ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace?

Turtle file

Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SHACL Spec

Raised by:

Holger Knublauch

Opened on:

2015-09-11

Description:

The question came up whether we want to produce a .ttl file along with the spec. Such a file would either be a SHACL graph or an RDFS ontology, or both. We could also decide to produce both separately, or publish them as non-normative.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 19 November 2015 (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-24)
2. shapes-ACTION-31: Create shacl-vocab.ttl and generate HTML as per resolution of ISSUE-87 (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-11-24)
3. Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-14)
4. Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-13)
5. Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-13)
6. Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from ncrossley@us.ibm.com on 2015-11-13)
7. Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-13)
8. Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-12)
9. Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-12)
10. Re: ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-11)
11. ISSUE-87: Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-11)
12. Re: Can we freeze the Tracker for while? (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2015-11-09)
13. Re: Can we freeze the Tracker for while? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-09)
14. Re: Can we freeze the Tracker for while? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-09)
15. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from arthur.ryman@gmail.com on 2015-11-05)
16. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-05)
17. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-03)
18. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-03)
19. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-03)
20. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-03)
21. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-03)
22. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-03)
23. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-02)
24. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2015-11-02)
25. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-02)
26. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-02)
27. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-02)
28. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-02)
29. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-02)
30. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-01)
31. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-01)
32. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-01)
33. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2015-11-01)
34. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-11-01)
35. Re: ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-10-31)
36. ISSUE-87: Turtle file - SHACL vs RDFS vs OWL, or all? (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2015-10-30)
37. Re: shapes-ISSUE-87 (Turtle file): Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2015-09-13)
38. shapes-ISSUE-87 (Turtle file): Shall we publish RDF files for the SHACL namespace? [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-09-11)

Related notes:

Display change log