suggest closing the prefix topic within 6 weeks. Michael indicates that this may be difficult given the amount of stakeholder and the holidays.

Confirming meeting with CSS at TPAC 11-12 monday

4: 30 - 6 APA publishing meeting

<lisa> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/101569/actionfielddestination/results

I took the survey

I felt comfortable with the number of items

Did others feel the same

Is four too much?

Action is first on the agenda

<clapierre> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/101569/actionfielddestination/results

<lisa> The action attribute

<lisa> sign up to register

<clapierre> Next / Previous button discussion Thaddeus will send an email after he thinks about this.

<lisa> ACTION: charles to add first and last [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/10/30-personalization-minutes.html#action01]

survey comment suggested explicit relationship for move - this may be an ARIA implementation vs Personalization

suggestion is to ask ARIA how a destination would be implemented within the context of move

one suggestion is move-right move-left move-up move-down

lets shelf this

lisa suggests reviewing simplification next week with the goal of consistency with other attributes

<lisa> ACTION: lisa update the defults for simplification [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/10/30-personalization-minutes.html#action02]

<lisa> ACTION: charles, make aflbetical [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/10/30-personalization-minutes.html#action03]

<janina> Lisa: We should save some time to talk about next call, i.e. post TPAC

<lisa> ACTION: lisa email micael request to do code example in destination [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/10/30-personalization-minutes.html#action04]

Expectations for next call. Should we have a call for the next two weeks?

No meeting next week

Lisa will email the list to see who is available for the 13th

Thank you and welcome Becky

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152  of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Present: clapierre thaddeus lisa janina Roy AndyHeath
Found Scribe: thaddeus
Inferring ScribeNick: thaddeus

WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting


WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 30 Oct 2017
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/10/30-personalization-minutes.html
People with action items: charles email lisa micael request

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.