ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about whether the user has sent a DNT header to third parties on their site?
Should the first party be informed about whether the user has sent a DNT header to third parties on their site?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-09-22
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-19 on Aleecia McDonald to Summarize progress on issue 59 - due 2011-10-26, closed- Related emails:
- Re: Agenda for July 18, 2012 DNT WG Call on TPE (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-07-18)
- RE: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-06-24)
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2012-06-24)
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2012-06-24)
- ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-06-24)
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties (from peter.cranstone@gmail.com on 2012-06-23)
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties (from peter.cranstone@gmail.com on 2012-06-23)
- Re: ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about the DNT values sent to third parties (from peter.cranstone@gmail.com on 2012-06-23)
- Re: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-03-23)
- RE: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-23)
- RE: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-23)
- Re: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-17)
- Re: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-17)
- Re: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from npdoty@w3.org on 2012-03-17)
- RE: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-15)
- Re: ISSUE-111, ad exchanges, web wide exception (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-03-15)
- Re: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from sid@mozilla.com on 2012-03-14)
- Re: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
- Re: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from sid@mozilla.com on 2012-03-14)
- RE: A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-03-14)
- A First-Party List API for Site-Specific Exceptions (ISSUE-59, ISSUE-109, ISSUE-111, ISSUE-113, ISSUE-114) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-03-14)
- Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-10)
- Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status (from ifette@google.com on 2011-10-30)
- Re: Summary of compliance issues raised (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-10-27)
- Summary of compliance issues raised (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-26)
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-26)
- Re: Propose to drop from the strawman: ISSUE-93 (from npdoty@w3.org on 2011-10-26)
- Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2011-10-26)
- Summary of progress on Issue 59 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-19)
- agenda for wednesday call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-18)
- ISSUE-59: Should the first party be informed about whether the user has sent a DNT header to third parties on their site? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22)
Related notes:
Call 2012-04-18: We agreed that we no longer need to consider the actual headers but instead will focus on user-granted exceptions.
I.e., ISSUE-59 will be superseded by ISSUE-111 from now on.
Display change log