ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace?
Turtle file
Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Holger Knublauch
- Opened on:
- 2015-09-11
- Description:
- The question came up whether we want to produce a .ttl file along with the spec. Such a file would either be a SHACL graph or an RDFS ontology, or both. We could also decide to produce both separately, or publish them as non-normative.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 19 November 2015 (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-24)
- shapes-ACTION-31: Create shacl-vocab.ttl and generate HTML as per resolution of ISSUE-87 (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-11-24)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-14)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-13)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-13)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from ncrossley@us.ibm.com on 2015-11-13)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-13)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-12)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-12)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-11)
- ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-11)
- Re: Can we freeze the Tracker for while? (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2015-11-09)
- Re: Can we freeze the Tracker for while? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-09)
- Re: Can we freeze the Tracker for while? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-09)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-05)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-05)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-03)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-03)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-03)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-03)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-03)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-03)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-02)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-02)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-02)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-02)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-02)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-02)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-02)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-01)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-01)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-01)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-01)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-01)
- Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-10-31)
- ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-10-30)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-87 (Turtle file): Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-13)
- shapes-ISSUE-87 (Turtle file): Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-09-11)
Related notes:
RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-87 with two files: shacl-vocab.ttl and shacl.shacl.ttl as per Arthur Ryman's proposal http://www.w3.org/mid/CAApBiOn9eBvt99Eyu%253DjGUL9FxGHB%252B4r6%253DmPrUrwzCAHjmsQpSA%2540mail.gmail.com
See http://www.w3.org/2015/11/19-shapes-minutes.html#resolution05
Display change log