ISSUE-164: To what extent should the "same-party" attribute of tracking status resource be required
To what extent should the "same-party" attribute of tracking status resource be required
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
- Raised by:
- Matthias Schunter
- Opened on:
- 2012-09-22
- Description:
- 3 Alternatives - text is needed:
(A) Current draft: Resource is optional
(B) Alternative proposal 1: If multiple domains on a page belong to the same party, then this fact SHOULD be declared using the same-party attribute
(C) Alternative proposal 2: State that user agents MAY assume that additional elements that are hosted under a different URL and occur on a page and declare "intended for 1st party use" are malicious unless this URL is listed in the "same-party" attribute - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-258 on Rigo Wenning to Propose 'should' for same-party and why - due 2012-12-12, closedACTION-418 on Roy Fielding to Add text to spec regarding conditions where it would be useful to indicate same-party member - due 2013-06-12, closed- Related emails:
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-12-17)
- RE: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from bs3131@att.com on 2013-12-05)
- RE: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-12-05)
- RE: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-12-04)
- RE: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from bs3131@att.com on 2013-12-04)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from kulick@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-12-04)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-12-03)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-12-03)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-12-03)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from kulick@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-11-21)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from singer@apple.com on 2013-11-15)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-11-14)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-11-14)
- Re: Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2013-11-14)
- Batch closing of TPE issues (Deadline: December 03) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-11-14)
- Re: Agenda for June 05 call on TPE (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-06-05)
- RE: Text for ISSUE-164 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-06-04)
- Text for ISSUE-164 (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-06-04)
- Agenda for June 05 call on TPE (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-06-04)
- Re: DNT: Agenda for March 20 call (revised) (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-19)
- Re: DNT: Agenda for March 20 call (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-03-19)
- DNT: Agenda for March 20 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-19)
- Revision on agenda -- deID decisions now on Tuesday (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-02-04)
- Agenda update for Monday and Tuesday in Cambridge (compliance spec) (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-02-04)
- Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-01-30)
- Re: TPWG agenda for Wednesday, January 16 (from singer@apple.com on 2013-01-29)
- ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-01-22)
- Agenda for 09 Jan 2013 TPE call - V01 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-01-08)
- Re: Agenda for 06 December 2012 TPE call - V01 (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-12-04)
- Agenda for 06 December 2012 TPE call - V01 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-12-04)
- Re: Agenda for 28 November 2012 call - V02 (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-11-27)
- Agenda for 28 November 2012 call - V02 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-11-27)
- Agenda for 28 November 2012 call - V01 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-11-25)
- Agenda for 07 November 2012 call - V01 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-11-05)
- Re: today's (24 October 2012) call: canceled (from ifette@google.com on 2012-10-24)
- Re: today's (24 October 2012) call: canceled (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-10-24)
- today's (24 October 2012) call: canceled (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-10-24)
- Re: Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification (from singer@apple.com on 2012-10-03)
- Re: Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2012-10-02)
- Towards closing the remaining issues in the TPE specification (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-10-01)
- Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2012-09-24)
- Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-24)
- Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2012-09-24)
- Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-24)
- Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-09-23)
- Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-09-23)
- Re: ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) (from ed@felten.com on 2012-09-23)
- ISSUE-164 (requirements on same-party attribute): Call for text alternatives (possibly until Wednesday September 26) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-22)
- tracking-ISSUE-164: To what extent should the 'same-party' attribute of tracking status resource be required [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-09-22)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log