ISSUE-216: Does “Contractual relationships and branding” provide an equal level of privacy controls as “ownership and branding” in the context of DNT?
Contracts and Branding
Does “Contractual relationships and branding” provide an equal level of privacy controls as “ownership and branding” in the context of DNT?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Compliance Current
- Raised by:
- Alan Chapell
- Opened on:
- 2013-10-01
- Description:
- I believe that we have WG consensus that common ownership, control and branding provides sufficient transparency and privacy controls. Building on some of David Wainberg’s recent posts, I believe that branding and contractual provisions provide an equivalent level of transparency and control.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Batch closing of TCS issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-09-10)
- tracking-ISSUE-216 (Contracts and Branding): Does “Contractual relationships and branding” provide an equal level of privacy controls as “ownership and branding” in the context of DNT? [Compliance Current] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-01)
Related notes:
This proposal was rejected by the working group in determining the definition of party. -Justin
Justin Brookman, 19 Nov 2014, 06:29:15This proposal was rejected by the working group in determining the definition of party. -Justin
Justin Brookman, 19 Nov 2014, 06:29:36Closed per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2014Sep/0023.html
Justin Brookman, 25 Feb 2015, 03:50:16Display change log
