See also: IRC log
http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-methods-credit-transfer-direct-debit/
http://w3c.github.io/webpayments-methods-credit-transfer-direct-debit/
IJ: Cyril and Vincent updated
Cyril: Vincent is going to
prepare an update to a spreadsheet with guidelines and mapping
to ISO 20022 labels
... and CGI
IJ: What mappings do we want to list in the document (e.g., in an appendix0?
Candidates:
* Sepa
* ISO 20022
* CGI
Cyril: For Europe the SEPA
implementation is both necessary and sufficient
... but CGI is interesting
Todd: NACHA for ACH
IJ: Where would we find the relevant terms?
<scribe> ACTION: Todd to locate the documentation of ACH terms for potential mapping within the CT document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/02/23-wpwg-credit-minutes.html#action01]
IJ: I Propose that we create an appendix with a table of mappings
pascal_bazin: There is also the
RTS committee that may have some descriptions
... from EBA
CyrilV: The RTS is from the EBA
(central bank)
... I've read the work
... it's not a technical standard
... more about principels
principles
scribe: eg.., requirements for
strong auth
... e.g., ability of have exceptions for risk-based auth
IJ: Where in the ISO 20022 repo should we look?
https://www.iso20022.org/payments_messages.page
<pascal_bazin> Thanks Cyril
What is the ISO equiv?
https://www.iso20022.org/message_archive.page#fifth_version_pain
https://www.iso20022.org/standardsrepository/public/wqt/Content/mx/pain.001.001.05
https://www.iso20022.org/standardsrepository/public/wqt/Content/mx/dico/mc/_QQntYSHQEeKGep4bhmamiA
<scribe> ACTION: Ian to ping Kris and Vincent to try to find the relevant ISO20022 vocabs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/02/23-wpwg-credit-minutes.html#action02]
IJ: Whom should we contact at NACHA to review the fields?
CyrilV: After review by VK and me we are confident re: SEPA and CGI
+1 to a similar NACHA review
<scribe> ACTION: Ian to find someone from NACHA to review [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/02/23-wpwg-credit-minutes.html#action03]
<todd_a> nacha has a mapping guide to iso 20022 - https://www.nacha.org/iso-20022-mapping
"NACHA ISO 20022 Credit Transaction Guide to Mapping U.S. ACH File Formats – CCD, CTX, PPD and Outbound IAT
"
Cyril: Our use case is credit
transfer request is FROM THE BENEFICIARY
... so not PAIN01
... we are pre-PAIN01 when the merchant is giving data (to
comply with PAIN 01)
... our request is closer to PAIN 13 and response closer to
PAIN 14
IJ: On NACHA site I see references to PAINs 01, 08, 02, 53
actions?
Cyril: What is CCD and PPD and CTX?
<todd_a> +
<todd_a> different formats for ach
Todd: These are data formats
e.g., CCD+ has addenda data around items
scribe: e.g., line item detail on a purchase order
"These formats apply to both PPDs (Pre
arranged Payment and Deposit Entry
type transactions) and also CCDs (Cash Co
ncentration or Disbursement type of
transactions). PPD transactions are co
rporate to consumer transactions, and
CCD/CCD+ transactions are corporate to
corporate transactions. Refer to the
National Automated Clearing House Association (NACHA) Rule Book for
information concerning the rules and guid
elines governing the different types of
ACH transactions. "
<pascal_bazin> Corporate Trade Exchange (CTX)
Cyril: It could also be interesting for Vincent to do some of the mapping; he has a tool
[Summary]
* Thank you Cyril and Vincent for the field review!
* Next steps:
- figure out relevant mappings to other standards and consider an appendix with a table of mappings
- get NACHA to look at this
- Bring the spec to the WG
IJ: Propose we send the spec to
the group on 9 March
... I plan to do a little editing.
... What should our list of supported credit transfer networks
be?
(initially)
Analogy => https://www.w3.org/Payments/card-network-ids
Today we have: ach, bacs, sepa, chaps
<scribe> ACTION: Ian to create a note in the spec about how we will manage the network list similar to card networks [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2017/02/23-wpwg-credit-minutes.html#action04]
IJ: Any other topics?
... Is there support for 9 March?
Cyril: +1
<CyrilV> +1
<todd_a> +
{no objections}
pascal: +1
IJ: if you edit the spec directly on GitHub, please let us know...apparently I don't get pinged for some types of edits
None planned